17:02:46 <yzhang> #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg
17:02:46 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed May 24 17:02:46 2017 UTC.  The chair is yzhang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:02:46 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
17:02:46 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_atomic_wg'
17:02:53 <yzhang> #topic Roll Call
17:03:07 <dustymabe> .hello dustymabe
17:03:08 <zodbot> dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' <dustymabe@redhat.com>
17:03:17 <yzhang> .hello yzhang
17:03:18 <zodbot> yzhang: yzhang 'Yu Qi Zhang' <jzehrarnyg@gmail.com>
17:03:25 <nzwulfin> .hello mmicene
17:03:26 <roshi> .hello roshi
17:03:26 <zodbot> nzwulfin: mmicene 'Matt Micene' <nzwulfin@gmail.com>
17:03:29 <miabbott> .hello miabbott
17:03:29 <zodbot> roshi: roshi 'Mike Ruckman' <mruckman@redhat.com>
17:03:30 <jberkus> .hello jberkus
17:03:32 <zodbot> miabbott: miabbott 'Micah Abbott' <miabbott@redhat.com>
17:03:35 <zodbot> jberkus: jberkus 'Josh Berkus' <josh@agliodbs.com>
17:03:38 <dustymabe> nzwulfin: \o
17:03:53 <nzwulfin> dustymabe, o/ glad to be back
17:04:08 <maxamillion> .hello maxamillion
17:04:09 <zodbot> maxamillion: maxamillion 'Adam Miller' <maxamillion@gmail.com>
17:04:34 <jbrooks> .hello jasonbrooks
17:04:35 <zodbot> jbrooks: jasonbrooks 'Jason Brooks' <JBROOKS@REDHAT.COM>
17:05:08 <yzhang> #chair yzhang dustymabe nzwulfin roshi miabbott jbrooks jberkus maxamillion
17:05:08 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jberkus jbrooks maxamillion miabbott nzwulfin roshi yzhang
17:05:27 <yzhang> #topic Action items from last meeting
17:05:33 <yzhang> dustymabe to migrate some cloud-base tickets to the cloud-sig tracker from the atomic-wg tracker
17:05:47 <yzhang> x3mboy and jberkus to hold meeting tomorrow to discuss marketing talking points
17:05:50 <yzhang> wait no
17:06:01 <yzhang> jbrooks to write project atomic blog post re #228, and add info to fedora PRD
17:06:06 <yzhang> jberkus to ask mattdm about how to get PRD approved
17:06:08 <yzhang> I think its those?
17:06:19 <dustymabe> yep
17:06:21 <dustymabe> and one more
17:06:27 <jberkus> yah, haven't been able to reach matt, please re-action
17:06:28 <dustymabe> dustymabe to add a ticket to look into getting an easy-to-use
17:06:30 <dustymabe> container review link after F26
17:06:41 <yzhang> dustymabe to put bz query for containers pending review on wiki
17:06:42 <jbrooks> I sent a PR today: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/434
17:06:47 <yzhang> dustymabe to add a ticket to look into getting an easy-to-use container review link after F26
17:07:10 <yzhang> #action jberkus to ask mattdm about how to get PRD approved
17:07:15 <yzhang> is that the command?
17:07:23 <jbrooks> yep
17:07:36 <dustymabe> #info jbrooks opened a PR for a blog post about support policy in the future for atomic https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/434
17:08:00 <dustymabe> I migrated the final remaining cloud-base ticket to the cloud-sig repo
17:08:06 <roshi> thanks dustymabe
17:08:32 <dustymabe> https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/138
17:08:44 <yzhang> #info dustymabe migrated all remaining cloud-base tickets to the cloud-sig repo: https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/138
17:08:52 <dustymabe> I also opened a ticket for getting an easy to use container review link
17:09:00 <dustymabe> https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/275
17:09:11 <yzhang> am I supposed to info all completed items?
17:09:22 <dustymabe> yzhang: you don't have to
17:09:36 <dustymabe> i just info the one from jbrooks in case anyone wants to click the link and review his blog post
17:09:46 <yzhang> ok, do you want me to re-action that item just as a reminder
17:09:56 <dustymabe> which item?
