17:00:01 #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg 17:00:01 Meeting started Wed Aug 23 17:00:01 2017 UTC. The chair is jbrooks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_atomic_wg' 17:00:07 #topic roll call 17:00:15 .hello yzhang 17:00:18 yzhang: yzhang 'Yu Qi Zhang' 17:00:24 .hello dustymabe 17:00:25 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 17:00:31 .hello walters 17:00:32 walters: walters 'Colin Walters' 17:00:34 .hello maxamillion 17:00:38 maxamillion: maxamillion 'Adam Miller' 17:01:02 .hello jberkus 17:01:03 jberkus: jberkus 'Josh Berkus' 17:01:24 .hello sinnykumari 17:01:25 ksinny: sinnykumari 'Sinny Kumari' 17:02:11 #chair yzhang dustymabe walters maxamillion jberkus ksinny 17:02:11 Current chairs: dustymabe jberkus jbrooks ksinny maxamillion walters yzhang 17:02:17 .hello jasonbrooks 17:02:20 jbrooks: jasonbrooks 'Jason Brooks' 17:02:26 #topic action items from last meeting 17:02:46 * contyk to update the readme in https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/atomic to point to other places where things are defined and explain why things are the way they are 17:02:57 * dustymabe walters jbrooks contyk to havea separate breakout on this topic 17:03:05 * jberkus to get with bexelbie to organize an atomic social for Flock 17:03:13 .hellomynameis kushal 17:03:14 kushal: kushal 'Kushal Das' 17:03:15 .hello sayanchowdhury 17:03:17 sayan: sayanchowdhury 'Sayan Chowdhury' 17:03:28 #chair sayan kushal 17:03:28 Current chairs: dustymabe jberkus jbrooks ksinny kushal maxamillion sayan walters yzhang 17:03:41 We have that separate meeting scheduled for tomorrow 17:03:55 jbrooks: indeed 17:04:02 meeting? 17:04:16 jberkus, About modularity 17:04:25 ah ok 17:04:29 jberkus: 'breakout meeting' 17:05:11 #info contyk's atomic modularity readme: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/atomic/blob/master/f/README.md 17:05:57 #info msg on atomic-devel list about lunch at flock: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-August/msg00051.html 17:07:04 We have no meeting-tagged tickets, or suggested topics 17:07:09 #topic Open Floor 17:07:15 sayan: thanks for adding issues! 17:07:32 topic pending release 17:07:36 #topic pending release 17:07:45 so we proposed a release candidate earlier this week 17:08:16 jberkus has found an issue (we believe) where the install from ISO (burned to USB) fails for his minnowboards (UEFI) 17:08:26 I have tested with an intel NUC and have not had issues 17:08:38 maxamillion: is going to do a few more hardware tests 17:08:49 The install appears to succeed, but it doesn't boot after that, right? 17:08:50 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/324 17:08:55 jbrooks: correct 17:09:10 if we are unable to reproduce the issue on other hardware I'd like to propose that we move forward with the release 17:09:18 and debug the minnowboard failures next week at Flock 17:09:45 we can link to the previous two week release and note the issue in the release blog post 17:09:46 agree, bare metal users are generally going to do in place updates with potential periodic reinstalls, so can always use an old ISO 17:10:33 +1 17:10:35 if we can get one other bare metal device to boot,I'm OK with going ahead with a warning in the announcement 17:10:50 maxamillion: ^^ FYI 17:10:58 dustymabe: I cna bring the minnowboard to flock, but not a monitor 17:11:05 jberkus: that's fine 17:11:05 dustymabe: +1 17:11:11 i've got a tiny monitor I can bring 17:11:21 jberkus, dustymabe in autocloud we also saw some issues with reboots of the libvirt box, could not reproduce it else where in other hardware. 17:11:38 Worked fine in the hardware I have. 17:11:42 kushal: libvirt vagrant box? 17:12:01 dustymabe, Yes, there were two failures after the final reboot in the last week. 17:12:07 I was trying to reproduce it. 17:12:14 But, I think we are okay. 17:12:31 ok i'll release back to open floor 17:12:44 #topic open floor 17:12:58 sorry, in a video call also ... reading backlog 17:13:26 maxamillion, How's the container release looking? 17:13:43 * kushal is going to miss Flock. Doctor asked not to travel. 17:13:56 Along with thumb, now I am having back problem. 