18:00:00 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
18:00:00 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Apr 20 18:00:00 2020 UTC.
18:00:00 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
18:00:00 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:00 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:00 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:00 <nirik> #chair cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:00:00 <zodbot> Current chairs: cverna mboddu nirik smooge
18:00:01 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
18:00:01 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
18:00:01 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting'
18:00:01 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
18:00:02 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review
18:00:03 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
18:00:11 <nirik> whos around to stand up? ;)
18:00:20 <smooge> gekki
18:00:24 <smooge> hello
18:00:25 <nirik> .ticket 8837
18:00:26 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8837: Give wwoods access to access_logs / - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837
18:00:38 <mboddu> .hello mohanboddu
18:00:39 <zodbot> mboddu: mohanboddu 'Mohan Boddu' <mboddu@bhujji.com>
18:00:47 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.assigned.added -- smooge assigned ticket fedora-infrastructure#8837 to smooge https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837
18:00:59 <nirik> so, not sure how best to do this/
18:01:00 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8837 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837
18:01:01 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8837: "Give wwoods access to access_logs / " https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837#comment-643139
18:01:22 <smooge> nirik, for that ticket it is add wwoods to sysadmin-analysis
18:01:23 <nirik> I guess make a sysadmin-data and add that to data-analysis01 ?
18:01:33 <nirik> ah, we already have a group?
18:01:39 <smooge> yep.. for mattdm
18:01:50 <nirik> cool. Can we just do it now? :)
18:01:59 <nirik> .ticket 8840
18:02:00 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8840: backup of copr fe DB by rdiff-backup - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8840
18:02:18 <nirik> I can do this one. Will probibly need a freeze break since it's adding to inventory...
18:02:52 <nirik> I am pretty sure I also asked about these since we were backing them up before, but they were going to backup somewhere else, but perhaps I am misremembering
18:03:12 <smooge> nirik, was working on it when the meeting started
18:03:12 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.tag.added -- kevin tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#8840: high-gain and low-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8840
18:03:13 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8840 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8840
18:03:27 <nirik> .ticket 8843
18:03:28 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8843: Add python-kerberos to the infra tags - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8843
18:03:41 <nirik> mboddu: ^ can you do that one? or want me to?
18:04:09 <mboddu> nirik: I can do it
18:04:20 <mboddu> But nils was also looking into it
18:04:21 <nirik> thanks.
18:04:27 <mboddu> I will check with nils
18:04:27 <nirik> well, it needs a koji admin
18:04:35 <mboddu> Then I got it
18:04:37 * cverna waive
18:04:53 <nils> mboddu, I filed it :)
18:05:02 <cverna> can we document how to do that ?
18:05:13 <cverna> at least in the ticket :)
18:05:29 <nils> mboddu, it's a task this other one depends on which I can't do myself :)
18:05:40 <mboddu> nils: Oh, its for fixing the other ticket, got it, sorry, I didn't check the ticket per say
18:05:45 <nirik> koji add-pkg epel7-infra packagename --owner owner
18:05:56 <mboddu> Yup
18:06:02 <nils> cverna, you want that in the howtos, right?
18:06:03 <cverna> thanks :)
18:06:33 <cverna> nils: would be great, happy to do it but I won't stop you from doing it :P
18:06:49 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8843 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8843
18:06:50 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8843: "Add python-kerberos to the infra tags" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8843#comment-643142
18:06:55 <nirik> so thats all needs-review from infra, but there was a bunch filed and processed out of band... lets go over the ones that are still open?
18:06:57 <nils> cverna, not tonight :) if I remember tomorrow I can file a PR
18:07:01 <mboddu> nils, nirik : ^^ Done
18:07:06 <nirik> .ticket 8835
18:07:07 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8835: snapshot epel7 as a point release archive - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8835
18:07:07 <nils> mboddu++ thanks!
18:07:09 <zodbot> nils: Karma for mohanboddu changed to 27 (for the current release cycle):  https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any
18:07:24 <cverna> nils: sure :)
18:07:37 <nirik> smooge signed up for this one... are you sure you will have time smooge ? and/or perhaps we could script this ?
18:07:43 <mboddu> I got one from releng side
18:08:40 <nirik> .ticket 8839
18:08:41 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8839: can no longer contribute in Fedora's Taiga - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8839
18:08:49 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.edit -- smooge edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#8837 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837
18:08:50 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- smooge commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8837: "Give wwoods access to access_logs / " https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8837#comment-643144
18:08:57 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- nphilipp commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8824: "posts submitted to Fedora Users List getting lost." https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8824#comment-643146
18:09:01 <nirik> I can ask our taiga contacts about this one... I have exchanged emails with them in the past.
