17:00:19 #startmeeting FAmSCo 2013-05-27 17:00:19 Meeting started Mon May 27 17:00:19 2013 UTC. The chair is sesivany. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:25 #meetingname famsco 17:00:25 The meeting name has been set to 'famsco' 17:00:31 #topic Roll call 17:00:36 .fas eischmann 17:00:36 sesivany: eischmann 'Jiri Eischmann' 17:00:57 .fas tuanta 17:00:57 tuanta: tuanta 'Truong Anh Tuan' 17:01:07 aeperezt, tuanta, nb: ping 17:01:25 .fas aeperezt 17:01:26 aeperezt: aeperezt 'Alejandro Perez' 17:01:33 hello sesivany 17:01:39 aeperezt: hi 17:02:39 I hope it won't be just three of us again. 17:03:05 right 17:03:48 ok, let's wait a couple more minutes if someone else shows up. 17:04:28 .FAS bckurera 17:04:29 bckurera: bckurera 'Buddhika Kurera' 17:04:46 Hi guys 17:04:46 bckurera: welcome 17:05:34 ok, let's start. 17:05:40 sesivany, great 17:05:40 #topic Announcements 17:05:48 any announcements? 17:06:16 I was at LinuxTag for the whole week, so I'm not much aware of any important information. 17:06:53 Election nominations are closed 17:07:08 yes, elections 17:07:14 :-) 17:07:41 #topic FAmSCo election nominations have been closed. There are 5 candidates for 4 seats. 17:07:46 #undo 17:07:46 Removing item from minutes: 17:07:56 #info FAmSCo election nominations have been closed. There are 5 candidates for 4 seats. 17:07:59 typo... 17:08:44 frankly I expected more candicates, but at least it will be real elections (more candidates than seats). 17:09:56 aeperezt: glad to see more candidates from LATAM. You seemed to make a good job in identifying good candidates for FAmSCo. 17:09:58 Yes 5 is really good :-) 17:10:40 what worries me a bit is that there are no candidates from NA. 17:10:51 sesivany, I'm glad that people are getting involve 17:10:56 So herlo and nb decided not for the reelection? 17:11:03 so there will be no representatives of NA in FAmSCo in the next term. 17:11:15 sesivany, o 17:11:31 bckurera: I don't see them in the list of nominated persons. 17:12:24 it's not good. we should have at least one member from each region 17:12:33 Yup so NA will not have a direct representation, but we all support all regions we can cooperate 17:13:31 tuanta: yes, it's not very fortunate, it will be more demaning in terms of cooperation. 17:14:21 FAmSCo will have to make sure that regions are aware of what's going on. So far, it's been easy. But now NA can't be left out. 17:14:54 ok, let's move on if no one else has any announcement. 17:15:36 #topic Quarterly Budget Meeting 17:15:55 I haven't found time to invite everyone :-( 17:16:00 but I'll do it ASAP. 17:16:22 just FYI: next week, we will have a quarterly budget meeting. 17:16:42 to make sure that all regions are on track with planned budgets. 17:16:55 That is good we will prepare ourselves 17:17:27 it will be part of FAmSCo meeting or replace it. Implementation details are not important. 17:17:50 It'd be great to have all regional budget treasurers/wranglers here. 17:18:20 + I'm going to invite rsuehle who is responsible for Fedora budget in RHT. 17:19:06 #info Quarterly Budget Meeting will be during the next FAmSCo meeting. 17:19:07 sesivany, add it as an #info #action :-) 17:20:05 #action every region to update their budgets (add the latest spendings) and prepare some overview of expenses in the near future. 17:20:56 got it. 17:20:59 anything else to this topic? 17:21:36 if not, let's move forward. 17:21:51 Ihave few 17:22:07 This is for Q2 right? 17:22:46 Then next saturday we are having APACbi weekly, can we still go for the approvals for fun request 17:23:05 bckurera: it's for both. We'd like to share how much the regions spent in the last quarter and how it looks like for the next one. 17:23:14 Even though we do not talk about the Q2 budget in famsco 17:23:15 Q1 of FY2014 (from 3-5/2013), bckurera 17:23:45 bckurera: there is no deadline. Q1 is already closed. 17:23:56 Ok cleared :-) thanks 17:24:31 bckurera: the thing is that rsuehle told me 2 weeks ago that we'd so far spent only 8k out of 27k allocated for Q1. 17:24:57 bckurera: requests for reviewing in the next APAC meeting will be accounted in Q2 17:25:00 bckurera: we just want to make sure that regions are on track and have no long-term problems to meet the budget plans. 17:25:27 tuanta, yes it is obvious 17:26:07 the goal is to avoid situation that at the end of the fiscal year, we will find out that we have spent only 2/3 of our budget or something. 17:26:08 sesivany, if so that means we lost around 19k and we cannot use it again? 17:26:49 yes we were working on yarly budget not quaterly 17:26:59 *yearly 17:27:06 bckurera: yes and no, I've spoken about it with rsuehle several times and told her that we can't have quarterly deadlines. 