18:00:02 #startmeeting FESCO (2015-07-08) 18:00:02 Meeting started Wed Jul 8 18:00:02 2015 UTC. The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:02 #meetingname fesco 18:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 18:00:02 #chair ajax dgilmore number80 jwb nirik paragan rishi thozza sgallagh 18:00:02 #topic init process 18:00:02 Current chairs: ajax dgilmore jwb nirik number80 paragan rishi sgallagh thozza 18:00:05 hi 18:00:12 hi 18:00:15 hi 18:00:34 hello 18:00:35 Hi all 18:00:37 morning 18:01:07 hi, i'm the owner of self contained change "Astronomy Spin" and i'm here to answer any quastions ;) 18:01:13 I'm only on mobile today. so may be little bit slow in response 18:01:13 *questions 18:01:23 hi all 18:01:23 Okay let's start now 18:01:34 #topic #1445 F23 Self Contained Changes 18:01:34 .fesco 1445 18:01:34 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1445 18:01:35 paragan: #1445 (F23 Self Contained Changes) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1445 18:01:48 we have 2 self contained changes this week 18:02:15 io.js Technology Preview and Astronomy spin 18:02:17 isnt this meeting a day early? 18:02:27 so what is the outcome of the io.he discussion? 18:02:41 Southern_Gentlem: nope 18:02:43 io.js 18:02:55 thozza, there is some reply on the list for io.js 18:03:05 I saw it 18:03:21 +1 to astronomy spin 18:03:31 but I am still not in favor to have io.js provided sometime in future it may get merged 18:03:38 but didn't see any final decision. I didn't check today though 18:03:48 no final decision too 18:04:15 +1 for astronomy, too 18:04:32 +1 both 18:04:32 anyone got any opinion for io.js change? 18:04:38 so it sounded like the change owner was ok with making io.js default in f23, but calling it io.js, not node... which seems reasonable to me. 18:05:03 yes, this is what I remember 18:05:09 but I don't think the change page is updated to reflect any of that discussion. 18:05:15 I'm also ok with this 18:05:26 then, it's fine with me 18:05:51 +1 both then 18:06:24 I do not have anything against io.js just not been able to catch up on it and it seems there is some unanswered questions 18:06:44 I guess I am +1 to both. 18:07:10 dgilmore: we mostly wanted to clarify the node.js/io.js transition as the current io.js will become the next node.js 18:07:42 number80: okay 18:07:55 I can give it a +1 then 18:08:07 I count 4 +1 excluding me 18:08:57 jwb, you want to vote on this? 18:09:10 I'm +1 for io.js if the page will reflect the discussion 18:09:24 paragan, 0 18:09:28 fair enough 18:09:30 so please note it 18:09:46 okay we reach 5 +1 18:09:54 I am 0 18:10:50 AGREED: All self-contained changes are approved (+5, 2 , 0) 18:11:04 #topic #1455 F23 System Wide Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy 18:11:04 .fesco 1455 18:11:04 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1455 18:11:07 paragan: #1455 (F23 System Wide Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1455 18:11:21 so, we don't really need to discuss this 18:11:24 please note the change of the change page for io.js 18:11:30 as long as fesco is ok with approving it once I have a draft. 18:12:10 I am okay once we have a draft we can vote and decide on this change 18:12:33 nirik, s/approving/reviewing? 18:12:36 voting without a draft has no meaning 18:12:43 I agree 18:12:47 right. 18:13:02 yeah, i'm certainly fine with reviewing it whenever a draft materializes 18:13:16 well, my concern was that since we are so far along people would say to go to F24. 18:13:25 I wanted the change so we know it's being worked on. 18:13:50 as long as the plan is good, it could make it in F23 18:14:00 and in fact t8m already wanted bugs against a tracker (which could be the change bug) 18:14:09 yes it can make it in F23 18:14:48 if the draft will not be ready for f23 it should be moved to f24. but there is still some time 18:15:11 proposal: let's revisit this next time when draft gets ready for review 18:15:17 +1 18:15:23 +1 18:15:27 if we defer to f24, there's going to be lots of pain. ;) but I will try and get something as soon as I have time to. 18:15:41 +1 18:15:59 votes? 18:16:13 +1 18:16:15 paragan: I'm still waiting for you to note the update of the io.js change page... 18:16:50 you want me to add action to have io.js change page updated? 18:16:52 sure, +1 (not sure we need to vote on this but ok) 18:17:29 at least we agreed to review it and not delay it by default ;) 18:17:32 nirik, why will there be lots of pain? 18:17:50 at least an info so that the change wrangled can notify the change owner 18:17:59 wrangler 18:18:04 jwb: because the anaconda default right now is the thing that everyone yelled about in f22. 