#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org: F41-blocker-review

Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 16:00:03 UTC

LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Final_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
INFO: Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
INFO: The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
INFO: We'll be following the process outlined at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
INFO: The bugs up for review today are available at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)
LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Beta_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:04:58)

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311936 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:45)

TOPIC:(2311936) pyanaconda.modules.common.errors.storage.UnknownDeviceError: Volume0_0 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:45)

INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:45)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1658 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:45)
INFO: Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:07:45)
AGREED: 2311936 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a clear violation of Final criterion "The installer must be able to detect and install to firmware RAID storage devices" (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:00)
INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:08)
INFO: Proposed Blocker, python3.13, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:08)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1661 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:08)
LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311907 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:08)

TOPIC:(2311907) Anaconda crashes when an error occurs and should be reported. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:08)

AGREED: 2311907 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted under "Bug hinders execution of required Final test plans or dramatically reduces test coverage" at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Blocker_Bugs . this bug prevents us from reliably testing whether crash reporting works, which is an important and release-blocking function (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:19:32)
LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258100 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:19:45)
INFO: Proposed Blocker, qemu, MODIFIED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:19:45)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1663 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:19:45)

TOPIC:(2258100) qemu guest agent: migrate "blacklist" option to "block-rpcs", add support for "allow-rpcs" alternative (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:19:45)

AGREED: 2258100 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of Final criterion "All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must start properly" on qemu VMs (including cloud instances). we note the affected service provides pretty important functionality for scripted deployment of VMs (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:38:26)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1662 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:38:33)
INFO: Proposed Blocker, wpa_supplicant, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:38:33)

TOPIC:(2307226) f41 and rawhide should get the fix from wpa_supplicant-2.11-3.fc40 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:38:33)

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307226 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:38:33)
AGREED: 2307226 - punt (delay decision) - we agreed to ask for clarification on the seriousness of this issue, as it doesn't seem apparent unless you're an enterprise networking expert (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:02)

INFO: as a reminder, we're checking in on progress here, not revoting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:29)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1605 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:37)

TOPIC:(2282171) gsk: vulkan renderer causes gtk4 apps to crash on resize operations on Raspberry Pi 4 and 400 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:37)

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282171 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:37)
INFO: Accepted Blocker, bcm283x-firmware, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:49:37)
INFO: peter told me "I know the solution, just need to finish it up and make sure it fully works" (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:50:01)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1607 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:52:23)
INFO: Accepted Blocker, kernel, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:52:23)

TOPIC:(2283978) Raspberry Pi 4 automatically suspends when idle, claims to support suspend, but can't be woken up (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:52:23)

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283978 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:52:23)
INFO: we've now tagged this as commonbugs, likeliest resolution is that we document this, as fixing it is complex (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:54:59)
LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1603 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:56:31)
INFO: Accepted Blocker, selinux-policy, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:56:31)

TOPIC:(2278845) gnome-initial-setup: Choosing avatar results in "SetIconFile call failed" "unknown reason" due to SELinux denial (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:56:31)

LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278845 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:56:31)
INFO: we are just waiting for a fix from the selinux maintainer here, not much else to talk about (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:58:19)

Meeting ended at 17:02:12 UTC