17:01:29 #startmeeting FESCO (2014-07-30) 17:01:29 Meeting started Wed Jul 30 17:01:29 2014 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:01:29 #meetingname fesco 17:01:29 #chair dgilmore jwb kalev mattdm mitr mmaslano nirik sgallagh t8m thozza 17:01:29 #topic init process 17:01:29 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 17:01:29 Current chairs: dgilmore jwb kalev mattdm mitr mmaslano nirik sgallagh t8m thozza 17:01:58 .hellomynameis sgallagh 17:01:59 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 17:02:10 Hello 17:03:13 ok, thats 3. :) We may not have quorum today 17:04:06 i'm here.. sorry 17:04:16 that doesn't quite make quorum though :) 17:04:26 plus I have to leave in 40 minutes. 17:05:19 alright. 17:05:54 I assume we will not be meeting next week as thats flock time. 17:06:15 Is all of FESCo going to be on-site? 17:07:11 not sure. 17:07:19 possibly 17:07:47 #info no meeting next week, see 'meet your fesco' at flock. 17:08:58 * mattdm nods 17:09:58 ok, I guess no quorum... 17:10:17 continue in tickets and at flock and we will meet the week after. 17:10:28 here, sorry 17:10:38 oh hey. :) 17:10:50 thats quorum then for now. ;) 17:10:57 #topic #1322 F21 Changes - Progress on Changes Freeze 17:10:57 .fesco 1322 17:10:57 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1322 17:10:59 nirik: #1322 (F21 Changes - Progress on Changes Freeze) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1322 17:11:18 any changes of concern? 17:11:35 Hopefully they will use the extra time... 17:11:42 at the moment, no 17:12:03 yes, the extra time really helps for atomic in particular 17:12:11 and sgallagh was mentioning also for the server api 17:12:17 * nirik nods 17:12:41 #topic #1326 change to fesco replacement process? 17:12:41 .fesco 1326 17:12:41 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1326 17:12:43 nirik: #1326 (change to fesco replacement process?) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1326 17:12:44 Yeah, we're a little behind schedule, but I think the slip has us covered 17:13:00 Motion: discuss this at Meet Your FESCo, live. 17:13:01 so there's been a lot of discussion on ticket. 17:13:37 Also, it may be very on topic in the governance workshop 17:13:49 That too 17:13:55 cwickert is running the latter one, right? 17:13:57 yes, absolutely. 17:14:01 sgallagh: live, yes; taking time from audience questions in that session, I’d rather not 17:14:03 and abadger1999 17:14:31 http://flock2014.sched.org/event/9d2f47d741d92f1ddf559bb918dcb2d1 17:14:58 number80 and I ... is cwickert involved in the same one or a parallel session? 17:15:10 * sgallagh looks 17:15:36 I think I had that confused with the "Fate of Spins" session 17:16:46 Anyhow, I don't know that we have reached a conclusion in this ticket, so I would be happy to defer it until after flock and see what we can work out there. 17:16:59 +1 17:17:02 sure 17:17:20 any objections? 17:17:30 nirik: +1 to deferring 17:18:04 #info will defer this until after flock. 17:18:10 #topic #1327 Process whenisgood results 17:18:10 .fesco 1327 17:18:11 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1327 17:18:12 nirik: #1327 (Process whenisgood results) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1327 17:18:30 and the survey says: 17:18:34 no time is good for everyone. ;) 17:18:50 The current time appears closest 17:19:18 The current time is actually attended by the person who says he can’t do it :) 17:19:50 mitr I noticed that too. 17:20:13 ok then... sounds like we just keep this time then? or ask everyone to update as much as they can? 17:20:15 who was that? 17:20:19 jwb: t8m 17:20:20 jwb: t8m 17:20:25 jinx 17:20:39 * sgallagh hands over a Pepsi 17:21:24 (It'd be nice if the whenisgood app allowed "inconvenient but i can do it" and "best time" votes. 