#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting

Meeting summary

1. roll call (adamw, 15:03:43)
   
2. previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:05:41)
   1. pschindl followed up on Boxes test day, event was not prepared in time so was pushed out another week, needs checking up again (adamw, 15:08:19)
   2. ACTION: adamw to check in on Boxes test day once more (adamw, 15:08:29)
   
   
3. Fedora 17 Final status/planning (adamw, 15:08:38)
   
4. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819563 (adamw, 15:13:41)
   1. AGREED: need more info to determine state of 819563 (adamw, 15:23:07)
   
   
5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819371 (adamw, 15:23:15)
   1. AGREED: - 819371 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F17 final release criterion: "All applications listed under the Applications menu or category must withstand a basic functionality test and not crash after a few minutes of normal use" (tflink, 15:26:46)
   
   
6. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819140 (adamw, 15:27:25)
   1. AGREED: 819140 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" (adamw, 15:29:46)
   
   
7. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819139 (adamw, 15:30:16)
   1. AGREED: 819139 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" (adamw, 15:30:58)
   
   
8. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819138 (adamw, 15:31:04)
   1. AGREED: 819138 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" (adamw, 15:31:53)
   
   
9. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818935 (adamw, 15:33:34)
   1. AGREED: 818935 is rejected as a blocker as it is fixable with an update and seems to occur very infrequently, some testers have never seen it (adamw, 15:44:06)
   
   
10. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819492 (adamw, 15:44:33)
    1. AGREED: 819492 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "All known bugs that can cause corruption of user data must be fixed or documented at Common F17 bugs" (adamw, 15:47:21)
    
    
11. Mini blocker review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818378 (adamw, 15:47:33)
    1. AGREED: 818378 is a blocker per criterion "In most cases (see Blocker_Bug_FAQ), a system installed according to any of the above criteria (or the appropriate Beta or Final criteria, when applying this criterion to those releases) must boot to the 'firstboot' utility on the first boot after installation, without unintended user intervention, unless the user explicitly chooses to boot in non-graphical mode." - this breaks 32-bit install (adamw, 15:56:30)
    
    
12. Fedora 17 Final status/planning (adamw, 15:56:59)
    1. tflink is planning a 'bugs that need re-testing' summary (adamw, 15:57:11)
    2. we still need to complete the TC3 matrix to find any other lurking blockers, no point waiting till the RC (adamw, 15:59:08)
    
    
13. Upcoming QA events (adamw, 16:04:46)
    
14. AutoQA update (adamw, 16:14:41)
    1. there is no news, autoqa team has been working on F17 validation (adamw, 16:14:50)
    
    
15. open floor (adamw, 16:14:56)

Action items

1. adamw to check in on Boxes test day once more

Action items, by person

1. adamw
   1. adamw to check in on Boxes test day once more

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (130)
2. tflink (65)
3. kparal (33)
4. pschindl (16)
5. akshayvyas (13)
6. zodbot (5)
7. mkrizek (4)
8. satellit_ (4)
9. Cerlyn (1)
10. robatino (1)