17:27:34 and then the other part was that the credit card charges do't go to the month but to next month 17:27:48 when the statement is don 17:27:53 *done 17:27:57 bckurera: but OSAS has strict quarterly budgets, so they lose the money. Our budget is part of their budget, but we shouldn't be affected. They should balance it somehow. 17:28:06 so that is what we need to learn to work 17:28:11 sesivany, yes we need to get it clarified and yearly is the best 17:28:33 so we should try to land as many expenses in the same quarter as they're planned to help OSAS. 17:28:42 when was reimbursed not when the ticket was filled 17:29:04 so please remind people that they should not take time to ask for reimbursement. 17:29:05 +1 sesivany 17:29:37 Yes agree with you 17:29:47 we have cases when people ask for reimbursement after 6 months of more. I don't want to set any strict rule, but it's just not acceptable. 17:30:15 if people want money back from Fedora, they should find time to provide receipt and ask for reimbursement. 17:31:13 but that's something we can discuss more in detail at the meeting. 17:31:50 ok, can we move on? 17:31:57 Yes will move 17:32:17 #topic Segio's Blog post (vol. 2) 17:32:25 just very briefly... 17:32:35 because we discussed it in length last time. 17:32:46 #link http://blog.sergiodj.net/post/2013-05-16-so-long-ambassadors/ 17:32:50 sesivany, ok 17:32:58 for those who don't know what's going on. 17:33:30 aeperezt: I read a blogpost of one Brazilian ambassador who felt really offended by the original blogpost. 17:34:00 have not seen it 17:34:07 aeperezt: I hope the case hasnt caused any big turmoil in the regional community. 17:34:22 * sesivany is searching for it. 17:34:26 sesivany, it has and some step are in place 17:34:47 sesivany, there will be a new mentor on Brazil 17:35:18 latam mentor are selecting the best candidate for it 17:35:59 I prefer peer program as sesivany mentioned last meeting 17:36:12 aeperezt: I just wanted to say that FAmSCo is here to help in case the situation gets out of control. FAmSCo should help in such cases with advice, judging etc. 17:36:15 it's much easier 17:36:33 sesivany, thanks 17:36:48 please do not forget we also have cwg 17:37:06 I've found it... 17:37:12 #link http://www.cleitonlima.com.br/2013/05/dont-throw-a-grenade-when-you-leave-some-place/ 17:37:38 which I am also a member 17:37:44 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group 17:38:19 sesivany, I will read it 17:38:30 tuanta: thanks for pointing that out. 17:38:41 * tuanta reading it 17:39:01 * bckurera reading..... 17:40:47 Now that I read it 17:41:34 sesivany, he refer to "that every year we have a war when the FISL (Free Software’s International Forum) is approaching. It goes more far that discuss about money, and enter in a “I did more for Fedora than you did” to receive the money to pay the costs to represent Fedora in the event. And that’s exactly what happened this year as well." 17:42:19 well that is true and before the issue with fisl was simple group desided who goes and that was the main issue 17:43:10 this year we open it before that desisions where made on close doors 17:44:04 aeperezt: openness can sometimes bring the opposite effect than expected, but it's better in long term. 17:44:25 +1 sesivany 17:44:41 At the end I have to rescue the comment by brochecha , fedora community on Brazil is not healty 17:45:02 sesivany, that is what I wanted it to be everything has to be transparent 17:45:36 the main issue on Brazil is for many people the mention of Padula on the list cause trouble 17:46:04 aeperezt: that's a good step, now it's important to make sure people can work in transparent environment. Sometimes they take time to get used to it. 17:47:00 * nirik would like to note there's a request for a second br mailing list: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3814 17:47:09 right, I think I'm taking the bullet for that, but there are many people on Brazil that has agreed specially new ones 17:47:25 nirik, you are welcome to bring that 17:47:27 here 17:48:03 yeah, it's not been made yet (two lists competing seems non ideal to me), but perhaps FAmSCO could weigh in on it... 17:48:28 what really need there is a another moderator 17:48:31 nirik, aeprerezt: what is wrong with the current one? 17:48:32 on the list 17:49:05 sesivany, the issue now is that the list is close, if you want to join need owner approval 17:49:06 I don't know any details. Just the request for a new list and what I have heard second hand. 17:49:25 I heard that the moderator is slow to add new people or moderate. 