17:21:30 yeah. 17:23:07 mattdm: GSoC project for next summer: Better WhenIsGood 17:23:12 heh. 17:23:17 * sgallagh wasn't kidding 17:23:27 actually there is a open source nicer one. 17:23:34 but then we would have to run it. 17:23:37 hi weeds! 17:23:41 nirik: OpenShift? 17:23:41 :) 17:23:48 jwb yeah. moving on? :) 17:23:57 proposal: keep current time 17:24:03 sure 17:24:05 nirik: Point me at it, I'll host it on the fedoraserver openshift account 17:24:10 Since we have basically 2 options, 17:24:13 proposal: keep current time; if t8m and kalev negotiate that the Tuesday one would be better, they can ask for a change. 17:24:13 can someone ask t8m if the current time really doesn't work due to a schedule change? 17:24:23 mitr +1 17:24:29 sgallagh: can't find it now, but will let you know if I do 17:24:34 nirik: +1 17:24:37 nirik: Seems like the best choice. Either this or Tuesday at the same time and lose Kalev 17:25:41 mattdm: t8m will be at Flock 17:25:42 * nirik is ok with mitr s too 17:25:59 They are equivalent anyway :) 17:26:18 mitr true :) 17:26:32 mitr: +1 17:27:59 #agreed keep current time (+5,0,0) 17:28:06 (assuming jwb's sure was a +1) 17:28:11 yes, sorry 17:28:23 #topic Week after next's chair 17:28:32 who wants the next chair? 17:28:48 this is for the week _after_ next, right? 17:29:13 I will be travelling back from post-flock meetings in brno 17:29:18 right 17:29:28 the 13th 17:29:38 Same, I will be in transit that day 17:31:02 I'll be back, but I was chair today. ;) 17:31:06 I guess I can next time too. 17:31:08 *shrug* I can do it 17:31:14 cool. thanks mitr 17:31:22 #info mitr to chair aug 13th meeting 17:31:25 #topic Open Floor 17:31:30 any items for open floor? 17:32:23 There was a request to discuss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118907 17:33:18 i read that over, but i would need more time to decide anything there 17:33:21 yeah, I glanced at it but haven't had time to look into it much 17:33:43 I'm tentatively +1 to colin's approach but would like to hear if there's a practical reason to enable it now 17:33:45 My impression is that this is way too invasive to land during what should already be Alpha 17:33:47 Similar here 17:34:35 A lets-not-think-about-this fallback is saying that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups still applies and systemd should comply, and the new mechanism should go through FPC for F22 (which it should anyway) 17:35:06 lets defer? I see sgallagh asked walters to file a fesco ticket on it too. 17:35:27 +1 wait. 17:35:27 but the right thing to do is to file a ticket, discuss more, and defer -- unless this were time-sensitive 17:35:38 * nirik nods. 17:35:52 It's probably time-sensitive 17:36:03 It sounds like the systemd guys enabled this in F21 and it's breaking things 17:36:14 We likely don't want to fix the breakage this close to Alpha 17:36:40 * mattdm has to go. see you all in cz! 17:36:43 The next FESCo meeting is 1 day after the Alpha deadline; we _could_ handle this in a ticket but I wouldn’t bet on it. 17:37:00 * nirik looks at the bug again. 17:37:05 safe travels mattdm 17:37:22 sgallagh: OTOH systemd is the only user, so the fallout is Alpha testing one component being done slightly differently, which is perhaps not that much of a deal. 17:37:57 sgallagh: And, it _has_ broken things but wasn't that already fixed? 17:38:11 Anyway, without mattdm we are out of quorum so deferring by default. 17:38:11 I guess it's implied that it broke atomic? 17:38:18 (since walters was trying to disable it) 17:38:28 should ask for more info. yeah. 17:38:41 ok, any other items before we close out? 17:38:57 I generally vote to stay conservative this late in a cycle. 17:39:09 We're under quorum, so no :) 17:39:11 I’ll just go ahead and file the ticket 17:39:16 aalright. 17:39:33 Thanks for coming everyone. See (many/most/all) of you at flock next week! 17:39:36 #endmeeting