<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:01:04
!startmeeting F42-blocker-review
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
17:01:05
Meeting started at 2025-02-24 17:01:04 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
17:01:05
The Meeting name is 'F42-blocker-review'
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:01:25
well, a success!
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:01:27
!topic Roll Call
<@pboy:fedora.im>
17:01:27
!hi obviously it does
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:01:27
Sorry, I can only look up one username at a time
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:01:39
!hi
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
17:01:40
thanks kamil, i'll check the logs later
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:01:40
Neal Gompa (ngompa) - he / him / his
<@pboy:fedora.im>
17:01:43
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:01:44
Peter Boy (pboy)
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:01:46
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:01:47
Derek Enz (derekenz)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:02:37
I'll be (trying to) lead the meeting today, because Adam is having a very long full english breakfast...
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:02:47
and a vacation, or whatnot
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:02:59
Enjoy Adam!
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:03:02
Chupacabra
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:03:21
mmm english breakfast
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:03:49
gah, another one with two accounts and no hint which one is the primary one
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:03:56
lol
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:04:10
ain't nobody topping my account set :)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:08
anyway, let's start
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:18
!topic Introduction
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:22
Why are we here?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:26
!info Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:30
!info We'll be following the process outlined at:
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:33
!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:36
!info The bugs up for review today are available at:
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:39
!link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:42
!info The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:44
!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:47
!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Beta_Release_Criteria
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:05:50
!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Final_Release_Criteria
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:29
today we have:
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:34
!info 3 Proposed Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:38
!info 3 Accepted Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:40
!info 0 Accepted 0-day Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:43
!info 0 Accepted Previous Release Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:46
!info 4 Proposed Freeze Exceptions
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:48
!info 5 Accepted Freeze Exceptions
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:06:57
pasting line by line is terrible
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:07:09
anyone volunteering to be a bug secretary?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:07:56
if not, I'll do it after the meeting or leave it up to Adam 😉
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:08:09
ok, let's start
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:08:40
!topic Proposed Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:12
hrm, does Adam really always paste it line by line? no wonder he's nuts
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:17
!topic (2346007) GCC with LTO miscompiles KWin and breaks using ICC profiles for color management
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:09:19
yeah
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:21
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346007
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:24
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1754
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:09:25
the bot chokes a lot on multiline paste
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:28
!info Proposed Blocker, gcc, NEW
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:33
!info Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+1,0,-1) (+ngompa, -nielsenb)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:35
!info Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+5,0,-0) (+adamwill, +nielsenb, +derekenz, +ngompa, +lruzicka)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:09:37
!info Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+5,0,-0) (+adamwill, +nielsenb, +derekenz, +ngompa, +lruzicka)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:10:35
so, we already have pretty strong +5 votes for BetaFE and FinalBlocker. Does anyone want to add something?
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:10:48
I don't :)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:11:00
Neal, what happens if you break your screen and then reboot the machine, as a normal person would? does it work after a fresh boot?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:11:10
it stays borked
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:11:19
until you clear out the ICC settings
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:11:26
so how do you reset the profile when you don't see anything?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:11:36
VT switch, erase the config file
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:11:44
bummer
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:11:49
yeah it really suck
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:11:52
*sucks even
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:12:14
given the severity, I'm fine with the final blocker
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:12:29
we think we have a workaround in Plasma 6.3.1 or upcoming 6.3.2
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:12:39
but I would rather keep the blocker open until we confirm that
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:12:58
!hi
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:12:59
and really, LTO miscompiles are painful
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:13:01
Fábio Ribeiro (farribeiro) - he / him / his
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:13:11
(6.3.2 releases tomorrow)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:14:38
proposed !agreed 2346007 - AcceptedBetaFE AcceptedFinalBlocker - This is quite difficult to work around and a complete showstopper for a general user. Therefore it is accepted as a blocker.