17:10:06 <yzhang> https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/275
17:10:11 <yzhang> since its for the f26 time frame
17:10:30 <dustymabe> i'd say we'll revisit it later
17:10:40 <dustymabe> don't worry about bringing it up next week
17:10:59 <yzhang> alright
17:11:04 <yzhang> good work on the action items
17:11:06 <yzhang> :D
17:11:13 <yzhang> #topic Enforce ENV usage as a requirement for release label
17:11:24 <yzhang> #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/277
17:11:42 <yzhang> maxamillion ^
17:11:43 <maxamillion> o/
17:11:48 <roshi> this makes sense to me
17:11:52 <yzhang> +1
17:11:55 <maxamillion> the ticket is hopefully self explanitory
17:11:57 <dustymabe> +1
17:12:03 <roshi> +1 from me
17:12:21 <maxamillion> I just wanted to make sure and get visibility and some discussion on it if necessary before I made changes to the guidelines
17:12:31 <maxamillion> cool, thanks all
17:12:42 <dustymabe> i updated the issue
17:12:44 <roshi> do we already enforce the use of LABEL instead of Maintainer?
17:12:46 <maxamillion> dustymabe: thanks
17:12:53 <jberkus> +1
17:12:56 <maxamillion> roshi: huh?
17:12:56 <roshi> we should do that as well, if we don't already
17:13:09 <roshi> MAINTAINER in a dockerfile is depreciating soon
17:13:12 <yzhang> LABEL maintainer
17:13:19 <roshi> so it should be LABEL maintainer <foo>
17:13:25 <maxamillion> ahhh
17:13:26 <maxamillion> rgr
17:13:32 <roshi> didn't know if we set that as a hard or soft requirement
17:13:38 <maxamillion> yeah, I'm +1 to that ... I'm not sure either
17:13:39 <roshi> but it shouldbe hard, since it'll break things later
17:13:44 <maxamillion> right
17:13:51 <miabbott> fwiw, the system container example has 'LABEL maintainer=blah'
17:13:56 <miabbott> lowercase vs uppercase
17:14:02 <maxamillion> miabbott: +1
17:14:06 <yzhang> maxamillion's example also has LABEL MAINTAINER
17:14:07 <maxamillion> lowercase please :)
17:14:08 <yzhang> just upper case
17:14:14 <maxamillion> yeah, I'll update
17:14:25 <yzhang> do you want me to condense that into one action item maxamillion
17:14:28 <yzhang> just for tracking
17:15:35 <yzhang> #action maxamillion to update container guidelines to enforce ENV and label maintainer usage
17:15:39 <yzhang> I can always undo that
17:16:12 <dustymabe> yzhang: it's good to reference the issue #
17:16:19 <yzhang> gotcha
17:16:30 <roshi> it'll show up on the meetinbot logs just fine though
17:16:30 <yzhang> er
17:16:34 <yzhang> how do I unaction
17:16:40 <roshi> but you won't see that in the action items next week
17:16:43 <roshi> #undo
17:16:43 <zodbot> Removing item from minutes: ACTION by yzhang at 17:15:35 : maxamillion to update container guidelines to enforce ENV and label maintainer usage
17:16:50 <yzhang> thanks
17:16:53 <roshi> :D
17:17:11 <yzhang> #action maxamillion to update container guidelines to enforce ENV and label maintainer usage https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/277
17:17:26 <yzhang> is that ok
17:17:29 <dustymabe> yep
17:17:43 <yzhang> alright moving on
17:17:45 <maxamillion> +1
17:17:45 <yzhang> #topic fedimg: don't use 'builder' instance for uploading AMIs
17:17:59 <dustymabe> is sayan around today?
17:17:59 <yzhang> #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/269
17:18:09 <yzhang> I feel like this has been here for awhile
17:18:28 <dustymabe> yzhang: it has - mostly here for progress updates
17:18:42 <yzhang> gotcha
17:19:03 <yzhang> paging sayan
17:19:18 <dustymabe> jberkus: is he still on the west coast - or heading back to india?
17:19:38 <jberkus> he's at the PyCon sprints, so he's still in Portland
17:19:50 <dustymabe> ok, but not here today
17:19:54 <dustymabe> move on to next ticket
17:19:59 <yzhang> #topic clarify policy on atomic host support for older Fedora "number" releases
17:20:03 <yzhang> #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/228
17:20:05 <yzhang> I think
17:20:12 <yzhang> This is being blocked on jberkus's action?
