16:00:27 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 16:00:27 Meeting started Mon Nov 27 16:00:27 2023 UTC. 16:00:27 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:27 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 16:00:31 #meetingname fedora-qa 16:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 16:00:36 #topic Roll Call 16:01:20 hi folks, who's around for qa meeting fun? 16:01:23 .hi 16:01:25 pboy: pboy 'Peter Boy' 16:01:58 hi pboy 16:03:08 .hello2 16:03:10 tflink: tflink 'Tim Flink' 16:03:58 .hello2 16:03:59 lruzicka: lruzicka 'Lukáš Růžička' 16:06:19 hum, we really need to move this to matrix or whatever is gonna get more people to show up :P 16:07:15 I am also monitoring the matrix channel, but there is not much activity either. 16:07:20 true 16:07:28 i guess we just don't have a lot to *meet* about any more... 16:07:35 same here, I'm rarely paying attention to IRC anymore 16:07:37 quick, think of some controversial topics! 16:07:50 in the meantime, let's do these 16:07:58 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 16:08:04 or maybe we have not clearly said where we were going to meet regularly, so that people could get used to it first (again) 16:08:15 #info no action items 16:08:16 you'd think that the discourse + matrix conversation would be controversial enough to get attention but maybe that's just old at this point 16:08:24 tflink: right? oh, well 16:08:53 #topic Fedora 40 check-in and Change review 16:09:14 #info Plasma 6 is landing in Rawhide right now, so expect a bit of rockiness if you're on that 16:11:19 #info Network install images and the Workstation live went oversize again today, I'll look at that 16:12:18 looking at the f40 changes...https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/40/ChangeSet 16:12:55 obviously Plasma 6 is significant, especially with the plan to drop X support 16:13:31 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PamBerkeleyDBtoGdbm is also significant, I am rather concerned by "This proposal contains manual steps to be executed by system administrators in the upgrade path" 16:13:50 though it seems the module is rarely used 16:13:53 totally drop the X support? that will be serious. 16:14:24 "This upgrade is also notable that for Fedora Linux (and Fedora Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 10, once that materializes), KDE Plasma will not offer an X11 session." 16:14:46 possibly at first you'll be able to hack it back in by just providing a session file, but yeah, as shipped there will be no X session 16:15:13 This will be a red rag for a lot of bulls. 16:15:24 already has been, I think 16:15:29 we also have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AnacondaWebUIforFedoraWorkstation back, which obviously is still a big change - we need to keep testing focus on that and finding any more stuff that needs fixing before we get to branch/beta 16:15:46 yeah, there's already a lot of chatter about it on the interwebs 16:16:10 wasn't there at least one article claiming that all of Fedora was dropping X support? 16:17:08 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModernizeLiveMedia also fun 16:17:15 tflink: probably? they usually get it wrong 16:17:33 workstation is also planning to drop X support soon, and as we all know KDE and GNOME are the only things that exist 16:17:47 (long term it's probably gonna happen, but not in f40) 16:18:34 I'm bit concerned about Anaconda / first boot. I suppose we use that in Server VM. Didn't had time to check in details 16:18:52 pboy: i don't think that's a formal change proposal for f40, at least not yet 16:18:56 it was just a sounding out 16:19:06 Oh, OK 16:20:16 That puts my mind at ease 16:22:14 ok, so... 16:22:15 #topic Communications overhaul: Discourse and Matrix? 16:22:27 again let's skip through this quite quickly as there aren't really enough people to get into the meat of it 16:22:35 sounds good 16:22:47 we're still planning to push things towards matrix and discourse, but need to actually, you know, do stuff :D 16:22:57 maybe i'll try moving the meeting back to matrix next week, it seems like the bot is more or less ready 16:23:11 #action adamw to consider moving the meeting back to Matrix next time 16:23:28 yeah, let's try matrix and we'll see how it plays out. 16:23:37 that's good to hear 16:23:49 if that works out then we can look at updating all the docs to just point to matrix, not IRC any more 16:23:57 IIs there a list anywhere what "stuff" has to b w done? 16:24:08 We consider to move Docs as well 16:24:37 not yet, making the list is part of the job. :D 16:24:43 move docs? 16:24:54 yes, docs meeting 16:25:09 (not docs :-) ) 16:25:09 oh, i see 16:25:39 Would be interested in that list :-) 16:25:52 there's a channel for bot development where you could ask, i dunno if the new bots are documented yet. it's very similar to the irc ones aiui. https://matrix.to/#/#zodbot-devel:fedoraproject.org 16:26:21 * tflink is of the mind that having a single place is more important than the techincal merits of any of the choices but that's probably not controversial here 16:26:32 #info i'm going to skip the event topic as sumantro isn't here and i don't see anything obvious coming up in the tickets 16:26:44 also i have another meeting in four minutes :D 16:26:47 #topic Open floor 16:26:49 so, anything else? 16:27:02 nothing from me 16:27:11 nope 16:27:18 not at the moment 16:27:25 well alrighty then 16:27:43 that was easy 16:28:47 thanks for coming, folks 16:28:50 #endmeeting