18:00:07 <nirik> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting 18:00:08 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon May 15 18:00:07 2023 UTC. 18:00:08 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:08 <zodbot> The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 18:00:08 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:08 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:11 <nirik> #chair nirik nb smooge phsmoura 18:00:11 <zodbot> Current chairs: nb nirik phsmoura smooge 18:00:25 <nirik> #meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting 18:00:25 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting' 18:00:29 <nirik> #info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops 18:00:35 <nirik> #info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily 18:00:41 <nirik> #info reminder: speak up if you want to work on a ticket! 18:00:46 <nirik> #topic Tickets needing review 18:00:51 <nirik> #info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1 18:03:24 <nirik> .ticket 11310 18:03:24 <nirik> .ticket 11310 18:03:24 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11310: I am not authorized to create a CDN behavior - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11310 18:03:25 <nirik> hum, bridge lagging 18:03:25 <nirik> basically on this one: we don't have any IAM rules for cloudfront because we didn't think people needed to make changes very often. I'll just do the changes. 18:03:28 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11310: I am not authorized to create a CDN behavior - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11310 18:05:37 <nirik> .ticket 11311 18:05:38 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11311: external nagios web-ui has a ssl certificate issue - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11311 18:05:48 <jednorozec[m]> hello 18:06:22 <nirik> The underlying issue here is that our letsencrypt role isn't restarting httpd after updating certs... saibug is working on it. low, low, ops. 18:06:27 <nirik> hey jednorozec! 18:07:08 <nirik> .ticket 11312 18:07:09 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11312: Planned Outage - Server updates/reboots - 2023-05-17 21:00 UTC - fedora-infrastructure - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11312 18:07:21 <nirik> mass update/reboot on wed... 18:07:32 <nirik> I was thinking I would just do the builders upgrade then too... 18:07:53 <nirik> If someone could review this and make sure I didn't make any typos, etc I can send it out and update status. 18:08:27 <jednorozec[m]> I can do that 18:08:30 <nirik> thats all on infra side, lets see for releng... 18:08:34 <nirik> thanks! 18:09:18 <nirik> .releng 11422 18:09:18 <nirik> med med ops? and assign to jednorozec? 18:09:18 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11422: Please send openh264-2.3.1-1.el9 to Cisco - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11422 18:09:19 <nirik> but also... 18:09:19 <nirik> .releng 11423 18:09:22 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11423: Please retire python-proton-client - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11423 18:09:22 <nirik> sorry 18:09:25 <nirik> .releng 11425 18:09:27 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11425: openh264 is not a multilib repo - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11425 18:09:36 <nirik> we may want to sort this before sending. 18:09:51 <nirik> I'm not sure I understand what i686 users we have tho 18:10:32 <jednorozec[m]> right, I have no idea who uses i686except for steam and wine 18:11:47 <nirik> well, it might be those... ;) 18:12:10 <nirik> we use odcs to make those repos? I think it can do multilib... 18:12:29 <jednorozec[m]> I think so 18:12:37 <jednorozec[m]> never did it but it should 18:12:44 <nirik> I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to just dist-repos for this. 18:12:55 <nirik> I know it does multilib 18:13:10 <jednorozec[m]> can you point me to more info? 18:13:10 <nirik> but meh 18:13:33 <nirik> for dist-repo? or odcs multilib? 