16:01:04 #startmeeting FESCO (2016-05-27) 16:01:04 Meeting started Fri May 27 16:01:04 2016 UTC. The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:04 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2016-05-27)' 16:01:04 #meetingname fesco 16:01:04 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 16:01:04 #chair maxamillion dgilmore number80 jwb nirik paragan jsmith kalev sgallagh 16:01:04 Current chairs: dgilmore jsmith jwb kalev maxamillion nirik number80 paragan sgallagh 16:01:04 #topic init process 16:01:09 .hello sgallagh 16:01:10 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 16:01:18 .hello pnemade 16:01:18 .hello maxamillion 16:01:18 paragan: pnemade 'Parag Nemade' 16:01:21 maxamillion: maxamillion 'Adam Miller' 16:01:28 .hello hguemar 16:01:29 number80: hguemar 'Haïkel Guémar' 16:02:04 morning 16:02:10 .hello kevin 16:02:11 nirik: kevin 'Kevin Fenzi' 16:02:43 let's wait a minute for others to join 16:02:52 .hello kalev 16:02:53 kalev-afk: kalev 'Kalev Lember' 16:03:20 .hello jsmith 16:03:21 jsmith: jsmith 'Jared Smith' 16:03:27 Sorry I'm late... was wrapping up a phone call 16:03:47 we are just starting now :) 16:03:55 On the bright side, I should be working from home again most Fridays, so I should be able to join the meetings much more easily 16:04:12 cool 16:04:15 #topic #1568 F25 Self Contained Changes 16:04:15 .fesco 1568 16:04:15 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1568 16:04:18 paragan: #1568 (F25 Self Contained Changes) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1568 16:04:43 there are 3 Changes to discuss 16:05:01 Replace udisks2 with storaged 16:05:01 NSS enforces the system-wide crypto policy 16:05:01 Java/OpenJDK enforces the system-wide crypto policy 16:05:12 * nirik is +1 on all 16:05:21 * kalev-afk is +1 on all as well. 16:05:23 I'm +1 on all three 16:05:29 No big surprises here 16:05:57 I am also +1 for all 16:06:01 +1 for all 16:06:08 +1 16:06:11 I'm +1 for all, but I think udisks2 is a system-wide 16:06:18 From the discussion on the list. 16:06:58 Should we ask Change submitter to change it to system-wide? 16:07:05 hi all 16:07:25 paragan: Yes, i think so 16:07:39 udisks is system wide 16:07:58 Okay then I will add that comment in the ticket 16:08:12 +1 to the other two 16:08:58 #agreed Approved all 3 Self Contained Changes (8, 0, 0) 16:09:18 #topic #1573 Docker Layered Image maintainer guildelines, naming guidelines and review 16:09:18 .fesco 1573 16:09:19 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1573 16:09:21 paragan: #1573 (Docker Layered Image maintainer guildelines, naming guidelines and review) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1573 16:09:44 o hai 16:09:45 :) 16:10:18 maxamillion, can you give update on this ticket? 16:11:05 the ticket is up to date 16:11:13 I'm not sure what you want in respect to an update 16:11:17 There's still a fair number of fixmes... perhaps it should go for another run by devel list for more feedback? 16:11:18 I took it to the devel list like requrested 16:11:51 nirik: interest died out, I'm not sure what that'll do 16:12:10 I can't even get the Cloud SIG (whom initiated the whole thing) to review it in detail 16:12:46 well, sometimes different people are active or notice things on the list or have more time than they did when it first went by 16:13:23 * nirik isn't ready to approve it without re-reading it personally, but I guess we could try and do that next week or just bypass me if everyone else is comfortable with them 16:13:47 no, it's fine ... I'll take it to the list again 16:14:07 * dgilmore wishes we had a review app, or reviews integrated in pkgdb 16:14:07 maxamillion, thanks 16:14:13 something other than bugzilla 16:14:22 but that is a bit off topic for this 16:14:29 this whole project is just wearing on me ... everyone seemed to want the layered image build system yesterday, but when it comes time to even just review documents (much less help with the work), everyone is nowhere to be found 16:14:52 * jsmith promises to read it once again, and be more prepared to discuss details next week 16:15:10 * nirik tired to send feedback 16:15:13 alright, we can table this until next week and I'll kick off another round on devel list 16:15:15 happy to try again 16:15:28 dgilmore: yes, that would be nice. I am not sure where that is. ;( 16:15:40 nirik: I don't mean specifically FESCo, I mean the community at large ... it's just been a frustrating experience 16:16:11 Is there plans to form some Container committee? 