15:00:03 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 15:00:03 Meeting started Mon Oct 11 15:00:03 2010 UTC. The chair is jlaska. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:10 #meetingname fedora-qa 15:00:10 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 15:00:14 #topic Gathering ... 15:00:36 * maxamillion is here 15:00:46 iirc adamw is out today ... canadian holiday 15:00:51 hey maxa! 15:00:59 ($boss cancelled my conflicting meeting, so I finally get to attend a QA Meeting!) 15:01:03 * kparal 15:01:04 * jskladan is here :) 15:01:11 * jsmith is travelling back from UTOSC, and will lose internet access shortly 15:01:24 kparal: jskladan: jsmith: greetings all 15:02:07 * jlaska whispers wwoods summoning spell 15:02:11 I am here, I have to multitask though (math lecture:)) 15:02:42 mkrizek_home: oh goodness :) 15:03:10 * adamw is definitely not here 15:03:21 adamw: you should be giving thanks! 15:03:28 given 'em 15:03:30 they were small 15:03:34 * jlaska figures that's just adamwbot responding 15:03:42 *beep* 15:03:42 alright, let's get started 15:03:49 #chair kparal 15:03:49 Current chairs: jlaska kparal 15:04:08 kparal: hopefully no objections, but I may need your help closing out the meeting again 15:04:18 of course 15:04:30 #info agenda available on the list -- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094537.html 15:04:38 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 15:05:11 #info jlaska will ask Hurry whether adding some amount of installer validation or installer bug verification is possible 15:05:29 Hurry and Newgle are back from holiday, and will be jumping into the F-14-Final testing as planned 15:06:05 I'll save the remaining part of the action item for discussion shortly 15:06:21 basically just a ping to the list ot help work down our ON_QA queue and more 15:06:24 that's all I had from last week 15:06:31 anything I missed? 15:06:58 #topic F-14-Final Testing 15:07:28 adamw: I was assuming you'd be out today, but your welcome to talk through this 15:08:46 #info Oct 08 - blocker review meeting held last Friday (see http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-10-08/fedora-bugzappers.2010-10-08-15.59.html) 15:09:05 i was really just hovering in case anything important comes up 15:09:09 okay ... 15:09:14 but yeah, we had the blocker review, we have another next week 15:09:26 we just did a RATS run (right?), and we have TC1 due tomorrow 15:09:34 #info Oct 07 - Fedora 14 RC acceptance test run planned (see rel-eng ticket#4140) 15:09:40 the tc1 on alt.fp.o is pre-tc1? 15:09:52 yeah ... Newgle was out, so I'm collecting results now. I've asked for his help to summarize testing to the list 15:09:56 it was meant to me the acceptance test image 15:09:59 s/me/be/ 15:10:00 fenris02: it's incorrectly named TC1 15:10:06 ok, fair enough. 15:10:21 you're welcome to test it, but there will be a *real* TC1 landing this week 15:10:57 #info I pulled together a query of the MODIFIED and ON_QA F14Blocker and F14-accepted bugs -- http://tinyurl.com/3235yah 15:11:33 For folks looking for a relatively quick way to get involved and help move things forward, validating ON_QA blocker bugs is a good way to get started 15:11:51 also, writing kernel patches 15:12:22 and as adamw notes, we have the scheduled TC1 release validation test run starting this week 15:12:33 #info Oct 12 - F-14-Final TC1 validation starts 15:12:45 adamw: kernel patches, that doesn't strike me as a low barrier to entry :) 15:13:00 pfah, it's easy. they especially love submissions in Microsoft Word format 15:13:32 adamw: be sure to add the text "Reviewed by: awilliam" 15:13:44 okay, anything else on F-14-Final testing? 15:14:05 not that I can think of 15:14:12 Please keep communicating issues and potential bugs to the list 15:14:29 alrighty ... next up ... 