19:00:07 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
19:00:07 <zodbot> Meeting started Fri Feb  7 19:00:07 2020 UTC.
19:00:07 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
19:00:07 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:07 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:07 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
19:00:08 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:08 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
19:00:08 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
19:00:08 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik relrod smooge
19:00:08 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
19:00:09 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
19:00:19 <nirik> smooge said he might be a bit late.
19:00:24 <nirik> anyone else around?
19:00:49 <nirik> .ticket 8622
19:00:50 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8622: review-stats script is failing - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8622
19:00:54 * mboddu is around
19:01:21 <nirik> I think we can close 8622, or just leave it for cverna to close.
19:01:33 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8622 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8622
19:01:40 <nirik> .ticket 8628
19:01:41 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8628: Issues assigning or setting the fedora-review flag in tickets on bugzilla - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628
19:01:52 <nirik> so, I think perhaps this script isn't working right. ;(
19:02:37 <mboddu> .fasinfo brandfbb
19:02:38 <zodbot> mboddu: User: brandfbb, Name: Breno Brand Fernandes, email: brandfbb@gmail.com, Creation: 2019-08-23, IRC Nick: skywalker, Timezone: America/Toronto, Locale: en, GPG key ID: None, Status: active
19:02:39 <nirik> its the export-bugzilla script in fas. running on fas01
19:02:41 <zodbot> mboddu: Approved Groups: fedorabugs packager cla_done cla_fpca
19:03:40 <nirik> so I guess we need to look into it.
19:04:29 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8628 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628
19:04:30 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8628: "Issues assigning or setting the fedora-review flag in tickets on bugzilla " https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8628#comment-625098
19:04:52 <nirik> the script runs fine without errors, but doesn't seem to be working to actually do what it's supposed to. ;)
19:04:55 <mboddu> nirik: Its the packager group who can review the packages, but I thought there is another check on that, isn't it?
19:05:53 <nirik> The script takes everyone in 'fedorabugs' and sets the 'fedora_contrib' perms in bugzilla for them.
19:06:09 <nirik> well, if it's working thats what it would do
19:06:31 <mboddu> Okay
19:07:11 <nirik> .ticket 8629
19:07:12 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8629: HyperKitty is using a deprecated GitHub API - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8629
19:07:25 <nirik> so for this I think it's blocked on us moving to newer mailman3.
19:08:40 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8629 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8629
19:08:41 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8629: "HyperKitty is using a deprecated GitHub API" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8629#comment-625100
19:09:08 <nirik> mboddu: want to do some releng ticket poking since you and I are the only ones around?
19:09:18 <mboddu> nirik: Sure
19:09:45 <mboddu> .releng 9169
19:09:46 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9169: Block unretirement commits - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9169
19:10:23 <nirik> I'm not sure if this is possible. :)
19:10:27 <mboddu> There are more cases happening, they accidentally retire it, which updates pdc, but they revert it which still keeps the pdc date
19:10:36 <nirik> yeah.
19:10:54 <mboddu> meaning, they cannot push the next day onward and its blocked
19:11:10 <mboddu> May be we should add "fedpkg unretire"
19:11:15 <nirik> so what does the pdc update?
19:11:26 <smooge> back
19:11:30 <nirik> it listens for a message with dead.package right?
19:11:31 <mboddu> PDC set the eol to the current date
19:11:35 <mboddu> Yup
19:12:00 <nirik> so, we already deny commits if pdc is eol? could we just set it to current-date - 1 day?
19:12:04 <nirik> hey smooge
19:12:17 <smooge> anything I need to work on from earlier?
19:12:28 <nirik> all the things(tm). :)
19:12:29 <mboddu> Sure, that would be the easiest fix, but the dates would be wrong
19:12:54 <nirik> smooge: was going to ask about...
19:13:02 <nirik> .ticket 8615
19:13:03 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8615: Retire keys.fedoraproject.org 2020-02-07 - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8615
19:13:06 <nirik> thats today right?
