17:00:12 #startmeeting fedora-server 17:00:12 Meeting started Wed Mar 24 17:00:12 2021 UTC. 17:00:12 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:12 The chair is copperi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-server' 17:00:26 #chair michel_slm pboyHB 17:00:26 Current chairs: copperi michel_slm pboyHB 17:00:38 #topic Roll Call 17:01:00 .hello salimma 17:01:01 michel_slm: salimma 'Michel Alexandre Salim' 17:01:24 .hello2 17:01:25 dcavalca: dcavalca 'Davide Cavalca' 17:03:30 Peter should come shortly 17:03:35 #topic Introductions 17:03:47 * nirik can try and watch, but also busy with the account system stuff. 17:04:12 Anyone new who want to introduce themselves ? 17:04:31 * michel_slm have a work organizational presentation but can lurk 17:05:34 I've missed a bunch of these previously due to conflicts, but will try to attend more regularly going forward 17:05:47 I work with michel_slm at Facebook and maintain our CentOS Stream deployment there 17:06:49 Welcome dcavalca 17:07:17 thanks 17:07:28 #topic Documentation update 17:07:41 #info Fedora Server Update Proposal https://hackmd.io/@x3mboy/By5OkH71O 17:07:52 #info Fedora Server Documentation https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/ 17:08:39 .hello 17:08:39 x3mboy: (hello ) -- Alias for "hellomynameis $1". 17:08:46 .hi 17:08:47 x3mboy: x3mboy 'Eduard Lucena' 17:09:52 * michel_slm didn't know there's hi - is that the same as hello2 17:10:09 .hello. pboy 17:10:37 you have an extra dot there 17:10:39 .hello pboy 17:10:40 pboyHB: pboy 'Peter Boy' 17:10:43 for the PRD, this one item seems like it should not specifically mention EL8 - "For the people who were using it as servers, it was split between getting ready for the next RHEL/CentOS they would be deploying, they needed packages which were not in EPEL, or things like python/nodejs/etc was new enough for what they needed to run but wasn’t in EL8." 17:11:38 :copperi: thanks that's ai :-) 17:12:36 I really like the "server of the future" framing in the PRD 17:14:05 Sorry for beeing late. What section we are dicussing? 17:14:33 pboyHB: I just gave links, have not gone over it yet 17:14:49 the bit that michel_slm mentioned is in 4.1 17:14:57 yeah, I just jumped to the first issue I noticed, it's in 4.1 17:15:02 added a comment in the doc 17:15:11 thanks 17:15:49 do we need to refresh this a bit to mention Stream? having a clear segmentation between when to use Stream and when to use Server could be useful 17:16:20 (also please let me know if I rehash something that's been discussed previously, I missed a few meetings due to parental leave) 17:16:46 referencing back the mission, I think you could say that CentOS (both Linux and Stream) is the "server of the present", while Fedora is the "server of the future" 17:17:01 michel_slm: That's the uneditid collection. It should not go into the PRD that way. Next section i tried to summerize.I think I don't explizity mentiopn EL8 there. 17:17:43 pboyHB: ah, got it 17:19:30 I think we shouldn't mention any other project beyond our project 17:19:31 "Very easy (quasi rolling) updates with shorter, less disruptive release jumps" -- I'd suggest saying "faster release cycle aligned with other Fedora editions" or something like that 17:19:47 Server isn't a rolling distro, and mentioning rolling could cause confusion 17:20:01 dcavalca: Should we really mention any other distribution when we try to argue for Fedora? Shouldn't concentrate on our own ? 17:20:16 pboyHB: oh I agree, this should be focused on Fedora 17:21:04 dcavalca: To mention alternatives could be part of marketing considerations, I guess. 17:21:31 yeah, either there or in a separate FAQ document of some kind 17:22:43 dcavalca: I agree, we should not mention "rolling", but one of your alternatives 17:24:32 left a comment on the doc 17:25:19 I never saw it as rolling, it's just "quickly updated" 17:25:23 Did you already agree upon section 3 (Mission) and 4 (market opportunity)? 17:25:52 x2mboy: + 17:26:16 x3mboy, of course 17:26:58 I have a question 17:27:11 Why are we still using the side-by-side version? 17:27:30 x3mboy: There are nearly all of the comments. 17:27:54 Ok 17:28:25 It will be extremely easier to update the only- new version 17:28:30 After goining through this version, we (or better you?) create an updated version, than full page, i would suggest. 17:28:45 Ok 17:28:55 I already have one 17:28:56 https://hackmd.io/xv-iMBzsTQ-KMvnDNV7VIA 17:29:04 Without all the comments 17:29:26 I think I will work over that one, when we start to have written on stone decisions 17:29:33 x3mboy: Yes, i linkt both versions on our Wiki page. 17:29:45 (Y) 17:29:49 👍️ 17:29:52 #info updated Product Requirement Document 17:30:07 #link https://hackmd.io/xv-iMBzsTQ-KMvnDNV7VIA 17:31:47 x3mboy: I made couple changes to old version, you want to update them to new one ? 17:32:10 4.1 title and 4.1.2 wording 17:32:21 Sure 17:32:28 Action me 17:33:32 #action x3mboy to update new version as proposed on the old one 17:37:03 If we are still discussing 4.1: The question is, does the "Another Numbering " section includes all the relevant arguments of the items 1-13 or is there missing one? 17:37:59 Questen (b) is there something which shouldnt be there? 17:41:07 the content in "Another Numbering" lgtm, modulo the rolling comment I mentioned previously 17:42:35 OK, so we do agree upon 4.1 Another numbering including the rolling release modification. 17:42:46 last chance to object. :-) 17:44:03 +1 17:45:02 #agree: section 4.1 Another numvbering including modification rolling release 17:46:20 pboy: do you have anything else on the agenda today ? 17:46:30 OF course, we may have a "second reading" and make addtional modifications 17:47:05 copperi: The next auestion is documentation. 17:48:45 As an info: I contacted docs group leader about contribution to the Fedora installation Guide and Sys Admin Guide. It chould be possible, but no detailed planning yet. 17:49:37 #info pboyHB contacted docs group leader about contribution to the Fedora installation Guide and Sys Admin Guide. It chould be possible, but no detailed planning yet. 17:49:50 I'm considering to wrtie some text to our own guide so we will have some info. And discuss later, if we transfer it to Fedora docs. 17:50:28 Final location is minor issue, writing docs should come first 17:50:59 we can take a look at it next time. 17:51:03 Yes, but the content is partly dependent on the context. 17:51:45 ok 17:52:24 #topic Housekeeping (next meeting and chair) 17:52:49 Who wants to chair next meeting ? 17:54:34 If there is no one else, I coiuld take it. 17:54:55 #action pboy chairs next meeting 17:55:16 next wednesday same time ? 17:55:34 it's a fixed schedule now, right? 17:56:04 #info next meeting 31.3.2021 17.00 UTC 17:56:21 michel_slm: yes, just to make safe 17:56:29 copperi++ for hosting 17:56:29 michel_slm: Karma for copperi changed to 8 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 17:56:35 #topic Open Floor 17:56:57 anyone have any last minute items ? 17:57:18 are there server oriented packages we should keep a close eye on when they break? 17:57:38 e.g. nextcloud server is currently uninstallable because of a missing PHP dependency 17:58:11 idea is: everyone should check packages which are most important for him. 17:58:46 And of course inform about issues, as with nextcloud 18:00:12 We can look at it more next time 18:00:17 #endmeeting