15:00:37 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting 15:00:37 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jul 14 15:00:37 2020 UTC. 15:00:37 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:37 <zodbot> The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:37 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:37 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting' 15:00:37 <pwhalen> #chair pwhalen pbrobinson jlinton 15:00:37 <zodbot> Current chairs: jlinton pbrobinson pwhalen 15:00:37 <pwhalen> #topic roll call 15:00:50 <pwhalen> Morning folks, who's here today? 15:01:10 * pbrobinson is o/ 15:02:52 * jlinton waves 15:03:56 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Userspace Status ==== 15:04:10 <pwhalen> Anyone aware of any new issues? 15:04:42 * jsmith lurks 15:05:03 <jsmith> I'm not aware of any new issues. 15:05:21 <pwhalen> #info No new issues reported. 15:05:31 <pwhalen> thanks jsmith, nor am I 15:05:50 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ==== 15:06:14 <pwhalen> #info kernel-5.7.8-200.fc32 now available in Fedora 32. 15:06:14 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1538400 15:06:43 <pwhalen> #info This kernel returns the default boot to device tree. Apologies for those affected. 15:07:06 <jlinton> Sounds good, I saw the fixes, presumably there were other reports of failures? 15:07:37 <pwhalen> Yes, a few people reported issues. 15:07:55 <pwhalen> #info kernel-5.8.0-0.rc5.1.fc33 available for testing 15:07:56 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1541262 15:08:10 <pwhalen> Just started testing this myself, no issues so far 15:10:25 <pwhalen> #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm. 15:10:43 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Bootloader Status ==== 15:11:14 <pwhalen> #info Latest U-Boot available for testing - uboot-tools-2020.07-1.fc33 15:11:14 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1537374 15:11:40 <jsmith> I've done some testing with it, and so far it's working great for me. 15:12:11 <pwhalen> Same, I need to check on a couple of devices still but so far, no issues 15:13:53 <pwhalen> #topic 4) ==== Fedora 33 ==== 15:14:26 <pbrobinson> the btrfs change is happening here atm 15:14:32 <pbrobinson> that's causing a bunch of joy 15:14:33 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test 15:15:17 <pwhalen> Right, the disk images and anaconda have been changed to use btrfs as the default 15:15:34 <jlinton> I didn't see if the plan was to chop the rootfs into a bunch of subvolumes (like suse does)... 15:16:15 <pwhalen> /home and /root are their own subvolumes 15:16:54 <jlinton> Thats probably ok, the problem was the dozen or so FS's (usr, parts of var, etc) that all end up needing hand holding 15:18:15 <pbrobinson> splitting out most of those is pointless waste, I think root and home are fine 15:19:36 <pbrobinson> oh and I think it's / root as opposed to /root/ but I haven't looked closely 15:20:17 <jlinton> Yah, sounds reasonable. 15:20:38 <pwhalen> I was a little surprised that anaconda defaults to btrfs for say a minimal installation , the change seems to be just desktops 15:21:00 <jlinton> I have the two line kernel.spec update for coresight, basically a build dep and a CORESIGHT=1 in the perf build line, along with the PAC stuff 15:21:08 <pwhalen> and /boot remains ext4 15:21:18 <jlinton> I'm assuming gcc 10.2 will be merged to f33 soonish? 15:22:15 <pbrobinson> I have explicitly asked to ensure minimal remains ext4 15:22:26 <jlinton> There are PAC fixes in 10.2 we should pick up. 15:22:46 <pbrobinson> jlinton: I'm guessing as soon as it's tagged 15:23:02 <pbrobinson> and for the spec file, I'm guessing you mean kernel-tools package? 15:23:12 <jlinton> yes 15:24:22 <pbrobinson> jlinton: I'm co-maintainer so just ping me and I can get it tested and done 15:24:30 <pwhalen> #info Fedora 33 Schedule - https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-all-tasks.html 15:25:16 <jlinton> Actually I lied, its the perf- package not kernel-tools 15:25:28 <jlinton> (assuming I'm looking at it correctly) 15:25:42 <pbrobinson> I think perf is built as part of kernel-tools 15:26:01 <pwhalen> #info Fedora 33 Accepted Changes - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/ChangeSet 15:27:11 <pwhalen> Any other changes that we should be concerned about? 15:28:09 <jlinton> Not changeset related so much, is I have that open todo, to assure the armhfp grub/etc process works 15:29:06 <pwhalen> that would be awesome :) 15:29:22 <pbrobinson> I have the PARSEC one, not sure if that's approved yet 15:29:38 <pbrobinson> and that's sort of arm related 15:29:47 <pbrobinson> and I need to deal with a bunch of rust packages 15:30:42 <jlinton> The plan is to wrap them like the python packages, or just expect people to pull them via cargo? 15:32:56 <pbrobinson> there's a process around rust, it seems straightforward and there's some automation tools, I just need more time to work it all out 15:34:28 <pwhalen> Anything else for F33? 15:35:28 <pwhalen> #topic 5) == Open Floor == 15:36:26 <pbrobinson> nothing from me 15:37:51 <pwhalen> #endmeeting