14:00:00 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:00:00 Meeting started Mon Jan 7 14:00:00 2013 UTC. The chair is bcotton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:20 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00:34 started at 14:00:00? bounus points to me! 14:00:39 bonus, as well 14:00:42 #topic Roll Call 14:00:43 * zoglesby is here 14:00:47 * Capesteve wave 14:01:06 * jsmith is here (but only barely) 14:01:49 * lnovich here 14:04:06 * randomuser 14:04:12 #chair zoglesby 14:04:12 Current chairs: bcotton zoglesby 14:04:16 #info Participants are reminded to make liberal use of #info #link #help in order to make the minutes "more better" 14:04:26 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 14:04:42 okay, i sent a poke to guide owners on the mailing list, but it's probably good to do that again, so 14:04:46 #action bcotton to solicit guide updates on mailing list 14:04:50 jjmcd_: ping 14:06:26 okay, no jjmcd_ 14:06:43 #action jjmcd_ to update the install directory for the Release Notes 14:06:50 #topic Fedora 18 schedule 14:06:58 #link http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html 14:07:16 * jreznik is around 14:07:17 #info F18 final is scheduled for 15 Jan 14:07:24 good morning, jreznik 14:07:53 * zoglesby has to run 14:08:27 btw. if any poking is still needed, /me can help 14:08:52 have your pokestick sharpened? 14:10:35 any other discussion on the schedule or guide status? 14:11:47 * shaiton says Hi, and know that he as too look for fr plublications :s 14:11:55 #topic Release Notes 14:12:14 * randomuser ahem 14:12:42 randomuser: go 14:13:23 We're behind schedule on the release notes, so while information that might be added continue to come to light, i think we should bite the bullet and declare them finished 14:13:41 Sorry /me is here, just brain dead 14:13:50 mornin, jjmcd_ 14:13:55 And no 14:13:55 I'm going to do a review today before pushing POTs out, and would appreciate it if anyone else had the time to skim as well 14:14:38 randomuser: on the people.fp.o site? 14:14:41 * pkovar is late 14:14:54 that too 14:15:39 yeah, I can put up something on fedorapeople to review 14:15:58 #info randomuser will publish RN preview on http://people.fedoraproject.org/groups/docs/release-notes/ before updating POTs 14:18:27 i have nothing else on the release notes 14:18:36 anyone else have RN-related discussion? 14:19:15 #topic /usr/share/help 14:19:23 pkovar, the floor is yours 14:19:33 thanks 14:19:56 i plan to file a bug report against publican 14:20:27 to see if the global change of the install dir is realistic 14:20:44 from /usr/doc to /usr/help 14:20:57 there would be still some issues 14:21:18 like publican using a different standard for lang codes, for example 14:21:24 #action pkovar to file a bug report against publican to see if the global change of the install dir is realistic 14:21:42 but the idea is to have both the fedora and gnome docs installed in /usr/help 14:22:04 #info the idea is to have both the fedora and gnome docs installed in /usr/share/help 14:22:24 with the plan to implement docs search from gnome shell 14:22:24 pkovar: is this something that other packages will be moving toward, too? 14:22:47 bcotton: if approved, yes 14:23:01 pkovar: approved by? FESCo? 14:23:06 * zoglesby is back 14:23:25 Docs are in /usr/share/doc, help files in /usr/share/help - If Publican produced help files it may be a good plan\ 14:23:27 by docs communities / people doing the docs packaging... 14:24:08 pkovar, if I understand this correctly, you want indexed content to be searchable, and it helps to separate CHANGELOG etc from user help docs? 14:24:17 Many apps put their help files in help, all put their doc files in doc 14:24:19 jjmcd_: you mostly have license files in /usr/share/doc 14:24:26 Mostly 14:24:38 randomuser: exactly 14:24:40 But you also have docs for proper apps. No docs in help 14:25:07 the ones that only have licenses are just lazy developers 14:25:36 there are no docs in help, only help files 14:26:00 jjmcd_: it depends on how you define documents (docs) 14:26:16 i think that help files are documents, actually 14:26:43 True, we used to put RNs in yelp 14:26:51 Well, talk to Shaun about that 14:27:09 But yelp became unuseable for docs 14:27:33 jjmcd_: yes, i already talked to shaun about that : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690058 14:28:12 it looks like we could have search if /usr/share/help is used... 14:28:25 no go with /usr/share/doc 14:28:30 There is no real structure to help. It can be thought of as index cards. Different from docs 14:29:10 pkovar, certainly if you used mallard 14:29:20 jjmcd_: that's the case with gnome help files, yes 14:29:52 jjmcd_: but i think we can still produce