17:20:25 <yzhang> to contact mattdm
17:20:34 <dustymabe> #info please review jbrook's blog post on this topic: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/434
17:20:50 <jbrooks> Yeah, that's that
17:21:16 <jberkus> yzhang: huh?
17:21:30 <yzhang> jberkus: sorry was just reading through last week's logs
17:21:35 <jberkus> yzhang: contact him how?  I don't see that, and don't remember it
17:21:50 <dustymabe> jberkus: you were going to contact matt about the PRD I think
17:21:58 <jbrooks> I think there was a separate issue about ratifying the.. yeah
17:21:59 <yzhang> wasn't that the action item
17:21:59 <yzhang> jberkus to ask mattdm about how to get PRD approved
17:22:00 <jberkus> more importantly, have we integrated the policy into the PRD?
17:22:11 <jberkus> yzhang: that's separate from this issue
17:22:14 <yzhang> ah my bad
17:22:32 <jbrooks> I was looking at it today, and the PRD actually says there'll be only current-stable releases
17:22:48 <jbrooks> I was kind of wondering how historical/future-looking the PRD should be
17:23:05 <jbrooks> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic/PRD#Updates
17:23:49 <dustymabe> jbrooks: so basically saying less is better?
17:23:56 <dustymabe> i'm ok with that
17:24:09 <jbrooks> Well, yeah, what the PRD says now is basically what we want
17:24:21 <dustymabe> jberkus: ^^ ?
17:24:28 <jbrooks> It doesn't describe NOW, but is this where we need to describe now?
17:24:29 <jberkus> yah, so just put the detailed policy on the wiki elsewhere
17:24:34 <jbrooks> Right
17:25:17 <yzhang> I'm not very familiar with this, where would "elsewhere" be
17:25:25 <roshi> PRD is supposed to be our goals, aims and whatnot, aiui
17:25:47 <jbrooks> maybe https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
17:26:04 <jbrooks> Though that doesn't seem like a doc to mod willy-nilly
17:26:14 <jberkus> yzhang: in teh atomic space on the wiki
17:26:20 <jbrooks> to use a technical term
17:27:29 <yzhang> do we want to do this as an action item?
17:28:31 <dustymabe> i'm thinking it should be
17:28:33 <yzhang> or do we want to get https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-site/pull/434/files
17:28:36 <yzhang> reviewed and merged first
17:29:11 <yzhang> and/or who wants to take the action item
17:29:20 <jbrooks> We don't seem to have much in the Atomic space on the wiki
17:29:29 <jbrooks> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic
17:29:38 <jbrooks> that's... spartan
17:30:04 <jberkus> jbrooks: our group tends to write blog posts instead of wiki pages
17:30:24 <jbrooks> It almost seems like a topic for a vfad
17:30:29 <jberkus> we need an intern who we can task with transcribing the blog posts to the wiki ;-)
17:30:55 * yzhang looks at yzhang
17:30:56 <yzhang> hmm
17:31:29 <miabbott> yzhang: can new intern peter be convinced to work on this?
17:31:36 <yzhang> possibly
17:31:53 <roshi> I thought there was more there
17:31:56 <yzhang> but probably not immediately since starting with docs before fully understanding everything is probably not a good idea
17:31:58 <dustymabe> jberkus: not to get into a docs tooling discussion, but i would rather it not be wiki format
17:32:21 <dustymabe> so we have things scattered from the old cloud wg and the new atomic wg
17:32:28 <jberkus> that wasn't really serious
17:32:42 <jberkus> new docs are asciiBinder, that's already chosen
17:32:55 <dustymabe> one VFAD i want to do is have a short few hour session where we "find all relevant docs" to our WG and then create an index of all of them
17:33:04 <roshi> that's right, we were using the cloud space still
17:33:05 <dustymabe> and that can be our front page of our pagure repository
17:33:17 <roshi> and update that space in the wiki
17:33:23 <dustymabe> basically the front page of our pagure repo is links to all the relevant things about the WG
17:33:27 <dustymabe> PRD, etc etc.
17:33:33 <roshi> which should be in the wiki
17:33:42 <dustymabe> right
17:33:45 <roshi> since the wiki is where all new contributors go, and expect to find things
17:33:46 <dustymabe> PRD is fine in the wiki
17:33:56 <roshi> all the things on the pagure space ought to be there too
17:34:07 * roshi continues his defense of the wiki
17:34:08 <dustymabe> roshi: could we just have the index in pagure?