15:14:30 #topic F-14 Test Days 15:14:46 * jlaska notes ... just got a message from wwoods ... he's having VPN connection issues 15:15:10 #info Oct 14 - OpenLDAP with NSS - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-10-14_OpenLDAP/NSS 15:15:29 kparal: thanks for sending out a test day announcement ... quite early as well! 15:16:08 I still see a few FIXME's on the test day wiki page 15:16:17 jlaska: the openldap guys wanted to send it even several days earlier :) 15:17:20 the FIXMEs will be hopefully solved soon 15:17:31 anything they need help with? 15:17:51 sounds like they are 'aware' and wiki updates coming soon... 15:17:52 I might help them to create LiveCDs 15:18:03 apart from that they handle everything on their own 15:18:20 alright, thanks for keeping in touch with them 15:18:33 of course, give a holler if you need help creating/hosting images 15:18:45 will do 15:18:52 * jlaska would like to have a positive contribution to hosting test day images this release :) 15:19:01 also to note ... this is our last scheduled test day 15:19:22 if anyone wants to schedule another event, please let us know (fedora-qa ticket or test@ mailing list) 15:19:57 which reminds me, there was a request for a dual-boot test day 15:20:10 I'll re-ping on that topic to see if that would make sense for F-15 (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/135) 15:20:16 #action jlaska - check-in on https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/135 15:20:40 #topic AutoQA package acceptance update 15:20:51 kparal guide us through the autoqa wilderness please! 15:21:32 ok, so, there were a few new patches in autoqa last week 15:21:53 the email results should now contain a traceback in case the test case crashed 15:22:10 we now catch errors even in setup() method 15:22:15 #info Email test results now include detailed traceback 15:22:31 jlaska helped to update some documentation 15:22:47 kparal: there were 2 more outsanding docs tickets 15:22:53 I think I'd need some guidance on those 15:23:09 and there will be more tickets soon, that's for sure :) 15:23:10 #link https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=Outdated+documentation 15:23:25 kparal: heh, c'mon ... documentation is self-updating :P 15:23:29 but now, we have a milestone for outdated documentation, an idea of jskladan 15:24:06 wwoods: you're here now? 15:24:26 wwoods: I don't want to post your updates, if you're really here :) 15:24:32 * jlaska suspects he's behind a steering wheel at the moment ... heading into the office at a high rate of speed 15:25:11 ok, so wwoods posted a first blogpost of his highly desired 'depcheck series': http://qa-rockstar.livejournal.com/10187.html 15:25:26 more to come, he says 15:25:28 maxamillion this topic is meant as a check-in for how AutoQA is progressing towards automating the package update acceptance plan (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan) 15:25:43 #link http://qa-rockstar.livejournal.com/10187.html 15:25:50 kparal: I just saw part#2 hit the planet a moment ago 15:25:57 great! 15:26:04 #link http://qa-rockstar.livejournal.com/10368.html 15:26:04 jlaska: ah! thanks :D 15:26:21 the current plan is to make depcheck post karma comments to bodhi 15:26:33 expect this in the following weeks 15:26:44 oooo 15:26:47 that'd be cool 15:26:52 and jskladan has some more updates, let's hear him: 15:27:07 * jlaska imagines kparal handing the microphone off to jskladan 15:27:21 #info the current plan is to make depcheck post karma comments to bodhi 15:27:24 ok, so i've done some research on the turbogears2 front, and created simple proof-of-concept 'generic frontend' which can show results of testplans, if given metadata in proper format 15:27:29 * jskladan searching for the mail 15:27:39 jskladan: oooh, goodie! 15:28:04 this thread: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2010-September/001187.html 15:28:25 so basically, you can specify a structure of the testplan like this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Sandbox:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan_Metadata 15:28:58 and if resultsdb has the required data, it can show the results 15:29:13 (beware, this is ugly!) http://test1185.test.redhat.com:8080/?envr=openssh-5.4p1-3.fc13 15:29:23 jskladan: can you screenshot that? 15:29:32 jskladan: that appears to be inside the firewall 15:29:39 jskladan: since not everyone can see on the .redhat.com network 15:29:43 gimme a moment :) 15:29:45 jlaska: +1 15:31:05 while jskladan is screenshot'ing ... just to note something that didn't make sense to me initially, but jskladan cleared it up 15:31:32 http://jskladan.fedorapeople.org/ResultsDB%20Package%20Acceptance%20Test%20Plan.html 15:31:32 the wiki structure posted earlier (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Sandbox:Package_Update_Acceptance_Test_Plan_Metadata) allows anyone to define how autoqa test results will be grouped and organized for a particular test plan 15:31:46 jskladan: thanks! 