14:01:28 #startmeeting fedora-hubs 14:01:28 Meeting started Tue Sep 13 14:01:28 2016 UTC. The chair is sayan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:28 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-hubs' 14:01:38 #topic Roll Call 14:01:40 .hello duffy 14:01:40 mizmo: Something blew up, please try again 14:01:45 .hello devyani7 14:01:46 devyani7: Something blew up, please try again 14:01:47 .hello sayanchowdhury 14:01:49 sayan: Something blew up, please try again 14:01:59 puiterwijk: looks like zodbot isn't happy 14:02:01 :O 14:02:01 .hello a2batic 14:02:02 a2batic: Something blew up, please try again 14:02:04 zodbot, you are kind of blow-uppy today 14:02:08 zodbot goes crazy 14:02:10 pingou: in what fashion? 14:02:15 oh, I see. checking 14:02:17 :) 14:02:39 .hello puiterwijk 14:02:40 puiterwijk: puiterwijk 'Patrick "マルタインアンドレアス" Uiterwijk' 14:02:46 .hello duffy 14:02:47 puiterwijk: duffy 'Máirín Duffy' 14:02:53 .hello sayanchowdhury 14:02:54 puiterwijk: sayanchowdhury 'Sayan Chowdhury' 14:03:06 What are you guys doing to poor zodbot?! 14:03:28 .hello devyani7 14:03:29 devyani7: devyani7 'Devyani Kota' 14:03:31 It was a2batic :) 14:03:36 .unhello puiterwijk 14:03:48 .hello a2batic 14:03:49 a2batic: a2batic 'Kanika Murarka' 14:03:56 #chair mizmo pingou a2batic devyani7 14:03:56 Current chairs: a2batic devyani7 mizmo pingou sayan 14:04:14 I don't think I missed anyone 14:04:22 #topic status updates 14:04:37 * pingou has pretty much no updates on his side :( 14:05:08 devyani7: you want to go first? 14:05:17 sayan, yup, sure 14:05:35 so, I think there is some issue with my branches 14:05:45 the image i showed you last night 14:05:51 devyani7: yes 14:05:59 Can't figure out how to fix them 14:06:03 were you able to fix it? 14:06:15 Apart from that, I want to ask mizmo about 14:06:25 if she has new mockups 14:06:35 since we have a vertical bookmark bar now 14:06:54 where do we want to have the dropdown now? 14:07:25 devyani7, i don't have new mockups - since we're vertical now, i'm thinking instead of a dropdown it's behind a disclosure triangle or that kind of mechanism 14:07:49 devyani7, so we have the primary nav items that are always visible - the ones beyond that can be hidden behind a drawer or whatever that the user can open up to reveal them 14:07:54 um, mizmo: not quite sure 14:08:07 I see, ok 14:08:20 it would be great if you can direct me some example :) 14:08:29 devyani7, something simple like this - http://www.w3schools.com/jquery/jquery_hide_show.asp 14:08:36 "disclosure triangle" 14:08:38 * devyani7 clicks 14:08:50 mizmo: but then should we have a limit on the number elements on the bookmark bar 14:08:53 devyani7, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosure_widget 14:09:15 sayan, yeh it can be the same as when it was horizontal 14:09:21 devyani7, actually facebook has a good example too 14:10:19 they do a little differently though, they have a 'more' link on the list and that brings you to a page that lists out all the items 14:10:24 * devyani7 checks facebook dropdown 14:10:39 yes but incase of horizontal bar, we had more vertical space 14:11:14 mizmo, nod nod 14:12:53 It would not look good to have the bookmark bar bigger than the other widgets 14:12:59 would look odd in that case 14:13:41 um sayan so what do you suggest :/ 14:15:08 I suggest to have a scroll bar maybe with the bookmark bar height getting adjusted based on the other widgets 14:15:19 how does that sound? 14:15:31 sayan, the bookmark bar doesn't live in the same space as the widgets 14:15:37 sayan, so it's not erally competing - it's more the chrome of the site 14:15:43 i don't think it makes sense to scroll the bookmark bar 14:15:46 mizmo, sayan so, maybe we add the 'more' button, and then when someone clicks on that we can givethem a modal window 14:15:53 nested scrollbars = generally a bad idea 14:16:06 mizmo: second that 14:17:01 devyani7, you could do three layers... eg first say 12 bookmarks are visible, beyond that you hit 'more' and you get up to say 36, beyond that you hit a 'view all' and it gives you a modal with a search filter 14:17:35 nice, +1 like facebook^^ 14:17:54 so facebook has just 2 layers 14:17:59 got that ! 14:18:31 sayan, your feedback? 14:19:01 devyani7: in the same modal we can have the rearrange facility too 14:19:03 wfm 14:19:11 yup sure 14:19:37 devyani7: anything from your side? 14:20:07 sayan, that's all I have, i guess :) 14:20:21 a2batic_: want to go next? 14:20:42 sayan, sure 14:21:31 I am working on the commit issue in my PR #255 14:21:56 I will resolve it today so that the PR can be merged 14:22:12 a2batic_: yes, do ping for help 14:22:22 it would be good to merge that soon 14:22:22 sayan, yup 14:22:26 :) 14:22:50 sayan, thats all from my side 14:23:13 mizmo: do you want to go next? 14:23:48 sayan, sure nothing to report tho, i was out sick and some catch up 14:23:53 but if anybody needs anything form me urgently let me know 14:24:24 oh okay 14:24:44 pingou: do you have something to share? 