2024-05-01 14:01:18 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !startmeeting Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting
2024-05-01 14:01:21 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2024-05-01 14:01:18 UTC
2024-05-01 14:01:22 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting'
2024-05-01 14:01:29 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !chair pwhalen pbrobinson coremodule idiez saypaul djachimo miabbott
2024-05-01 14:01:37 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic roll call
2024-05-01 14:01:44 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Who's here today? 
2024-05-01 14:02:50 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Good morning! 
2024-05-01 14:02:53 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !info 1) ==== Working Group ====
2024-05-01 14:03:40 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> We had some new docs added to our Getting started guide... 
2024-05-01 14:03:54 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/fdo-the-process-of-device-onboarding/
2024-05-01 14:05:07 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> site is a bit slow it seems 
2024-05-01 14:05:25 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/booting-the-simplified-provisioner/
2024-05-01 14:06:48 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Be great if folks could go through the docs, try it out, see if you can find any issues. coremodulemight be good to check it out from your perspective, I dont think you've tried these yet. At some point, we can look at new tests in openqa 
2024-05-01 14:07:33 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/creating-an-ignition-configuration-file/
2024-05-01 14:08:24 <@coremodule:fedora.im> Yes, agreed. These are well done. I will make a point to go through each and see if I encounter anything.
2024-05-01 14:09:19 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Agreed! big thanks to mmartinv for working on that documentation! 
2024-05-01 14:10:09 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Anything else for admin? 
2024-05-01 14:10:35 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 2) Fedora 40 - Stable
2024-05-01 14:10:46 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !info OpenQA testing - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=40&build=Fedora-IoT-40-20240501.0&groupid=1&groupid=5
2024-05-01 14:11:17 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> No issues there. 
2024-05-01 14:11:31 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Has anyone had any issues, seen reports elsewhere? 
2024-05-01 14:12:08 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I haven't heard of any issues with IoT.
2024-05-01 14:12:18 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I haven't experienced any either.
2024-05-01 14:13:37 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Anything else for f40? 
2024-05-01 14:14:07 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 3) Fedora 41 - Rawhide
2024-05-01 14:14:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> I dont have anything for Rawhide myself. It exists, but I have not looked at it 
2024-05-01 14:14:57 <@coremodule:fedora.im> 😂 
2024-05-01 14:15:08 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I have not either.
2024-05-01 14:15:31 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=41&build=Fedora-IoT-41-20240422.0&groupid=1@groupid=5
2024-05-01 14:15:39 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> testing looks ok :D 
2024-05-01 14:16:18 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 4) General Bugs
2024-05-01 14:16:39 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> And nothing of note here either. Anyone else? 
2024-05-01 14:18:02 <@miabbott:fedora.im> Eh...not a bug per se, but I just happened to see this post on the Fedora discourse site - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-set-repo-and-branch-in-fedora-iot-images/114812

I think we need additional docs for users building their own Fedora IoT images...maybe additional functionality in `osbuild` for this use case
2024-05-01 14:18:07 <@eliadcohen:matrix.org> What is the simplified provisioner?
2024-05-01 14:19:01 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Micah Abbottwe definitely do! If there isnt an issue for that now, I'll file one 
2024-05-01 14:20:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Eliad Cohen https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedProvisioning
2024-05-01 14:20:56 <@miabbott:fedora.im> !action pwhalen to file issue related to building custom Fedora IoT images with `osbuild`
2024-05-01 14:21:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> its a new tool that can automate installations for iot
2024-05-01 14:22:00 <@eliadcohen:matrix.org> Thanks pwhalen - Do you think it is worth adding a description to what it is in the docs?
2024-05-01 14:22:36 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Eliad Cohenindeed! Definitely an oversight, thanks for pointing it out 
2024-05-01 14:23:22 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !action pwhalen to file an issue to add simplified provisioning description to the docs 
2024-05-01 14:24:35 <@eliadcohen:matrix.org> I'm new to this group so apologies for the very basic questions, where would we be tracking tasks to create such docs? Or, can I find this info in the contrib. guide?
2024-05-01 14:25:12 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> https://github.com/fedora-iot/iot-distro/issues
2024-05-01 14:26:14 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> This lists most of our related projects - https://github.com/fedora-iot
2024-05-01 14:26:39 <@eliadcohen:matrix.org> Thank you thank you!!!
2024-05-01 14:26:42 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !topic 5) Open Floor
2024-05-01 14:27:32 <@miabbott:fedora.im> To Eliad's point, we probably need an SoP for running this meeting and how to handle actions, etc
2024-05-01 14:28:50 <@coremodule:fedora.im> I can take that, I have some personal documentation that I used to use when I ran the IoT meeting.
2024-05-01 14:29:30 <@coremodule:fedora.im> !action coremodule to work on documenting the IoT Meeting SOP.
2024-05-01 14:29:42 <@miabbott:fedora.im> thanks coremodule
2024-05-01 14:29:51 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> Anything else for today?
2024-05-01 14:31:02 <@pwhalen:fedora.im> !endmeeting