17:14:04 jbrooks: it will start after the 2WA, if we get one out today, I'll get a container release out tomorrow but it'll take like 6-8 hours because it's a pain in the ass 17:14:08 kushal: That's sad :/ 17:14:17 there's too many commas in that sentence ... sorry 17:14:23 maxamillion, :) ack 17:15:08 jbrooks: sorry about all the delays 17:15:10 kushal: I think you need to go into a bubble for 6 months or something 17:15:28 :) 17:16:02 one other topic for open floor 17:16:06 Shoot 17:16:20 I'm working on getting a unified repo set up for f27 and "beyond" 17:16:32 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6984 17:16:46 kushal: I know about back problems 17:17:00 i think dennis' concerns will be alleviated once I go through the process to be a part of releng like ralph bean just did 17:17:09 kushal: if I had to fly as far as you, I'd not make it to flock 17:17:23 kushal: as it is I'll be travelling with a half-suitcase of exercise equipment 17:18:12 jberkus: want to give us an update on atomic-host-docs repo? 17:18:51 dustymabe: as of now we're mostly set up for next week's workshop 17:18:57 we have issues for all of the missing docs 17:19:04 jberkus: cool - did you investigate openshift online pro? 17:19:24 dustymabe: we have an account. I'm working with the OpenShift Docs team; they want to move to the same CI/CD workflow we want 17:19:38 so we'll be collabing with the openshift docs team on making a container image etc/. 17:19:55 and designing the templates, jenkins files, etc. 17:20:45 this will probably require having an RPM for AsciiBinder; would anyone be up for creating that? 17:21:01 jberkus, There's one in copr 17:21:09 oh, cool. link? 17:21:26 well - wouldn't it be nice if we got that into the real repos though? 17:21:41 dustymabe: I think it would make maxamillion happier 17:21:43 yes, but making it is a first step 17:21:44 if someone creates the rpm I can review it 17:22:07 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/asciibinder/ 17:22:19 Yeah, that actually failed to build 17:22:27 jbrooks: so you made the rpm? 17:22:28 I saw a working one in this megarepo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rubygems/rubygems/ 17:22:36 It's sort of automagic 17:22:49 copr has gem2rpm built in 17:22:49 jberkus: meh, whatever ;) 17:23:29 any takers on creating a review for this in Fedora (and ultimately EPEL) ? 17:23:58 dustymabe: is there a package review BZ? 17:24:03 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rubygems/rubygems/package/rubygem-ascii_binder/ 17:24:15 maxamillion: i imagine not, but I can look 17:24:42 no 17:24:48 if there is one, I can review it 17:25:16 so I won't have hosting for the new docs ready quite in time for the workshop' 17:25:20 but soon thereafer 17:25:29 well, I can have hosting ready, just not CI/CD 17:25:30 however, I'm not looking to mentor a new packager at the moment, I'm too under water to really offer a decent amount of attention to someone new to things 17:25:36 I guess the test one in my copr built for el7 but failed for f26 17:25:38 jberkus: if you work out how to run it in openshift we can host it on my cluster for the workshop 17:25:43 also web design is still pending 17:25:58 dustymabe: I have an OS pro account, it's running 17:26:02 oh ok 17:26:10 the holdup is designing the CI/CD templates 17:26:13 and workflows 17:26:23 jbrooks: do you want to take the rpm you have and tweak it to get it working for fedora and then throw up a review 17:26:27 maxamillion: and I can review it 17:26:36 dustymabe, Yeah, I'll do it 17:26:45 jberkus: what "workflows" are there? 17:26:50 #action jbrooks to submit asciibinder pkg for review 17:26:50 dustymabe: +1 17:26:58 jbrooks: thanks a bunch! 17:27:18 merge to branch --> jenkins --> build container image --> push --> deploy to OS.com 17:27:40 * maxamillion grumbles about jenkins 17:27:41 jberkus: so I have mostly that already (without jenkins) 17:27:49 just with plain vanilla openshift 17:27:52 it's real easy 17:28:04 with asciibinder? 17:28:25 jberkus: it's with hugo (static website generator) 17:28:31 but should be much the same 17:28:56 what's more complicated with asciibiner is that we need a custom builder container 17:28:56 jberkus: i can show you after the meeing 17:28:58 sure 17:29:36 anyone else with anything for open floor? 17:29:47 ksinny? i know you were going to try some stuff with the new rpm-ostree 17:29:56 a new rpm-ostre you say? 17:29:58 can we give jzb about 100 seconds? he pinged me but isnt here yet 17:30:21 Sure 17:30:56 dustymabe: Didn't get time, was dibugging an issue which was related to building FAH on armv7. Problem is deep down related to 32 bit issue I believe 17:31:25 Drakonis_: yeah there was a new release of rpm-ostree 17:31:46 walters: Any update on implementing rpm-ostree feature from https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/877 in anaconda? 17:32:01 not yet sorry, it's on the list though 17:32:29 cool - we'll wait on jzb 17:32:30 walters: No proble, just wanted to get current status :) 17:32:40 ksinny: any chance you will be at flock? 17:32:51 dustymabe: Yes, I will be there :) 17:33:12 oh. everyone: thursday lunch at Flock 17:33:17 was the only timeslot I coudl find 17:33:33 ok, jzb won't make it, so not waiting 17:34:03 All right, so I think we're all set for this week 17:34:15 jbrooks: final item 17:34:19 heh 17:34:21 cancel next weeks meeting 17:34:27 +1 17:34:50 dustymabe: what, Just because it's *during* an atomic preso? 17:35:19 maybe 17:36:21 #action dusty to send out email about cancel next weeks meeting 17:36:33 jbrooks: do the honors 17:36:39 #endmeeting