20:01:24 #startmeeting 20:01:25 Meeting started Fri Feb 5 20:01:24 2010 UTC. The chair is hiemanshu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:01:30 #chair sijis 20:01:31 Current chairs: hiemanshu sijis 20:01:38 #topic Who's here 20:01:41 * hiemanshu 20:01:42 * ricky 20:01:53 * mchua 20:01:55 * sijis is ..but in car 20:02:03 * giarc for a little while... 20:02:14 * hiemanshu waits for people to turn up 20:03:41 #topic Fedora Insight 20:03:44 mchua: go ahead 20:03:55 These weekly meetings are very helpful :) 20:03:55 So, Fedora Insight. 20:03:55 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight 20:03:55 I'm trying to set up a weekly test cycle with FWN ("QA," everyone else - websites, mktg, infra, design, etc - is "development," at the moment.) More details at 20:03:58 #link http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/logistics/2010-February/000378.html 20:04:01 The big thing for Websites is getting the skin working and the working skin packaged. 20:04:04 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Design 20:04:07 We're going to be doing the final deployment in RHEL, so this needs to hit the EPEL repo eventually. 20:04:13 hiemanshu: you've been doing a lot of the design work on the skin. (Thank you! I think this brings the cookie count I owe you up to several million.) Do you have an estimate on when the theme package will be ready to go, are there any blockers in your way? 20:04:28 And is there anything that - when the FWN folks start doing those weekly test cycles - would be particularly helpful to watch/test for? 20:04:32 #OF 20:04:34 er, EOF 20:04:49 fwn? 20:05:00 fedora weekly news 20:05:01 ohh weekly news 20:05:14 mchua: Just a single blocker that I am working on, I hope to have it ready for final release soon 20:06:06 giarc: you have taken a couple of ticket IIRC 20:06:07 i updated the footer but im not sure its been comitted 20:06:10 anything on that 20:06:24 sijis: you updated it in the git repo? 20:06:29 yeah, i have committed a small amount of code 20:06:46 its not on publictest6 ( the udpate ) 20:06:55 i dont have repo access. i thought i sent patch to the list 20:06:57 it cleans up the rss /planet feed 20:07:09 maybe it was someone directly 20:07:19 and also some home page wonkiness on said feeds 20:07:26 sijis: apply for the group when you can and I ll have you in the group 20:07:28 oh, and the overall width has been widened 20:07:35 but still works at smaller resolutins 20:07:39 ok will do 20:07:41 resoltuions 20:07:45 basically, the thing I'm looking for (and will be asking every so often) is whether we're ready to apply the instructions on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_set_up_a_Zikula_sandbox#Applying_the_Fedora_Insight_theme to staging (or rather, tell mmcgrath to do so). 20:07:50 giarc: can you send an update to the list? 20:07:53 sure 20:07:55 and if not, what's in the wya of us doing it. :) 20:08:08 are we using publictest6 at all anymore? 20:08:28 i note that its not been git pulled to HEAD 20:08:35 mchua: I will have the theme in the infra repo that make its easy to create a new test instance or import it to staging 20:08:52 giarc: Yes, pt6 is still a sandbox to try things out on as needed to make sure the sandbox instructions install a working theme when they're executed. 20:08:56 ok 20:08:57 so 20:09:23 can someone update the theme there? or is not using the git repo/theme? 20:09:43 giarc: its the updated theme and then the patches are carried over to the git repo 20:10:04 * hiemanshu doesnt like the idea of having git repo write access on publictest machines 20:10:42 * giarc is confused how pushing inot the repo gets the code on pt6 ? 20:10:49 yeah, anyone with access to publictest machines has sudo on them... 20:11:09 it's why mo and I didn't set it up that way when we first started the theme work 20:11:17 * giarc nods 20:11:21 giarc: Right now the git repo is just a place for people who want to try the latest theme 20:11:26 ah 20:11:34 well, that is where my changes went 20:11:40 the git repo? 20:11:43 yep 20:11:48 I dont see anything in the log though 20:11:53 hmmm 20:11:55 i do 20:12:05 lemme do a git pull and see 20:12:32 * giarc fires up f11 20:12:40 * mchua has to run in a few minutes - any q's, any blockers we can clear for you, any updates we should give the rest of the Fedora Insight folks (we're all on the logistics list, I know a couple of you are there)? 