15:01:41 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 15:01:41 Meeting started Mon Aug 21 15:01:41 2023 UTC. 15:01:41 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:41 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 15:01:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 15:01:47 * sumantro is here 15:01:48 #meetingname fedora-qa 15:01:48 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 15:01:51 #topic Roll Call 15:01:59 ahoy, who's made it to IRC for a meeting? 15:01:59 hello adamw! 15:02:15 hello 15:02:17 * coremodule is here. 15:02:29 * lruzicka is here, too 15:02:39 * sumantro is here 15:05:33 wow, what a turnout 15:05:36 how's everyone doing? 15:05:56 all good!! :) 15:06:04 o/ - i exist but only because I stumbled in here 15:06:10 morning adamw 15:06:14 quite hot in here 15:06:50 hi, neil 15:06:52 .hello2 15:06:53 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 15:06:59 ooh, a wild bcotton appeared 15:07:26 hey bcotton :) 15:07:48 okay, let's get rolling... 15:08:10 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 15:08:29 #info no action items to follow up on 15:08:32 Hello, Ben- 15:08:37 #topic Fedora 39 status, inc. anaconda webUI review 15:08:45 okay, so, we're hitting the fun part of the f39 schedule now 15:09:14 beta freeze is in just under nine hours 15:09:18 wait, scratch that 15:09:23 ...just under 23 hours 15:09:30 wooo 15:09:42 yaay 15:10:47 we have built up six proposed blockers while i wasn't paying attention, so we should probably vote on those - please vote in-ticket, links from https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/39/beta/buglist 15:10:58 #info please vote in tickets on proposed f39 beta blockers at https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/39/beta/buglist 15:11:14 Roger Taylor 15:11:56 composes are mostly passing tests, with several known issues 15:12:18 ugh, brb, call of nature 15:16:45 alriiighty 15:16:59 so, we have one big issue to look at: the anaconda webui Change 15:17:02 it's kinda running behind 15:18:07 fesco seems to be voting right now on whether to delay it: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3053 15:18:17 #info fesco is currently voting on delaying the anaconda webui change to f40 - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3053 15:18:53 I have asked them for a test week and commented on tickets 15:19:18 yep, i saw, thanks sumantro 15:19:27 we can still do the test week even if the feature gets delayed, i think, using a custom image 15:19:36 yes thats the plan 15:19:36 but maybe we don't have to rush it 15:19:54 I am not sure if there is a lot to be tested. 15:20:07 looking at it right now, we have two +1s to delay the change, plus a comment from zbyszek which makes me think he would also be +1, so it's looking likely to be delayed 15:20:43 The webui, as is, currently only supports selecting a destination and either erase it or reuse the partitons. That's all it does. 15:20:59 when i wrote the agenda I was gonna suggest we discuss whether to recommend delaying it, but it seems that probably won't be necessary 15:21:25 I want to see if they have worked out , bootloader issues and bug reporting 15:21:29 lruzicka: there's a lot of detail to the 'reuse partitions' workflow, though, we found several bugs in it already and that was just scratching the surface 15:21:48 apologies, it took me longer than I'd like to admit to realize why there was no meeting in matrix 15:21:58 and when it's actually finished as intended, there's the new-gis part of the flow to test also 15:22:05 .fire tflink 15:22:05 adamw fires tflink 15:22:44 sweet, I can leave 15:22:58 #info as it seems like fesco is leaning towards delaying the webui Change to F40, we probably don't need to do anything about that 15:23:05 anyone have any other issues/notes on f39? 15:24:13 adamw, I know, I have reported two of them, however I am not convinced it is worth a test day in the current status quo 15:25:09 lruzicka, I think the desktop team has asked for it as well. Since devconf CZ actually 15:25:26 when we were discussing web UI changeset 15:26:17 sumantro, the desktop team does not have its part, afaik. Why not wait until the GIS is ready, too? 15:26:46 yeah, we should definitely make sure the gis part is ready for the test day. 15:30:59 OK, moving on 15:31:07 #topic Flock report 15:31:25 #info we had a lot of folks and presentations at Flock 2023 15:32:00 #info adamw state-of-automated-testing talk: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or4U/fedora-ci-and-automated-testing-where-were-at 15:32:27 #info tflink AI/ML analysis of openQA results talk: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or2N/using-aiml-to-process-automated-test-results-from-openqa 15:33:00 #info sumantro community ops talk: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or7G/community-ops-20-in-unity-we-stand 15:33:11 #info sumantro toolbx talk: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or7D/toolbxnext-state-of-toolbx-project 15:33:42 #info lruzicka how-to-setup-openqa talk: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1PSs5/how-to-set-up-autotesting-fedora-in-20-minutes 15:33:51 .hello geraldosimiao 15:33:52 geraldosimiao: geraldosimiao 'Geraldo S. SimiĆ£o Kutz' 15:34:02 sorry for being late 15:34:23 hi geraldo! 15:34:30 did I miss any other talks? 