#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-08-24)

Meeting summary

1. init process (nirik, 19:30:02)
   
2. #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation (nirik, 19:34:01)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ajax/Stable_Release_Policy (ajax, 19:34:10)
   2. AGREED: we should just use critical path and remove references to 'important packages' (nirik, 19:39:13)
   3. ACTION: mclasen to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria (nirik, 19:41:06)
   4. ACTION: notting to ask for more clarification on question 2. (nirik, 19:49:34)
   
   
3. #382 Implementing Stable Release Vision (nirik, 19:55:25)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ajax/Stable_Release_Policy (nirik, 19:56:01)
   2. ACTION: ajax to update docs. Will revisit over the week and next meeting. (nirik, 20:11:26)
   
   
4. FES tickets roundup (nirik, 20:11:41)
   1. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/report/6 (nirik, 20:11:45)
   
   
5. Open Floor (nirik, 20:19:03)
   1. ACTION: mclasen to write up ideas for branched releases update criteria (nirik, 20:32:33)

Action items

1. mclasen to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
2. notting to ask for more clarification on question 2.
3. ajax to update docs. Will revisit over the week and next meeting.
4. mclasen to write up ideas for branched releases update criteria

Action items, by person

1. ajax
   1. ajax to update docs. Will revisit over the week and next meeting.
2. mclasen
   1. mclasen to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
   2. mclasen to write up ideas for branched releases update criteria
3. notting
   1. notting to ask for more clarification on question 2.

People present (lines said)

1. nirik (96)
2. mclasen (48)
3. ajax (42)
4. pjones (36)
5. notting (26)
6. cwickert (9)
7. SMParrish (7)
8. zodbot (6)
9. skvidal (6)
10. gholms (5)
11. cebbert (5)
12. mmcgrath (4)
13. jsmith (4)
14. mjg59 (3)
15. lmacken (2)
16. dgilmore (2)
17. kylem (0)