========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F39-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:40 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2023-09-04/f39-blocker-review.2023-09-04-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:46) * Introduction (adamw, 16:06:10) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:06:10) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:06:10) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:06:10) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:06:12) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:06:14) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:06:16) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:06:18) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:06:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:06:24) * for Beta, we have: (adamw, 16:06:26) * 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:06:28) * 7 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:06:30) * 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:06:32) * 31 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:06:34) * for Final, we have: (adamw, 16:06:36) * 4 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:06:42) * 2 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:06:42) * frantisekz will secretarialize (adamw, 16:08:03) * Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 16:08:15) * (2234518) webUI: allows you to enter an encryption passphrase in non-ASCII characters with no warning (adamw, 16:08:30) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234518 (adamw, 16:08:30) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1193 (adamw, 16:08:30) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 16:08:31) * Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+3,0,-4) (+tflink, +nielsenb, +lruzicka, -geraldosimiao, -imsedgar, -kparal, -bcotton) (adamw, 16:08:31) * Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+adamwill) (adamw, 16:08:33) * AGREED: 2234518 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we agreed that anaconda not displaying a warning here is not in itself serious enough to be a blocker bug, but fixing it would be useful. The libblockdev crash and gnome-initial-setup keyboard layout selection issues are being addressed separately (adamw, 16:18:29) * (2234640) Installer webUI doesn't allow to install system without separate boot partition (adamw, 16:18:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234640 (adamw, 16:18:42) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1249 (adamw, 16:18:42) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:18:42) * Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-2) (+geraldosimiao, +bcotton, -kparal, -lruzicka) (adamw, 16:18:42) * Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+kparal, +lruzicka) (adamw, 16:18:44) * AGREED: 2234640 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this does not really violate any Beta criteria, though we see significant concerns with whether it's appropriate for anaconda to suddenly start enforcing a requirement for a separate /boot when it did not previously. Accepted as an FE - if we do change this, it makes sense to do so for Beta, not change it between Beta and Final. (adamw, 16:32:32) * (2235236) CVE-2023-30079 libeconf: Stack overflow in function read_file at atlibeconf/lib/getfilecontents.c [fedora-all] (adamw, 16:32:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235236 (adamw, 16:32:50) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1253 (adamw, 16:32:50) * Proposed Blocker, libeconf, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:32:50) * Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-1) (+geraldosimiao, +lruzicka, -adamwill) (adamw, 16:32:50) * Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+bcotton, +adamwill) (adamw, 16:32:54) * Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0) (+bcotton, +kparal, +adamwill) (adamw, 16:32:56) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Blocker_Bugs (geraldosimiao, 16:39:15) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Blocker_Bugs (geraldosimiao, 16:40:08) * AGREED: 2235236 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is rejected as a Beta blocker as it doesn't violate any Beta criterion. It does violate the security criterion for Final so it's accepted as a Final blocker, and a Beta FE as it would be good to fix it for Beta too (adamw, 16:45:55) * that's all the Beta blocker proposals, moving on to: (adamw, 16:46:28) * proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 16:46:33) * (2236321) coreutils-9.4 reverts an undesirable change to the -v option that landed in coreutils-9.3 (adamw, 16:46:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236321 (adamw, 16:46:44) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1239 (adamw, 16:46:44) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, coreutils, ON_QA (adamw, 16:46:44) * AGREED: 2236321 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - the benefit here isn't huge (getting the new/old behaviour during live sessions and at first boot, not just on first update) but the risk is also small and we're feeling generous, so...fine (adamw, 16:55:12) * (2237039) NeoChat cannot verify its sessions with other Matrix clients (adamw, 16:55:21) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237039 (adamw, 16:55:21) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1254 (adamw, 16:55:22) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, neochat, ON_QA (adamw, 16:55:22) * Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-2) (+nixuser, +lruzicka, -kparal, -adamwill) (adamw, 16:55:22) * AGREED: 2237039 - RejectedFreezeException (Beta) - as neochat is not preinstalled in any image we know of, there doesn't seem to be any reason to give this an FE, it is fine being a regular update (adamw, 17:00:47) * that's all the proposed Beta FEs, let's move onto: (adamw, 17:01:24) * Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 17:01:28) * two can be decided with ticket votes, so we only have two to handle (adamw, 17:01:39) * (2236438) Anaconda is very slow to show a window after clicking install in gnome-initial-setup (adamw, 17:02:08) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236438 (adamw, 17:02:08) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1242 (adamw, 17:02:08) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:02:08) * Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0) (+kparal, +lruzicka, +adamwill) (adamw, 17:02:08) * AGREED: 2236438 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - we agree that ideally anaconda should start faster and/or the user should get some feedback indicating it's loading, but this really doesn't take long enough to plausibly constitute a release blocker. note it's already accepted as Beta FE (adamw, 17:21:19) * (2189899) Blivet-GUI: A btrfs partition can't be reformatted (adamw, 17:21:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189899 (adamw, 17:21:39) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157 (adamw, 17:21:39) * Proposed Blocker, blivet-gui, NEW (adamw, 17:21:39) * Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+nielsenb) (adamw, 17:21:39) * AGREED: 2189899 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - based on feedback from vtrefny via kparal at https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157#comment-872594 , we agree it doesn't make sense to take too strict of an interpretation and make this a blocker. we will document how to handle it as a common bug (adamw, 17:30:54) * (2187858) sddm-wayland-plasma does not respect keyboard layout variant (adamw, 17:31:09) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187858 (adamw, 17:31:09) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1158 (adamw, 17:31:09) * Proposed Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw, 17:31:09) * Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+1,0,-1) (+geraldosimiao, -catanzaro) (adamw, 17:31:09) * Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +nielsenb, +catanzaro) (adamw, 17:31:11) * AGREED: 2187858 - punt (delay decision) - we did not yet get around to the re-testing that we agreed last week is needed for this bug (adamw, 17:34:33) * that's all the proposals, let's do a quick run through: (adamw, 17:34:48) * Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 17:34:54) * 2236398 - needs to be evaluated by anaconda team now we've accepted it (adamw, 17:35:50) * 2230720 , 2234928 , 2231680 are addressed, just waiting push to stable (adamw, 17:36:30) * 2232711 - we've attempted a fix, but lruzicka said he still saw some kind of automatic suspend happen in testing, I am asking for more details from him about that (adamw, 17:37:10) * 2235100 is waiting for upstream acceptance according to pbrobinson, 2113005 we will likely need to waive again (adamw, 17:37:36) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232711 (geraldosimiao, 17:45:04) * Open floor (adamw, 17:50:33) Meeting ended at 17:52:58 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (208) * geraldosimiao (78) * frantisekz (51) * lruzicka (40) * kparal (34) * zodbot (10) * amoloney (3) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions