17:00:02 #startmeeting fedora-server 17:00:02 Meeting started Wed Jun 7 17:00:02 2023 UTC. 17:00:02 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:02 The chair is pboy. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 17:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-server' 17:00:15 #topic Welcome / roll call 17:00:21 hello, all 17:00:25 Welcome to our Server WG IRC meeting today! 17:00:25 .hello2 17:00:26 eseyman: eseyman 'Emmanuel Seyman' 17:00:47 Please, everybody who is lurking, say either .hello2 or .hello 17:01:07 I’ll post the agenda in 4 minutes. 17:01:36 .hello2 17:01:37 jwhimpel: jwhimpel 'John Himpel' 17:01:38 .hello2 17:01:41 cooltshirtguy: cooltshirtguy 'Jason Beard' 17:02:57 lurking. lol I'm on a customer meeting so I might be slower than normal 17:03:42 I've a new equipment and it is still a bit uncomfortable. So, welcome. :-) 17:04:07 Great, our permanent members almost complete. 17:04:15 So legt's start. 17:04:27 #topic Agenda 17:04:36 #info Follow up actions 17:04:46 #info F39 Work Project: Fedora Server on (ARM) SBC 17:05:02 #info Using Ansible to install and configure Wildfly 17:05:13 #info F39/40 Work Project: Fedora Server in a virtualized runtime environment 17:05:22 #info Open floor 17:05:29 Any additions? 17:05:54 Ok, none. next 17:06:02 honestly, that's already an hour's worth of disc. 17:06:14 indeed. 17:06:15 #topic 1. Follow up actions 17:06:24 info ACTION: pboy will write a info about changing the timeout value and nirik will review – still work in progress 17:06:31 #info ACTION: pboy will write a info about changing the timeout value and nirik will review – still work in progress 17:06:48 #info otherwise no open actions. 17:07:13 But some annopuncdements today 17:07:33 1. This year we'll have a in-person Flock again, after 3 years. 17:07:43 #link https://flocktofedora.org 17:07:51 Aug. 2 - 4 in Cork Ireland. 17:08:01 I'll attend, and I hope someone else from us. 17:08:12 And wie should consider how to contribute. 17:08:25 Any ideas? 17:09:05 I think, we should discuss on mailing list and it should be one topic next meeting. 17:09:15 2. I prepared and document how to setup a nfs service. 17:09:24 #link https://docs.stg.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/services/filesharing-nfs-installation/ 17:09:39 Unfortunately, it doesn't work as expected, And I don't find my mistake. 17:09:56 Therefore, help welcome! 17:10:09 Can someone have a look at it? 17:10:46 I can do that 17:10:48 i'll take a look 17:11:02 Thanks, both of you! 17:11:08 Next topic 17:11:22 #topic 2. F39 Work Project: Fedora Server on (ARM) SBC 17:11:24 sadly, I'm just learning about Flock and I've already planned my vacation trip 17:11:47 eseyman freally 17:11:53 really a pitty 17:12:11 (I still struggle with the keyboard and mouse 17:12:20 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/108 17:12:25 let me give it some thought about how I can make it work 17:12:46 Would be great!! 17:12:58 Back to SBC 17:13:14 Topics we have to deal with 17:13:14 - Discussion of the working plan 17:13:24 * For reference list: 17:13:25 - What other SBC equipment do we have available 17:13:25 - Discussion of the criteria 17:13:34 * Evaluation study 17:13:34 - Discussion of the content plan 17:13:34 - Who can contribute to which section 17:13:50 Let's start with the first. (working plan) 17:15:03 select a list of SBC that will be vetted 17:15:15 RPi4 should be on the list 17:15:41 I see the CEO is promising the supply chain issues with Rpi 4 will ease significantly this fall and be a thing of the past by 4Q 2023. 17:15:53 yes, saw that too 17:15:55 I dont't have anything else except Pi's 17:16:15 I think detailed installation instructions and list of supported H/W would be a good start. 17:17:16 both the Banana Pi and the Vim are more appealing than RPi to me but YMVV 17:17:22 Yes, when we have agreed about the reference list project, we should as the ARM Sig for proposal and comments. 17:17:54 eseyman Yeah, the RPi is missing a fast internal disk. 17:18:25 Neverthe less, the RPi is important. It has the role of a reference device 17:19:26 And, BTW I made contact to several makers. Hopefully, we get 1 or 2 test devices. 17:19:28 agreed 17:21:11 The VIM stuff looks promising. Do you have detailed installation instructions for them? 17:21:46 jwhimpel no, not yet. they are quite expensive in Germany 17:21:55 But it is one of my contacts. 17:21:58 jwhimpel: https://forum.khadas.com/t/how-to-install-fedora-linux-for-any-khadas-sbc/13323 17:22:24 esseyman: How about you for detailed install instructions? 17:22:28 eseyman ++1 Didn't found that yet 17:23:16 esseyman: Thanks 17:23:27 I'm waiting on a VIM 3. Once I have it, I'm installing Fedora on my VIM 1 17:23:58 The relative silence I interpret that we agree on the part 1 (reference list)? 17:24:08 Objections? 17:24:35 nope 17:24:53 OK, then: 17:24:56 No objections here. 17:25:19 #agreed The WG agrees on part 1 of the plan in issue 108 and will create a reference list. 17:25:53 I'll start a comment with a list, who has what device available. 17:26:24 And as soon as I get positive feedback from a maker, I'll contact our group via email. 17:26:34 I've sent my list to the ml 17:26:51 s/feddback/decision/ 17:27:01 eseyman. yes. 17:27:38 OK, next part, the evaluation. 17:28:24 Any comment? 17:28:53 I'm more worried about the criteria, TBH 17:29:19 which criteria? freference list or evaluation? 17:29:35 the evaluation criteria 17:30:36 Yeah. I think the 3 basic assumptions are quite virulent, aren't they? 17:30:54 But empirical evidence is sparse 17:31:30 Do you think of something else or additional? or replace? 17:32:14 performance is subjectif; economy of power is hard to measure, ... 17:32:51 eseyman agreed, but everybody talks about it, nevertheless 17:33:06 yeah, I know... 17:33:56 Regarding performance, instead of artifical numeric indices we could compare 1-3 typical server tasks. 17:34:14 That would not be representative, and not scientifical. 17:34:45 but maybe interesting and meaningful 17:35:24 Phoronix has a pretty extensive test suite that is open-source. I know many tests are video oriented, but a bunch are apropos for server tasks. 17:35:39 Sorry, I need to think about it 17:35:58 jwhimpel great! could you post a link on ml? 17:36:12 pboy: sure 17:36:24 eseyman no problem. it is not easy, and we should carefully think about it. 17:36:46 But: we need to pick the next topic! 17:37:01 Let's try the ml regarding the evaluation. 17:37:29 eseyman: maybe you can write some (temptative) ideas? 17:37:46 I'll give it a shot 17:37:53 Thanks! 17:38:25 In any case, the topic is generating a lot of interest. It is therefore worthwhile. 17:38:38 Let's swith to next topic 17:38:54 #topic 3. Using Ansible to install and configure Wildfly 17:39:05 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/60 17:39:54 As far as I know we have a working Wildfly and at least a part of Ansible scripts. 17:40:12 jwhimpel: Could you provide some info? 17:40:23 Would is the next reaquired step? 17:40:31 I have been consumed by a higher priority task, so I haven't made much progress. I think I found a network config error that prevented me from getting SSL working when communicating with Wildfly. Hope to get back to this in July. 17:41:08 OK. Do you propse to postpone until July? 17:41:19 Would be no prob I think 17:41:44 If anyone want to help see: https://developer.jboss.org/people/fjuma/blog/2018/08/31/obtaining-certificates-from-lets-encrypt-using-the-wildfly-cli 17:42:34 We have the working Wildfly instance on the VM that pboy created for us. You can use that for testing purposes. 17:42:36 I 17:42:49 I'm find with a postponement. 17:42:57 s/find/fine/ 17:43:18 OK. I'll check the blog entry. 17:43:32 Question: Can I find the Ansiblescript anywhere in 17:43:37 on the server? 17:44:54 I think the M/L has a pointer to the ansible stuff. You should be able to find the reference in the M/L archives. If not, ping me. 17:45:08 OK thanks. 17:45:32 this, maybe : https://gitlab.com/jwhimpel/wildfly-ansible ? 17:45:48 I'll ask my trustworthy search tengine. :-) 17:46:06 Yeah thanks, I'll have a look. 17:46:26 So, let's switch to the next topic. 17:46:43 #topic 4. F39/40 Work Project: Fedora Server in a virtualized runtime environment 17:46:53 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/110 17:46:56 That url looks right. I'm away from my workstation right now, so cannot verify. 17:47:18 This plan got some attention, too 17:47:35 jwhimnpol thanks. I'll try or ask you by mail. 17:47:47 Sorry, again a typo 17:48:30 We should discuss the provisional working plan, here 17:49:14 I don't use a VPS/VDS so I don't think I'll be able to contribute 17:49:29 I'm going to focus on the backup plan 17:49:56 eseyman OK 17:50:09 Is the only difference between this effort and Fedora Cloud, the packages that are included? 17:51:14 There are several difference with the preinstalled packages, the file system, and the purpose of the use, I think 17:51:57 I had several discussions with several people on ask.fedora and discussion. 17:52:01 May 17:52:20 Certainly, the difference is purpose of use. I just was wondering if we could generate appropriate images using their tooling with a different package list? 17:53:18 My first idea is, tp pick our KVM image and add some hoster specific configuration / packages, etc 17:53:47 One isue is abviously the first boot 17:55:12 Our time is running up. 17:55:16 I have fedora-server running on a computer utilizing KVM and run mutliple VM's. does that meet the requirements? or help? 17:56:35 cooltshirtguy not directly. Your case seems to be the same as mine. :-). The people I discussed don't have a machine of their own on the internet. 17:56:55 ahh ok. 17:57:02 wasn't sure of the direction here 17:57:36 They are looking for a affordable machine, to kind of "simulate" their own machine using the hosting provider as "hardware" 17:58:03 ahh. so cloud stuff 17:58:11 So it is intended to be permanent and with fixed resources. 17:58:33 Does the provider have a pre-installed O/S when a new VPS is created or is that up the purchaser of the VPS? 17:58:51 Well. cloud is a bit ambigious 17:59:26 jwhimpel several options. Some provide just a empty pre-installed VM, Other accept a 'custom image' 17:59:50 and the latter is the particulary interesting case here 18:00:28 Have to leave now. 18:01:02 Regarding cloud statt: That means originally "resources on demand". You don't have fixed resources and pay, but that<#s vafriable and you just pay what you use. 18:01:39 and he cloud system interacts with the cloud instances to make it work. 18:02:17 But some people use cloud for anything that is not running on their own hardware 18:02:31 interesting. I've vaguely heard of it but never looked into it 18:02:46 Well time is up. 18:03:23 For practical reason: Any objection to perform the community survey as discussed on mailing list? 18:03:57 nope 18:04:02 OK 18:04:28 #agreed WG will perform the community survey as proposed in #110 18:04:44 So, let's continue on mailing list. 18:05:00 Thanks everybody for coming! 18:05:16 See you in 2 weeks. 18:05:23 bye, folks 18:05:42 #endmeeting