#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:06 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (adamw, 15:00:14)
- previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:03:39)
- "adamw to bug j_dulaney to bug Sugar test day
folks" - I did that, the page got lots of nice test cases, and much
fun was had by all. (adamw,
15:04:14)
- Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review (adamw, 15:05:25)
- Beta RC1 was built Friday afternoon and now
needs testing (adamw,
15:06:06)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804514 (adamw, 15:22:09)
- AGREED: #804514 is a
blocker per the criterion about a 'basic video' install option being
present and the one about installs that are done according to the
other criteria booting to a functional desktop (adamw,
15:28:34)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806749 (adamw, 15:29:04)
- AGREED: 806749 is
accepted as a blocker per alpha criterion "The installer must be
able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options".
note kparal reports not seeing this bug, so we should compare
notes (adamw,
15:35:47)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806708 (adamw, 15:36:18)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804813
was the previous bug (adamw,
15:37:34)
- AGREED: #806708 is a
blocker per alpha criterion "The installer must be able to use the
HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options", needs more
info (adamw,
15:41:22)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806931 (adamw, 15:42:03)
- AGREED: we need to
know if 806931 affects non virt-install cases to determine blocker
status - punt until next meeting (adamw,
15:50:32)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805166 (adamw, 15:50:50)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Options#method
(wwoods,
16:12:26)
- ACTION: kparal to
propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced
from one repo, packages from internet repos) (adamw,
16:18:12)
- ACTION: wwoods to
ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed
to be capable of (adamw,
16:18:17)
- AGREED: 805166 is not
a blocker per anaconda team's statement that using root= in this way
is not supported or expected to work (adamw,
16:18:22)
- http://www.math.vt.edu/people/jbwillia/computer.gif
(j_dulaney,
16:18:47)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806962 (adamw, 16:19:32)
- AGREED: 806962 is a
blocker per criterion "The installer must boot (if appropriate) and
run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types
that are common on those architectures, from default live image,
DVD, and boot.iso install media", in the case of DVD or boot.iso
written to USB with l-i-t-d (adamw,
16:29:31)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806867 (adamw, 16:31:01)
- AGREED: 806931 is a
blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able to
successfully complete an upgrade installation from a clean, fully
updated default installation (from any official install medium) of
the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by
booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must meet all
release criteria" (adamw,
16:35:20)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806931 (redux) (adamw, 16:35:35)
- AGREED: 806931 is
accepted as a blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able
to use all kickstart delivery methods" (adamw,
16:37:44)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806784 (adamw, 16:37:56)
- AGREED: 806784 is a
blocker per criterion "The installer must be able to create and
install to software, hardware or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5
partitions for anything except /boot" (adamw,
16:43:23)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806466 (adamw, 16:43:40)
- AGREED: 806466 is
rejected as blocker but accepted as NTH (not serious enough to break
any criteria) (adamw,
16:47:03)
- AGREED: 806664 is
accepted as NTH while we're at it (both make ootb network behaviour
somewhat icky) (adamw,
16:47:54)
- Beta blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804522 (adamw, 16:48:12)
- AGREED: 804522 is a
blocker per beta criterion "The installer must be able to create and
install to software, hardware or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5
partitions for anything except /boot" (adamw,
16:49:25)
- AGREED: agenda item
"'Project' status" is tabled until next week due to lack of time and
rapidly decreasing will to live (adamw,
16:50:49)
- Test Day report (adamw, 16:51:02)
- Sugar test day had low turnout - only satellit_
and cerlyn - but they achieved an impressive amount of
testing (adamw,
16:52:20)
- j_dulaney also tested but has not yet filed
results (adamw,
16:52:27)
- upcoming QA events (adamw, 16:53:06)
- kdump and software rendering test days set for
tuesday and thursday, both need some more prep but look to be
broadly in hand (adamw,
16:55:19)
- go/no-go is wednesday (schedule) and release
readiness is thursday (adamw,
16:55:29)
- autoqa update (adamw, 16:55:48)
- the AutoQA news is, there is no news (for time
reasons) (adamw,
16:57:01)
- open floor (adamw, 16:57:13)
Meeting ended at 16:59:58 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos)
- wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of
Action items, by person
- kparal
- kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos)
- wwoods
- wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of
People present (lines said)
- adamw (269)
- tflink (78)
- kparal (71)
- j_dulaney (57)
- bcl (30)
- twu (27)
- wwoods (21)
- brunowolff (15)
- pschindl (11)
- zodbot (6)
- rbergeron (4)
- mkrizek (4)
- jskladan (3)
- Cerlyn (3)
- maxamillion (3)
- satellit_laptop (1)
- mmaslano (1)
- rmarko (1)
- Viking-Ice (1)
- limburgher (1)
- nirik (1)
- Southern_Gentlem (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.