16:16:35 sorry, sometimes thats the way it goes. ;( And rest assured once we pass guidelines someone will complain that they don't like them. ;) 16:16:57 paragan: as far as a container packaging committe equivilent of FPC? 16:17:21 I saw some comments about this in ticket and devel discussion 16:17:22 paragan: absolutely, I just need people who are willing and able to join up 16:17:46 if we can find folks for that, I think it might be a good idea. I don't know if any/all of FPC would want to do that... 16:17:52 paragan: if there is it will be up to FESCo to decide and charter it 16:18:07 dgilmore, okay 16:18:41 Let's visit this ticket next week, hope we will have some positive decision on it 16:19:05 #agreed revisit this ticket next week. 16:19:26 #topic #1576 Evaluate Workstation graphical upgrade Change status 16:19:26 .fesco 1576 16:19:26 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1576 16:19:27 paragan: #1576 (Evaluate Workstation graphical upgrade Change status) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1576 16:19:42 I am not sure what more we can do here? 16:20:44 Yeah :-/ 16:20:55 say sure graphical updates are great? 16:21:02 But are they? 16:21:02 well, it sounds like we don't know what the plan really is. ;) 16:21:07 we should figure that out. 16:21:11 The Test Day found a bunch of issues 16:21:14 kalev-afk: you have any info here? 16:21:18 or adamw ? 16:21:25 I think kalev-afk fixed them 16:21:47 yeah, we've been working through the issues found during the test day 16:21:53 very close to having all of them fixed 16:22:18 is there a f23 update with avility to test? 16:22:21 ability. 16:22:24 * nirik cannot type today 16:22:26 my personal plan is to enable it in F23 once kparal says it works fine for him :) 16:22:52 there's a copr with the latest git builds 16:22:53 kalev-afk: Shortly after the 2038 disaster, then? 16:23:13 :) 16:23:30 kalev-afk: yeah, but I thought it was hoped we could push one into real f23 that had a gsetting or something to turn it on... 16:23:45 yeah, after fixing up the bugs :) 16:23:48 so we actually test the real thing we are going to enable and then push an update that enables it. 16:24:31 getting close to being able to put something to updates-testing 16:24:36 if we are enabling this sometime after release we really need to make sure marketing/etc are on board 16:24:49 we wanted to fix up the test day bugs before that so that we wouldn't get everything reported all over again 16:24:54 because if they tout it on release day and it's not there we look bad. ;( 16:25:00 * kalev-afk nods. 16:25:29 I'll talk to hughsie on Monday and figure out an action plan, I think we might be able to actually ship it on the release day actually 16:25:34 kalev-afk: do you think it can be ready at release day? 16:25:37 we've been making good progres there 16:25:39 yeah 16:26:10 and I'll update the fesco ticket after talking to hughsie 16:26:38 okay then we can revisit this ticket next week, is that okay with others? 16:26:38 and to be clear, this just needs the f23 update right? there's nothing needing changing in 24? 16:26:46 yes, correct 16:27:02 yes there is no change needed for f24 16:27:18 yeah, so I would say we update ticket with 'tenative plan is to have it on release day' and update it monday with further details and revisit next meeting after that? 16:27:45 looks good 16:27:48 +1 16:27:52 nirik, +1 16:27:52 sounds good 16:28:55 +1 from me 16:29:14 + 16:29:16 +1 16:29:36 +1 16:29:42 I will mark this as "tenative plan is to have this change implemented on release day and update it monday with further details and revisit this ticket next meeting" 16:30:06 * nirik nods. +1 16:31:25 #agreed tenative plan is to have this change implemented on release day and update it monday with further details and revisit this ticket next meeting (6, 0, 0) 16:31:50 #topic #1578 F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/repos.d as default reposdir 16:31:50 .fesco 1578 16:31:50 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1578 16:31:51 paragan: #1578 (F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/repos.d as default reposdir) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1578 16:33:04 As per the current Change information, I see "current default repository configuration directory /etc/yum.repos.d will still be supported by package managers but /etc/repos.d would be preferred default path." 16:34:09 yeah, I'm not sure what the purpose of this is since the backwards compat thing will always exist ... is the goal here just to add a layer of distro-agnostic pathing? 