18:18:21 nirik, eh. that isn't new this time around though. 18:18:39 #info We need io.js change page updated with the information provided on devel mailing list 18:18:56 well, I don't know that they want to patch this again without a fesco policy in place. anyhow, lets please move on? 18:19:06 paragan: thanks 18:19:26 #agreed let's revisit this next time when draft gets ready for review 18:19:38 #topic #1456 F23 System Wide Change: Node.js 0.12 18:19:38 .fesco 1456 18:19:38 paragan: #1456 (F23 System Wide Change: Node.js 0.12) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1456 18:20:15 The Change proposal looks good to me. I see change owner already addressed the issues raised on devel mailing list. 18:20:57 sgallaghl was suggesting this should be system wide on the list. 18:21:27 oh, they adjusted for that. great 18:21:35 yes 18:21:36 +1 18:22:03 shouldn't this be merged with the io.js change? 18:22:36 maybe someone want to use node.js 0.12 18:22:55 let this be separate 18:23:16 yes, let's keep them separate 18:23:22 well, the io.js was supposed to be a tech prevew thing. 18:23:40 right, but if there is only io.js, then there will be no node.js 18:24:16 well, it's also going to be node.js down the road (love all this. ;) 18:24:41 :-) 18:24:44 0 18:24:44 so, for f23 we would have node.js and io.js, then f24 (or whenver they merge back) we just have node.js again 18:24:52 (this is all why i keep voting 0) 18:25:00 yes 18:25:05 ok. so I'm +1 for node.js 18:25:08 javascript attention deficit disorder 18:25:11 but IMHO we should also trust the folks doing the work. 18:25:21 +1 18:25:23 +1 for this node.js 18:25:39 and I agree that javascript ecosystem is a PITA 18:26:06 +1 but this seems like an ugly mess that will get messed up and have issues 18:26:19 I also trust the js experts 18:26:37 +1 18:26:45 #agreed F23 System Wide Change: Node.js 0.12 (+6, 1, -0) 18:27:08 #topic #1457 F23 System Wide Change: jQuery 18:27:08 .fesco 1457 18:27:10 paragan: #1457 (F23 System Wide Change: jQuery) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1457 18:27:19 another js change 18:27:41 at least, it's an improvement 18:27:44 This change was approved for Fedora 21 but it did not complete on time due to unfinished package reviews which are all completed in May 2015. 18:28:26 +1 18:28:32 I am +1 for this change 18:28:38 I'm not convinced that this is beneficial after reading the conversation on devel list 18:28:39 +1 but I don't think there's any way they can all be moved without some massive efforts... but still, progress. 18:28:49 +1 i guess 18:28:49 but it seems we can't claim to be first in that it took us two releases to get it reviewed 18:28:57 thozza, what issue you see? 18:29:30 that it is almost impossible to move all applications to system package 18:30:17 I think there are different cases given https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/jQuery#Migrating_Web_Applications 18:30:27 however I see the benefit of trying to move at least as much packages as possible 18:30:56 *applications 18:31:03 * nirik nods 18:31:24 so for marketing purposes I'm for it 18:31:29 +1 18:31:41 also to appreciate the work already done 18:32:04 +1 then 18:32:40 jwb, your vote 0 for this also? 18:34:05 #agreed F23 System Wide Change: jQuery (+6, 0, -0) 18:34:09 #topic #1458 F23 System Wide Change: IBus 1.5.11 18:34:10 .fesco 1458 18:34:12 paragan: #1458 (F23 System Wide Change: IBus 1.5.11) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1458 18:34:45 As explained in the ticket, this is a simple change that provides 2 sub-changes 18:35:02 +1 18:35:03 One for KDE to show language prefix icons for xkb layouts 18:35:12 we also had concerns about GNOME support? 18:35:21 second is dynamically load system compose tables along with any other extra mappings written in $HOME/.XCompose file. 18:35:33 +1 18:35:53 paragan, sorry, distracted. i am +1 for jQuery 18:36:06 i'm also +1 for this 18:36:41 +1 18:36:42 number80, we already have langauge prefix icons in GNOME 18:36:52 then, it's all good for me 18:36:54 +1 18:36:59 +! 18:37:03 +1 18:38:01 thozza1, we are discussing last change IBus 18:38:16 your vote please 18:39:25 sorry my connection dropped 18:39:55 I'm +1 for ibus 18:39:58 cool 18:40:18 #agreed F23 System Wide Change: IBus 1.5.11 (+7, 0, 0) 18:40:32 #topic Next week's chair 18:40:43 any volunteer? 18:41:18 sure I can 18:41:27 dgilmore, thanks 18:41:42 #info dgilmore to chair next week 18:41:49 #topic Open Floor 18:42:01 anything for open floor? 18:42:21 nothing from me 18:42:35 * nirik has nothing. 18:43:14 nein 18:43:37 nada 18:43:52 same 18:44:41 thanks everyone for having this meeting. 18:44:46 #endmeeting