18:09:19 <nirik> .ticket 8842
18:09:20 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #8842: Give the channel OP on #buildsys-build for "copr" pagure.io group - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8842
18:09:22 <cverna> I tagged the person from tagai in the ticket
18:09:57 <nirik> cverna: ok. I am not sure if thats the same one I have emailed with, but I can check.
18:10:06 <smooge> nirik, I am in a stuck state until RDU is racked and networked and IAD2 is networked.. so i was going to do that snapshot after I get the move documented updated
18:10:12 <nils> nirik, re #8839 I've talked to Evolution and sent a mail to Taiga support for it
18:10:12 <nirik> nb signed up on this one, but I think I am the only one in access on that channel. ;)
18:10:33 <nirik> smooge: ok. fair
18:10:34 <cverna> nirik: yeah I picked his name from the last taiga ticket we had :)
18:10:50 <chkr> hi - you might remember that I asked a few weeks ago whether I can run the fedora packaging index scripts for https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ (to solve bug report: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/432 )
18:10:53 <nirik> nils: ok, we might coordinate so we don't all mail and ping them differently. ;)
18:11:02 * nils gets the feeling he's run roughshod over established procedures
18:11:25 <nirik> no, it's fine, but just note it in the ticket or something so we can all be on the same page.
18:11:29 <chkr> so far I found a few issues and fixed a bunch of potential and actuall uncaught exceptions
18:12:05 <nils> nirik, uhm, like in the comment in the ticket? :D
18:12:07 <chkr> before I can create a merge request I would like to let the script run a few more times completely
18:12:28 <smooge> chkr, can you wait until the current ticket is finished discussed
18:12:28 <nirik> chkr: can you hang on a min...
18:12:55 <nils> cverna, is migonzalvar a Taiga support person whom we ping in such cases?
18:13:50 <nirik> nils: ok, I misread then... 'forward on to our tiaga support people' wasn't clear as 'I am going to email our support people'... but thats likely my misreading
18:14:09 <nils> could have expressed myself clearer
18:14:15 <nirik> my understanding is that they actually look at the taiga tag for things, but I am not sure how often
18:14:20 <cverna> nils: that's the person that solved the last taiga issue we had, so a ping seemed like a good idea
18:14:38 <cverna> for info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7827
18:14:43 <nirik> but of course we have no way of knowing that they are still with the company/doing that, etc.
18:14:58 <cverna> yeah :(
18:15:03 <nirik> actually...
18:15:10 <cverna> we can only ask and hope for an answer
18:15:28 <nils> Anyway, Taiga support knows about it. I'll log off for the day, see y'all tomorrow!
18:15:42 <nils> i.e. I sent this email, to be clear ;)
18:16:02 <nirik> sure. I have an outstanding email with them about accounts actually.
18:16:11 <cverna> nils: thanks have a good evening
18:16:14 <nirik> So I should answer that, but this user isn't on that list, so it isn't the same thing
18:16:52 <nirik> it's a list of users with local accounts instead of fas accounts, local accounts that never logged in and 3 users with both a local and a fas account
18:16:56 <fm-admin> pagure.issue.comment.added -- nphilipp commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8839: "can no longer contribute in Fedora's Taiga" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8839#comment-643147
18:16:58 <nirik> anyhow...
18:17:20 <nirik> on the fedora-buildsys thing. I can grant nb privs
18:17:39 <nirik> but I wonder if we couldn't just start pointing people to #fedora-copr or something more specific?
18:18:01 <nirik> fedora-buildsys used to be the releng/plague channel, then koji, then... now it's just copr
18:18:22 <nirik> I guess mock developers used to hang out there too.
18:18:29 <nirik> I can ask that in the ticket I guess.
18:18:36 <smooge> msuchy still does at times
18:18:48 <smooge> just only during his 8-5 hours
18:18:58 <nirik> mboddu: you had a releng ticket or two?
18:19:03 <mboddu> Yes
18:19:12 <mboddu> .releng 9408
18:19:13 <zodbot> mboddu: Issue #9408: Tag ghc into EPEL8 buildroot for ghc bootstrap - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9408
18:19:25 <nirik> I don't understand that ticket.
18:19:29 <mboddu> Me neither
18:19:41 <mboddu> Hence, I wanted to know if something is missing
18:19:48 <nirik> if ghc is in rhel8 it cannot be in epel8...
18:19:59 <nirik> except as a module I guess...
18:20:12 <nirik> or is it a module in rhel?
18:20:57 <nirik> I guess lets ask reporter ?