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:15:01
+1
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:15:08
+1
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:15:42
usually this is the time for ack/nack/patch, but it doesn't really matter 🙂
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:16:12
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:16:15
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:16:23
!agreed 2346007 - AcceptedBetaFE AcceptedFinalBlocker - This is quite difficult to work around and a complete showstopper for a general user. Therefore it is accepted as a blocker.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:16:43
!topic (2347292) The initial setup in KDE does not switch on third party repositories
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:16:47
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2347292
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:16:52
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1765
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:16:57
!info Proposed Blocker, plasma-welcome, NEW
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:17:29
this one is very fresh
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:17:57
you won't have tummy ache from it
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:18:23
I'm confused how this broke
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:18:25
the proposed criterion doesn't really cover this
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:18:28
we didn't change anything
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:18:50
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Final_Release_Criteria#First_boot_experience
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:18:50
This is the right one:
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:18:57
"If an initial setup utility is run or intended to be run after the first boot of the installed system, then it must start successfully and each page or panel of the initial setup utility should withstand a basic functionality test. "
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:19:15
Ok, then I guess let's move it to Final
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:19:42
yes, it looks like a clear Final violation
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:19:54
This is also the plasma-welcome-fedora package rather than plasma-welcome itself, so I've moved the bug to that package
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:20:08
Thanks Conan Kudo
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:20:35
FinalBlocker +1
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:20:35
BetaFE +1
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:21:00
FinalBlocker +1
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:21:00
BetaFE +1
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:21:04
+1 to Kamil
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:21:06
BetaFE +1
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:21:06
FinalBlocker +1
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:22:04
proposed !agreed 2347292 - AcceptedBetaFE AcceptedFinalBlocker - This is a violation of "each page or panel of the initial setup utility should withstand a basic functionality test"
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:22:14
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:22:19
ack
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:22:32
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:22:47
!agreed 2347292 - AcceptedBetaFE AcceptedFinalBlocker - This is a violation of "each page or panel of the initial setup utility should withstand a basic functionality test"
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:23:00
!topic (2344322) installed package systemd-standalone-sysusers-257.2-17.fc42.x86_64 conflicts with systemd provided by systemd-257.2-17.fc42.x86_64 from rawhide
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:23:03
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344322
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:23:07
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1752
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:23:09
!info Proposed Blocker, systemd, POST
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:23:12
!info Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+nielsenb, +lruzicka)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:25:00
I don't know what we should be doing for this issue anymore
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:26:58
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:26:58
but in principle I agree with blocker status, because the UX sucks now, so...
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:26:58
+1 BetaBlocker
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:27:19
hmm, I haven't read this one before and it's quite complex
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:28:07
which containers do we block on?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:29:17
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f42 doesn't exist, which means neither the release blocking list does
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:29:55
for F41, no container is listed: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f41/blocking/
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:30:02
container-toolbox is listed
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:30:13
sorry, I overlooked that
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:30:40
tbh, I'm not sure _why_ our base container isn't release-blocking
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:31:02
especially with the hoopla about bootc, that probably should change eventually
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:32:32
alright, so, I don't really know how to vote here. This looks like a big change in what users expect, but not specifically a bug. A packaging side effect. It doesn't break system functionality, but certain software is not installable until you swap systemd
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:32:51
Btw, I wonder whether `dnf swap` works, instead of `--allowerasing`?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:32:53
Anyway
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:32:56
it does
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:33:06
the budgie people use that
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:33:27
This sounds like something that could be documented, and not considered an issue, by some people
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:33:31
!link https://github.com/BuddiesOfBudgie/budgie-desktop/pull/673
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:33:42
perhaps raise this with FESCo under the Change ticket?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:34:16
supposedly the conflict no longer exists anymore
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:34:23
but I haven't tested
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:35:34
alright, let's punt this. Even if this was deemed a blocker, I think it would qualify for Final and not Beta. Let's test whether this is still a problem, and if it is, consider raising this with FESCo instead.
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:36:07
ok
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:36:07
thoughts?
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:36:27
Sounds good
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:36:49
sounds good to me
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:06
proposed !agreed 2344322 - punt - We're not sure whether this is a bug, or just something to be documented (and improved in certain packages). A discussion with FESCo would be very helpful. But first let's try whether this issue is still valid or not, after latest package changes.