18:13:38 <jednorozec[m]> because, if we drop modules from flatpaks and we move this from odcs we can drop odcs 18:14:26 <jednorozec[m]> is this what you mean? https://docs.pagure.org/koji/exporting_repositories/#dist-repos 18:14:53 <nirik> yes 18:15:18 <nirik> but is odcs no longer used with flatpaks under the proposed new setup? I know it was not going to be using mbs, but not sure about odcs... 18:15:37 <smooge> hello 18:16:22 <nirik> hey smooge 18:16:26 <jednorozec[m]> it might be mi mind playing games on me with acronims 18:16:31 <nirik> anyhow, last releng one... 18:16:42 <nirik> .releng 11426 18:16:43 <zodbot> nirik: Issue #11426: F39 Change proposal to no longer pre-install fedora-repos-modular - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11426 18:16:49 <jednorozec[m]> but we are running 2 instances of odcs so maybe we can drop atleast one? 18:16:53 <nirik> this is just a minor fedora-repos change... 18:17:15 <nirik> I don't think we are running two? 18:17:26 <jednorozec[m]> yes, good news! 18:18:39 <jednorozec[m]> odcs_backend_releng and odcs_backend_general 18:19:02 <nirik> ah, no, thats just two backends... not two instances. They share the same frontend/queue/everything... 18:19:16 <nirik> and it's just for silly historical reasons we have them seperate at all. 18:19:17 <jednorozec[m]> ah 18:19:35 <nirik> and... odcs is fedora 36... at least the releng backend. ;) So, I guess I get to look at updating that 18:19:46 <nirik> so, perhaps we should consolidate them into one? 18:19:48 <jednorozec[m]> I can do that 18:19:55 <smooge> consolidate them into zero? 18:20:01 <nirik> as far as I know, the general one is... not uesed? or perhaps it is for flatpaks? 18:20:16 <jednorozec[m]> for flatpaks I think 18:20:22 <nirik> also the latest version is broken. 18:20:33 <nirik> and the current version is broken and we have to monkeypatch it to work 18:20:35 <jednorozec[m]> and the releng one is used for openh264 18:20:59 <jednorozec[m]> well opensource 18:21:14 <nirik> so, the non releng one (odcs-backend01) is rhel8... 18:21:26 <jednorozec[m]> half broken things put together with ducktape, but they work! sometimes :D 18:21:27 <nirik> I wonder if we can just drop the releng one and get everything using the other one? 18:21:41 <jednorozec[m]> I think we can 18:21:54 <jednorozec[m]> the onle use for the releng one is openh264 18:22:01 <jednorozec[m]> and I am all for moving it to dist-repo 18:22:14 <nirik> you want to work on that? ;) Would need coordinating with sgallagh too (for eln, they use releng backend for eln composes) 18:22:27 <nirik> yeah, no, eln uses it too 18:22:34 <jednorozec[m]> ok 18:22:42 <jednorozec[m]> yeah I can work on it 18:22:47 <smooge> i think arrfab in CentOS just redeployed their odcs so maybe there are notes if needed 18:22:51 <jednorozec[m]> should probably create a ticket about it or something 18:22:58 <nirik> so, IMHO, we should try and just move those (h264/eln) to the non releng one, then retire the releng one? 18:23:24 <nirik> I think we may need to make the non releng one bigger as thats why we had a seperate one... 18:23:34 <nirik> yes, ticket would be good. ;) 18:23:47 <nirik> I'm happy to dump^Whand this off to you if you want it. ;) 18:24:03 <jednorozec[m]> yup 18:24:32 <nirik> great! :) 18:24:43 <nirik> #topic work plans / upcoming tasks 18:25:05 <nirik> #action jednorozec to consolidate odcs backends into one with eln and flatpaks and h264 all happy there 18:26:12 <nirik> for me this week: get the outage announcement out, start updating things in staging. Hopefully get wiki (f36) and notifs-backend01 (f36) upgraded, then work back on rhel9 upgrades. 18:26:34 <nirik> I got a batcave02 installed, the playbook failed in packages for grobisplitter, need to look more at that... 18:26:51 <nirik> moving batcave01 will require an outage sometime, but doesn't have to be this week. 18:27:36 <nirik> I seem to have finally gotten download-ib01 in sync... but I need to see if it can keep up on updates/rawhide before I close that ticket. 18:28:16 <nirik> I think thats it from me... anyone else have questions or comments or ideas? 18:29:01 * jednorozec[m] was going through inbox most of the day 18:29:18 <nirik> yeah, the email is strong these days. 18:29:36 <jednorozec[m]> I had a week without computers 18:30:03 <jednorozec[m]> it was amazing but my inbox and backlog here was just endless :) 18:30:05 <nirik> nice. :) 18:30:07 <smooge> that sounds like a good week 18:30:11 <nirik> yeah, I bet. 18:30:22 <nirik> ok, if nothing else will close out then... 18:30:35 <nirik> #endmeeting