16:34:30 as I understand it, the DNF team is fine with dropping this after the fedora-devel list discussion (and internal RHEL discussion) 16:34:33 Well, I think they were asking for this to become the official path that would be in the guidelines, etc. 16:34:53 But yeah, they can't really produce any benefit to *Fedora*. 16:34:57 they just haven't retracted the Change yet 16:36:28 oh ok 16:36:49 Proposal: FESCo doesn't see any value added to Fedora by this change. We don't have any problem with it landing as part of an upstream rebase, provided that backwards compatibility is maintained indefinitely. We will not be marketting this Change. 16:36:52 so lets reach out to them and find out if this is still something they would like to do or if we can just archive it 16:36:55 I am -1 to this 16:37:10 the change taht is 16:37:14 not the proposal 16:37:22 +1 to sgallagh's proposal 16:37:29 I'd rather -1 it more strongly than sgallagh's proposal 16:37:58 I would rather it not land upstream 16:37:59 kalev-afk: I don't want to suggest that we can influence upstream. 16:38:16 or if it does to not have it land in Fedora 16:38:50 dgilmore: I don't see the harm, so long as we make it clear that Fedora packages will always use the existing approach. 16:38:52 dgilmore: I think I'm missing something, what negative effect would it have on us so long as the backwards compat lives on? 16:39:12 maxamillion: it makes things messy 16:39:13 can we table this for a week and I'll talk to jsilhan next week and see where they stand and if they want to retract the change proposal? 16:39:25 +1 sgallagh proposal 16:39:32 and at some point they will push to remove /etc/yum.repos.d 16:40:13 * nirik is back, Xwayland crashed on me and I had to reboot. 16:40:32 nirik: welcome back 16:40:40 nirik: Sorry to hear that :-( 16:40:44 Do others want to wait for a week so that kalev-afk can get more feedback on this ticket? 16:40:51 yeah, I don't see any value here for Fedora. Happy to reject or wait a week. 16:40:52 That's fine with me 16:40:58 I am fine with waiting 16:41:01 dgilmore: yeah, that's fair but I don't think this is necessarily more messy than things we've already dealt with in the yum->dnf transition 16:41:26 * kalev-afk thinks it was a mistake too. 16:41:35 maxamillion: perhaps not, I would rather avoid the churn 16:41:55 as I understand, RHEL plans on keeping the yum name too instead of dnf 16:42:00 I really wish they had stuck with teh original plan, they their docs still say they are doing 16:42:07 * nirik also really doesn't like the dnf-1.1.9 strict groups change, but thats another bug I guess. 16:42:21 kalev-afk: how... confusing. 16:42:47 dgilmore: fair enough 16:43:56 #agreed revisit this ticket next week so that kalev-afk can get feedback on this 16:44:25 #topic #1579 F25 System Wide Change: Parallel Installable Debuginfo 16:44:26 .fesco 1579 16:44:26 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1579 16:44:27 paragan: #1579 (F25 System Wide Change: Parallel Installable Debuginfo) – FESCo - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1579 16:45:04 +1 16:45:22 nice change I think 16:45:23 +1 16:45:38 +1 16:45:40 sure +1 16:45:40 +1 16:45:45 +1 from me, if all the parties involved can agree on the changes necessary to make it work 16:46:37 +1 16:47:10 +1 16:47:19 #agreed F25 System Wide Change: Parallel Installable Debuginfo (8, 0, 0) 16:47:24 means more things to distribute and sign, but oh well. 16:47:58 yeah 16:48:03 #topic Next week's chair 16:48:21 Who want to chair for next week meeting? 16:48:24 I can do it 16:48:39 Thanks kalev-afk 16:48:39 thanks kalev-afk ! 16:48:53 I will probably miss the meeting the week after next, traveling. 16:49:05 #info kalev to chair for next week meeting 16:49:18 #topic Open Floor 16:49:27 anything here to discuss? 16:49:39 nothing from me 16:49:50 * jsmith has nothing else 16:50:13 nada 16:50:43 okay lets wait a minute and will close the meeting 16:50:49 could someone from releng email the devel list when the last F24 stable push is going to happen, please? 16:51:12 kalev-afk: ? 16:51:26 * dgilmore will be missing the next two meetings 16:51:29 just a heads up that the freeze is coming up and when you guys plan on doing the last push 16:51:39 kalev-afk: stable pushes are happening every day until freeze 16:51:48 kalev-afk: same as we all ways do 16:51:55 just after midnight monday 16:52:08 right, I know that, but other people might not :) 16:52:31 it may be a bit later than normal as pbrobinson is on push duty next week and he will probably do it when he gets up tuesday 16:55:16 * paragan is closing the meeting now 16:55:22 thanks everyone coming for this meeting 16:55:28 #endmeeting