17:34:09 <roshi> :p
17:34:18 <roshi> an index? sure
17:34:23 <jbrooks> I'm sure there's a way to sync them
17:34:30 <dustymabe> yeah that's all i really want
17:34:41 <roshi> but the wiki is kinda the canonical source of truth about groups and what they do for all of Fedora
17:34:43 <dustymabe> i'm fine if the PRD and other WG related things are in the wiki
17:34:55 <dustymabe> i would prefer to have an index on the atomic-wg pagure landing page
17:34:58 <yzhang> Pagure and wiki can link to each other
17:35:01 <yzhang> problem solved
17:35:18 <yzhang> don't hurt me
17:35:18 <dustymabe> and then for "real docs" like how-to's - i would prefer them to be on a readthedocs like site
17:35:32 <miabbott> +1 to that
17:35:36 <dustymabe> roshi: ^^
17:35:39 <dustymabe> thoughts?
17:35:40 <roshi> wiki
17:35:41 <yzhang> should we open an issue to keep track of all this
17:36:00 <roshi> I think our SOPs and whatnot all need to be in the wiki
17:36:04 <roshi> because that's where people look
17:36:29 <yzhang> Can't we just have a similar landing page on both the wiki and pagure
17:36:35 <yzhang> Which indexes all the other docs
17:36:37 <yzhang> and each other
17:36:46 <roshi> sure - we just need to keep the wiki updated is all I'm saying
17:36:52 <maxamillion> roshi: +1
17:36:56 <jberkus> yzhang: that seems hard to maintain
17:37:13 <roshi> because this kind of stuff is making our wiki get further and further away from becoming as good as the arch wiki
17:37:16 <roshi> which we should all want
17:37:24 <roshi> well, all want ours to be that good
17:37:36 <miabbott> roshi: it would be nice if the wiki was canonical, but the first page of google results for 'fedora atomic host' don't even have a link to the wiki
17:37:40 <jbrooks> I want docs as good as those, but meh on wiki
17:37:45 <jbrooks> I like git
17:37:55 <jberkus> Sayan confirms no update to his ticket
17:38:00 <miabbott> roshi: i think those google results are going to steer folks elsewhere
17:38:01 <jbrooks> But surely a script or something can keep them in sync
17:38:03 <roshi> because we don't put anything there
17:38:15 <dustymabe> ok - this is worth it's own discussion sometime
17:38:20 <roshi> that's not an indictment against the wiki, it's our failing to update it like we should
17:38:21 <jbrooks> vfad
17:38:23 <dustymabe> i'm going to propose a VFAD
17:38:25 <maxamillion> I keep saying I'm going to build a tool that allows for the import of docs into the wiki from arbitrary pagure repos in some whitelisted set of accepted markup languages
17:38:29 <maxamillion> but ... you know ... time
17:38:29 <yzhang> can I action that dustymabe
17:38:30 <miabbott> roshi: agreed
17:38:41 <dustymabe> yzhang: the vfad?
17:38:44 <maxamillion> it would basically be pandoc with some magic on top
17:38:48 <roshi> if people come to the project for another group - they'll get to the wiki, then look for Atomic because they heard about it and find nada
17:38:49 <yzhang> yeah, just to track everything we discussed
17:38:51 <yzhang> in a sense
17:38:52 <jberkus> dustymabe: for docs?
17:39:20 <dustymabe> jberkus: well - the vfad was original for finding relevant WG docs
17:39:20 <roshi> vfad is fine
17:39:27 <dustymabe> and creating an index of all the content on our wiki
17:39:33 <roshi> and updating/cleaning the wiki space
17:39:35 <jberkus> ah, ok
17:39:36 <dustymabe> so that we can easily find everything
17:39:41 <roshi> and all other places as well
17:39:49 <dustymabe> i assume we can have a 'docs dicussion' as part of that
17:40:12 <yzhang> #action dustymabe to propose a VFAD for wiki and docs discussion
17:40:17 <dustymabe> sounds good
17:40:32 <yzhang> any objection to moving on?
17:40:38 <yzhang> 3
17:40:39 <yzhang> 2
17:40:40 <yzhang> 1
17:40:49 <yzhang> that's all the meeting tagged items
17:40:55 <yzhang> anything else before open floor?
