14:09:24 #startmeeting Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting 14:09:24 Meeting started Wed Dec 16 14:09:24 2020 UTC. 14:09:24 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 14:09:24 The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:09:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:09:24 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_iot_working_group_meeting' 14:09:24 #chair pwhalen pbrobinson bcotton tdawson puiterwijk coremodule 14:09:24 Current chairs: bcotton coremodule pbrobinson puiterwijk pwhalen tdawson 14:09:24 #topic roll call 14:10:07 * cyberpear listens in 14:10:27 * tdawson is here 14:10:52 * defolos is around 14:10:57 * pbrobinson o/ 14:11:22 cyberpear: feel free to participate ;-) 14:11:33 #topic 1) ==== Working Group process and admin ==== 14:11:33 #link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/ 14:11:52 So we have aarch64 container build components now 14:12:03 w00t! 14:12:18 Ya!! 14:12:22 I'm still working out how all that works but it means we can start to build application stack more easily for x86_64 and aarch64 14:12:53 🎉 14:13:11 #info container building now support for aarch64 alongside existing x86_64 support 14:13:20 #link https://osbs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/users.html# 14:13:29 #link https://docs.pagure.org/releng/layered_image_build_service.html 14:13:43 thanks to the CPE team for getting this done! 14:14:13 thanks for the links 14:15:03 Anything else for admin? 14:15:13 not for this topic 14:16:06 #topic 2) ==== Fedora 33 status ==== 14:16:27 #info Fedora-IoT-33-20201215.0 compose going out as stable this afternoon 14:16:33 #info Latest - Fedora-IoT-33-20201215.0 14:16:33 #link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=33&build=Fedora-IoT-33-20201215.0&groupid=1 14:17:12 Looks good. Has anyone hit any issues? 14:18:18 I saw mail from the list we lost clout-utils? Person having issues with growpart not being on the image. 14:18:26 cloud-utils 14:19:28 We need to update the docs minimally 14:19:43 Anything else for F33? 14:20:08 #topic 3) ==== Fedora 34 (Rawhide) status ==== 14:20:32 #info Latest compose - Fedora-IoT-34-20201216.0 14:20:32 #link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=34&build=Fedora-IoT-34-20201216.0&groupid=1 14:20:46 Hot off the presses, still working its way through openqa 14:20:59 pwhalen: I don't ever remember us shipping cloud-utils, and I think systemd has a grow partition utility 14:21:16 pwhalen: we've basically mostly used the arm-image-installer functionality 14:21:45 ok, it seems its in our docs, I'll take a look and update 14:22:43 #info rpm-ostree crashes on armhfp when installing some packages ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906184 ) 14:23:20 that looks to be fixed, but waiting on a build 14:25:06 Anything else we want to discuss for F34? 14:25:48 #topic 4) ==== Open Floor ==== 14:26:26 #info Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20201216.0 nightly compose nominated for testing 14:26:47 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora-IoT_34_RC_20201216.0_Summary 14:27:18 I'm curious what's the overlap between IoT and CoreOS and when might I want IoT? (I'm very familiar w/ Fedora CoreOS) 14:29:42 or if the two might share more (e.g., build) tooling in the future? 14:29:43 cyberpear: what overlap, IoT is focused on IoT and Edge user cases, CoreOS is focused on k8s 14:30:14 cyberpear: they both use rpm-ostree but that's like asking why the overlap between Workstation and KDE because they both use dnf 14:30:37 RHCOS is k8s-only, but Fedora CoreOS tries to be more generic 14:31:11 pbrobinson, I have a point for open floor 14:31:16 (but fair enough that the overlap is small) 14:31:33 smooge: go for it! 14:31:51 there may be an un-foreseen problem with container builds on aarch64 currently 14:32:33 the team set it up using Fedora 33 and OKD and there are a couple of config differences between that and the EL7-OSBS that x86_64 has 14:32:50 cyberpear: it's FCOS is still focused as a k8s distribution, just not only openshift 14:33:31 smooge: unforseen as in it's going to be fixed, or you want eyes out and reports if there's problems seen? 14:33:40 one of those was how layering is done with the default with F33/OKD being overlays and EL7-x86_64 with devicemapper 14:33:57 the first problem that has been run into is that the overlays does not allow for hardlinks 14:34:23 so certain builds are failing because they untar and hardlink 14:34:48 i lost the ticket.. one sec 14:35:11 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9532 14:35:34 the fix seems to require rerolling out the infrastructure in places 14:35:48 it will be looked at in the new year 14:36:18 that is all I know but I didn't want you to run into it this break without knowing at least that amount 14:36:30 thanks smooge 14:36:50 pbrobinson: FCOS runs any generic workload that can run inside a container, including k8s. FCOS ships both docker and podman so users can choose their preference. Users can also layer rpm-ostree packages, but the marketing/support team heavily encourages folks to do it in containers instead 14:37:06 smooge++ thanks 14:37:06 pbrobinson: Karma for smooge changed to 9 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 14:37:49 cyberpear: sure, I used the term focused for a reason! 14:37:50 no problem. I am going to spend this break trying to catch up on all of this 14:38:03 that doesnt sound like a break 14:40:24 #info The next Fedora IoT meeting will be January 6th, 2021 14:40:46 Have a nice break everyone! See you next year 14:40:48 #endmeeting