16:01:47 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 16:01:47 Meeting started Mon Dec 21 16:01:47 2015 UTC. The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:47 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 16:01:50 #meetingname fedora-qa 16:01:50 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 16:01:55 #topic Roll call 16:02:08 ahoyhoy folks, who's around for (probably) the last qa meeting of the year? 16:02:08 * tflink is present 16:02:32 * satellit listening 16:04:08 anyone else? 16:04:16 * adamw wonders if the entire brno office is lying in a gutter somewhere 16:05:13 * satellit looked at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151219_Installation#Default_boot_and_install 16:05:56 adamw: all the folks but one from our team are out until the 4th, I think 16:06:11 * roshi is here 16:06:20 damnit, they're all fired 16:06:28 we don't believe in holidays, only bugs 16:06:37 .fire everyone 16:06:37 adamw fires everyone 16:06:54 and adamw is now left to do the entirety of fedora on his own :) 16:07:07 no, i fired myself too ;) 16:07:16 clever :) 16:07:25 lol 16:07:56 alrighty then, guess we can plow through 16:08:00 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 16:08:06 er, scuse me while i make this up on the fly... 16:08:34 you have been scused 16:09:01 #info "adamw to come up with draft wiki changes and blockerbugs patch for new blocker handling, using Accepted0Day and AcceptedPreviousRelease as the new magic words" - I did that, the blockerbugs patch is still being reviewed 16:09:10 i think that's all we had by way of action items, anything else to follow up on? 16:10:27 * roshi has nothing 16:10:39 okey dokey then 16:10:42 * satellit nothing here 16:10:52 #topic Fedora 24 status + planning 16:11:09 so i just threw this in as a kind of catch-all sync up topic 16:12:05 the Change process is still open, so F24 planning itself isn't complete yet, but we do have some stuff we know about coming down the pipe, i guess 16:12:37 seems that Cloud WG is intent on using networkd as the default network management thing in cloud images for 24 16:13:08 * roshi grumbles 16:13:26 I'm still looking, but has a testing plan come out of that yet? 16:13:34 nope 16:13:35 complete with testcases and whatnot? 16:13:43 not that I saw 16:13:44 aside from the 'oh there's this one guy who uses it and it works fine, everything's gonna be fine' no. 16:13:47 that's what I thought 16:14:18 the thing is, i suspect that even if we do come up with a test plan we might find it all works, because i'm guessing the basic stuff in networkd that you could test by just running a few instances and poking around will be fine 16:14:27 if anything i'm guessing there'll be subtler bugs of the kind you really only hit in regular use 16:14:36 but trying to get out in front of it would be nice of course... 16:14:51 * roshi wishes we'd just go ahead and get Wayland merged with systemd and we can be done testing everything since it'll all be systemd 16:14:58 unfortunately i'm not sure me or tflink can take another big action item atm :/ 16:15:04 yeah 16:15:22 the systemd-wayland industrial complex 16:15:57 then it'll be World Flame War N for which DE gets subsumed 16:16:10 * satellit be nice to have opt out from wayland in installer 16:16:11 16:16:22 satellit: the wayland stuff still seems pretty up in the air at this point 16:16:31 k 16:16:35 i suspect we'll get a clearer picture of how it's going to end up some time around beta 16:16:51 there is of course wayland too, yeah. lots of big ticket stuff coming. 16:16:54 sounds about right 16:17:00 i suppose we can at least run test days for all this stuff 16:17:09 okay, let's see: 16:17:25 #info cloud WG seems to be planning to use networkd as default for all/some cloud images for F24 16:17:32 all the more reason not to rely on the official cloud images for taskotron's dispoable clients, i guess 16:18:01 true 16:18:09 #info Wayland situation is still fluid but we need to at least work on the basis it may become default for F24 16:19:19 another thing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pungi_Refactor 16:19:35 i didn't realize dennis had actually filed a change for it, but yeah, there's big change coming on the compose front 16:20:01 they're working to switch nightly composes over to the new pungi, which would give us a rather different output (i.e. we'd get product-ized images and more of 'em, more like a TC) 16:20:04 yeah, that's gonna be big but it'll be helpful 16:20:16 will livecd-tools remain for remixes? 