17:41:22 <yzhang> #topic open floor
17:41:27 <dustymabe> i have sometime
17:41:30 <dustymabe> something*
17:41:32 <dustymabe> sigh
17:41:34 * roshi has nothing he doesn't think
17:41:55 <dustymabe> so we need to schedule a test day for 26 atomic host
17:42:05 <dustymabe> could be worth also testing out the cloud base image as part of that
17:42:27 <dustymabe> roshi: when do you think would be a good time to set that up?
17:42:32 <roshi> we can propose a test-day through the QA group
17:42:40 <roshi> after Beta, I'd say
17:42:40 * jberkus has an item
17:43:00 <dustymabe> roshi: so something like next friday or the following friday?
17:43:04 * jbrooks has a micro item
17:43:11 * yzhang has a micro item
17:43:13 <roshi> depends on if we slip or not come tomorrow
17:43:22 <maxamillion> dustymabe: do we have the use case of "updating a f25 atomic host to f26 atomic host" ... possibly with some stuff installed and running (k8s, openshift origin, $other) ?
17:43:27 <dustymabe> let's just plan for the following friday
17:43:42 <roshi> after beta is a Go?
17:43:47 <dustymabe> maxamillion: yes - we need to make sure that works
17:44:01 <miabbott> perhaps we should be testing that now
17:44:01 <dustymabe> roshi: yeah, theoretically even though atomic is not part of the beta
17:44:06 <dustymabe> miabbott: +1
17:44:08 <yzhang> friday the 9th of June?
17:44:12 <roshi> I just mean for people to have time
17:44:24 <maxamillion> dustymabe: +1
17:44:24 <roshi> as in I'm swamped with release validation and CI stuff
17:44:34 <roshi> but when we release beta, that'll ease a bit
17:44:43 <dustymabe> roshi: indeed - just want to make sure we don't wait too late
17:44:50 <yzhang> sounds like we're in consensus
17:44:52 <dustymabe> because otherwise we won't be able to get changes in
17:45:10 <dustymabe> # dusty and roshi to plan test day for coming weeks
17:45:11 <roshi> right, before Final Freeze for sure
17:45:18 <dustymabe> #action dusty and roshi to plan test day for coming weeks
17:45:26 <dustymabe> #chair
17:45:26 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jberkus jbrooks maxamillion miabbott nzwulfin roshi yzhang
17:45:48 <dustymabe> ok jbrooks jbrooks you had items?
17:45:52 <yzhang> jberkus next
17:45:53 <jberkus> yes
17:45:53 <yzhang> I think
17:46:05 <jberkus> the CfP for Fedora Flock is open
17:46:07 <dustymabe> meant to say jbrooks jberkus
17:46:15 <jberkus> dustymabe: it's a chronic problem
17:46:23 * roshi offers maxamillion to do all the talks
17:46:25 <dustymabe> damn jbs
17:46:34 <jberkus> https://www.flocktofedora.org/
17:46:35 <dustymabe> roshi: sacrificial lamb?
17:46:39 <yzhang> jbieber
17:46:41 <roshi> something like that :p
17:46:52 <dustymabe> what talks do we want to submit?
17:46:52 <jberkus> the plan for this flock is to have entirely work-session type workshops
17:46:57 <maxamillion> roshi: what?
17:46:59 <jberkus> not standard talks
17:47:16 <jberkus> as in, basically, an all-mini-FAD Flock
17:47:18 <roshi> ah
17:47:23 <roshi> interesting
17:47:27 <maxamillion> yeah, having an all-workshop flock will be interesting
17:47:32 <jberkus> Flock 2017 is a more action-oriented event than previous years. This affects the types of session proposals that will be accepted. A team status report is less likely to be accepted than a collaborative team working session or a workshop.
17:47:40 <dustymabe> yeah, TBH i like it the way it was
17:47:47 <maxamillion> dustymabe: same
17:48:00 <jberkus> well, seems good for our group.  I'd like to coordinate on proposals from the Atomic WG
17:48:26 <yzhang> Open a pagure issue to track maybe?
