18:00:38 #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:38 Meeting started Mon Jul 27 18:00:38 2020 UTC. 18:00:38 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:38 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:38 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:38 #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou 18:00:38 #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:38 #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:38 Current chairs: mboddu nirik pingou smooge 18:00:38 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:39 #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:40 #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:41 #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:43 * mboddu is here 18:00:47 Smooge is out today. 18:00:52 mboddu: want to adjust tickets? 18:01:05 Sure, I can do it 18:02:02 so... we need to talk with our eariler compatrots. ;) 18:02:26 they are triaging things (yea!) but they need to move them out of needs-review so they don't show up for us anymore. 18:02:38 .ticket 9196 18:02:43 nirik: An error has occurred and has been logged. Check the logs for more information. 18:02:44 just move to waiting on assignee 18:02:47 .ticket 9196 18:02:51 nirik: An error has occurred and has been logged. Check the logs for more information. 18:02:57 .ticket 9169 18:02:58 nirik: Issue #9169: Bodhi update not pushed to stable after "Auto-request stable based on time?" - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9169 18:03:06 .ticket 9170 18:03:07 nirik: Issue #9170: Cleaning up temporary queues in /bodhi? - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9170 18:03:08 same here 18:03:10 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9169 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9169 18:03:25 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9170 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9170 18:03:45 .ticket 9171 18:03:46 nirik: Issue #9171: src.fedoraproject.org Activity not displayed on user pages, unlike on pagure.io - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9171 18:03:47 Done and done 18:03:56 no idea here, probibly something for pingou. ;) 18:04:03 med/med/groomed/waiting? 18:04:17 Maybe a config or needs a new pagure deployed 18:04:19 +1 18:04:34 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9171: groomed, medium-gain, and medium-trouble https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9171 18:04:35 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9171 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9171 18:04:49 I guess thats it from infra? 18:04:51 yeah, I think we hotfixed this on pagure.io, but perhaps not src? 18:04:57 yep. anything on the releng side? 18:05:02 Yes 18:05:21 .releng 9629 18:05:22 mboddu: Issue #9629: PDC: do we want to store the EPEL compose? - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9629 18:05:45 right. I chimed in there and you did too. :) 18:05:46 low trouble as its just a opinion, high gain, groomed? 18:06:28 .releng 9630 18:06:29 mboddu: Issue #9630: openh264 debuginfo repo is broken - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9630 18:06:50 This needs some investigation 18:06:51 sure. 18:07:01 yeah, that might be something on the cisco side. ;( 18:07:01 med,med,groomed? 18:07:17 Yeah, I am not 100% sure now 18:07:21 I recall we asked them about debuginfo a while back... but I thought it was fixed. 18:07:25 +1 18:08:01 .releng 9631 18:08:02 mboddu: Issue #9631: flatpaks: move from 'master' to 'stable' - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9631 18:08:08 This is huge 18:08:15 high,high,groomed 18:08:32 ack. Yeah, we can do it, will just take time... 18:09:03 Thats all I got 18:10:08 #info mass rebuild has started and is churning away 18:10:20 any other tickets to discuss / blockers / etc? 18:10:29 I have a question 18:10:38 fire away! 18:11:09 Me and vipul were planning to work on a ticket tomorrow 18:11:13 .ticket 9161 18:11:17 mobrien[m]: Issue #9161: Create ansible playbook to restart failed services on proxy hosts - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9161 18:11:57 There has been some community contribution which is not quite the full solution, should we take it over and finish it or advise the community contributor and leave it to them? 18:12:05 Not sure what the process is 18:12:19 well, no set process... 18:12:44 usually we want community folks to help us, so I'd say advise them and review and such? 18:12:58 mobrien[m]: we have the answer ^-^ 18:13:10 unless they are fine with you taking over I suppose... 18:13:41 Ok cool. There are some comments on the PR we'll see how they respond and take it from there I guess. One other related question to that. 18:14:14 cool. 18:14:20 If a new playbook is created do we raise a ticket to get rbac assigned to it or just ask someone on this channel? 18:14:55 either way. If no one is around/everyone busy, go with the ticket... if not it could just be done out of hand... 18:15:27 it's a pretty easy change... just a 2 liner... playbook and group 18:15:28 ok cool. Thats all from me thanks 18:15:43 * mboddu needs to look at how to assign rbac access 18:16:13 mobrien[m] / siddharthvipul: oh, did you see from the eariler standup... can you move things from 'needs review' to 'waiting on asignee' status? that will drop them off our radar here. 18:16:33 mboddu: it's 2 lines in a config file in ansible-private. 18:16:43 Ok will do 18:16:45 nirik: https://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/sysadmin-guide/sops/ansible.html#role-based-access-control-for-playbooks ? 18:17:09 nirik: you mean on centos-infra? 18:17:14 we can do that 18:17:29 we may want to rework how all this flow works, but for now... yeah. 18:17:49 nirik: yeah, I would also like to color match the tags, but too much? 18:17:50 :P 18:18:03 mboddu: yes, but there's a config file in ansible-private/files/rbac/ that is the config file that uses. 18:18:13 anyway, you are right! the idea was to tag those tickets where we need input from Brian or Fabian 18:18:31 Thanks nirik 18:18:36 once the board feature of pagure lands, we should revisit things. 18:18:54 very soon ^-^ 18:19:26 🎉🎉🎉 18:20:31 mobrien[m]: oh, on that south ameria error... I bet we need to 'enable' that region... new ones aren't enabled by default. 18:20:41 and how is the maintainer test stuff looking? 18:20:55 That makes sense 18:22:59 The maintainer stuff is frustrating me. I got an f31 up and ran the playbook succesfully then 10 mins later it became unreachable. The logind service is failing so won't allow any logins. If you already have an ssh session open it will stay open. I was hoping to get someone to look at it with me to figure out why the service is failing 18:23:13 strange 18:23:26 I could tomorrow? just drop a time on my calendar... 18:23:48 hum, I see we already have south america enabled... not sure whats going on with it now. 18:24:24 I'll put a calender invite in and hopefully we'll have time to look at both problems 18:24:44 sounds good. :) 18:25:31 FYI, I need to file a ticket sometime soon for grokmirror... it's failing in some cases and sending emails about it. Not sure what changed, but it needs looking into 18:25:57 anyone have anything else they would like to discuss 18:25:58 ? 18:27:04 ok, thanks for coming everyone! 18:27:06 #endmeeting