15:34:53 adamw was in mentoring panel discussion 15:36:13 and you... 15:36:52 #info adamw and sumantro on mentoring panel: https://flock2023.sched.com/event/1Or82/panel-mentoring-and-mentorship-best-practices-in-fedora 15:37:17 #info the sched pages have slide decks and video links, not sure all the video links are entirely correct right now 15:37:48 the folks who were there got lots of face to face time and I won an exciting new COVID strain, so it was great all around! 15:38:33 yeah, it seems like several of us got that prize. I've talked to one other person who tested positive after Flock 15:38:46 really? new covid strain? oh God... hope you're fine 15:39:11 fine now, yeah 15:39:26 good to know 15:39:36 adamw: how do we uhh... get a special badge for those of us who were blessed with such a prize? 15:39:53 i don't think we've made that badge yet, but it'd be a funny suggestion :D 15:40:00 neil: as much as that would amuse me, it feels a little wrong :) 15:40:09 :P 15:40:19 you can propose it at https://pagure.io/fedora-badges/new_issue 15:40:26 i suggest calling it the Flock Plague badge 15:40:28 :D 15:40:40 (and yes it will almost certainly get rejected for inappropriateness :D) 15:40:59 there is a joke here about the ghost tour that I will not make (directly) 15:41:40 joking aside, was great to meet you (and others) in Cork :) 15:42:25 any other notes on flock? 15:42:57 other than "I wish I had worn a mask"? nothing beyond what you've covered 15:45:30 hah 15:45:40 #topic Test Day / community event status 15:45:47 sumantro, where are we at? 15:45:52 The dnf5 test week happened last week and saw a bunch of testers .. https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/163 15:46:11 the Gnome test week happened as well https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/162 15:46:24 and Gnome Apps https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/164 15:47:01 The i18n test week is going to happen on 2023-09-05 through 2022-09-11 15:47:09 https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/161 15:47:54 Podman Desktop, Web UI, CoreOS, Toolbx , Cloud are all in works and will appear this season after beta 15:48:16 awesome, thanks for the update 15:48:28 Also, i want to add something 15:48:47 just an observation: test cases for dnf only aplly 100% for dnf4. dnf5 have some differences, and some people complaint about that 15:49:18 I saw one of them who tested exaclty with the old dnf command 15:49:34 ah, yeah, sumantro, please be careful about checking that test cases are up to date and applicable... 15:49:36 and sure, all passed, because he have runned "sudo dnf xxxxx" 15:49:42 and not dnf5 xxxx 15:49:47 geraldosimiao, of course when you see a problem like this you can try to improve it, the wiki is open for editing :D 15:49:58 tflink++ 15:49:59 neil: Karma for tflink changed to 2 (for the release cycle f38): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:50:05 (for the mask comment...) 15:50:25 geraldosimiao, there is so much more to happen with dnf 5. The dnf5 team will need to nail down next few test days 15:50:38 geraldosimiao, but thanks for pointing 15:50:46 yeah, I thoug about it, it may be better create a "dnf5 test case" version fo the prior "dnf testcases" 15:50:49 adamw I will be careful for sure 15:51:00 * tflink makes note to test things like automation and mock with dnf5 for the next test day 15:51:09 that was not terribly fun 15:51:21 s/mock/fedora-review 15:51:32 I need your advice on next test day 15:51:39 its all about mock and fedora-review 15:52:44 on fun community things however, there is ask from RHT side of things to do a11y testing... we might have something like that soon 15:53:35 that might be good. I've never spent the time to understand how to do a11y testing well or what to watch out for 15:54:10 atk or a1y toolkit is a critpath package and does nothing 15:54:33 I am discussion about that now with folks, lets see how things sail :) 15:55:53 alright 15:55:57 #topic Open floor 15:56:01 any other business, folks? 15:56:20 i thought kparal might want to discuss the idea to change things from 'fedora qa' to 'fedora quality' but he's not around today 15:56:20 nopes 15:56:29 i'll look to have that on the agenda next time 15:56:30 nothing from me 15:57:18 when will start the F39 blocker reviews meetings? next month? 15:59:19 depends how ticket voting goes 15:59:31 if we can cover all the votes in tickets, we don't need a meeting 15:59:44 ah, ok. thats good 15:59:45 so, i'll keep an eye on the blocker list and decide 16:00:05 alright 16:00:53 another thing: anyone else tested the new iso with anaconda webui? 16:00:56 https://fedorapeople.org/groups/anaconda/webui/temp/ 16:01:54 I found the behavior when trying to assign partitions a little awkward... but still testing further on this 16:02:40 haven't enough time to see if it a missunderstanding form my part 16:02:47 yeah, some of us did some testing on it last week and filed several bugs... 16:02:53 what did you find awkward? 16:04:23 first thing is: I cannot install without a separate /boot partition 16:05:33 in actual anaconda we can opt for not create a separate /boot partition, and then it uses /boot inside the same / one 16:06:28 hmm, not sure whether that's a bug or not, but file it and see :) 16:07:05 ok 16:08:15 anything else? 16:08:20 like I said, I'll test further and then open new tickets or see if it fits some other ticket already opened. 16:08:36 nothing else for now 16:09:03 alrighty 16:09:12 we're a bit over time, so let's end here :) thanks for coming, everyone! 16:09:15 #endmeeting