13:00:59 #startmeeting Fedora Docs Project - Agenda https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 13:00:59 Meeting started Mon Sep 19 13:00:59 2011 UTC. The chair is zoglesby. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:01:03 #topic roll call 13:01:10 * zoglesby is here 13:01:17 i'm here 13:01:18 * jhradilek is here. 13:01:23 * jjmcd 13:01:49 #meetingname Fedora Docs 13:01:49 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 13:01:54 * Sparks 13:02:59 We don't have any follow ups from last week, so we will move past that 13:03:04 #topic Fedora 16 Schedule 13:03:16 #link http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-docs-tree-tasks.html 13:03:22 +Build f-r-n.rpm and Push to updates-candidate (2011-09-12 2011-09-14) 13:03:44 jjmcd: this is done correct? 13:03:51 Still sitting at "will be pushed" 13:04:04 Has Karma, I don't think we can do anything but wait 13:05:01 +Reminder: Send Project Wide-Final Release Notes Deadlines (2011-09-22 2011-09-22) 13:05:24 jjmcd: are you going to send this? 13:05:29 Affirm 13:05:33 Reminder to Trans that Final Guides POT files are coming (2011-09-13 (2011-09-13) 13:05:51 I will take care of this 13:06:03 #action jjmcd Reminder: Send Project Wide-Final Release Notes Deadlines 13:06:21 #action zoglesby Reminder to Trans that Final Guides POT files are coming 13:06:36 + Remind new guide owners SRPM package review 13:06:38 note that this is not case for the majority of guides now ^ 13:06:48 * the case 13:07:16 I believe that is just for the Release Notes 13:07:20 I am not sure about the last task as the only guide that is packaged is the release notes 13:07:20 and our docs are still under Fedora 15 (Lovelock) Documentation in Tx 13:07:31 Sparks, Guides != Release Notes 13:07:56 Once upon a time we were going to package all guides 13:08:05 jjmcd: Release Notes are a guide... not all guides are release notes 13:08:14 pkovar: I am not sure how to fix that 13:08:16 Correct but we aren't doing that now 13:08:17 Release Notes are not a guide 13:08:20 that would make sense, yes, thanks 13:08:22 separate schedule 13:08:33 This item is under the "Guides" tree 13:08:40 It should be removed 13:08:42 jjmcd: or rename the item? 13:08:55 Yeah, we should either remove it or decide to package 13:08:56 Sparks: yeah I will talk to rbergeron to have it removed for next time 13:09:06 it is misleading, that's for sure 13:09:08 Release notes don't need review 13:09:14 already there 13:09:42 That's why it says NEW guide owners 13:09:43 zoglesby: She aught to be able to remove it now in an effort to clean up the schedule and be better prepared for next time. 13:10:15 #action zoglesby talk to glezos about how to change tags for guides to f16 13:10:18 jjmcd: Is that "New guide" owners or new "guide owners" 13:10:24 yeah 13:10:37 Sparks: okay I will ask her later today 13:10:42 But if a guide were already packaged, a new owner wouldn't need to review 13:10:54 perhaps 13:11:03 zoglesby: i asked about that a week ago in the trans list... 13:11:12 i mean the tags 13:11:25 With the naming schema every guide packaged would need to be reviewed each release. 13:11:37 but that's a big can o worms... 13:11:38 no reply so far, so i can ping them again ^ 13:11:46 pkovar: I don't see how to change anywere on a guide that I am an owner of 13:12:01 I'm not sure we need to worry about tagging in TX 13:12:13 Translators aren't working on old stuff... 13:12:16 pkovar: I will ask in #transifex 13:12:19 we are updating old stuff... 13:12:27 s/are/aren't 13:12:27 yes, i cant see that either. the project owners from trans can do that though 13:12:47 We should be able to just update the POT files and let the translators continue on. 13:13:06 Sparks: but if it seems as if a guide is for f15 they may not work on it 13:13:19 right, provided we have an up-to-date category with relevant docs 13:13:31 zoglesby: Right... but a guide is a guide... they should be working on current and never see old... 13:13:47 so we just keep updating the POT files because most of the time the text isn't changing that much. 13:13:51 zoglesby: they can if the guide is still listed in the docs release set 13:14:18 +Final Build All Guides: All Languages (2011-09-21 Mon 2011-09-26) 13:14:19 pkovar: We should just have the current POTs on TX and nothing else 13:14:31 zoglesby: Remove... 13:14:38 #undo 13:14:38 Removing item from minutes: 13:14:48 ? 13:14:55 Sparks: so then somebody swould have to go though the category and remove old items 13:15:08 pkovar: Nothing is old... it's all current 13:15:26 pkovar: So if a guide hasn't been updated since F14 it's still the current version 13:15:27 i mean guides not branched for f15 or f15 13:15:37 *f16 13:15:39 zoglesby: I meant that can be removed. 13:15:53 alright, i see 13:16:03 pkovar: Exactly. Doesn't matter. The latest is the current. Doesn't matter if it's branched for current F version. 