16:01:13 #startmeeting F35-blocker-review 16:01:13 Meeting started Mon Aug 30 16:01:13 2021 UTC. 16:01:13 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:01:13 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:13 The meeting name has been set to 'f35-blocker-review' 16:01:19 #meetingname F35-blocker-review 16:01:19 The meeting name has been set to 'f35-blocker-review' 16:01:20 #topic Roll Call 16:01:28 .hello2 16:01:29 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 16:01:31 .hello2 16:01:32 coremodule: coremodule 'Geoffrey Marr' 16:03:27 ahoyhoy 16:04:02 .hello chrismurphy 16:04:03 cmurf[m]: chrismurphy 'Chris Murphy' 16:04:31 I voted on several of the CE' 16:04:35 *FE 16:04:37 dangit 16:04:58 I voted on several of the FEs just a few minutes ago and marked six of them as accepted after reaching 3 votes 16:05:29 coremodule: thanks, did you mark them in BZ as well? 16:05:40 negative 16:05:45 I will do that 16:06:17 its been a whole cycle since I've had to do this! 16:06:48 hehe 16:07:07 the app won't move them to 'accepted' until bz is updated (and we resync) 16:07:16 let me know when you've done them all and i'll force a resync 16:07:46 .hello2 16:07:47 pwhalen: pwhalen 'Paul Whalen' 16:09:41 morning pwhalen 16:09:47 adamw, wilco, give me 2 more min 16:12:02 alright adamw, done 16:12:11 rgr 16:14:27 resynced 16:14:41 that looks better! 16:14:47 sweet!! 16:14:48 nice quick meeting coming up 16:14:54 #chair pwhalen coremodule 16:14:54 Current chairs: adamw coremodule pwhalen 16:14:54 this one weird trick shortens meetings by 80% 16:15:06 lol 16:15:17 heh 16:15:18 impending boilerplate alert 16:15:23 #topic Introduction 16:15:26 Why are we here? 16:15:31 #info Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. 16:15:36 #info We'll be following the process outlined at: 16:15:41 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting 16:15:48 #info The bugs up for review today are available at: 16:15:48 #link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current 16:15:54 #info The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: 16:15:58 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria 16:16:15 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Beta_Release_Criteria 16:16:16 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria 16:16:17 god I have got to find a better way to do that in matrix 16:16:28 #info for Beta, we have: 16:16:33 #info 1 Proposed Blockers 16:16:33 #info 7 Accepted Blockers 16:16:42 dang did that come through as a multiline message? 16:16:50 yes 16:16:51 no, looks good 16:17:29 1 proposed blocker, 7 accepted blockers, moving on 16:17:32 it's definitely one message on the matrix side. did the bridge get smarter? 16:17:33 #info for Final, we have: 16:17:48 gah 16:17:49 #undo 16:17:49 Removing item from minutes: INFO by adamw at 16:17:33 : for Final, we have: 16:17:55 #info 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions 16:18:00 #info 12 Accepted Freeze Exceptions 16:18:05 #info for Final, we have: 16:18:17 #info 1 Proposed Blockers 16:18:20 #info 2 Accepted Blockers 16:18:31 alright, whew 16:18:37 who wants to secretarialize? i volunteer coremodule 16:18:57 the efficiency of volunteering others :P 16:18:57 dang I was going to not say anything when it came to this point, despite the last 5 years history 16:19:07 but since you insist 16:19:24 =) 16:19:33 #info coremodule will secretarialize 16:19:37 * mclasen lurks 16:20:04 * sgallagh is around-ish 16:20:15 so you're sort of aoval? 16:20:29 Pear-shaped 16:20:30 thanks folks, i'm here all week 16:20:48 alrighty, let's get started with 16:20:51 #topic Proposed Beta blockers 16:21:03 #topic (1998712) does not boot - bad shim signature, you need to load the kernel first 16:21:08 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998712 16:21:14 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/415 16:21:18 #info Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW 16:21:24 #info Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+tablepc, +coremodule, +chrismurphy) 16:21:37 oh, this has +3 already? welp, let's have a quick looksee anyway 16:22:04 Seems +1 to me 16:22:06 +1 blocker 16:22:13 Though it also is reportedly fixed already 16:23:08 uh, don't we already have a bug for this? 16:24:09 yes, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997886#c3 16:24:51 eh, i guess we can count it as an f35 version. 