14:02:05 <jkurik> #startmeeting Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
14:02:05 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Jun  6 14:02:05 2018 UTC.
14:02:05 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
14:02:05 <zodbot> The chair is jkurik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:05 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
14:02:05 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'prioritized_bugs_and_issues'
14:02:10 <jkurik> #meetingname Fedora Prioritized bugs and issues
14:02:10 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_prioritized_bugs_and_issues'
14:02:15 <jkurik> #topic Purpose of this meeting
14:02:20 <mattdm> hello!
14:02:21 <jkurik> #info The purpose of this process is to help with processing backlog of bugs and
14:02:27 <jkurik> #info   issues found during the development, verification and use of Fedora distribution.
14:02:31 <jkurik> #info The main goal is to raise visibility of bugs and issues to help
14:02:37 <jkurik> #info   contributors focus on the most important issues.
14:02:42 <jkurik> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues_-_the_process
14:02:47 <jkurik> #info Currently we have 5 proposed bugs for evaluation and 4 bugs already approved for review.
14:02:53 <jkurik> #topic Roll Call
14:02:57 <jkurik> #chair jkurik mattdm mcatanzaro dustymabe sgallagh
14:02:57 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jkurik mattdm mcatanzaro sgallagh
14:03:01 <jkurik> hi mattdm
14:03:28 <jkurik> do we have more people here for the Prioritized bugs meeting ?
14:04:08 <mattdm> I know sgallagh is in training this week and had some other stuff going on
14:07:46 <jkurik> mattdm: are you ok if just two of us will go through it ?
14:08:02 <mattdm> yeah we can at least look quick
14:08:05 <mattdm> it's been a while!
14:08:37 <jkurik> #topic Evaluation of bug #1563674: Nautilus silently fails to delete non-empty directories on Samba share
14:08:43 <jkurik> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563674
14:11:32 <jkurik> looks like we already have a patch, my proposal will be to ask assignee to fix it and if it is not fixed at the time of the next Prioritized-bugs meeting then mark it as "Prioritized"
14:11:52 <mattdm> +1
14:13:31 <jkurik> #action jkurik to ask assignee to fix it
14:14:19 <jkurik> #agreed If the bug is not fixed at the time of the next Prioritized-bugs meeting then it is going to be marked as "Prioritized"
14:14:27 <jkurik> #topic Evaluation of bug #1573873: Cogl/Clutter does not support 10-bit depth colours making some Gnome applications unusable
14:14:33 <jkurik> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573873
14:16:09 <mattdm> I'm not sure this is appropriate as a prioritized bug
14:16:40 <mattdm> I mean, sure, it's a thing that needs work, but I think Chris's suggestion of a workstation WG ticket is better.
14:16:59 <jkurik> +1
14:18:11 <mattdm> I guess it's just the two of us to vote so we get to decide :)
14:19:12 <jkurik> proposed #agreed Bug #1573873 has not been approved for the Prioritized bugs list. jkurik to update the bug to support Chris's suggestion of a workstation WG ticket.
14:19:30 <mattdm> +1
14:19:36 <jkurik> #agreed Bug #1573873 has not been approved for the Prioritized bugs list. jkurik to update the bug to support Chris's suggestion of a workstation WG ticket.
14:19:43 <jkurik> #topic Evaluation of bug #1098749: new-kernel-pkg needlessly adds LANG= to boot options
14:19:48 <jkurik> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098749
14:22:39 <jkurik> This is an ancient one... and it is not clear for me how much this affects general users.
14:23:38 <mattdm> pjones, you happen to be around?
14:24:49 <mattdm> As far as I can tell, this is entirely aesthetic.
14:25:31 <jkurik> Does aesthetic mean for you "prioritized" ?
14:25:38 <jkurik> I am slightly -1
14:25:43 <mattdm> No. I mean "Is this just a matter of making something pretty?"
14:25:57 <mattdm> aesthetic as opposed to a real problem :)
14:26:12 <mattdm> I'm going to ask for that clarification in the bug and let's come back to it next meeting.
14:26:13 <jkurik> right, I feel it the same
14:26:19 <jkurik> ok
14:26:51 <jkurik> #agreed mattdm will ask for a clarification and we come back to it next meeting
14:27:00 <jkurik> #topic Evaluation of bug #1548586: get_best_query().filter(latest=True) is returning incorrect results
14:27:07 <jkurik> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548586
14:27:28 <mattdm> I just nominated this one myself.
14:28:27 <mattdm> pbrobinson: you around?
14:28:35 <mattdm> Do you have a workaround for this?
14:30:08 <mattdm> I guess he is away. Can we make this contingent on that answer? That is, if Peter says this blocks IoT, make it prioritized?
14:30:19 <jkurik> I do not expect we will update DNF to 3.0 version in F28
14:31:02 <mattdm> yeah, that's not a good solution.
14:31:44 <jkurik> proposed #agreed Let's pbrobinson decide whether this is blocking for IoT or not. If so, then this bug will be tracked as prioritized.
14:32:06 <mattdm> +1
14:32:18 <mattdm> and I'll take the action of asking peter
14:32:35 <jkurik> #action mattdm to ask pbrobinson about this
14:32:39 <jkurik> #agreed Let's pbrobinson decide whether this is blocking for IoT or not. If so, then this bug will be tracked as prioritized.
14:32:51 <jkurik> #topic Evaluation of bug #1573923: GDM login screen does not honour the selected keyboard language
14:32:57 <jkurik> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573923
14:33:32 <mattdm> this looks to be fixed.
14:33:44 <mattdm> halfline1 -- this one is needinfo on you. can you verify?
14:34:39 <halfline> yea let's close it!
14:34:49 <mattdm> awesome. thanks :)
14:34:51 <mattdm> halfline++
14:34:51 <zodbot> mattdm: Karma for rstrode changed to 3 (for the f28 release cycle):  https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any
14:36:30 <jkurik> proposed #agreed as this bug seems to be fixed halfline will verify it and we can re-evaluate on a next meeting in case the fix will not work
14:37:08 <mattdm> I don't think we even need to re-evaluate. If it's not fixed, someone can re-nominate
14:40:33 <jkurik> ok
14:40:53 <jkurik> proposed #agreed as this bug seems to be fixed and halfline will verify
14:42:10 <mattdm> +1
14:43:01 <halfline> (i'm actually not going to do anything else with that bug)
14:43:44 <halfline> (someone already said the problem is fixed and the fix is in so it's just going to stay in the closed state with no further action on my part)
14:43:47 <mattdm> (marking it closed is good enough for me)
14:43:49 <mattdm> +1
14:44:09 <jkurik> #agreed The bug is already fixed, so there is no need for a follow-up action
14:44:14 <jkurik> mattdm: this was the last proposed bug for today. Can we skip the "review" section ? I am now multitasking which makes me schizophrenic :-)
14:44:18 <jkurik> halfline: thanks
14:45:30 <mattdm> jkurik: yeah, I think that's enough for today
14:46:08 <jkurik> #endmeeting