#fedora-blocker-review: F31-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:22 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:02:23)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:04:55)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:04:56)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:04:56)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:04:56)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:04:57)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:04:59)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:05:01)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:05:03)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:05:05)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:05:07)
- coremodule will secretarialize (adamw,
16:05:09)
- for Final, we have: (adamw,
16:05:20)
- 7 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:05:25)
- 6 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:05:25)
- 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:05:28)
- let's get started with proposed blockers
(adamw,
16:08:51)
- (1751673) Second user gets locked out of his session every ~10 seconds (adamw, 16:08:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751673
(adamw,
16:08:58)
- Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (adamw,
16:08:58)
- AGREED: 1751673 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All
elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all
release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical
use" (adamw,
16:16:15)
- (1750805) Apply button stays gray on Network configuration (adamw, 16:16:23)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750805
(adamw,
16:16:24)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-control-center,
NEW (adamw,
16:16:24)
- AGREED: 1750805 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All
elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all
release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical
use." (adamw,
16:19:00)
- (1749868) GNOME Software doesn't prepare offline updates (adamw, 16:19:10)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749868
(adamw,
16:19:10)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
(adamw,
16:19:10)
- fesco has asked dnf to revert the change that
appears to be causing it (bcotton,
16:20:26)
- AGREED: 1749868 -
punt (delay decision) - we believe the reversion of the DNF
skip_if_unavailable default to True should mean this is no longer a
big enough problem to be a blocker, we will confirm this once the
reversion is done (adamw,
16:25:59)
- (1747408) Cannot upgrade to Fedora 31: package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed (adamw, 16:33:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408
(adamw,
16:33:50)
- Proposed Blocker, libgit2, NEW (adamw,
16:33:50)
- AGREED: 1747408 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - we reject
this as a Final blocker for the same reason we rejected it for Beta:
it does not affect any release-blocking default package set, so does
not break the criteria. But it's definitely a bad bug and we'd like
it resolved if at all possible, and documented if it is not
resolved (adamw,
16:48:48)
- (1750036) Problem with time syncronization (adamw, 16:50:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750036
(adamw,
16:50:02)
- Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy,
ASSIGNED (adamw,
16:50:02)
- AGREED: 1750036 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a blocker with
reference to multiple criteria: default panel functionality (as this
affects time configuration), system services (as the service does
not really start 'properly'), and domain-related criteria (as lack
of time synchronization will often break domain
authentication) (adamw,
16:55:01)
- adamw is a legend (kparal,
16:55:22)
- (1750345) [abrt] gnome-initial-setup: webkitWebViewBaseMakeGLContextCurrent(): gnome-initial-setup killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 16:55:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750345
(adamw,
16:55:29)
- Proposed Blocker, webkit2gtk3, NEW (adamw,
16:55:29)
- AGREED: 1750345 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "All
elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all
release-blocking desktops must function correctly in typical
use" (adamw,
17:00:30)
- (1751852) Xfce is using upstream desktop background (adamw, 17:00:37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751852
(adamw,
17:00:37)
- Proposed Blocker, xfdesktop, ON_QA (adamw,
17:00:37)
- AGREED: 1751852 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of "The
proposed final Fedora artwork must be included and used as the
background on release-blocking desktops..." (adamw,
17:04:41)
- Proposed Final freeze exception (adamw, 17:05:18)
- (1751936) Google account shows just empty window (adamw, 17:05:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751936
(adamw,
17:05:27)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions,
gnome-online-accounts, NEW (adamw,
17:05:28)
- AGREED: 1751936 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we accept this as a *blocker*, not just an
FE, as a violation of "All elements of the default panel (or
equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must
function correctly in typical use" (adamw,
17:11:52)
- Accepted blockers (adamw, 17:12:43)
- most of these are in a fairly straightforward
state and don't need particular followup (adamw,
17:12:54)
- (1728240) Cannot start Fedora-KDE-Live (F31) in basic graphics mode on BIOS machine (adamw, 17:13:33)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728240
(adamw,
17:13:33)
- Accepted Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw,
17:13:33)
- ACTION: frantisekz
and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly
gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode) (adamw,
17:17:22)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:18:25)
Meeting ended at 17:25:02 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode)
Action items, by person
- frantisekz
- frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode)
- lruzicka
- frantisekz and lruzicka to further investigate on this bug (sddm (and possibly gdm?) issues with basic graphics mode)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (132)
- kparal (74)
- frantisekz (74)
- lruzicka (46)
- sgallagh (35)
- bcotton (26)
- coremodule (21)
- zodbot (14)
- pwhalen (12)
- Southern_Gentlem (5)
- satellit_ (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.