14:25:10 sayan: basically, nope :( 14:26:26 I was busy was fedimg testing last week. 14:27:06 I spent mostly nights working on waartaa 14:27:35 I wrote the login page 14:27:55 but while trying to run the server I failed 14:28:07 seems like webpack configuration is wrong 14:28:40 I spent 4 days on it without much progress. I planned to ping ryan today but I was late :( 14:29:09 So I will be spending next few days fixing that as I only see a gray page 14:29:19 and the jsx files are also not building properly 14:29:48 After the fedimg deployment, I am moving ahead with tahrir deployment so I am looking into packaging and deploying it 14:29:55 14:31:16 #topic Action items from last week 14:31:17 * sayan to review a2batic's karma_pr branch 14:31:19 * sayan to create a gist of meeting widget and create docs for it 14:32:16 a2batic_ commits have some issues 14:32:54 I have reviewed the PR and waiting for a2batic_ to fix the commits 14:33:24 I have not created the gist for meeting widget so reactioning it 14:33:33 #action sayan to create a gist of meeting widget and create docs for it 14:33:55 sayan, yup 14:34:11 mizmo: btw, since alex sent us a example zanata fedmsg message. should we start working on that? 14:34:26 sayan, yeh i think so, thats on the roadmap 14:35:04 how are we on ticket triage? 14:35:44 mizmo: yes, we did some last week and were somewhere in 90's 14:35:56 * sayan looks for the number in the meeting log 14:36:24 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- a2batic commented on pull-request#255 of project "fedora-hubs" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/pull-request/255#comment-9776 14:36:27 so the last issue triaged was #91 14:36:36 should we start again from there? 14:36:40 yeh lets do 14:36:42 #topic ticket triage 14:36:46 oh also 14:36:57 #info we should get working on the zanata stuff using alex's example zanata fedmsg msg 14:37:04 * mizmo wonders if she is a chair 14:37:07 * mizmo kicks zodbot 14:37:26 #chair mizmo 14:37:26 Current chairs: a2batic devyani7 mizmo pingou sayan 14:37:38 i was a chair, zodbot is just being weird i think 14:37:45 :P 14:37:45 ok here's #92 14:37:51 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/92 14:37:54 Start page "wizard" 14:38:37 so this is kind of a design / discussion ticket 14:38:54 i think its ok as is altho i would make it normal not high priority 14:39:05 +1 14:39:20 ill tag it ux discuss too 14:39:25 pagure.issue.tag.added -- duffy tagged ticket fedora-hubs#92: ux discuss https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/92 14:39:26 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#92 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/92 14:39:36 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/93 14:39:39 Produce a special not-signed-in view 14:40:17 this is sort of already part of the design 14:40:21 i dont know if its worth keeping the ticket? 14:40:41 ill put it on normal priority anyway 14:40:52 yes, this can be closed 14:41:35 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#93: "Produce a special not-signed-in view" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/93#comment-6159 14:41:40 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#93: "Produce a special not-signed-in view" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/93#comment-6160 14:41:42 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#93 to: Invalid https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/93 14:41:42 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#93: "Produce a special not-signed-in view" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/93#comment-6161 14:41:58 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/94 14:42:02 Groups overview page 14:42:08 Add a groups page that prioritizes highlighted (common+important) groups, and lists all the rest below (possibly groups groups in groups, including an "etc." group of groups), all with follow and join buttons 14:42:14 i think it's a duplicate of 92 14:42:26 Yeah this might come in the joining flow 14:42:47 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#94: "Groups overview page" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/94#comment-6162 14:42:51 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#94: "Groups overview page" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/94#comment-6164 14:42:52 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#94: "Groups overview page" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/94#comment-6164 14:42:53 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#94 to: Duplicate https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/94 14:43:05 we should add a note to #92 about a feature like this 14:43:05 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/96 14:43:24 sayan, it's already in the mockup in 92 14:43:24 Okay the mockups already have, ignore 14:43:30 +1 14:43:35 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/96 14:43:39 Meetings Widget: Conditional display of Timestamp 14:44:13 im not sure about the status of this, is the PR accepted? 14:44:26 says its merged 14:44:30 do we closed fixed? 14:44:36 yes 14:44:59 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#98: "#halp/help widget: Default in the CommOps Hub" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98#comment-6165 14:44:59 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#98 to: Fixed https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:45:10 wait wht 14:45:12 thats the wrong one 14:45:23 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#98: "#halp/help widget: Default in the CommOps Hub" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98#comment-6166 14:45:24 gah 14:45:24 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#98 to: Open https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:45:38 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#96: "Meetings Widget: Conditional display of Timestamp" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/96#comment-6167 14:45:38 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#96 