2024-02-28 16:00:32 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !startmeeting Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting
2024-02-28 16:00:33 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2024-02-28 16:00:32 UTC
2024-02-28 16:00:33 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting'
2024-02-28 16:00:45 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Good morning, who's here today?
2024-02-28 16:01:50 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> coremodulehow're you doing? 
2024-02-28 16:03:43 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Doing well! Nothing special today, which is good. how about you?
2024-02-28 16:05:28 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> No complaints. Looks like the two of us today. 
2024-02-28 16:06:01 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Yes, looks that way... I *could* blame the change to Matrix but... lol
2024-02-28 16:06:09 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> let's get started, we can make this short 
2024-02-28 16:06:11 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !info 1) ==== Working Group ====
2024-02-28 16:06:28 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Not much here, som minor edits which we will have to ramp up before Beta 
2024-02-28 16:06:43 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Not much here, someminor edits which we will have to ramp up before Beta 
2024-02-28 16:06:59 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I plan to finish the bug I filed about documenting the release process for IoT soon, certainly before F40 is released
2024-02-28 16:08:22 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Great, thanks for working on that. We'll need to coordinate before Beta 
2024-02-28 16:09:15 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 2) Fedora 39 - Stable
2024-02-28 16:09:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> We broken openqa testing in F39 now too 
2024-02-28 16:09:43 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> We broke openqa testing in F39 now too 
2024-02-28 16:10:09 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !info https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=39&build=Fedora-IoT-39-20240220.1&groupid=1
2024-02-28 16:10:41 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Oof
2024-02-28 16:10:57 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> That was the last tested succesfully. Yesterday - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=39&build=Fedora-IoT-39-20240227.0&groupid=1
2024-02-28 16:12:38 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> For the F39 GA, the ostree remote was moved to /sysroot .. which we didn't really notice at the time, but it caused issues with upgrades to F40, so we had to make a similar change in F39 to fix it up and move it to etc. As a result, the iso openqa tests is broken. 
2024-02-28 16:13:07 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> The other, osbuild produced iso, will work. But the needles dont match what openqa expects
2024-02-28 16:14:08 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> so, we are hoping you can help by adding needles to complete the install.. 
2024-02-28 16:14:22 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> you, being QE
2024-02-28 16:14:45 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> So here - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/2447734#step/_boot_to_anaconda/14
2024-02-28 16:14:55 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> that is what it will like like now
2024-02-28 16:15:55 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> its not what we want, Adam opened an issue about it as well and we plan to fix it, but it would be  great to get testing done on the rest of it for now 
2024-02-28 16:17:02 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Got it. I... will look into it. Is the move to /sysroot intentional, or necessary?
2024-02-28 16:17:54 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> unintentional. We were working on planned changes to the remote, but I don't know how it ended up there. 
2024-02-28 16:18:42 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> I added a script to detect in fix in f40, which we had to pull back into f39
2024-02-28 16:19:03 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> I added a script to detect and fix in f40, which we had to pull back into f39
2024-02-28 16:20:10 <@coremodule:fedora.im> The issue that Adam opened, was it about adding the new needles or fixing the remote location?
2024-02-28 16:20:19 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> coremoduledo you have the ability to add new needles? Or does Adam handle that?
2024-02-28 16:21:21 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> sorry, was looking for it
2024-02-28 16:21:24 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> https://github.com/osbuild/images/issues/309
2024-02-28 16:21:36 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Adam handles that... To be honest, openQA is not something that I ever work on, short of looking at logs to identify that an issue has occurred.
2024-02-28 16:22:49 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I will send this meeting log to him once we finish the meeting and see what he says.
2024-02-28 16:23:52 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Ok, thanks. Let us know, or he can ping in channel. 
2024-02-28 16:24:19 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Okay, I'll start with an email and go from there.
2024-02-28 16:24:22 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Anything else for f39?
2024-02-28 16:24:25 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> thanks
2024-02-28 16:24:44 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 3) Fedora 40 - devel
2024-02-28 16:25:01 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Nothing from me.
2024-02-28 16:25:32 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Same issue, no openqa testing. I've tested the disk images and upgrades a fair amount
2024-02-28 16:26:33 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> So all manual testing here is appreciated. coremoduleif you want to create some wiki pages we can start to gather some results. 
2024-02-28 16:26:56 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Have you done any manual testing of disk images/isos?
2024-02-28 16:27:54 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Will do. I have, just to make sure things boot, but haven't done much in-depth. Well, not as "in-depth" as the test matrix takes us. I'll get a new wiki up and some results posted today.
2024-02-28 16:28:18 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> great, thanks. I will definitely add some results there too and harass others to do the same. 
2024-02-28 16:28:40 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Perfect, that would be good to have others' input too...
2024-02-28 16:30:16 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> in other f40 news, it looks like the aarch64 kernel issues should be behind us soon (issue seems to be a blc limitation, iiuc)
2024-02-28 16:30:29 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> in other f40 news, it looks like the aarch64 kernel issues should be behind us soon (issue seems to be a bls limitation, iiuc)
2024-02-28 16:30:37 <@coremodule:fedora.im> wooo
2024-02-28 16:30:43 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> as dicussed yesterday at the arm meeting 
2024-02-28 16:31:19 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> I think thats all I had for f40, anything else to mention? 
2024-02-28 16:31:39 <@coremodule:fedora.im> No, nothing regarding IoT F40 from me
2024-02-28 16:32:48 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 4) Fedora 41 - Rawhide
2024-02-28 16:33:21 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> I don't really have anything for Rawhide. It works, I've tested upgrades. That's about it 
2024-02-28 16:34:46 <@apiaseck:matrix.org> Hi all! We will start the fedora_coreos_meeting as soon as `Fedora IoT Working Group` meeting is fisnished.
2024-02-28 16:34:47 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Sounds good to me. Once we hit this stage in a new milestone, I kind of disregard rawhide until we're in the clear (as in GO) for the current milestone. At least until we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
2024-02-28 16:35:06 <@apiaseck:matrix.org> How does that sound?
2024-02-28 16:35:09 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> ah, sorry apiaseck
2024-02-28 16:35:21 <@apiaseck:matrix.org> :) NP
2024-02-28 16:35:41 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 5) General Bugs
2024-02-28 16:36:00 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> we can move over to our channel for the rest
2024-02-28 16:36:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> apiaseckapologies, we previous had this slot booked on the IRC, not sure if I need to rebook it elsewhere
2024-02-28 16:36:51 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> apiaseckapologies, we previously had this slot booked on the IRC, not sure if I need to rebook it elsewhere
2024-02-28 16:37:03 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 6) Open Floor
2024-02-28 16:37:13 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Anything else for open floor?
2024-02-28 16:37:17 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Nothing from me!
2024-02-28 16:37:41 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !endmeeting