22:00:34 #startmeeting Fedora Mobility SIG 22:00:34 Meeting started Wed Feb 22 22:00:34 2023 UTC. 22:00:34 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 22:00:34 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 22:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 22:00:34 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_mobility_sig' 22:00:42 #meeting_name fedora_mobility_sig 22:00:56 #chair torbuntu pbrobinson Yoda 22:00:56 Current chairs: Yoda nirik pbrobinson torbuntu 22:01:02 #topic init process 22:01:09 I need to get more coffee... back in a few min 22:02:02 👋 22:02:28 🖐️ 22:02:33 Hi 22:05:02 hey everyone. 22:05:10 Hey there! 22:05:18 #topic remix status / issues / plans 22:05:27 So, whats the news on the remix front? 22:05:56 nightlies are now build from the Phosh image 22:06:07 sweet. 22:06:24 Exciting! 22:06:34 So, do you have published anywhere the scripting/changes that it makes? I mean, installing the other kernel obviously... 22:07:11 I've been meaning to update the scripts on the njha github repository, but I haven't gotten the "initial setup" to startup yet on the phosh image itself yet on other systems. 22:07:46 no, not yet - needs a lot of cleaning ... but I'm on it right now 22:07:46 yeah, we need to sort that out I guess. 22:07:55 #info nightly images are based on the Phosh image + extras 22:08:18 anything else on the remix side? 22:09:02 libcamera seems to be working on at least PP - I'm now including qcam 22:09:26 nice! 22:09:33 progress is being made. ;) 22:09:37 #topic fedora mainline 22:10:02 So... there's a number of things here: 22:10:25 Todays rawhide Phosh image should have a 6.3.0rc0 kernel in it... we should see if it can light up the display/etc. I plan to try and do that later. 22:10:31 We should look at all the stuff thats on the Phosh image and... prune. 22:10:31 On both the PP and Pro? 22:10:36 it's gigantic. 22:10:45 just the pro I think 22:10:50 but unclear. 22:11:06 I just build todays image in nightlies for PPP 22:11:23 haven't tested it yet 22:11:26 * nirik starts a download 22:12:11 #info help wanted to help prune things from the Phosh image. 22:12:23 Yes, there is way too many packages. Even on minimal image I remove a lot 22:12:29 I suppose an ostree image would need more of the basic hardware support completed first right? 22:12:31 #info testing wanted on the fedora stock kernel and how it does on both ppp and pp 22:12:48 However I have left everything on the Phosh image for now 22:12:55 yeah, the thought was to get it all working and then we could look at ostree... it's too many parts right now to do that 22:13:36 the Phosh image is also too big (12GB) set it down to ex 8GB would be nicer 22:13:56 We can do that... just needs a PR. 22:14:11 I think I picked 12 just to make sure it didn't run out of space 22:14:16 it also funny enough do not have the Phosh group installed 22:14:34 really? huh... that doesn't sound right. 22:15:31 almost all packages are there - but when I install phosh group on it it adds 2 packages iirc 22:15:33 anyhow, it's not intended. Will need to investigate. 22:16:12 Then we need mobile release identity on it 22:16:25 note that it installs the 'phosh-desktop-environment' env group... which should have the main phosh-desktop packages in it. 22:16:38 Oh yes, thats another thing. 22:16:51 #info needed: fedora-release-mobility package added to fedora-release 22:17:07 Is it possible to get openQA to test the image ? 22:17:12 what are the 2 package it installs? if you can recall? 22:17:49 possibly yes? we would need to ask adamw about that 22:17:49 I'll check the log... 22:18:18 Installerer gruppe-/modulpakker:... (full message at ) 22:18:55 ahhhh. 22:18:59 yes, thats expected... 22:19:20 we can't distribute that... it has to be downloaded from cisco (who can distribute it) 22:19:41 probibly should remove it from the group? 22:20:05 or perhaps it does some good being there. dunno. 22:21:16 I think just leave it - then it might be pickup auto when users update 22:21:29 yeah. It's in another group ('multimedia') too 22:21:53 I'm a bit surprised it doesn't fail the image build. 22:22:12 maybe it is just a recommended package 22:22:40 nope, it's regular: gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 22:23:01 anyhow. 22:23:31 One other thing: we should talk to the websites folks about adding this image somewhere... 22:23:36 #info needed: someone to talk to websites and see about adding phosh image info 22:24:10 Nico was asking about that a few days ago 22:24:40 ah nice. 22:24:54 Anything else on the phosh image? 22:25:13 That was all I noted 22:25:13 How are things looking on the plasma-mobile front? 22:25:13 I need to get to packaging and submitting a request for phosh-mobile-settings https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/phosh-mobile-settings 22:25:42 nice. 22:26:37 I have no idea if the KDE guys are doing anything with plasma-mobile 22:27:00 I think they are, but I am not sure the status... I suppose we should ping them. 22:27:16 Onuralp Sezer (he/him) any news ? 22:28:17 at least I think that all apps for it is packaged 22:28:40 I've noticed more folks coming by running on more mainstream hardware (oneplus6t, etc). Anyone have any experences there? are any of those other devices fall enough along to try and target things on? 22:30:35 I don't have any usefull device. As far as I hear, not enough is upstreamed to make any of them work - so it would require a remix with another kernel 22:30:54 looking at the postmarketos page for oneplus6 a lot of things work there... but yeah... 22:31:10 Is that using a downstream kernel though? 22:31:25 likely so yes 22:31:29 yeah, patches exists, but upstreaming takes time 22:31:50 yep. Not easy at all. 22:32:09 the only ones that can make any remix for those phones, are the owners 22:32:27 continuing on the hardware discussion: there's a new keyboard firmware for the pinephone keyboard. (I haven't updated mine yet, but plan to soo) 22:32:31 soon even 22:32:54 yes, I saw that too 22:33:30 #topic Open Floor 22:34:04 Oh, I had one other issue... meeting time. ;) Folks in the ticket said monday at 18utc was better for them, so was going to try that next time? or should we stick to this slot? 22:34:33 This slot works best for me but I can attempt to make the other one. Or post on the meeting ticket any notes 22:35:35 I don't know working hours more than 25 days ahead 22:36:06 yeah. understand. 22:36:19 well, we can try monday and if no one shows, punt to wed. ;) 22:36:40 :) 22:37:33 anyone have anything else to discuss? I'm happy we are finally making some progress... thanks to everyone's hard work 22:38:22 Been some very exciting progress lately indeed. 22:38:23 I didn't have anything else 👀 22:38:36 nothing here either 22:39:32 Thanks for coming everyone! 22:39:34 #endmeeting