to: Fixed https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/96 14:45:42 ok fixed it :) 14:45:44 :) 14:45:47 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:45:50 #halp/help widget: Default in the CommOps Hub 14:45:50 Now #98 14:46:02 im working on this one, almost finished with the mockup, then we need a dev to take it 14:46:06 maybe can finish today 14:46:15 pagure.issue.assigned.added -- duffy assigned ticket fedora-hubs#98 to duffy https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:46:26 what do you think about the priority 14:46:34 mizmo: High 14:46:42 ok cool so we'll leave that 14:46:54 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/99 14:46:59 Log out bug 14:47:10 I know akahat was working on this 14:47:14 maybe I can ping him 14:47:24 is the fas name akahat? i can assign to him 14:47:24 change priority to Low 14:47:34 .fas akahat 14:47:34 sayan: takahata 'Masahiro Takahata' - amolkahat 'Amol Kahat' 14:47:42 amolkahat 14:47:53 pagure.issue.assigned.added -- duffy assigned ticket fedora-hubs#99 to amolkahat https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/99 14:47:55 got it 14:47:55 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#99 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/99 14:48:48 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/106 14:48:52 Updating layout/design of github PR widget 14:49:00 this needs a quick mockup ill assign to myself, is high right priority? 14:49:08 Normal for now 14:49:09 pagure.issue.assigned.added -- duffy assigned ticket fedora-hubs#106 to duffy https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/106 14:50:30 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#106 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/106 14:50:36 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/107 14:50:42 A class reference which could help the contributor a lot just by searching for the key word when they are stuck. 14:50:53 thoughts? 14:51:00 I don't get it 14:51:25 Are they referring to fedora classroom? 14:51:54 i think he means classes in programming 14:51:56 like methods 14:52:03 ? 14:52:23 'class refreence' sounds like programming to me o_O 14:52:30 maybe close insufficient? 14:52:33 Yes 14:53:01 Why would someone need 'class reference' in hubs :) 14:53:18 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#107: "Idea : Class Reference" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/107#comment-6168 14:53:25 pagure.issue.comment.added -- duffy commented on ticket fedora-hubs#107: "Idea : Class Reference" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/107#comment-6169 14:53:25 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy set the status of ticket fedora-hubs#107 to: Insufficient data https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/107 14:53:38 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/108 14:53:43 EDU Hub 14:53:49 Low priority for now 14:53:53 priority low for now, we dont have anyone dirving it 14:53:54 lol 14:53:58 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#108 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/108 14:54:11 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:54:15 PEP8 Compatible Code 14:54:35 Easyfix and Low 14:54:54 pagure.issue.comment.added -- sayanchowdhury commented on ticket fedora-hubs#114: "PEP8 Compatible Code" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114#comment-6170 14:54:55 pagure.issue.comment.added -- sayanchowdhury commented on ticket fedora-hubs#114: "PEP8 Compatible Code" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114#comment-6171 14:54:57 pagure.issue.edit -- sayanchowdhury edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#114 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:54:58 pagure.issue.comment.added -- sayanchowdhury commented on ticket fedora-hubs#114: "PEP8 Compatible Code" https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114#comment-6172 14:55:06 pagure.issue.tag.added -- duffy tagged ticket fedora-hubs#98: easyfix https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:55:07 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#98 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:55:36 ^^what just happened? I just clicked once 14:56:03 lol 14:56:36 ugh 14:56:52 pagure.issue.tag.removed -- duffy removed the easyfix tags from ticket fedora-hubs#98 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:56:53 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#98 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/98 14:57:10 pagure.issue.edit -- duffy edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-hubs#114 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:57:17 pagure.issue.tag.added -- duffy tagged ticket fedora-hubs#114: easyfix https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:57:29 pagure.issue.tag.added -- duffy tagged ticket fedora-hubs#114: easy https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:57:30 pagure.issue.tag.removed -- duffy removed the easyfix tags from ticket fedora-hubs#114 https://pagure.io/fedora-hubs/issue/114 14:57:48 ok got it now 14:57:49 all right 14:57:57 i have to go, i have a call in a couple of minutes 14:58:12 is there anything else we should talk about? 14:58:29 sayan here, seems like my client freezed 14:58:32 Nope 14:58:52 mizmo, thanks for the suggestions :) 14:58:59 mizmo: can you go to Open Floor and end this meeting? 14:59:08 * yudocaa goes fixing the client 14:59:11 sure 14:59:15 #topic open floor 14:59:22 #endmeeting