#fedora-blocker-review: F32-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 17:00:58 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 17:00:58)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 17:06:00)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 17:06:00)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 17:06:00)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 17:06:01)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 17:06:03)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 17:06:05)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 17:06:07)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:06:09)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:06:11)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:06:13)
    10. ACTION: coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 17:06:15)
    11. for Beta, we have: (adamw, 17:07:04)
    12. 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:07:05)
    13. 7 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 17:07:05)
    14. 5 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 17:07:09)
    15. 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 17:07:09)
    16. for Final, we have: (adamw, 17:07:11)
    17. 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 17:07:17)
    18. 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 17:07:17)

  3. proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 17:07:30)
  4. (1807252) bootloader entry missing after installation on armhfp (adamw, 17:07:45)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807252 (adamw, 17:07:45)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 17:07:45)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/ReleaseBlocking (adamw, 17:12:30)
    4. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ReleaseBlocking lists minimal raw armhp, but dunno if this is hittiing rhat (jlanda, 17:25:44)
    5. AGREED: punt (delay decision) on blocker, AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), provisionally accepted as a blocker if any 32-bit ARM installer issues can be blockers - this is clearly a blocker *if 32-bit ARM installer issues can be blockers*, we are currently not entirely clear on that point. we will clear this up in discussion with ARM folks and FESCo and update bug as appropriate (adamw, 17:33:34)

  5. (1807768) dnsmasq user is not created during installation, breaking NAT (adamw, 17:33:56)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807768 (adamw, 17:33:56)
    2. Proposed Blocker, virt-manager, NEW (adamw, 17:33:56)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Beta_Release_Criteria#Self_hosting_virtualization (kparal, 17:37:06)
    4. AGREED: 1807768 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of "The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same release...This criterion applies only to the recommended Fedora virtualization tools - the qemu/kvm - libvirt - virt-manager stack." (adamw, 17:39:33)

  6. proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 17:41:28)
  7. (1806520) pyanaconda.modules.common.errors.storage.MountFilesystemError: Failed to mount sr0 at /tmp/tmphuna95st: mounting filesystem iso9660 is not supported (adamw, 17:41:38)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806520 (adamw, 17:41:38)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST (adamw, 17:41:39)
    3. AGREED: 1806520 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as a Final blocker as a violation of "The installer must be able to use an installer update image retrieved from removable media or a remote package source". accepted as a Beta FE as a significant issue which cannot be fixed by update (installer issue) (adamw, 17:47:19)

  8. (1807339) Second pass through INSTALLATION DESTINATION with empty disk complains there is not enough space (adamw, 17:47:29)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807339 (adamw, 17:47:29)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST (adamw, 17:47:29)
    3. AGREED: 1807339 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as a noticeable issue that cannot be fixed with an update (installer issue), and due to its impact on openQA tests. if the fix is delayed or doesn't work we may also consider it as a Beta or Final blocker (adamw, 17:54:37)

  9. (1807679) enable fedora-cisco-openh264 repo by default (adamw, 17:55:19)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807679 (adamw, 17:55:19)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, fedora-repos, NEW (adamw, 17:55:19)
    3. AGREED: 1807679 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as a freeze exception as it makes sense to change this in Beta if we intend to have it changed for Final, but we will not actually push the update stable until we're sure workstation WG and releng are on the same page about the consequences and any necessary changes to ensure the result is as intended (adamw, 18:11:33)

  10. (1807692) fedora-repos-32-0.6 requires fedora-repos-rawhide (adamw, 18:11:43)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807692 (adamw, 18:11:43)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, fedora-repos, NEW (adamw, 18:11:43)
    3. AGREED: 1807692 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - accepted as a prominent issue that will affect all installs and cannot be entirely fixed with an update (adamw, 18:17:30)

  11. (1799606) libx86emu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32 (adamw, 18:17:39)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799606 (adamw, 18:17:39)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, libx86emu, MODIFIED (adamw, 18:17:39)
    3. AGREED: 1799606 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - accepted as we usually accept FTBFS fixes in order for the package to make the frozen trees, this isn't very important but should not affect release-blocking contents in any way (adamw, 18:24:03)

  12. (1809270) Include GNOME 3.35.92 in F32 Beta (adamw, 18:33:58)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809270 (adamw, 18:34:05)
    2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, distribution, NEW (adamw, 18:34:18)
    3. AGREED: 1809270 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is a major change but we're still relatively far out from Beta and think we have sufficient time to land it if it tests out well, and it is a significant benefit to test closer to the final release (adamw, 18:38:31)

  13. Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 18:40:02)
    1. we already did #1806520 (adamw, 18:40:28)

  14. (1809107) Maximize doesn't work on GNOME Wayland, moves window partly off-screen (adamw, 18:40:33)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809107 (adamw, 18:40:33)
    2. Proposed Blocker, firefox, NEW (adamw, 18:40:33)
    3. AGREED: 1809107 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we accept this as a blocker as a violation of "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test", this is held to be 'basic functionality' for a commonly-used app like Firefox (adamw, 18:51:43)

  15. Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 18:52:58)
    1. most blockers are under active development (adamw, 18:53:30)

  16. (1807342) Fedora 32 backgrounds not included (adamw, 18:53:40)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807342 (adamw, 18:53:40)
    2. Accepted Blocker, distribution, NEW (adamw, 18:53:40)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804564 , seems not to be (frantisekz, 18:53:54)
    4. bcotton is working with the design team on this, will continue to nudge it (adamw, 18:58:10)

  17. (1804564) Cannot upgrade to Fedora 32: Modules blocking the upgrade path (adamw, 18:59:15)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804564 (adamw, 18:59:15)
    2. Accepted Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (adamw, 18:59:15)
    3. ACTION: bcotton to follow up on this issue with hughesie and try to make sure it gets addressed (adamw, 19:07:20)

  18. Open floor (adamw, 19:07:30)


Meeting ended at 19:11:54 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. coremodule will secretarialize
  2. bcotton to follow up on this issue with hughesie and try to make sure it gets addressed


Action items, by person

  1. bcotton
    1. bcotton to follow up on this issue with hughesie and try to make sure it gets addressed
  2. coremodule
    1. coremodule will secretarialize


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (216)
  2. cmurf (81)
  3. frantisekz (48)
  4. lruzicka (40)
  5. pwhalen (29)
  6. bcotton (27)
  7. kparal (23)
  8. Eighth_Doctor (16)
  9. zodbot (16)
  10. mboddu (13)
  11. kalev (12)
  12. jlanda (12)
  13. Southern_Gentlem (9)
  14. coremodule (8)
  15. mclasen (3)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.