15:00:34 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 15:00:35 Meeting started Mon Jun 27 15:00:34 2022 UTC. 15:00:35 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:35 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 15:00:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:35 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 15:00:40 #meetingname fedora-qa 15:00:40 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 15:00:45 #topic Roll Call 15:01:06 Here 15:01:09 .hello 15:01:09 tflink[m]: (hello ) -- Alias for "hellomynameis $1". 15:01:30 morning morning 15:01:40 .hello tflink 15:01:41 tflink[m]: tflink 'Tim Flink' 15:02:44 .hello lruzicka 15:02:45 lruzicka_: lruzicka 'Lukáš Růžička' 15:03:31 .hello2 15:03:32 coremodule: coremodule 'Geoffrey Marr' 15:04:00 afternoons 15:04:15 middays 15:04:31 * kparal won't attend today, sorry 15:04:53 morning is the only acceptable answer 15:05:04 if it's not morning your sun is broken 15:05:16 adamw: Morning :) 15:05:17 very good! 15:05:26 I'm on my 3rd cup of coffee, if we're still calling it "morning", I may have to admin it's a problem 15:05:30 how's everyone doing? 15:05:31 doing quite fine :) 15:06:03 ok 15:06:10 doing alright! 15:06:59 I'm fine, thanks 15:11:31 alllrighty 15:11:32 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 15:11:54 "lruzicka to add question about exact required automated test coverage for desktop apps to one of the ongoing discussions with desktop team (mailing list or ticket)" - did you do that, lruzicka? 15:13:59 I forgot to do it, sorry. 15:14:24 I will do it asap. 15:14:40 okey dokey, we'll add it back 15:15:04 #info "lruzicka to add question about exact required automated test coverage for desktop apps to one of the ongoing discussions with desktop team (mailing list or ticket)" - this was forgotten, we'll add it back 15:15:10 #action lruzicka to add question about exact required automated test coverage for desktop apps to one of the ongoing discussions with desktop team (mailing list or ticket) 15:15:19 #topic Fedora 37 check-in 15:17:34 #info Python 3.11 has been merged into rawhide, mostly successfully 15:17:41 #info Rawhide is composing and mostly passing openQA tests at the moment 15:18:16 #info the x86_64 netinst images are oversize, i'll be looking into that this week 15:19:34 #info branch is approaching on Augst 9th 15:19:41 anything else on rawhide/f37? 15:22:16 i guess not! 15:22:21 #topic Test Day / community event status 15:23:53 it looks like we're still trying to pin down the details for the next onboarding event 15:25:23 and some test days are in the works but no dates yet 15:25:24 anyone know anything else? 15:26:54 I don't 15:27:07 I don't 15:27:10 I'm curious if anyone has played with Kiwi for test cases 15:27:20 not yet 15:27:33 we've got open floor next, so let's switch to that... 15:27:34 #topic Open floor 15:27:58 I'm curious if anyone has played with Kiwi for test cases 15:28:00 :D 15:28:17 tflink set it up, if you want access, you can ask him to set you up with it (if you haven't already) 15:28:33 I played with the instance a few months ago 15:28:37 #info tflink has posted details on a demo instance of Kiwi as a potential alternative to 'wikitcms': https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B4XLKXQF2VNENSESWJGRHIYALOKSI6EQ/ and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3YJYN7HT4B44W37S7HHNC44IDEEP47B7/ 15:28:39 nielsenb: not yet tbh 15:28:41 you can message him for access if you want to play with it 15:28:59 I was going to, but this is the first time I've had to sit in front of a computer and think about Fedora for more than 30s in a couple of months 15:29:05 y'all beat me to it. I was going to mention the TCMS discussion 15:31:02 nielsenb: heh. i don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing? 15:31:51 A little of both 15:35:14 I guess my one thought on Kiwi without having played with it yet, is that it feels a bit like replacing one "only used by Fedora QA" tool with another "only used by Fedora QA" tool 15:35:44 I realize Kiwi is used by other projects, but from a "use within Fedora" standpoint 15:37:21 yeah, there is an element of that. unfortunately, there isn't really a tool that more than one distro uses for managing test cases 15:38:01 and there's no part of Fedora other than QA which really handles test cases 15:38:14 so, we're a bit sort of inherently stuck out on a limb :| that's why this has been one of those areas we constantly keep coming back to, because there's no obvious choice 15:38:28 and the thing we have now is very silly but works surprisingly well 15:39:02 I agree, and relval is a decently user friendly way of abstracting away a lot of the silliness 15:39:12 yeah, pretty much. it sounds like a really dumb idea until you get into the details, realize there isn't a good solution and it works pretty well for what we need 15:43:26 so, yeah, there's that, please do poke around with it and see what you think if you're interested 15:43:49 and of course i'd be happy to take any improvements to the relval CLI stuff if anyone wants to work on that. you can work on making the CLI interface a bit better without actually having to deal with any/much of the wiki craziness, i think 15:44:32 one thing i always want myself but have been too lazy to write (because you'd have to rearrange things a bit) is a 'go back' option, for when you picked the wrong page section or whatever... 15:44:51 Yeah, that is probably my biggest complaint with it 15:47:13 anyway, the code for it is at https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relval/blob/main/f/relval/report_results.py . be kind, i wrote it a long time ago and i'm not proud. :D it also doesn't have any tests, sadly. 15:48:23 Have you considered reimplementing in Rust? Maybe as a fun weekend project? :D 15:48:47 .fire nielsenb no 15:48:47 adamw fires nielsenb no 15:49:15 ...vala...? *ducks* 15:49:40 oh a QA meeting is happening :P 15:51:13 i need a bigger cannon 15:51:26 i could rewrite it in perl, that'd help with contributions! 15:51:35 everyone loves perl, right? 15:51:50 adamw: The answer must be YES:) 15:51:53 sure, there are like 1000 people waiting to join 15:52:08 only Python prevented them to do so 15:54:15 sounds like we're about all done here, right? anyone got any other burning concerns? 15:54:46 we 15:54:47 are done from my side :) 15:54:53 I don't 15:55:10 not at the moment 15:58:42 alrighty, thanks for coming everyone 15:58:48 #endmeeting