#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org: F40-blocker-review
Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 16:00:01 UTC
Meeting summary
- TOPIC:Roll Call (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:00:04)
- TOPIC:Introduction (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:00:07)
- TOPIC:Roll Call (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:00:14)
- TOPIC:Roll Call (@salimma:fedora.im, 16:01:20)
- TOPIC:Introduction (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:06)
- INFO: Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:13)
- INFO: We'll be following the process outlined at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:16)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:18)
- INFO: The bugs up for review today are available at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:20)
- LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:22)
- INFO: The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:26)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:29)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Beta_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:31)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Final_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:36)
- INFO: for Fedora 40 Final, we have: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:45)
- INFO: 2 Proposed Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:48)
- INFO: 1 Accepted Previous Release Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:51)
- INFO: 4 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:53)
- INFO: 8 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:05:56)
- INFO: coremodule will secretarialize (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:20)
- TOPIC:Proposed Final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:30)
- TOPIC:(2275099) Recording the screencast does not work properly. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:36)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275099 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:39)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1596 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:42)
- INFO: Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:44)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+lruzicka) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:46)
- INFO: we will table this bug for more testing during the meeting and proceed for now (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:00)
- TOPIC:(2274830) Reinstate network service for Fedora 40 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:06)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274830 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:09)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1593 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:11)
- INFO: Proposed Blocker, initscripts, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:14)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +ngompa) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:17)
- INFO: this bug is proposed as a blocker for FESCo to considering nominating it, it does not qualify as a blocker under the release criteria, so we will not vote on it (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:17:41)
- TOPIC:Proposed Final freeze exceptions (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:38)
- TOPIC:(2274740) fdo-client-linuxapp.service is not enabled by default on IoT (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:41)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274740 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:44)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1591 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:47)
- INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, fedora-release, ON_QA (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:49)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+4,0,-0) (+adamwill, +geraldosimiao, +salimma, +pbrobinson) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:51)
- AGREED: 2274740 - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this is accepted as an FE as it affects the intended configuration of the IoT edition and cannot be fixed with a post-release update (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:35:48)
- TOPIC:(2263334) F40FailsToInstall: network-scripts-teamd (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:36:04)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:36:06)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1592 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:36:08)
- INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, libteam, ON_QA, depends on other bugs (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:36:11)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:36:13)
- AGREED: 2263334 - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this is accepted on the general principle that we accept clean FTI fixes to ease the upgrade process (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:42:46)
- TOPIC:(2274724) [abrt] nautilus: ptr_array_free(): nautilus killed by SIGABRT (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:10)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274724 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:14)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1590 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:16)
- INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, nautilus, VERIFIED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:18)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-geraldosimiao, -adamwill, -catanzaro) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:21)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+3,0,-0) (+adamwill, +geraldosimiao, +kparal) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:23)
- AGREED: 2274724 - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this is accepted as a crasher bug people could at least potentially run into on the Workstation live image. The fix is targeted and well tested. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:20)
- TOPIC:(2274171) parsec 1.4.0 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:25)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274171 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:27)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1580 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:29)
- INFO: Proposed Freeze Exceptions, parsec, ON_QA (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:32)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +pwhalen) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:35)
- AGREED: 2274171 - RejectedFreezeException (Final) - the proposal here provides no real justification for a freeze exception, and the request is to pull in a major new release with an unclear backwards compatibility status and some slightly odd test results. This is rejected for now, can be proposed again with a clearer justification (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:03:47)
- INFO: let's circle back to our tabled blocker proposal (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:10:26)
- TOPIC:(2275099) Recording the screencast does not work properly. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:10:32)
- AGREED: 2275099 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - our testing during the meeting suggests this is almost 100% reproducible on libvirt/qemu VMs (especially without 3D passthrough), but not reproducible at all on bare metal. That makes this a conditional violation of the "basic functionality" criterion for default apps and the default panel functionality criterion, but we judge that it's not severe enough to constitute a blocker, but it is bad enough to grant an FE. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:43:40)
- TOPIC:Accepted blocker review (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:44:56)
- TOPIC:(2242759) dnf system-upgrade fails on some RPi4 due to system boot date that pre-dates gpg key (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:45:04)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242759 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:45:06)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1435 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:45:09)
- INFO: Accepted Previous Release Blocker, distribution, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:45:12)
- INFO: we still don't have a great idea for a fix for this, we'll have to discuss further at go/no-go (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:51:17)
- TOPIC:Open floor (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:56:24)
Meeting ended at 18:00:39 UTC
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- @adamwill:fedora.im (195)
- @nielsenb:fedora.im (62)
- @salimma:fedora.im (46)
- @tablepc:matrix.org (30)
- @nhanlon:beeper.com (26)
- @geraldosimiao:matrix.org (18)
- @frantisekz:fedora.im (13)
- @zodbot:fedora.im (13)
- @nirik:matrix.scrye.com (12)
- @decathorpe:fedora.im (7)
- @davdunc:fedora.im (4)
- @coremodule:fedora.im (2)
- @meetbot:fedora.im (2)
- @umu:catnip.ee (1)
- @conan_kudo:matrix.org (1)