13:16:12 its simply a tag issue, the POT files are all current 13:16:29 you're right, thanks 13:16:36 * Sparks would hate to see current material not be translated just because it's considered old. 13:16:46 old == not current F version. 13:16:59 +Final Build All Guides: All Languages (2011-09-21 Mon 2011-09-26) 13:17:18 zoglesby: That can be removed from the schedule 13:17:30 Sparks: oh 13:17:34 I see what you mean 13:17:43 Sparks: sorry I am a little slow today 13:18:19 thats all for this week then 13:18:23 #topic FUDcon Blacksburg 13:18:32 #undo 13:18:32 Removing item from minutes: 13:18:39 #topic FUDcons 13:18:59 any thing that needs mentioned about any of the fudcons? 13:19:33 #info Sparks gave ownership of the Publican talk to jsmith 13:19:38 #undo 13:19:48 #info Sparks gave ownership of the Publican talk to jsmith for FUDCon Blacksburg 13:19:56 OK, I'll do it :-) 13:20:14 #chairs Sparks 13:20:18 #chair Sparks 13:20:18 Current chairs: Sparks zoglesby 13:20:22 And I'm planning on helping jjmcd with the Publican/DocBook stuff at FUDCon Milan 13:20:24 try again? 13:20:29 cool 13:20:39 #chair jjmcd 13:20:39 Current chairs: Sparks jjmcd zoglesby 13:21:02 Expecting jhradilek to do some of the lifting at Milan 13:21:11 #info Sparks gave ownership of the Publican talk to jsmith for FUDCon Blacksburg 13:21:11 jjmcd: Yeah... me too! 13:21:46 jjmcd: Yeah, I was supposed to cover the Publican part. 13:21:57 :-) 13:22:36 And I still intend to do it. :) 13:22:39 #topic Docs QA 13:22:44 #link http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2011-September/013736.html 13:23:02 I outlined our plan for QA in my FAD report 13:23:29 and Sparks is going to document that on the wiki? :P 13:24:34 zoglesby: I can... 13:24:42 * Sparks got caught up in $DAYJOB 13:24:46 Sparks: i was not sure if you where going to bite 13:24:53 I will start working on it 13:25:05 * jhradilek is going to express his concerns in the mailing list. 13:25:38 jhradilek: please 13:26:05 yes, let's have a discussion on that in the list 13:27:18 anything else? 13:27:30 #actions zoglesby and Sparks document QA process on wiki 13:27:42 #topic Guide Status 13:28:04 Anyone need any help or have anything here? 13:28:08 * bcotton 13:28:17 bcotton: the floor is yours 13:28:50 * zoglesby notes we still need updated screenshots for the users guide 13:29:44 As much as I hate to admit it, I'm making absolutely no progress on the RPM Guide, mostly just due to the other things I've got going on in life. I think it can be a useful document (though perhaps outside of Fedora's responsibility?), but I don't think my ownership is doing anything to move it forward. Any takers? 13:30:21 bcotton: i already started a new guide called the Fedora packagers guide, ss 13:30:33 see my message to the docs list 13:30:49 pkovar: i saw that, though i'm not convinced it's a 1:1 replacement. 13:31:05 bcotton: can your bring it up on the list? Someone who is not here may want to help 13:31:12 zoglesby: gladly 13:31:14 since the old rpm guide is more like a book-style guide, it makes more sense to do it like a topic-based help 13:31:53 yes, let's followup there 13:32:22 any other guide stuff? 13:33:15 yes 13:33:24 jjmcd: 13:33:43 Someone (zoglesby maybe) sent me a bug for some guide that needed to be noted in RNs 13:33:58 I added it to RNs but didnt' close the bug as it was against some other guide 13:34:25 jjmcd: I think I made a duplicate (Sparks do you remember?) 13:34:47 oh, i forgot about the documentation guide. i moved the translation chapter in from wiki 13:35:06 i think it's ready to be published (as a draft) 13:35:20 and then work on other parts 13:35:49 any thoughts or plans wrt it? 13:37:04 pkovar: Sparks and jsmith did some work at OLF and its published as a draft 13:37:36 zoglesby: yes, saw that, thanks guys 13:37:52 (or they at least made a shell of a doc) 13:38:19 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 13:38:40 jjmcd answered the only question I had for this 13:38:56 anyone have anything? 13:40:07 #topic Open floor discussion 13:40:20 The floor is open 13:41:07 suehle: do you have anything, or still on hold for Sparks (trolling?) 13:41:10 * bcotton moves we translate the meeting transcripts into Pirate 13:41:16 All about Sparks 13:41:25 Was considering making the same motion as bcotton, so I'll second it. :) 13:41:29 bcotton, aya, matey 13:41:49 bcotton: please upload a POT to transifex 13:41:56 Sparks: When shall we expect more of your wisdom? 13:42:09 zoglesby: I've always wanted the attention of a woman... suehle has changed my mind. :) 13:42:16 So what'd I do now? 13:42:18 Sparks: I'll let your wife know. 13:42:37 suehle: no comment 13:43:25 So I need to work on the Documentation Guide and get it to suehle for QA... correct? 13:43:32 Yes 13:43:55 It's on my list 13:44:38 Any other items? 13:45:11 suehle: oh, count me in then 13:45:20 for the docs guide 13:46:23 thanks everyone for attending 13:46:27 #endmeeting