18:21:03 <nirik> want me to? or you want to mboddu ?
18:21:26 <mboddu> I can check with him in the ticket
18:21:35 <nirik> thanks.
18:21:46 <mboddu> But he says "ghc is available in the RHEL8 and Centos8 Buildroots"
18:21:46 <nirik> chkr: ok, you wanted to try and get packages back working?
18:21:52 <chkr> sorry guys, I did not realize that a meeting is on-going - my apologies...
18:21:56 <chkr> nirik, yes ;-)
18:22:09 <nirik> mboddu: yeah, and I don't see it, but might be in some module or steam we don't have?
18:22:16 <cverna> chkr: no worries :)
18:22:19 <chkr> before I can create a merge request I would like to let the script run a few more times completely - unfortunately that isn't fun from home - is there a remote system available close to the Fedora infrastructure like koji, pdc etc. which I can use to run them? any recent Fedora release should do (and to run the index scripts no privileges are needed)?
18:22:20 <nirik> cverna: since you last touched packages... you're it. ;)
18:22:23 <mboddu> Okay
18:24:06 <cverna> we could add chkr to the apprentice group, that should give him access to the stg instance to run the script ?
18:24:34 <nirik> well, apprentice has no sudo...
18:25:18 <nirik> we have a sysadmin-packages tho
18:25:19 <cverna> chkr: do you need sudo ? or do you want to try your own script ?
18:25:25 <chkr> to run them I don't need sudo - probably to get everything setup I would have to ask to get a few python packages installed
18:25:26 * cverna don't think the indexing requires sudo
18:26:14 <nirik> it should need at least the same uid/gid no?
18:26:41 <cverna> nirik:  what happens with packages with the colo move ? I don't think it is in the minimal viable fedora ?
18:27:18 <cverna> nirik:  I believe chkr want to try a custom script so not the one used curently, but I might not have understood that correctly
18:27:20 <nirik> it's just down until we readd enough capacity I guess.
18:27:54 <chkr> it is actually this script: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/blob/master/bin/fcomm-index-packages but with bug fixes
18:28:10 <nirik> packages in stg doesn't seem too happy
18:28:18 <nirik> "Error loading the data for this page element"
18:28:54 <cverna> I think we could then add chkr to the sysadmin-packages then, if everyone is happy with that
18:29:12 <cverna> or I can coordinate with you chkr to try the changes
18:29:15 <nirik> we should likely try and bring all the people together that are working on this... there's someone on list proposing replacing it with search/indexing and some stuff on top, msuchy partly wrote a re-write...
18:29:42 <nirik> sure, you can just add them in stg for now? or both is probibly fine too.
18:29:52 <cverna> yeah, I don't think packages in the current state will survive the move, I least that's my hope
18:29:59 <chkr> if my bug-fixed version would work, bugz.fedoraproject.org would be back this week ;-)
18:30:18 <chkr> one of the issues is, that all rpm packages refer to it...
18:31:22 <chkr> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/432
18:31:39 <cverna> chkr: so I think the best thing is to open a PR, then we can try to deploy that to staging make the tweaks needed to the PR if needed
18:32:15 <chkr> cverna, I would - but before opening the PR I need any kind of remote system running Fedora to let it finalize a complete run ;-)
18:32:20 <chkr> at home, I can only do it partially
18:32:20 <cverna> chkr: then deploy to prod, but that prod will go offline for a bit ( a few weeks, months)
18:32:38 <nirik> PR where? ;)
18:32:47 <nirik> you mean post a patch to the list I guess. ;)
18:33:02 <cverna> nirik: no on github
18:33:08 <chkr> for indexing, nothing special is required - to test the results, I can copy the index data back to my system and run fedora-packages in a container
18:33:25 <nirik> oh, that mirror. ok.
18:33:29 <chkr> but I can't use up that amount of traffic to generate the index ;-)
18:33:32 <cverna> chkr: in the infra too it often fails mid way ( all threads dies) :(
18:33:51 <chkr> cverna, I know ;-) that's what the bug fixes are for
18:34:05 <chkr> I found lots of uncaught exceptions - it should be much more stable now
18:34:09 <cverna> we can close the meeting and continue the discussion :)
18:34:23 <nirik> anyhow, fi-apprentice should get you access or sysadmin-packages sudo if you want to try it out more in stg.
18:34:35 <nirik> I don't think stg can get any worse, so happy to just update it.
18:34:41 <cverna> :)
18:34:48 <nirik> ok, any other tickets or blockers or whatever to discuss?
18:35:05 <nirik> ok, thanks everyone.
18:35:08 <nirik> #endmeeting