14:00:25 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:00:25 Meeting started Mon Jan 14 14:00:25 2013 UTC. The chair is Sparks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:34 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00:34 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00:39 #topic Roll Call 14:01:23 morning, Sparks 14:01:40 * Capesteve made it 14:01:48 * bcotton is here (bus ran late) 14:01:57 .chair bcotton 14:01:59 bcotton is seated in a chair with a nice view of a placid lake, unsuspecting that another chair is about to be slammed into them. 14:02:06 lolwut 14:02:22 #chair bcotton 14:02:22 Current chairs: Sparks bcotton 14:02:28 ah geez 14:02:57 * jjmcd_ . 14:03:23 bcotton: The agenda hasn't been updated and I don't have a copy of last week's meeting minutes. 14:03:50 bcotton: So... I'll just let you take over. :) 14:04:31 Sparks: sounds good 14:04:45 * suehle is here for whatever that's worth :) 14:05:10 woot! 14:05:21 * pkovar is here 14:05:24 * zoglesby is here 14:06:06 well i'd call that good enough 14:06:17 #info Participants are reminded to make liberal use of #info #link #help in order to make the minutes "more better" 14:06:23 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 14:06:39 i'm pretty sure i poked the list for guide updates 14:06:47 bcotton: You did 14:06:59 jjmcd_: update the install directory for the RN? 14:07:02 or I got the message via mental telepathy 14:07:08 negative 14:07:18 * jhradilek is here, just late. 14:08:13 jjmcd_: okay, we'll just let that drop then, i suspect it's a little bit late to make that change before 8am tomorrow :-) 14:08:29 I think the actual rpm was like a week ago 14:08:37 even that was later than I suspected 14:08:46 robyn had suggested moving the deprecated features from release announcement to release notes. any thoughts? 14:09:02 there's only one thing listed, so it's not making either one a ton longer, but length of the announcement was the motivation 14:09:13 suehle: it's too late for that, but we can consider it for f19 14:09:35 we'll come back to that in a moment 14:09:35 I expect we will have an RN update RPM in a few weeks 14:09:37 bcotton: We could 0-day it but that would just be annoying. 14:09:44 suehle: the text is in the release notes for the changes, but I would agree that going forward a section would make sense 14:10:15 pkovar: did you file a bug report against publican re: global change of install dir? 14:10:41 bcotton: not yet, still on my to do list 14:11:00 okay, then we'll leave it on 14:11:02 #action pkovar to file a bug report against publican to see if the global change of the install dir is realistic 14:11:07 thanks 14:11:13 #topic Fedora 18 schedule 14:11:27 #link http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html 14:11:37 #info F18 final is tomorrow 14:11:53 any last-minute schedule discussion? 14:12:30 #topic Release Notes 14:12:56 #info rbergeron has suggested we move deprecated features from the Release Announcement to the Release Notes 14:13:01 discussion? 14:13:19 i like it 14:13:39 i do, too 14:13:56 section 2.3.2 of the release notes has the note in question 14:15:02 but I would agree that when should have a dedeicated part of the release notes for it. there is also a note about Perl deprecation in perl later 14:15:05 hi 14:15:12 so one place to see it all makes sense 14:15:22 i 14:15:24 zoglesby: would it be better to put it in the relevant topic area? 14:15:53 'i'm not sure the perl example fits the mold, but a section for broader scope deprecation is a good idea 14:16:20 bcotton: maybe have a section that notes makes note to see section Xfor deprectation of X feature 14:16:37 zoglesby: good compromise :-) 14:17:05 let's turn this around the other way: suehle, is there a case where mentioning deprecations in the RA would be desired? 14:17:54 We could always just add a line under features that says "For stuff that's been deprecated, see the release notes." 