19:13:20 <nirik> mboddu: I think thats a small nitpick... and would prevent this issue.
19:13:30 <nirik> shall I propose it in the ticket?
19:13:58 <mboddu> Wait, I think I might have proposed that solution somewhere in another ticket
19:14:00 * mboddu looks
19:14:51 <smooge> nirik, yeah. I had said in the email to dev and such it was monday so was going to ask you if it was ok if I killed it early
19:15:22 <nirik> I am just fine killing it for great justice!
19:15:25 <nirik> anytime.
19:15:36 <smooge> ok will start on it after this meeting
19:15:38 <nirik> nuke nuke nuke.
19:15:58 <smooge> it will mean I have gotten 7 out of 8 things on my list this week !
19:16:12 <mboddu> From the meeting minutes:
19:16:14 <mboddu> * #8851 RFE: When the retirement commit is reverted before a package
19:16:14 <mboddu> gets blocked, don't block it  (mboddu, 16:08:02)
19:16:14 <mboddu> * LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8851   (mboddu, 16:08:08)
19:16:14 <mboddu> * When fedpkg retire is called, set the eol date to previous date so
19:16:14 <mboddu> that immediate reverts are not allowed. This is a temporary fix
19:16:15 <mboddu> until we get to automate the unretirement for less than 8 weeks.
19:16:17 <mboddu> (mboddu, 16:23:43)
19:16:21 <smooge> sorry 7 out of 15
19:16:53 <nirik> smooge: you are doing better than me for sure. I seem to have just answered and written a bunch of emails. ;(
19:16:55 <mboddu> smooge: How could you even complete 7?
19:17:03 <mboddu> Same here
19:17:19 <nirik> if we could get to the aarch64 boxes next week that wold be lovely.
19:17:44 <nirik> mboddu: ok, so we proposed it, but didn't do it? or there was some reason we didn't do it?
19:18:10 <mboddu> I guess we just didn't do it
19:19:27 <nirik> I added a comment, so churchyard can tell us if we are missing something
19:20:16 <nirik> other tickets?
19:20:59 <mboddu> .releng 9234
19:21:00 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9234: Update notice FEDORA-EPEL-2019-17d2b3507b (from epel-testing) is broken, or a bad duplicate, skipping. - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9234
19:21:10 <mboddu> I have never seen this before
19:21:18 <nirik> yeah, I have... I think it's a bodhi issue.
19:21:33 <nirik> it's the data it injects for security updates...
19:21:42 <smooge> my way of completing 7.. wake up at 4 am and work 3 hours and then do 8 hours
19:22:26 <nirik> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2487
19:23:15 <nirik> or old issue: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/275
19:23:47 <mboddu> Wow that is old
19:24:30 <nirik> and see also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194915
19:24:47 <nirik> anyhow, IMHO we should close the releng one in favor of the bodhi one
19:25:46 <mboddu> Okay, I will do it
19:25:51 <nirik> cool.
19:25:57 <nirik> 5min left. anything else?
19:26:51 * mboddu looking for an easy one
19:27:48 <mboddu> .releng 9100
19:27:50 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9100: cppcheck & EPEL 8 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9100
19:28:44 <mboddu> I dont know why it was not shipped, should we ask someone?
19:29:12 <nirik> I do see it.
19:29:14 <nirik> it's in CRB
19:29:19 <smooge> yeah
19:29:37 <nirik> Name         : cppcheck
19:29:37 <nirik> Version      : 1.83
19:29:37 <nirik> Release      : 1.el8
19:29:37 <nirik> Arch         : x86_64
19:29:38 <nirik> Size         : 1.1 M
19:29:39 <nirik> Source       : cppcheck-1.83-1.el8.src.rpm
19:29:40 <nirik> Repo         : rhel8-crb
19:30:03 <nirik> so, IMHO, close -> sorry
19:31:28 <mboddu> Okay
19:31:33 <mboddu> I will do that
19:31:45 <mboddu> Thats all
19:32:31 <nirik> #endmeeting