16:25:36 +1 blocker 16:26:13 a kernel that should fix this is building atm, will be submitted as an update soon 16:27:52 proposed #agreed 1997886 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - seems like a violation of "All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations", with footnote that lists secure boot as covered 16:28:44 ack 16:28:52 ack 16:30:04 ack 16:30:11 #agreed 1997886 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - seems like a violation of "All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations", with footnote that lists secure boot as covered 16:30:44 moving on to: 16:30:45 #topic Proposed Beta freeze exceptions 16:30:45 #topic (1936939) osbs-client fails to build with Python 3.10: E subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['git', 'rev-parse', 'HEAD']' returned non-zero exit status 128. 16:30:46 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936939 16:30:49 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/404 16:30:56 #info Proposed Freeze Exceptions, osbs-client, ON_QA 16:30:58 #info Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+adamwill, +coremodule) 16:31:20 this is fails-to-install, not just fails-to-build, as it needs rebuilding for the python 3.10 bump 16:31:20 so fe seems reasonable 16:31:56 OSBS isn't part of any install media, is it? 16:32:15 If not, why is an FE needed? 16:34:12 the standard reason is it helps with upgrades during the freeze 16:34:33 there's kind of a catch-all - if it's on media we want it to be installable, if it's not on media then the FE only helps with upgrades, but can't break any media. :P 16:34:58 so we usually wind up just taking FTIs as FEs. i do check them and make sure the builds aren't introducing any huge possibly-dangerous changes though. 16:35:50 +1 FE 16:36:39 I'll abstain, but I generally think that the point of a Freeze is to... avoid making changes. 16:37:09 wow, get this guy and his crazy takes 16:37:27 I stand with sgallagh :-) 16:37:38 they called him crazy until he suggested THIS 16:37:40 Maybe I should stop sleeping in my car with the garage door closed. 16:37:47 playing off bcotton 16:39:07 aaaanyhoo 16:39:07 sgallagh isn't crazy, he's just a little unwell. I know right now you can't tell. But stay awhile and maybe then you'll see a different side of he 16:39:12 unless anyone actually wants to vote -1, we've got +3, so 16:39:51 I'm 0 because this is so off on its own, but my concern has been logged. 16:39:51 seems low risk right 16:39:52 So let's move on 16:40:22 proposed #agreed 1936939 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as an FE as a fails-to-install issue, which we generally accept on the basis that fixing them helps upgrades work during the freeze period (without updates-testing enabled, as is commonly the case) 16:40:22 ack 16:40:26 ack 16:40:52 ack 16:40:53 u-t is always enabled for Beta unless a user turns it off manually, but whatever 16:41:14 ack 16:41:57 sgallagh: it's enabled for fresh installs 16:41:58 but when you're upgrading, the upgrade process uses whatever repos are currently installed, which typically doesn't include u-t 16:41:58 s/installed/enabled/ 16:41:58 ah 16:43:02 #agreed 1936939 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as an FE as a fails-to-install issue, which we generally accept on the basis that fixing them helps upgrades work during the freeze period (without updates-testing enabled, as is commonly the case) 16:43:03 moving on to... 16:43:03 #topic Proposed Final blockers 16:43:03 #topic (1991075) time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled 16:43:03 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991075 16:43:03 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/389 16:43:33 #info Proposed Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon, NEW 16:43:33 this is +3 in the ticket but i decided to put it in the meeting as i figured there may be some -1s 16:43:34 #info Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+bcotton, +chrismurphy, +tablepc) 16:43:34 i'm kinda on the fence about it, i suspect it might not pass the 'last blocker' test 16:43:51 it could be fixed by an update without hurting much, i guess. but it is a kinda visible and embarrassing issue... 16:45:13 we could punt this and see if more people hit it 16:46:03 or if it's conditional on some local issue 16:46:03 This would not pass the last blocker test. -1 16:46:45 It'd be a firm +1 FE from me, though. 