16:02:53 <jsmith> #startmeeting FESCo (2017-02-24)
16:02:53 <zodbot> Meeting started Fri Feb 24 16:02:53 2017 UTC.  The chair is jsmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:02:53 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:02:53 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2017-02-24)'
16:02:54 <jsmith> #meetingname fesco
16:02:54 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fesco'
16:03:27 <kalev> .hello kalev
16:03:28 <zodbot> kalev: kalev 'Kalev Lember' <klember@redhat.com>
16:03:33 <jsmith> #chair maxamillion dgilmore jwb nirik jforbes jsmith kalev sgallagh Rathann
16:03:33 <zodbot> Current chairs: Rathann dgilmore jforbes jsmith jwb kalev maxamillion nirik sgallagh
16:03:33 <jsmith> #topic init process
16:03:45 <Rathann> .hello rathann
16:03:46 <zodbot> Rathann: rathann 'Dominik Mierzejewski' <dominik@greysector.net>
16:03:46 <jsmith> I totally space the fact that I was running the meeting until just now
16:03:53 <jforbes> .hello jforbes
16:03:54 <zodbot> jforbes: jforbes 'Justin M. Forbes' <jforbes@redhat.com>
16:03:55 <nirik> .hello kevin
16:03:55 <jsmith> So apologies for not sending out an agenda, etc. ahead of time
16:03:57 <zodbot> nirik: kevin 'Kevin Fenzi' <kevin@scrye.com>
16:04:18 <maxamillion> .hello maxamillion
16:04:19 <zodbot> maxamillion: maxamillion 'Adam Miller' <maxamillion@gmail.com>
16:04:31 <jsmith> .hello jsmith
16:04:32 <zodbot> jsmith: jsmith 'Jared Smith' <jsmith.fedora@gmail.com>
16:04:40 <Rathann> jsmith: there should be a bot that grabs the tickets with meeting keyword and just sends it 24h before the meeting ;)
16:05:07 <maxamillion> +1
16:05:10 <maxamillion> that'd be sweet
16:05:12 <jsmith> Rathann: There should, but there's often some additional back/forth/communication that needs to happen on some of the tickets to get the meeting agenda together
16:05:23 <maxamillion> details!
16:05:25 <maxamillion> >.>
16:05:26 <jsmith> That being said, I don't think there's much (if anything) on the agenda for today
16:05:42 <jsmith> https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda shows 0 issues with the "meeting" keyword
16:05:54 <Rathann> huh that's a first ;)
16:06:08 <jsmith> #topic Open Floor
16:06:22 <jsmith> I think we'll have an open floor, and then talk about any issues that get raised there
16:06:24 <nirik> there was a deferred change pending...
16:06:33 * nirik looks for it
16:06:40 <maxamillion> yeah, the LVM RAID thing
16:06:43 <maxamillion> for Anaconda
16:06:47 <jsmith> Oh, that's right...
16:07:04 <jsmith> I've been swamped this week, and haven't caught up on the dev list -- did it actually get more discussion/traction?
16:07:23 <nirik> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comment-193419
16:07:30 <nirik> yeah, there were some answers.
16:08:13 <Rathann> I read the answers and I'm +1 to the change
16:08:52 <nirik> ditto. +1 here
16:09:04 <jsmith> Gimme two minutes to read up...
16:09:39 <jforbes> +1 here
16:09:40 <nirik> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/J5KCFU7XMPGJZKP4VB7RJD4E7MBRRTOQ/#JOEGRATE6N3HHYPXEOJN3NQQXHBMJYLR
16:09:47 <maxamillion> yeah, +1 here as well
16:09:54 <nirik> is the thread (see the bottom for new stuff)
16:10:19 <kalev> +1
16:11:47 <jsmith> I'm +1 to the change
16:12:59 <jsmith> OK, we're at +6... I haven't seen sgallagh or jwb or dgilmore join the meeting, so I'm assuming we can move on...
16:13:40 <jsmith> #agreed Approve the LVM RAID change for F26 (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
16:14:31 <nirik> there's 2 more new self contained ones on that same ticket.