14:19:14 okay, so are we all agreed that deprecated items belong in the RN and not the RA? 14:19:22 #agree 14:19:43 we'll figure out the specific implementation when it's time to start putting the F19 RN together 14:20:53 #agreed for future releases, deprecation notices will exist solely in the Release Notes 14:20:58 anything else on RN? 14:21:13 install dir - did it change? 14:21:22 pkovar: it did not 14:21:23 was just wondering.. 14:21:27 ah, ok 14:21:43 I should be able to do that for the first update, tho 14:21:46 well, not that it matters that much, but 14:22:17 interestingly enough, KDE is also using /HTML subdir 14:22:24 jjmcd_, i was looking over the d-p-r code; it seems like we could just declare everything %doc and be done? 14:22:29 but KDE doc is a mess i hear :-) 14:23:15 randomuser, I would hope so, but I would want to test to be sure. I think the javascript may also need work 14:23:41 * randomuser nods 14:25:07 anything else on RN? 14:25:56 #topic /usr/share/help 14:26:05 pkovar: did we have anything further to discuss about this? 14:26:25 no, not now 14:26:35 okay 14:26:36 #topic FUDcon NA 14:26:47 #info In Lawrence, KS January 18-20 14:26:52 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Lawrence_2013 14:27:05 probably nothing to discuss, but here's one last reminder 14:27:08 ! 14:27:12 zoglesby: go ahead 14:28:25 I think we should poke suehle and co to talk about our interactions with marketing and figure how best to work RA and other tasks going forward 14:28:42 also include jreznik 14:28:57 that sounds like a reasonable thing to do 14:29:43 we made changes to the work flow this release and we need to get the schedule to reflect them and still give everyone time to do their part 14:30:30 * jreznik will be available 14:30:48 that is all I have 14:31:06 good idea, btw. I wanted to meet you for that reason 14:31:08 anything else on FUDcon? 14:31:28 Pack your glove 14:31:29 s 14:31:41 suehle: :( 14:32:27 FUDCon 2014 Cancun... 14:32:33 zoglesby: +1 14:32:35 #topic Docs Leader election 14:32:41 #info It is tradition that at the end of every release, the Docs lead offers up the throne 14:32:47 #info bcotton will be unavailable to lead the group for F19 14:32:53 #info Volunteers and nominations due to the mailing list by 0000 UTC on Friday, 11 January. If there are multiple volunteers or nominees, we will set up an election. 14:32:59 #action bcotton to post call for volunteers to mailing list 14:33:42 if you read between the lines, what i said was "now is a great time to throw your friends under the bus" 14:33:52 * Sparks nominates zoglesby 14:34:00 * suehle seconds it 14:34:01 Sparks: you beat me to it! 14:34:12 wait that sounds wrong 14:34:19 #info zoglesby has been nominated by Sparks 14:34:24 * zoglesby was going to toss sparks under the bus 14:34:37 zoglesby: It's good to have friends isn't it? 14:34:47 Slowest typist has to be docs leader... that makes sense :D 14:34:50 zoglesby: no reason you can't. we can always have a deathmatch to settle it. but i think sparks is too busy being a board member or whatever 14:34:59 I think there is a rule against re-election 14:35:29 zoglesby: by which you mean "prohibition against double-jeopardy"? 14:35:46 Double Jeopardy is where the dollar values have doubled! 14:35:59 zoglesby: do you decline to accept the nomination from Sparks? 14:36:18 bcotton: no, I don't have an issue with it... 14:36:31 maybe you should 14:36:54 bcotton: but I would be happy to see fresh meat 14:37:07 zoglesby: If you like this idea I've got another one for you. 14:37:36 Sparks: I am still to young to be presedent 14:38:03 zoglesby: Even better 14:38:36 Sparks: this can't be good 14:40:18 anything else on elections? 14:40:32 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 14:40:47 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:40:55 #topic Open floor discussion 14:42:25 nothing? 14:43:08 Haven't we done enough damage for one day? 14:43:12 never! 14:43:22 Sparks: yes you have 14:43:26 thanks to everyone for your hard work on this release. enjoy your F18 upgrades tomorrow 14:43:45 #endmeeting