16:46:46 yeah, i'd definitely be +1 beta FE, we should vote on that too 16:46:46 feels like the sort of thing that would get us raked over the coals in reviews and whatnot 16:47:15 we're not even sure what the problem could be though either which also means no fix is on the way 16:47:15 Ben Cotton (he/him/his): If only we had some process by which we could prioritize certain non-blocking bugs to be looked at... 16:47:15 +1 beta FE 16:47:26 is it purely cosmetic or would it break things that rely on the clock being accurate (e.g kerberos) 16:47:50 +1 beta FE 16:48:27 sgallagh: i think the potential harm to the release directs this more toward the blocker process instead of the prioritized bugs process 16:49:12 especially since the lives would have to ...live... with it 16:49:13 i think if more than 1 or 2 people hit this bug, it's a blocker 16:49:13 Ben Cotton (he/him/his): It *looks* like a timezone issue, so stuff like krb5 which uses UTC internally should be okay 16:49:55 but for sure if lots of people hit it, it's a blocker - that's the way the criterion reads 16:50:15 I guess I'd be +1 Beta FE and prefer to defer Final Blocker status to gather more information 16:50:15 re: krb5, that's what i thought, so i'm glad to hear i was (probably) guessing correctly. that makes me slightly less willing to argue for blocker status, but i remain a +1 final blocker 16:50:15 it's a desktop UI/UX centric criterion 16:52:13 if i'm the only one hitting it, oh well :P 16:53:07 perhaps punt final blocker, see if others hit it and what other things it might affect? 16:53:58 i'm ok with punt 16:55:02 fair enough 16:55:02 i can live with that 16:57:59 * Eighth_Doctor is doing paperwork for pipewire atm 16:58:32 proposed #agreed 1991075 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (FinalBlocker) - we agreed to accept this issue as a Beta freeze exception issue as it definitely seems significant enough to fix if possible. Opinion on whether it should be a Final blocker was a bit split, and there was a consensus to punt and see if any significant consequences of the bug appear, or if it's mostly cosmetic 16:58:45 ack 16:58:57 ack 17:00:12 ack 17:01:39 ack 17:02:37 #agreed 1991075 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (FinalBlocker) - we agreed to accept this issue as a Beta freeze exception issue as it definitely seems significant enough to fix if possible. Opinion on whether it should be a Final blocker was a bit split, and there was a consensus to punt and see if any significant consequences of the bug appear, or if it's mostly cosmetic 17:02:40 did that fit? 17:02:46 yes 17:02:48 yeah 17:02:51 at least on matrix 17:02:57 it fit on irc 17:07:36 alrighty 17:08:41 thus endeth the proposals part of the meeting 17:08:42 i'll do a quick scoot through accepted blockers for the interested 17:08:42 #topic Accepted Beta blockers 17:08:42 #info fix for 1996223 is pending stable push 17:08:42 #info fix for 1993238 is pending stable push 17:08:43 #topic (1989726) [abrt] gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV 17:08:43 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989726 17:09:34 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/399 17:09:35 or is this more a 'graphics people' kinda ping? 17:09:35 kalev: mclasen: do you have any info on this one? 17:09:35 #info Accepted Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW 17:09:55 according to fmuellner: 'driver issue or mutter bug' 17:11:41 those seem like two fairly distinct possiblities :) how do we figure out which? 17:12:28 i've moved it to mutter for now at least 17:14:59 #info this is apparently "a driver issue or mutter bug", we don't know which. need to figure that out to fix it, I guess. 