15:05:55 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 15:05:56 Meeting started Mon May 15 15:05:55 2023 UTC. 15:05:56 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:05:56 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 15:05:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:05:56 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 15:06:04 it works! 15:06:09 #meetingname fedora-qa 15:06:09 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 15:06:14 #topic Roll Call 15:06:20 ahoyhoy, who's around for qa meeting fun? 15:06:22 .hello krakonos 15:06:23 lruzicka: Sorry, but user 'krakonos' does not exist 15:06:44 .hello everybody 15:06:45 lruzicka: Sorry, but user 'everybody' does not exist 15:07:04 .hello some-of-you? 15:07:05 lruzicka: Sorry, but user 'some-of-you?' does not exist 15:07:27 * kparal is here 15:07:55 * tflink[m] is here for the fun 15:08:02 so i guess we can take it that lruzicka is here 15:08:41 indeed 15:09:20 alllrighty 15:09:25 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 15:09:54 #info "adamw to migrate release criteria from the wiki to docs.fp.o" - this one was mostly a joke that wound up in the minutes. i didn't do it yet. :D 15:10:04 any other notes from last week? 15:10:52 adamw, to migrate means to convert into asciidoc and make a docs PR? 15:11:34 okey dokey 15:11:43 #topic Toolbox criteria proposal 15:11:48 soo, there's a proposal! 15:14:08 thanks a lot to kparal for the review on it 15:14:24 i'm replying to a question I was asked that I missed... 15:15:41 thanks 15:17:22 does anyone have any general concerns about the criterion or anything? I think it's mostly fine, we just need to get the wordsmithing done, and include toolbox image generation into pungi... 15:17:50 there's a proposed Change related to this 15:19:12 I just skimmed the discussion, there seem to be some technical challenges to overcome 15:19:29 hmm 15:19:29 * coremodule is here 15:19:46 i don't think we should have the criterion without the image generation in pungi, or at least we'd need to think it through... 15:20:32 It makes sense if both parts get accepted together 15:20:57 That's why I asked whether to wait for FESCo decision first 15:21:32 i'd be in favor of that, i'll reply to the list 15:25:14 #topic Fedora 39 status 15:25:46 f39 is pretty quiet atm, most openqa tests passing 15:26:01 today's compose failed due to not enough free disk space on the composers or something 15:29:39 #info fedora 39 is fairly stable atm, tests are passing. F39 changes are starting to build up at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/39/ChangeSet , we should do a review soon 15:34:00 anything else on f39? 15:34:21 nothing here 15:34:49 not so far 15:35:27 rgr rgr 15:35:32 #topic Test Day / community event status 15:36:27 Sumantro Mukherjee: around?> 15:36:33 #info kernel 6.3 test week recently concluded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-05-07_Kernel_6.3_Test_Week , https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/157 15:38:10 #info we're still working on the Fedora 39 Test Day slate, stay tuned! 15:38:15 #topic Open floor 15:38:29 alright, anything else before i crawl back to bed and try to get some more sleep 15:39:03 adamw, what does it mean to convert the release criteria into docs.fp.o? maybe I could do it? 15:39:05 nothing from me 15:40:41 it was really a joke 15:40:53 well, i suppose we could do it at some point, but it's not exactly high priority, the wiki works fine 15:43:25 adamw, ok :) 15:43:48 alrighty, i guess we're done! sorry for the quiet meeting, just not a lot going on right now 15:43:53 thanks for coming out, everyone 15:44:01 #endmeeting