16:14:39 <jsmith> yeah, looking at those now
16:14:42 * jwb_ is here now. apologies for being late
16:15:28 <jsmith> #topic #1635 Self-contained change: Docker SDK for Python, version 2
16:15:43 <jsmith> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Docker_SDK_For_Python_Version_2
16:16:11 <nirik> sure, +1
16:16:18 <jsmith> Seems straightforward to me... +1
16:17:12 <jsmith> I'm a little worried that there's no contingency plan, but it should be fairly self-contained, hopefully
16:17:13 <jforbes> Not backwards compatible, but they are going to validate that everything works so +1
16:17:32 <jwb> this is docker.  backwards compatibility isn't really something they go for
16:17:38 <jwb> it's reflective of the upstream
16:17:40 <jwb> +1
16:17:42 <kalev> sure, +1
16:17:51 <maxamillion> it's going to be a bit of a pain for some stuff I'm working on in OSBS and container releng automation land, but that's just a personal note
16:17:54 <maxamillion> +1 to the change
16:18:34 <jwb> maxamillion: i feel your pain :\
16:18:54 <maxamillion> jwb: :D
16:18:56 <jsmith> #agreed Docker SDK for Python, version 2 is approved (+1:6, +0:0, -1:0)
16:18:58 <maxamillion> docker \o/
16:19:21 <jsmith> #topic #1635 Self contained change: libpinyin 2.0
16:20:20 <maxamillion> .fesco 1635
16:20:23 <zodbot> maxamillion: Issue #1635: F26 Self Contained Changes - fesco - Pagure - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635
16:21:05 <nirik> +1 I guess. it's a bit thin on details...
16:21:06 <jsmith> I am +1 to this change... Seems straightword to me.
16:21:26 <maxamillion> +1 for this change, it's a little sparse on info but over all it seem straight forward
16:21:40 <jforbes> +1 same
16:21:43 <kalev> +1
16:21:45 <jsmith> nirik: Right, but the more I look into it, I think the only change of significance is the ability to do multiple sentences.... I think that *is* the entirety of the change
16:21:46 <Rathann> +1
16:22:02 <nirik> yeah
16:22:05 <jwb> +1
16:23:36 <jsmith> #agreed libpinyin 2.0 change is approved.  (+1:6, +0:0, -1:0)
16:23:50 <jsmith> #topic Open Floor (again)
16:24:03 <maxamillion> jsmith: next weeks chair?
16:24:19 <jsmith> I still owe the group a proposal on systemd security tightening -- still working on it, hope to have something soon
16:24:38 <jsmith> maxamillion: Yeah, that too...
16:24:46 * jsmith is all kinds of messed up today
16:25:10 <jsmith> Any volunteers?
16:25:35 <Rathann> I'm out next week (vacation)
16:25:45 <maxamillion> I'll be out next week for SCaLE 15x
16:25:54 <jwb> i will also be out next week
16:26:02 <jsmith> I'll be out the week after next (SXSW)
16:26:15 <Rathann> shall we cancel next week's meeting, then?
16:26:16 <jsmith> Do we want to skip next week and shoot for the 10th?
16:26:25 <Rathann> +1
16:26:35 <jsmith> Proposal: Skip the 3rd of March and meet next on the 10th of March
16:26:44 <Rathann> I can chair the meeting on the 10th
16:26:49 <jsmith> Rathann: Thanks!
16:26:57 <jsmith> #agreed Rathann to chair the next meeting on the 10th.
16:27:02 <jsmith> Anything else?
16:27:12 * Rathann makes a note to remember to send agenda ahead
16:27:29 <maxamillion> jsmith: aw man, I'm not going to SXSW this year :(
16:27:51 <jsmith> maxamillion: I'm not sure whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, to be honest :-p
16:28:13 <jforbes> maxamillion: I think I am as close to Austin as I want to be for SXSW this year
16:29:45 <maxamillion> jforbes: fair enough
16:29:47 * jsmith lights the fuse on the meeting...
16:29:57 <maxamillion> jforbes: I used to live in Austin, the "locals only" parties were kind of amazing
16:30:31 <jforbes> maxamillion: I could see that, still, too many people
16:30:49 <maxamillion> jforbes: agreed
16:34:51 <jsmith> OK folks, see you all in two weeks!
16:34:54 <jsmith> #endmeeting