#fedora-blocker-review: F34-blocker-review

Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:59 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (adamw, 16:03:08)
  2. Introduction (adamw, 16:10:22)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:10:31)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:10:36)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:10:40)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:10:45)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:10:50)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:10:55)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:00)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:05)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:11:09)
    10. for Final, we have: (adamw, 16:11:23)
    11. 2 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:11:28)
    12. 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:11:28)
    13. coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 16:12:35)

  3. Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 16:12:42)
  4. (1946074) boot failure when LV is a cryptoluks device used as sysroot (adamw, 16:12:55)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946074 (adamw, 16:12:59)
    2. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/321 (adamw, 16:13:03)
    3. Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (adamw, 16:13:06)
    4. Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+adamwill, +chrismurphy) (adamw, 16:13:11)
    5. AGREED: 1946074 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this seems like a clear violation of "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable partition layout using any file system and/or container format combination offered in a default installer configuration" combined with the requirement that installed systems boot successfully (adamw, 16:17:26)

  5. (1942443) Login using password failed after upgrade to Fedora 34 (adamw, 16:17:34)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942443 (adamw, 16:17:39)
    2. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/317 (adamw, 16:17:44)
    3. Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (adamw, 16:17:47)
    4. Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-2) (-chrismurphy, -catanzaro) (adamw, 16:17:53)
    5. AGREED: 1942443 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this is a very close call, but the consensus was that it's just too narrow in scope to see as a release blocker (we believe it affects systems that started as Fedora 27 or earlier, and systems where nsswitch configuration was changed outside of authselect). It is accepted as a freeze exception issue for the usual reason. (adamw, 16:36:41)

  6. Open floor (adamw, 16:37:46)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946278 (pwhalen, 16:38:43)

  7. (1946278) latest uboot fails to load the dtb (adamw, 16:41:56)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946278 (adamw, 16:42:00)
    2. Proposed Blocker, uboot-tools, NEW (adamw, 16:42:14)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM#Supported_Hardware_and_Devices (adamw, 16:43:02)
    4. AGREED: 1946278 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - accepted as a violation of "All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations" for affected ARM systems (pwhalen avows that systems on the list of officially supported ARM devices will be affected) (adamw, 16:48:06)

  8. Open floor (adamw, 16:48:15)


Meeting ended at 17:00:57 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (101)
  2. u9000 (29)
  3. Southern_Gentlem (21)
  4. bcotton (14)
  5. pwhalen (12)
  6. geraldosimiao (11)
  7. zodbot (11)
  8. copperi (4)
  9. coremodule (2)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.