16:20:25 i think so 16:20:40 i don't think the new pungi can do lives 16:20:47 k 16:20:48 satellit: i think livemedia-creator taking over from livecd-tools is kind of a separate thing from this 16:20:48 right 16:21:04 it's still on the agenda, but last I heard, dgilmore was rather unhappy with current lmc (still) 16:21:34 #info major changes coming to the compose process (new pungi): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pungi_Refactor 16:21:37 adamw: we have some meetings setup for the new year 16:21:41 cool 16:22:03 satellit: lived-creator will be removed 16:22:12 livecd-creator 16:22:28 satellit: remixes will need to use livemedia-creator 16:22:32 satellit makes a point, though - whenever we actually do switch to lmc, there should probably be some reasonable amount of communication for people who currently use litd for doing remixes etc. 16:22:49 and it'd be good to ensure we're covering their needs before ditching livecd-tools... 16:22:50 the kikstarts shipped by fedora will not work with livecd-creator 16:22:59 adamw: litd? don't you mean livecd-creator? 16:23:01 ugh... hope lmc instructions will be simple to use 16:23:03 tflink: i do, sorry 16:23:10 adamw: that is a big part of why we made a change for it 16:23:19 to ensure that the communication happens 16:23:23 dgilmore: there's a change for lmc too? or is it considered part of the 'pungi refactor'? 16:23:36 adamw: there is a seperate one for lmc 16:23:54 adamw: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LivemediaCreator 16:24:04 cool, thanks 16:24:13 so that looks like it's under control, great. 16:24:41 #info livecd-creator replacement with live media creator is also in progress: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LivemediaCreator 16:25:22 there's also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service , which gives us yet more deliverables, i guess 16:25:50 for some reason, i didn't think that was coming into full swing until F25-ish 16:25:59 that -> layered docker images 16:26:16 tflink: getting the tooling up and working 16:26:25 ^^ that 16:26:57 tflink: right now the only deliverable I know of will be the cockpit layered image that someone did outside of fedora and claims as official because atomic needs it 16:27:09 tflink: well, it got an email for F24.. 16:27:34 yeah, i'm thinking of the automation discussion, i guess 16:27:41 it would be nice if the change actually specified the expected deliverable(s) and some kind of plan/responsibility assignment for testing them 16:27:47 i guess i'll take an action item to follow up on that 16:27:59 adamw: this change really is just about the tooling 16:28:13 and getting a heads up out there that we can do things 16:28:40 dgilmore: well, i'm just going by the book, i.e. what the page says: "#action adamw to raise deliverables/testing concerns re Layered Docker Image change" 16:28:43 grrr. 16:28:44 "This change will deploy the build service to support building and delivering a set of layered Docker images, and will enable Fedora contributors to create and maintain Dockerfiles from which those images will be generated." 16:28:58 so i at least would like the Change itself to say what you're saying here :) 16:29:46 adamw: both are true, we are not anticipating any layered images other than cockpit in f24 timeframe 16:29:58 dgilmore: i just want that last part to actually be quantified 16:30:06 right now it's entirely open ended, so far as what's officially written down goes 16:30:29 alrighty, anyone got any more scary change to frighten us with? 16:31:24 okay, that took longer than expected, so let's roll on... 16:31:36 #topic Non-media blocker status update 16:31:55 so I already mentioned this briefly: the wiki changes are in place which means that from now on, we can accept blockers in the new categories 16:32:36 stats-bugzilla should be able to handle them already, and the patch for blockerbugs is in review; does anyone know of anything else we'd need to do? I can't think of anything much 16:32:40 adamw: I can come up with scary things if you want :D 16:32:48 maybe I should write an email to devel@ explaining the change 16:32:51 * adamw sits on dgilmore 16:33:20 adamw: what is the wiki page>? 