18:00:01 #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:01 Meeting started Thu Sep 17 18:00:01 2020 UTC. 18:00:01 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:01 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:01 #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou mobrien 18:00:01 #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:01 #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:01 Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nirik pingou smooge 18:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:02 #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:03 #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:04 #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:24 any folks around today for standup? 18:01:40 * pingou here but in meeting 18:02:23 I am here 18:02:26 I can update the tickets 18:03:28 pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9327 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9327 18:03:29 pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9327: "bug being spammed on rhbz" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9327#comment-686743 18:03:36 oh, cool. 18:03:49 I just closed 9327... there's nothing we can do there. 18:04:00 .ticket 9328 18:04:02 nirik: Issue #9328: Remove my updates from bodhi - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9328 18:04:39 again, I don't think there's anything we can do here. 18:05:05 I think they should bump and rebuild the one they want to add and unpush the old update. 18:05:10 I don't understand the f32 part 18:05:16 Agreed 18:06:15 I can comment on the ticket 18:06:25 we could do the DB dance, but :s 18:07:03 pagure.issue.edit -- kevin edited the close_status and status fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9328 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9328 18:07:04 pagure.issue.comment.added -- kevin commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9328: "Remove my updates from bodhi" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9328#comment-686745 18:07:15 oh sorry... will stop updating. ;) 18:07:40 pingou: well, yeah, but it gets to all the reasosns we don't want to delete updates. 18:07:54 .ticket 9329 18:07:55 nirik: Issue #9329: Allow ELN SIG to create dynamic sidetags with eln as a base repo - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9329 18:08:22 I'm fine with this. 18:08:29 simple hub config change... 18:08:42 med/low/ops ? and should we do a freeze break? 18:08:47 pagure.issue.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#9328: "Remove my updates from bodhi" https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9328#comment-686748 18:09:27 Maybe a freeze break just to review the PR, since we are in freeze 18:09:47 pagure.issue.tag.added -- mohanboddu tagged ticket fedora-infrastructure#9329: low-trouble, medium-gain, and ops https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9329 18:09:48 pagure.issue.edit -- mohanboddu edited the priority fields of ticket fedora-infrastructure#9329 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9329 18:09:50 do they want it now or can it wait post-freeze? 18:09:55 not sure. :) 18:10:06 but yeah, either way. it's a simple change... 18:10:31 we can open the PR, ask and flag the PR as FBR if they want it now 18:10:40 That works too 18:10:40 sounds good. 18:11:04 thats all from infra... any releng ones today? 18:11:21 Nope, I fixed the new one already :D 18:11:46 mboddu: I'll poke distgit's db after my meeting 18:11:55 pingou: Sure, thanks a lot :) 18:12:13 cool. any other tickets, blockers, pr's or poems to discuss? 18:12:29 pingou: did you see that I made a pagure02? should be ready to sync to... 18:12:32 we have a few FBR PR 18:12:54 nirik: I saw it, we should sync on this 18:13:01 I may try to look at it tomorrow morning 18:13:16 cool. I'm happy to help sync things or whatever. 18:13:21 oh, let me look at pr's 18:13:31 * mboddu also looks at the PR's 18:13:48 https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230 18:14:25 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- kevin commented on PR #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230#comment-132417 18:14:39 * pingou rebased it 18:14:43 mboddu: approved 18:14:54 * mboddu merging it away 18:15:03 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on PR #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230#comment-132418 18:15:09 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- pingou commented on PR #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230#comment-132419 18:15:10 pagure.pull-request.flag.updated -- Zuul updated the flags on fedora-infra/ansible#230 with: "Jobs result is pending" https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230 18:15:18 https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/249 18:15:36 on this one, I guess you will be manually reverting the change? since it will be gone from ansible entirely? 18:15:47 mboddu: don't forget to run the playbooks. ;) 18:15:59 ah, I see you addressed that... should have read 18:16:08 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- kevin commented on PR #249 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/249#comment-132420 18:16:42 nirik: Hehe, sure :) 18:17:03 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on PR #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230#comment-132422 18:17:04 pagure.pull-request.closed -- mohanboddu merged pull request #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230 18:17:18 shall we close 169 for now? we still need it for a while... 18:17:28 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- mohanboddu commented on PR #249 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/249#comment-132423 18:17:49 mboddu: is 240 post-freeze? 18:17:55 pagure.pull-request.flag.updated -- Zuul updated the flags on fedora-infra/ansible#230 with: "Jobs result is success" https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230 18:17:59 pagure.pull-request.comment.added -- zuul commented on PR #230 on fedora-infra/ansible https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/230#comment-132424 18:18:09 nirik: It can wait, its not a hurry 18:18:32 the issue about 169 is to remember to re-open it :) 18:19:56 mboddu: label it post-freeze then? 18:19:57 https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/254 is not frozen, right? 18:20:10 nirik: Sure, I will do it 18:20:28 https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/246 is that affecting just batcave? or ? 18:20:50 pingou: I'd say not frozen, yeah 18:20:55 thanks 18:21:09 nirik: 246, I believe so 18:23:30 ok, any other pr's? 18:24:25 I think we're good, thanks :) 18:24:33 Thats all I guess 18:25:18 mboddu: can you check 252? 18:25:20 there's some more that could go, but nothing that looks urgent 18:26:19 pingou: Done 18:26:28 thanks 18:27:48 ok anything else? or shall I close out? 18:28:39 ok, thanks everyone. 18:28:41 #endmeeting