#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_coreos_meeting
Meeting started by dustymabe at 16:30:36 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (dustymabe, 16:30:45)
- Action items from last meeting (dustymabe, 16:34:41)
- miabbott openeed a ticket to discuss criteria
for adding new packages to the base layer (dustymabe,
16:35:48)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/641
(dustymabe,
16:35:55)
- ACTION: jlebon to
reach out to the rpm maintainers to see if the relocation of the
rpmdb path is something they're willing to own for F34 (dustymabe,
16:38:16)
- Need dnsmasq for podman to create CNI networks (dustymabe, 16:39:18)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/519
(dustymabe,
16:39:24)
- https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/please-consider-reinstating-dnsmasq-in-coreos/23615
(dustymabe,
16:41:09)
- AGREED: we will
include the dnsmasq rpm in the host to enable integrations with
services that utilize the dnsmasq binary. We will add an override to
disalbe the dnsmasq service and add documentation that explains how
to re-enable it and explain why it's preferred that users not use
the service directly. (dustymabe,
17:17:46)
- 2020-09-30: gather status update for Fedora Council (dustymabe, 17:18:09)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/608
(dustymabe,
17:18:16)
- https://hackmd.io/A7VptlnASNy7bf2BZhma1g
(dustymabe,
17:18:44)
- tracker: Fedora 33 rebase work (dustymabe, 17:24:32)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/609
(dustymabe,
17:24:38)
- the `next-devel` stream is moved over to F33
and we're planning to do a `next` release with f33 content
today (dustymabe,
17:25:08)
- (dustymabe,
17:25:30)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/644
(dustymabe,
17:25:41)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/643
(dustymabe,
17:25:47)
- https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/646
(dustymabe,
17:26:05)
- open floor (dustymabe, 17:27:48)
Meeting ended at 17:30:05 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- jlebon to reach out to the rpm maintainers to see if the relocation of the rpmdb path is something they're willing to own for F34
Action items, by person
- jlebon
- jlebon to reach out to the rpm maintainers to see if the relocation of the rpmdb path is something they're willing to own for F34
People present (lines said)
- dustymabe (101)
- jlebon (25)
- zodbot (15)
- lucab (15)
- ilius (13)
- jdoss (9)
- bgilbert (9)
- cyberpear (6)
- walters (6)
- misc (4)
- skunkerk (3)
- bcotton (1)
- aoei (1)
- lorbus (1)
- davdunc (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.