20:12:43 giarc: I see it, I ll put the theme over to pt6 soon 20:12:49 ok 20:13:15 question: tickets 87/88 seem to deal with categorized rss feeds 20:13:33 yet, i cannot even add categories/tags to the RSS feeds in zikula... 20:13:56 giarc: sounds like a question for simon 20:14:00 ok 20:14:00 mchua: when is simon in next? 20:14:42 hiemanshu, also, if there are updates to the theme outside of the git repo 20:14:57 how can we be sure we are not clobbering each others work? 20:15:10 hiemanshu: Nothing is scheduled atm, but my advice would be to ask questions on the logistics mailing list - he's been pretty fast at responding there (and if enough of them queue up then we can schedule a time for him and other zikula folks to come on IRC). 20:15:10 or taking one step forward, two backwards? 20:15:24 giarc: if you make a change at pt6, you send a patch right away to the git repo 20:15:36 i can't make any changes on pt6... 20:15:38 so, ok 20:15:38 mchua: sure 20:15:38 hiemanshu: I'd like to make our zikula questions less dependent on simon being around, because he's got a lot to do as well - if things hit logistics, people can also take them to the zikula forums, etc. 20:15:40 :) 20:15:56 giarc: so, sounds like a question for the logistics list ;) 20:16:07 mchua, ok, got it 20:16:10 yay! 20:16:14 mchua: Ah right, also we want to test the new pagemaster module 20:16:33 all right, I gotta run, but this is all sounding fantastic - you guys are totally on top of things. 20:16:45 mchua: have fun 20:16:49 anyone else have anything else? 20:16:54 thanks all! 20:17:28 #topic blogs.fp.o progress 20:17:34 This is gonna be quick 20:17:45 Right now there hasnt been any change from last wekk 20:17:48 week** 20:17:55 and we are still looking for someone to write docs 20:18:02 one thing to add 20:18:12 sijis: go ahead 20:18:13 talking to nb a day or so ago, he meniotned that all the redirects are fixed 20:18:30 that was done quite some time back IIRC 20:18:31 so, the last step would just be docs 20:18:35 yup 20:18:48 thanks for nullsys for helping with that 20:19:06 #info Need someone to write docs, and QUICK :) 20:19:13 anything else? 20:19:26 nope 20:19:34 I don't have anything to say at least. 20:19:50 sijis: how long till you get to a computer? 20:19:56 i'm alreadyd here 20:19:59 hiemanshu, is there a link to what you are talking about, docs wise? 20:20:19 giarc: nothing that I can remember 20:20:46 #topic web group as tracking group 20:20:52 ricky, sijis : go ahead 20:21:07 i'll go 20:21:13 So the web group has grown to be a bit wider than just running fp.o 20:21:26 quite so 20:21:26 * sijis leaves it for ricky 20:21:39 Oh, I stopped, go ahead :-) 20:21:39 * hiemanshu nods 20:22:31 So it makes sense to have a tracking group and a separate group for commit access for those who do work that needs it 20:23:32 i think that's a great idea 20:23:33 This has worked well for infrastructure with sysadmin vs. sysadmin-* - being in the tracking group would be enough to get fp.o, etc. which could be useful 20:24:04 So the way I'm thinking of doing it is making a gitweb group and seeding it with the list of all committers to fedora-web.git 20:24:18 We can also send out an email to web-members announcing it to make sure we don't leave out anybody that needs it 20:24:54 so idea is either ping folks and have them reply or just copy web in 'web-git-access' group? 20:25:11 This will hopefully also make life easier on web sponsors, since it will eliminate the "give access to somebody that doesn't need it" hesitation :-) 20:25:15 nope, people ping you asking access to it 20:25:43 sijis: that way we know people who are actively working on stuff 20:25:55 Anybody that doesn't have commits in fedora-web has never used their web access, so I think it's safe to assume that they don't need it - the email would catch anybody that we missed thoughj 20:26:12 yeah 20:26:22 ricky: yeah, that makes absolute sense 20:26:40 I think we should send a notice today, then make the actual change next meeting 20:26:58 +1 from me 20:26:58 Anyway, if everybody's OK with this, then there's nothing stopping us from just doing it (maybe a week or two after an email to list + web-members) 20:27:18 +1 with tracking group 20:27:32 because I certainly wouldn't be very happy if my commit access just disappeared. 20:28:28 who wants to send out the email? 