15:32:16 jskladan: ah, very cool 15:32:21 yes, so if you had an access to the internal site (shame on me), you could play around with that metadata 15:32:22 jskladan: that shows a lot of possibilities 15:32:53 * wwoods here, reading scrollback 15:33:00 wwoods: hey! 15:33:06 jskladan: so ... question, where is the code that performs the test that produces that output? (or is that output generated off resultsdb?) 15:33:35 for example, if you'd remove the rpmlint from 'mandatory' group, it would disappear from the frontend... same for the 'group results' etc. 15:33:57 maxamillion: not really sure about your question 15:34:18 jskladan: did I word it badly? (I'm really good at that) 15:35:00 maxamillion: do you want to know "what creates the webpage" or "what provides the results shown on that page"? 15:35:31 jskladan: what provides the results shown on that page? 15:35:41 the results will be stored in the resultsdb automagically right from the autoqa 15:35:48 ah, ok 15:35:52 good stuff :) 15:36:19 (the changes are in the jskladan branch of autqa git, mmnt) 15:36:44 http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=autoqa.git;a=commit;h=46b4019b7608a7947bbda27c0219b67698985841 15:36:47 basically this 15:37:07 how do you guys want to handle that code? Should we hold off until merging until after depcheck is completed? 15:37:11 or before? 15:37:14 maxamillion: so autoqa tests report to resultsdb, and then we have test plan metadata that says "show results for these tests: [...]" 15:37:27 wwoods: exactly 15:37:41 and an autoqa *frontend* will read that metadata, pull the appropriate results out of resultsdb, and show them to you 15:38:02 wwoods: maxamillion: and that ugly web page is supposed to be that frontend 15:38:18 ah, ok 15:38:19 (will be nicer, though - i'm no web designer :-/) 15:38:20 makes sense now 15:38:33 heh! yep - it'll be pretty later, but making it show the right data is the first goal 15:38:38 * jlaska pretty jazzed by the wiki metadata potential 15:38:50 wwoods: jlaska: thanks for helpimg me out with the description of this magic :) 15:39:00 jskladan: i'm still learning! 15:39:35 kparal: I'm behind on the thread, but there is also an active discussion around improving rpmlint? 15:40:08 jlaska: there is so active discussion that right now there are 2 new messages even I haven't still read :) 15:40:47 kparal: the discussion is around a method to allow maintainers to whitelist/ignore specific rpmlint test results 15:40:49 basically we're discussing possible ways how to store config file defining rpmlint output whitelist 15:40:50 ? 15:40:55 better phrased, thanks 15:41:18 and I'm continuously learning from that discussion 15:41:41 oh, 3 new messages 15:41:43 +1 :) 15:42:01 alright, what else on the autoqa front? 15:42:11 jskladan: heh no problem - the design is a little complicated (and pretty clever, I think) so we might want a blog post or two to explain it, someday soon 15:42:23 jskladan: feeling bloggy? :) 15:42:28 jlaska: I think we have covered almost everything 15:42:37 kparal: okay ... 15:43:03 jlaska: not really :-D 15:43:13 oh, kparal, you mentioned you were planning to look into creating a depcheck wiki test case once wwoods posted all the depcheck blogs, anything else to add there? 15:43:29 jlaska: i can try to work something out, though 15:43:29 jskladan: it's tough to find the focus to crank those out 15:43:46 jlaska: nothing right now 15:43:55 but i'll need some corrections an re-wordings from native speaker, heheh :) 15:43:56 wwoods: btw ... nice posts, very imformative 15:44:22 alright, thanks all ... moving on 15:44:42 I had a topic from last week on the list still ... 15:44:44 #topic F-14-NTH (Nice to have) proposal status 15:44:56 Not sure if there is anything new on this front 15:45:16 I suspect the wiki pages will move out of draft coming soon 15:45:25 not sure if adamw plans to complete this before or after release 15:45:53 stay tuned to the list for follow-up 15:46:04 alright, everyone's favorite topic ... 15:46:06 #topic Open discussion 15:46:09 i was planning to do it friday 15:46:13 ran out of time though 15:46:24 adamw: 4+ hour meetings will do that to your day 15:46:47 heh 15:47:31 Meetbot is hungry and wants your 15:47:34 feed it 15:47:51 * jlaska makes sure he spelled meetbot, not meatbot 15:48:04 we'll close things out in 2 mins 15:48:10 tick tock tick tock ... 15:49:56 10 seconds ... 15:50:03 5 seconds ... 15:50:13 thanks all, have a great day 15:50:20 good luck with continued F-14-Final testing! 15:50:22 #endmeeting