17:49:28 people on the list has ask for another moderator 17:50:00 but manteiner has not appoint someone but he said it is a good idea 17:50:07 but does not take action 17:50:35 nirik, you right 17:50:55 I got lot of complains about it 17:50:56 aeperezt: can fedora infra do it if the regional community proposes an additional moderator? 17:51:41 yes, it's better to request infra to add more moderators 17:51:46 sesivany, my response was talk to manteiner. If he does not solve ask infra to add others 17:51:48 as a side note, I don't know why the list is closed. Shouldn't at least archives be open to all? 17:51:57 not to create a new list 17:52:10 nikik archives are open 17:52:13 oh, they are... nevermind. 17:52:22 * nirik thought they were not for some reason, sorry 17:52:46 nirik: that's right, closed mailing list for users looks a bit odd. 17:53:01 sesivany, right 17:53:29 aeperezt: can you bring this up in the LATAM community? 17:53:33 nirik can I modify the ticket so the request changes to add another moderators 17:53:37 sesivany, yes 17:53:49 aeperezt: sure. 17:54:08 might talk to the submitter of the ticket and see if they are ok with that or want more. 17:54:10 there seems to be two solutions: 1. add another moderator, 2. open the mailing list for everyone since it's a user mailing list. 17:54:22 sesivany, we try to solve the issue by talking to the manteiner 17:54:29 with no response 17:54:31 so 17:54:47 sesivany, brasil has 3 list 17:55:02 that one is like ambassadors list 17:55:06 but still 17:55:22 don't know why it needs to be closed 17:55:27 too many lists. it's not necessary, I think 17:55:28 aeperezt: then the next step should be a request to infra arguing that the maintainer is not responsive. 17:55:34 tuanta, right 17:55:41 sesivany, right 17:55:56 will change the request on the ticket 17:56:07 I don't like to splits things around 17:56:29 but issue is that if they cannot solve the issue the have to go higher 17:56:48 aeperezt: ok 17:57:08 we try to be open 17:57:18 another issue came up this weekend 17:57:31 and touch the brazilian domain 17:57:57 and is the freemedia program on brazil seems like that domain point people to a form that does not exist 17:58:07 instead of freemedia track 17:58:52 so a discution on the list is progress and the main idea is to point request to fedora freemedia track 17:59:20 aeperezt: so it's not a problem of unresponsive maintainer? 17:59:48 sesivany, that is another matter 18:00:43 I'm afraid we're now too deep in LATAM issues. 18:00:49 the brazilian ambassadors mailing lists is maintainer unresponsive or when he does he agreed but not solved 18:01:17 sesivany, it a country issue, that inside Latam 18:01:37 FAmSCo is here it help with issues when they prove not to be solvable in the region. 18:01:56 sesivany, that is what we are trying to do now 18:02:05 aeperezt: we can easily track in in a ticket created in FAmSCo trac. 18:02:29 next latam meeting we will talk about new mentor on Brazil 18:02:37 there is a ticket on latam track 18:02:40 about that 18:02:49 but all I can say now is that FAmSCo is watching the situation and is ready to help if the situation asks for it. 18:03:12 ticket number please, aeperezt 18:03:22 and next week a ticket on famsco will be a new mentor for Brazil so famsco can approved 18:03:54 #info FAmSCo is watching the situation in the Brazilian community and is ready to help if necessary. 18:04:09 #link https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-latam/ticket/120 18:04:23 I will also address the issue with the mailling list 18:05:47 we appreciate famsco support and we are working to make the situation better 18:05:49 ok guys, we've spent too much time on this issue regarding we discussed it last time, too. 18:06:01 it 18:06:08 it's a hot topic :) 18:06:34 tuanta: I know, but if we can to discuss it in length, we should move it to a ticket. 18:06:36 tuanta, yes 18:06:58 We just can't spend an hour on it at FAmSCo meeting. 18:06:59 aeperezt: you should open a new ticket in FAmSCo track 18:07:30 there used to be a 15-minute rule which I don't have to necessarily follow, but there was something about it. 18:07:31 LATAM trac is not in English 18:07:35 tuanta, the idea is to open it once we have the candidates as part of the solution to the issues on the region 18:08:31 +1 sesivany, really good rule 18:09:35 ok, if you feel we need to discuss it more, please open a ticket in FAmSCo trac. 18:10:01 if there is nothing else you want to add, I'm going to end the meeting. 18:11:16 no more from me 18:11:24 ok, thank you for coming and meet you next week! don't forget it will be the budget meeting! ;) 18:12:12 #endmeeting