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:38:11
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:38:14
ack
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:38:18
ack
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:38:20
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:26
!agreed 2344322 - punt - We're not sure whether this is a bug, or just something to be documented (and improved in certain packages). A discussion with FESCo would be very helpful. But first let's try whether this issue is still valid or not, after latest package changes.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:41
!topic Proposed Freeze Exceptions
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:54
!topic (2337588) GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 15, binutils 2.44, glibc 2.41, gdb 15+)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:57
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337588
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:38:59
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1761
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:39:02
!info Proposed Freeze Exceptions, Changes Tracking, ASSIGNED, depends on other bugs
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:39:04
!info Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+nielsenb)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:39:42
I suspect this is also going to wind up being related to other blocker/FE bugs caused by gcc 15 errors
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:40:01
I'm fine with a freeze exception at least, though it's weird putting it with the change ticket
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:40:06
+1 BetaFE
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:41:02
BetaFE +1
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:41:28
BetaFE +1
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:41:43
BetaFE +1
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:42:15
proposed !agreed 2337588 - AcceptedBetaFE - We think it's beneficial to include this in the Beta release for a wide user testing.
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:42:55
ack
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:42:58
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:43:00
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:21
!agreed 2337588 - AcceptedBetaFE - We think it's beneficial to include this in the Beta release for wide user testing.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:30
!topic (2347328) Update the FEX stack for f42
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:33
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2347328
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:36
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1766
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:55
!info Proposed Freeze Exceptions, fex-emu, MODIFIED
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:43:59
!info Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+ngompa)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:44:34
This is related to the FEX change for F42
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:44:58
this seems quite standalone, without much risk to anything major, IIUIC
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:45:02
yeah
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:45:18
Davide Cavalca more or less finished things up and so it'd be good to have this in
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:45:47
otoh, if we don't ship the binaries on some ISO, the blocker FE is quite meaningless, it will be in updates anyway
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:45:53
but I have no trouble giving it +1 FE
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:46:16
otoh, if we don't ship the binaries on some ISO, the FE proposal is quite meaningless, it will be in updates anyway
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:46:57
+1 FE
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:47:01
it's shipped on Fedora KDE ARM
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:47:18
+1 FE
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:47:56
proposed !agreed 2347328 - AcceptedBetaFE - This is shipped by default by Fedora KDE ARM, and doesn't pose a risk to anything major, so we're fine with giving it a freeze exception.
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:48:05
ack
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:48:09
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:48:14
ack
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:48:20
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:48:53
!agreed 2347328 - AcceptedBetaFE - This is shipped by default by Fedora KDE ARM, and doesn't pose a risk to anything major, so we're fine with giving it a freeze exception.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:03
(I discovered a trick to make these meetings bearable - just approve everything!)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:20
don't tell Adam...
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:27
!topic (2330681) Something changed between kernel-6.13.0-0.rc0.20241126git7eef7e306d3c.10.fc42 and kernel-6.13.0-0.rc1.20241202gite70140ba0d2b.14.fc42 which made debug kernels become non-working
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:31
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330681
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:34
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1745
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:38
!info Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, NEW
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:40
!info Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+0,0,-4) (-adamwill, -nielsenb, -derekenz, -ngompa)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:49:44
!info Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +ngompa)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:50:48
this is already rejected as a beta blocker, now we're voting just about beta FE
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:50:57
broken debug kernels kind of suck, but we don't ship them on any media...
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:51:07
BetaFE +1
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:51:21
BetaFE +1
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:51:24
I think BetaFE +1 is ok
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:51:24
no harm in giving it a FE
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:51:28
BetaFE +1
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:51:58
BetaFE +1
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:52:12
proposed !agreed 2330681 - AcceptedBetaFE - We would like to fix debug kernels ASAP, and we don't ship them on any medium, so this should be a safe freeze exception to grant.
<@farribeiro:matrix.org>
17:52:26
ack
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:52:54
ack
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
17:52:57
ack
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:53:59
!agreed 2330681 - AcceptedBetaFE - We would like to fix debug kernels ASAP, and we don't ship them on any medium, so this should be a safe freeze exception to grant.
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:54:19
well, and that's the end of the proposals!
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:54:30
now we should look at already accepted blockers...