17:15:12 #topic (1998681) KDE needs to pick up F35 backgrounds 17:15:16 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998681 17:15:20 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/414 17:15:27 #info Accepted Blocker, kde-settings, NEW 17:15:44 #info this should be fairly straightforward for KDE team, don't expect any issues, it's a standard thing 17:16:17 #topic (1995817) GNOME Software updates fail with "Prepared update not found" error 17:16:20 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995817 17:16:24 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/397 17:16:26 #info Accepted Blocker, PackageKit, NEW 17:16:59 this one actually got less common recently, but still happens sometimes. not 100% sure what's going on. I'll see if I can debug it any more. 17:18:05 #info we're not yet clear on what's happening here, mcrha and I are trying to figure it out 17:18:06 #info fix for 1997854 is pending stable push 17:18:06 #topic (1983861) pipewire-0.3.31-4.fc35.x86_64 no audio devices found (due to no session manager user service being automatically enabled on install or update) 17:18:06 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983861 17:18:06 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/388 17:18:26 #info Accepted Blocker, pipewire, NEW, depends on other bugs 17:18:27 we're kinda struggling with no response from the developer here. 17:19:07 i guess, in the end, the issue is relatively simple so probably someone else could fix it if it becomes necessary. 17:19:27 there's an update which suggests: wireplumber now, but i don't know if the session service is enabled by default in wireplumber... 17:19:47 i guess i'll have to look into it 17:20:41 #info this issue seems relatively simple but still need to check it's being properly fixed. the recent update should switch to wireplumber by default, but we still need to make sure the wireplumber session service is enabled by default 17:21:21 are we at the "ben, please go sit on someone's desk until they give a satisfactory answer" stage yet? 17:21:42 maybe not quite 17:21:42 roger 17:21:42 i will let you know if we get there 17:22:28 alrighty, that's all the blockers 17:22:29 #topic Open floor 17:22:29 any other business, folks? 17:23:29 adamw: I made fixes for this 17:23:30 I have one, see the "Oh no!" screen in Workstation, similar to what we saw in F34. Initial-setup is run and works fine, system works as expected after running initial-setup 17:23:34 submitted an update and comps PRs 17:23:44 Conan Kudo: what's "this"? 17:23:53 wireplumber-y/pipewire-y issues 17:23:55 Looks like it affects all arches, might be more visible on aarch64 17:24:24 the no session manager by default, nonworking audio, preinstall wireplumber, etc. 17:24:24 pwhal: that's already an FE 17:24:25 pwhalen: it can't be a blocker yet because we didn't actually approve the criterion 17:24:25 this is why i brought it up again last week 17:24:34 ah, ok. I missed it. thanks. 17:24:47 pwhalen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997310 - if that's not what you're talking about, let me know 17:25:56 Conan Kudo: uh. the update for pipewire is from wim. what update did you send? 17:25:57 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b87a167119 17:27:29 that's the one from wim... 17:27:53 neal ninjaed an update in (from -1 to -2) 17:27:58 adamw enforcing=0 makes it run a little faster but the "oh no" screen is still visible briefly 17:28:26 ah, okay. 17:28:27 -2 was just the mass rebuild, though 17:29:08 nope 17:29:09 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipewire/c/173bbb14328adeac9d361f05d38aa26b47d990bb?branch=f35 17:29:09 oh sorry, i'm confusing pipewire and wireplumber builds, duh 17:29:23 but still 17:29:32 the pipewire update makes it suggest wireplumber 17:29:44 but the key issue in this bug is making sure the service for the session manager is enabled by default 17:29:47 whichever session manager is used 17:29:57 wireplumber session manager is enabled by default in fedora-release 17:30:03 the other one isn't 17:30:16 ah, okay. that wasn't mentioned anywhere. 17:30:25 would be helpful to point that out in the bug and/or update notes. 17:30:57 I'll note it in the bZ 17:30:58 *BZ 17:31:26 thanks 17:31:52 i don't think we need both the update and the comps change, do we? 17:31:58 I'm mostly worried about pungi 17:32:05 hence comps update 17:32:05 yeah, was just thinking about that, sigh 17:32:28 i'm trying to remember the ins and outs there 17:32:29 oh, i think the thing it might wind up affecting is silverblue... 17:33:21 lives are built out of Everything these days so it shouldn't affect workstation live, but i think the issue we're both thinking of is when silverblue gets built out of a tree that doesn't have a package that's Suggested 17:33:44 yeah, there's a comps sync thing for silverblue 17:34:26 i figure that'll cover it 17:34:49 ok, we can chew it over more in the pr, i guess. anyhoo, thanks 17:34:54 anything else? 17:37:12 alrighty then, thanks for coming everyone 17:38:12 #endmeeting