18:00:00 #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:00 Meeting started Mon May 10 18:00:00 2021 UTC. 18:00:00 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:00 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:00 #chair mboddu nirik smooge pingou mobrien nb 18:00:00 #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:00 Current chairs: mboddu mobrien nb nirik pingou smooge 18:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:00 #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:01 #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:02 #info reminder: speak up if you want to work on a ticket! 18:00:03 #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:05 #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:00:10 Hello 18:00:15 And I can update tickets 18:00:46 .ticket 9941 18:00:47 nirik: Issue #9941: meetingminutes emails does not contain correct email subject now - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9941 18:00:51 this is actually a duplicate. 18:01:09 of 9820 18:01:20 so, close -> duplicate and mention 9820 18:02:20 +1 18:02:39 .ticket 9943 18:02:40 nirik: Issue #9943: Insecure HTTP logins - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9943 18:02:58 I think this is intended/fine, but I'd prefer our security officer check it. 18:03:05 med / med / ops / security 18:03:26 thats it for infra 18:03:44 +1 18:03:56 any releng ones? 18:04:01 nirik: Assign it to Patrick? 18:04:03 Yes 18:04:14 sure 18:04:16 I saw 'security officer check' :D 18:05:34 .releng 10109 18:05:37 mboddu: Issue #10109: ELN builds referenced in Fedora 34 mass rebuild bugzillas - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10109 18:05:53 yeah. :( 18:05:56 I think, medium gain, low risk, dev? 18:06:16 sure. It seems it should be a fix in the mass rebuild/ftbfs scripting 18:06:17 I think https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10109#comment-731789 is the problem 18:06:22 ack 18:06:42 That is all 18:06:48 nirik: question, I would probably plan to update bodhi in prod on wednesday, still testing it in stg, but s far so good. Does wednesday sound reasonable? where do I need to notify people? 18:07:15 asaleh: sounds good to me. How much downtime will there be? 18:07:16 asaleh: infra list for sure 18:08:50 I guess the web part would be pretty quick (just new deploy in openshift)... 18:09:15 so may be not much end user visible I guess. 18:09:27 best case scenario, ~30 mins? its 4 playbooks, each takes 5-10 mins to run. Realistic scenario, 4 hours, I would start after EU infra standup, and Tomas would help me destroy the backend worker 18:10:12 I think I managed to iron out all of the kinks in staging deployment, but I could have introduced new ones :D 18:10:29 ok. I'd say file an outage ticket, get it reviewd as ok then we can send to devel-announce and infrastructure lists... 18:10:38 there's a template for them in pagure... 18:10:51 link? tracker? 18:11:03 pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 18:11:16 👍️ 18:11:37 just new ticket and choose outage from the pull down... then make the "Planned outage: ..." line copied to the subject of the ticket. 18:11:48 I can do the emailing (unless you want to, thats fine too) 18:11:50 ^ "Types" pull down 18:12:08 ah, I was searching for planned downtime :) thanks! 18:12:56 you can look at some old one to see... but hopefully the template is reasonable 18:13:28 and many thanks for pushing that forward. 18:13:55 we should probibly push some updates after the backend is updated ( just to make sure it's working) 18:15:03 #topic weekly plans 18:15:36 I've been in meetings all morning, so I haven't really had a chance to read emails and plan my week. ;( 18:15:50 Mohan's week plan: As they come :D 18:16:08 but one issue thats come up, is that fedora_koji is getting too large again. ;( I'm looking, but might be kojira isn't correctly deleting repos again or something. 18:17:16 #topic Open floor / discussion / all other business 18:17:20 anything to discuss? 18:17:28 None from me 18:17:51 when is f32 eol again? 18:18:14 25th it seems 18:18:49 Yeah, 25th 18:19:18 we are going to have to be more careful archiving f32 than we have been. 18:20:05 anyhow 18:20:10 will close out if nothing else... 18:20:20 Thanks nirik 18:20:25 #endmeeting