guides and install them in /usr/share/help 14:30:05 but you won't get search out of it 14:30:28 gnome used to produce guides in docbook and they were installed in /usr/share/help 14:30:39 yes, before they changed yelp 14:30:47 we used to, too 14:30:48 jjmcd_: we will if we use /usr/share/help :-) 14:31:12 only if you write for yelp 14:31:29 jjmcd_: yelp fully supports HTML 14:31:49 so we can view our publican books in yelp 14:31:49 Another issues we ran into that shawn promoised to fix - incompatible with KDE 14:31:58 yes view 14:32:24 I don't believe search tho unless you wrote in mallard 14:32:26 jjmcd_: yes, KDE is another issue 14:33:07 jjmcd_: why? i see no problem in implementing a search provider indexing publican html files 14:33:24 As I recall, yelp would really trash html if the user selected the wrong colors as well 14:33:44 gnome shell already has a provider for documents like pdfs, chat logs, etc, 14:33:54 why not publican books.. 14:34:07 just needs to be done 14:34:24 jjmcd_: haven't seen that issue yet 14:34:27 But we could do that for leaving the docs in the docs place, too 14:34:54 Theat was one of the other reasons we left yelp 14:35:02 jjmcd_: the we would probably be indexing lots of useless content 14:35:15 but the non-GNOME desktops was the big reason 14:35:41 pkovar: and shaun doesn't like /doc at all :-) 14:35:56 yeah, well, he wants the workd to be mallard 14:36:10 And it is superb FOR HELP FILES] 14:36:53 jjmcd_: well, he is willing to implement support for publican, but only in one root dir 14:37:02 that dir being help 14:37:26 So what about all the other desktops? 14:37:45 BTW, yelp would fix a lot of ugliness around handling languages 14:38:08 jjmcd_: i plan to talk to some kde people 14:38:24 jjmcd_: yes, that's an important point 14:38:42 I think Shaun did some work to make yelp less KDE hostile, but then he lost interest 14:39:00 Probably because the KDE help thing is so much better 14:39:13 i think we can at least try to improve things a bit 14:39:51 And a few years back there was some impetus to get the various help shchemes together 14:40:25 But then everyone got distracted by GNOME shell 14:42:21 yep... 14:42:39 sounds like we have more to work out on this, but is there anything else that needs to get snuck in this week? 14:43:09 Now that we know GNOME shell is never going to deliver its promises, maybe folks have the time to revisit consolidating the help schemes 14:44:23 okay, moving on, then 14:44:26 #topic FUDcon NA 14:44:32 #info In Lawrence, KS January 18-20 14:44:41 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Lawrence_2013 14:45:05 I think we can remove this item as only Sparks and I will be attending 14:45:27 aww 14:45:39 * jjmcd_ will be in SaR training 14:46:06 jjmcd_: I hope you will not be jumping out of a helo 14:46:18 Nope, wildernedd first aid 14:46:23 wilderness 14:46:36 or wild nerd first aid 14:46:43 :) 14:48:11 * jsmith is *hoping* to be there 14:48:58 jsmith: hoping? I hope you will be there (and to meet bcotton and company ;-) 14:50:06 jreznik: unless he's passing through lafayette on his way there, he might have a hard time with that :-) 14:51:51 anything else on FUDCon? 14:52:42 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 14:52:50 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:52:53 yup. bugz 14:53:12 oh, i have a question here 14:53:18 randomuser: go ahead 14:53:56 is there a way to search for bugs that are tagged with fedora_requires_release_note flag, besides going off the email? 14:54:24 there's a pattern matching function in BZ custom search, but I couldn't make it dance 14:54:27 randomuser: yes, i think it's under the advanced search options 14:54:45 i did it once, i should have bookmarked it 14:54:57 I can keep poking at it if not 14:55:59 #topic open floor discussion 14:56:10 we have about 4 minutes for anything that hasn't been covered 14:56:45 Release Annoucemment still needs love 14:56:54 #help Release Annoucemment still needs love 14:56:56 jreznik: hint hint 14:57:07 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F18_release_announcement 14:57:09 zoglesby: is it to the point where we can make it Marketing's problem? 14:57:17 zoglesby: thanks 14:57:36 KDE should be KDE Plasma Workspaces 14:57:54 bcotton: sure, jreznik and rbergeron had some input for content, but other then that its ready for marketing 14:57:56 * jreznik is going to fix it 14:58:00 suehle: ^^ 14:58:24 but otherwise it seems ok to be sent to marketing 14:58:59 okay, great 14:59:12 bcotton: I will send an email to marketing and a reminder in irc 14:59:15 and we've reached the end of the hour and QA probably wants to kick us out :-) 14:59:18 zoglesby: thanks! 14:59:21 thianks everyone! 14:59:26 #endmeeting