20:28:38 * ricky must leave the room, see you all later 20:28:41 ricky: so basically its a web tracking group and fedora-web for git access ? 20:28:49 ricky: later :) 20:28:51 hiemanshu: basically 20:29:11 sijis, what problem is this solving? 20:29:24 sijis: and any more groups that would require you to be a part of web ? 20:29:49 no, as of right now that thought it only a single gropu for the commit access 20:29:54 giarc: this is taking a load of sponsors with the "do they really need it?" question 20:30:07 so there would be 'web' (tracking) and 'web-commit' (or whatever the name will be) 20:30:26 giarc: its not exactly solving a specific problem. 20:30:47 just more granularity in giving folks access ? 20:30:54 its sort of a small re-org. we can then look at seperating stuff into other gorpus that require access. 20:30:56 giarc: right 20:31:01 ok, got it 20:31:22 yeah +1 20:31:24 :) 20:31:25 sijis: also a process for a giving access (will put it up a topic soon after this) 20:31:25 also, from my perspective too.. i think that it gives confidence and welcomeness to folks if they belong to a 'group'. 20:31:45 * hiemanshu nods 20:31:53 so, if soneone wasn'ts to be part of 'web', thats ok.. they wouldn't have access to anything but its a start 20:31:56 * giarc agrees with sijis 20:32:26 anything else on this ? 20:32:36 i'll put a draft together for this email and work with ricky on it 20:32:37 onekopaka_laptop: you wanna write the email? 20:32:46 we'll plan on sending it a couple of days 20:32:49 sijis: good enough 20:33:08 #action sijis to work with ricky and write the email to be sent 20:33:31 #info web to be a tracking group and a new group to give access 20:33:41 urgh 20:33:52 #info web to be a tracking group and make a new group to give git access 20:33:55 better :) 20:34:03 anything else? 20:34:53 #topic Procedure for giving git access yeah 20:34:57 #topic Procedure for giving git access 20:35:01 damn typo :( 20:35:17 So the plan I have in mind right now 20:35:25 * giarc is now on conf call and has one eye on the meeting 20:35:41 Is not to give access to anyone or everyone to the git repo 20:35:47 and have a written procedure for it 20:35:59 What I plan on is that, they become a part of web 20:36:05 and then find something to work on 20:36:12 make a patch send it to the list 20:36:24 once it has alteast a couple of +1 give access 20:36:29 to the git repo 20:36:34 comments? 20:36:46 I give that 1 20:36:49 +1* 20:37:00 i'm ok with that. 20:37:09 tht's sorta what is done now.. just informally 20:37:35 nope, we have people find something to work on and just give git access 20:37:45 even though they dont actually do anything 20:38:20 moving to the next topic 20:38:25 #topic alpha release 20:38:28 sijis: jump in 20:38:38 ok. so this is the F13 release schedule 20:38:51 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Schedule 20:39:05 right now, alpha is targeted for 2010-03-02 20:39:14 so, a couple of things 20:39:23 a - we should be aware of it 20:39:38 b - start thinking about the 'want beta?' headers on pages 20:39:53 c - any projects that should be completed by then or by F13. 20:40:19 i for 1, have to get complete the get-* pages for fp.o 20:40:39 so i'm going to need help with that 20:40:39 sijis: are the design ready yet? 20:40:50 * hiemanshu will be around to help 20:41:15 yeah, the design is availe 20:41:19 * sijis is finding hte link 20:41:27 * onekopaka_laptop could possibly help 20:41:32 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Website_redesign_2009/Mockups/Get.fpo 20:41:41 its in a git branch 20:41:44 I wont be here much for the next couple of weeks though 20:41:49 Mid-Winter break is coming closer 20:41:57 sijis, i can lend a hand 20:41:58 for me 20:42:01 week after next 20:43:12 sijis: anything else? 20:43:27 nope. 20:43:40 #topic Open Floor 20:43:40 so, any hlep would be appreciated 20:44:00 I have $work stuff to do next couple of weeks and then i am off to pune (for a talk on genshi and a fedora remixing workshop) Hoping to find some new contributors 20:44:23 oh, last thign.. i'm targeting that date.. worse case by Beta on 2010-04-06 20:45:24 sijis: I am here after the 22nd 20:45:32 jam packed till the 22nd 20:45:57 ok. 20:46:10 any new folks around that want to introduce themselves? 20:46:28 I dont think so 20:46:46 I will close the meeting if I dont have anything in a few 20:46:57 ..... 20:47:01 .... 20:47:05 ... 20:47:09 .. 20:47:10 . 20:47:14 Thanks for coming all 20:47:17 #endmeeting