17:48:31 <jberkus> as in, specific things we'd like to get included in Flock.  like, for example, a "contianerize an application" workshop
17:48:34 <jberkus> yzhang: sounds good
17:48:39 <jberkus> also, an #action
17:48:41 <roshi> guess I won't submit the talk I was going to
17:48:45 <roshi> since it's a normal talk
17:48:57 <jberkus> #action everyone to discuss flock proposals next week
17:49:03 <roshi> lol
17:49:07 <roshi> .fas everyone
17:49:07 <zodbot> roshi: cox 'kis kiki' <heloeveryone@freemail.hu> - sandyrockseveryone 'Sandeep' <sandyrockseveryone@gmail.com>
17:49:08 <jberkus> roshi: let's talk about how to re-orient it
17:49:11 <yzhang> jberkus too fast for me
17:49:15 <roshi> lol
17:49:26 <roshi> my talk jberkus ?
17:49:41 <jberkus> FYI, I have some budget to get critical people to Flock if their departments don't have budget
17:49:42 <roshi> can do after
17:49:42 <maxamillion> I'd like to see a "how to create a system container" talk
17:49:49 <jberkus> and Bex has some for outside contribs
17:49:50 <maxamillion> or group workshop or whatever
17:49:51 <jberkus> maxamillion: +1
17:49:59 <jbrooks> maxamillion, +1
17:50:04 <dustymabe> i think we should still submit talks, but also plenty of workshops as well
17:50:05 <jbrooks> I could participate in that
17:50:16 <roshi> that'd be a good one
17:50:22 <maxamillion> woohoo \o/
17:50:26 <roshi> and "How to know if you need a system container or not"
17:50:35 <maxamillion> roshi: +1
17:50:54 <yzhang> Perhaps I should invite giuseppe onboard this meeting?
17:51:03 <yzhang> or well
17:51:11 <yzhang> It's pretty late for him
17:51:19 <jbrooks> yzhang, we could start an issue to discuss it
17:51:24 <jbrooks> do it async
17:51:33 <yzhang> well we have an action for the proposals
17:51:43 <dustymabe> ok - jbrooks you had an item?
17:52:13 <jbrooks> yes
17:52:25 <dustymabe> btw i honestly still think a 'what is atomic host' talk will be valuable - something like what I did for the navops roadshow
17:52:25 <jbrooks> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f4ccc7cb91 this runc needs a bit more karma
17:52:31 <dustymabe> plenty of people still don't know
17:52:41 <roshi> yeah
17:52:49 <roshi> and "Why would I want to use it?
17:52:50 <roshi> "
17:52:51 <jbrooks> But how to make that a workshop
17:53:09 <dustymabe> i'm saying - would still be nice to have it be a talk
17:53:14 <jberkus> apparently there will be *some* talks
17:53:20 <roshi> help people port things to atomic?
17:53:35 <nzwulfin> set up a k8s cluster in under X minutes?
17:53:35 <jberkus> "Atomic vs. Server: Fight!"
17:53:42 <dustymabe> haha
17:53:46 <roshi> is there going to be a keynote workshop?
17:53:50 * roshi ducks
17:53:50 <jberkus> anyway, I think we've talked this one out, more on #fedora-cloud
17:53:56 <dustymabe> yep
17:54:03 <yzhang> alright one last thing from me
17:54:05 <jberkus> jbrooks is next I think
17:54:12 <jbrooks> I already said mine
17:54:16 <yzhang> the runc karma
17:54:17 <jbrooks> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f4ccc7cb91 karma please
17:54:17 <jberkus> ok
17:54:33 <yzhang> anyways, does anyone want to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452221
17:54:42 <yzhang> its the container-engine (docker) container
17:54:47 <yzhang> system container
17:55:35 <yzhang> I'll take that as a maybe
17:55:39 <miabbott> lol
17:55:46 <yzhang> but do check it out if you have the time
17:55:49 <yzhang> that's all
17:55:55 <yzhang> anything else?
17:55:56 <dustymabe> yzhang: i really do want to review it
17:56:09 * dustymabe fails at life
17:56:43 <yzhang> dustymabe: pssh other than roofing I'd say you're living life to the fullest
17:56:47 <yzhang> well maybe too much work
17:56:54 <jbrooks> yzhang, I'll have a look at it
17:57:00 <yzhang> thanks jbrooks!
17:57:06 <yzhang> alright giving it 30 secs
17:57:10 <yzhang> for anything else
17:57:35 <yzhang> ending meeting in 3
17:57:36 <yzhang> 2
17:57:37 <yzhang> 1
17:57:38 <yzhang> #endmeeting
17:57:41 <jberkus> yzhang: ooh, yes, I'd love to try it
17:57:43 <yzhang> #endmeeting