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:54:35
Cool
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:54:53
!topic Accepted Blockers
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:54:59
!topic (2346436) "EFI System Partition" does not show in available filesystems for custom installs since blivet 3.12.0
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:55:02
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346436
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:55:04
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1758
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:55:06
!info Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:56:13
the PR is still not merged, so this is waiting for anaconda devs
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:56:24
but it seems to be on the right path
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:57:14
maybe poke the devs to merge this, or at least create an updates image, so that we can fix it
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:57:40
!info this is pending anaconda devs to merge the PR, let's poke them a bit
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:57:46
anything more to this?
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
17:58:10
I don't think
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:58:20
don't think so
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
17:58:24
probably needs a poke
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:58:30
!topic (2344434) Cannot install to a software RAID device created in the storage editor as it's impossible to assign the root mount point successfully
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:58:34
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344434
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:58:37
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1751
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:58:39
!info Accepted Blocker, anaconda-webui, NEW
<@kparal:matrix.org>
17:59:47
the PR is also open, but without any review this time
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:00:06
oh, and it's very fresh, 4 hours old
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:00:17
so probably just wait a week on this?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:00:46
are we concerned we could wind up with release slippage?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:01:16
I think it looks ok at this stage, doesn't it
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:01:28
beta release is slated for March 11
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:01:30
!info there is a fresh PR, needs review
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:01:39
so that means there's only two weeks
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:15
well at least for these two blockers, we have fixes already, we just need to build it and test it, once merged
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:02:21
yup
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:31
ok, let's go to the next one
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:37
!topic (2342065) Broken support for C++ coroutines in GCC 15 breaks qcoro, which breaks Plasma Discover
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:40
!link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342065
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:43
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1747
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:02:45
!info Accepted Blocker, gcc, POST
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:03:16
this one has been annoying, we've been playing wack-a-mole across KDE about this bug
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:04:29
so no fix yet, it seems
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:04:34
seemingly there might be a fix, but we need the gcc folks to update the package to find out
<@farchord:fedora.im>
18:04:45
Yes....
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:04:49
they added a test case from KDE to verify behavior
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:05:10
Neal, your comment #19 applies to the update in #18?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:05:39
yes
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:06:02
bodhi's fun automatic bug closer kicked in when I didn't want it to
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:06:44
ok, so there's a new patch in the works, but we need the gcc maintainers to update the package
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:07:21
we worked around it in two KDE packages by turning off GNU C++ extensions
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:07:34
but we don't really know how widespread the problem is
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:08:57
!info there are some mitigations in two KDE packages, but the gcc issue is still unfixed. A new patch is available, according to Neal, but needs a new gcc build.
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:09:23
(well, I assume there's a new patch since they added a test case for it...)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:09:39
gcc commit messages are kind of inscrutable
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:09:52
ok, thanks
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:09:59
and that's all!
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:10:10
!topic Open Discussion <your bugs here>
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:10:19
anything else from anyone?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:11:10
are you planning to submit the updates tagged with accepted bugs after this meeting?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:11:34
you mean request accepted FEs to be pushed?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:11:39
yes
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
18:11:42
I do not have anything, I will need to go anyway. Take care and have a nice time.
<@lruzicka:matrix.org>
18:11:44
Thanks
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:11:50
Thanks lruzicka
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:12:17
I'm waiting on the KDE Plasma update FE to be requested to be pushed to merge https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/1092
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:12:47
Conan Kudo: I didn't mean to, but Adam is away today and tomorrow, maybe it's a good idea to do it. I'll ping him and ask him.
<@farchord:fedora.im>
18:13:14
Yeah adam was bugged yesterday and didn't seem too happy XD
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
18:13:45
Thus Adam is on vacation lol
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:15:54
I'll let you know Conan Kudo
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:15:57
anything else?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:16:23
nothing from me that's urgent
<@derekenz:fedora.im>
18:16:44
Nothing for now, thanks Kamil
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:16:49
I would also like https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6ec8dfc721 pushed too since it meets karma (even though bodhi doesn't realize it yet)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:16:53
and that's it
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:17:37
I'm done now :)
<@marcdeop:matrix.org>
18:17:39
will we be able to have a FE for KDE Plasma 6.3.2? it's launching tomorrow :)
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:18:33
well you can request it. It depends on how many changes there are, I guess
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:19:27
ok, thanks everyone for attending!
<@kparal:matrix.org>
18:19:34
!endmeeting