16:34:01 dgilmore: it falls into the blocker bug process page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - and the blocker review meeting page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting 16:34:15 look at the recent changes or just search for 'Accepted0Day' and 'AcceptedPreviousRelease' 16:35:03 adamw: okay 16:35:26 alrighty then, sounds like that one's more or less done, we'll see how it works out once we actually need to use the new tags 16:35:45 #info wiki changes are done, stats-bugzilla change is done, blockerbugs change is under review, nothing else is known to be needed 16:35:53 #topic Two release upgrades 16:36:11 so i was hoping kparal would be around, but he's not; i guess we're too short-handed to take a vote on the criterion today 16:36:49 not sure if there's anything else we can do here - anyone have any notes on this? (the proposal to have the release criteria require upgrades from the last two stable releases work, rather than only the most recent one) 16:37:32 not much from me, it sounds like a good plan 16:37:49 yeah, i'm +1 too, but i guess we'll knock it off in the new year 16:37:57 alrighty then 16:38:00 #topic Open floor 16:38:11 program note: i plan to hit up the proposed blocker(s) after this 16:38:31 so, anyone got anything else? 16:38:37 bottles of whisky for me? :) 16:39:21 * satellit have to go out.... 16:39:36 alrighty, thanks for coming satellit 16:39:39 happy holidays :) 16:39:44 and thanks for testing as always 16:39:54 : ) 16:40:31 * roshi has nothing 16:42:13 alrighty, let's do some mini blocker review 16:42:21 whee! 16:42:26 #topic Mini Blocker Review 16:42:40 #info we're going to do some blocker review, yadda yadda https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting , I think everyone here knows the drill 16:43:07 #topic (1281675) [gnome-shell] gnome-terminal fails to start up: GDBus.Error:org.freedeskt op.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited 16:43:07 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281675 16:43:07 #info Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, ASSIGNED 16:43:17 so more and more people seem to be hitting this now 16:43:29 the GNOME folks don't seem to have a clear idea of what's going on yet 16:43:40 it's an odd bug, but i'm +1 given that it doesn't seem to be some really rare thing 16:45:00 +1 16:45:24 tflink? 16:45:27 dgilmore? 16:46:52 am I understanding this right? in order to hit it, you have to logout, login with X, logout and log back in with wayland? 16:47:06 or is that just the one reproducer 16:48:01 no 16:48:01 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281675#c8 16:48:12 also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281675#c14 16:48:24 in that case, +1 16:48:28 and cmurf's email from yesterday 16:49:41 proposed #agreed 1281675 - AcceptedBlocker (Alpha) - seems to violate https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Required_applications , at least for several reporters 16:49:46 hmm 16:50:08 proposed #agreed 1281675 - AcceptedBlocker (Alpha) - seems to violate "It must be possible to run the default web browser and a terminal application from all release-blocking desktop environments", for several reporters 16:50:12 i suck at pasting today. 16:50:16 ack 16:51:36 roshi, dgilmore? 16:52:27 ack 16:52:34 #agreed 1281675 - AcceptedBlocker (Alpha) - seems to violate "It must be possible to run the default web browser and a terminal application from all release-blocking desktop environments", for several reporters 16:52:53 ok, that looks like it - no proposed for beta or final 16:53:01 whee! 16:53:03 don't think there's anything we can say about the one acceptedblocker for alpha 16:53:10 #topic Son of open floor 16:53:22 last call for open floor :) 16:54:07 * roshi has nothing 16:54:18 me neither 16:54:35 allllrighty folks 16:54:44 everyone enjoy the shutdown 16:55:01 and if i disappear in a couple of hours i am definitely working on important things and absolutely *not* going to see star wars 16:55:19 * adamw sets fuse 16:56:42 adamw: sounds better than why I'll be disappearing shortly 16:57:00 why's that? 16:57:03 dentist 16:57:29 aw, the dentist's always fun 16:57:37 you get to watch muted hgtv on a ceiling tv! what's not fun about that 16:58:01 the drilling 16:58:03 i don't think the tv has ever been on when I went to the dentist 16:58:08 and the muffled screams of your co-captors 16:58:15 huh, you need to get yourself a dentist with a ceiling tv, man 16:58:19 actually, i think the lidocane is one of the worst parts 16:58:35 "do you have a ceiling tv?" "No." *walks out* 16:58:47 they have tv, they've just always been off 16:59:54 wow, that's even worse 17:00:07 it's like 'look, see? we could be distracting you but instead we will make you focus on your pain' 17:00:46 there's always attempted conversation 17:00:59 mmbl mmbl mmbl ARGH 17:01:01 "how has your day been?" "mmfh mfmmm" 17:01:12 :) 17:01:16 alrighty, thanks again everyone, see you and your hangovers in the new year 17:01:19 #endmeeting