15:00:42 #startmeeting FESCO (2019-11-25) 15:00:42 Meeting started Mon Nov 25 15:00:42 2019 UTC. 15:00:42 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:42 The chair is zbyszek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:42 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2019-11-25)' 15:00:42 #meetingname fesco 15:00:42 #chair nirik, ignatenkobrain, jforbes, zbyszek, bookwar, sgallagh, contyk, mhroncok, otaylor 15:00:42 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 15:00:42 Current chairs: bookwar contyk ignatenkobrain jforbes mhroncok nirik otaylor sgallagh zbyszek 15:00:45 #topic init process 15:00:49 .hello2 15:00:49 .hello2 15:00:50 jforbes: jforbes 'Justin M. Forbes' 15:00:51 .hello psabata 15:00:54 zbyszek: zbyszek 'Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek' 15:00:57 contyk: psabata 'Petr Šabata' 15:01:01 .hello2 15:01:02 bookwar: bookwar 'Aleksandra Fedorova' 15:01:40 .hello2 15:01:41 ignatenkobrain: ignatenkobrain 'Igor Gnatenko' 15:01:47 So we have quorum. Let's go. 15:01:51 Unfortunately I'll have to go in 15 minutes =( 15:01:51 #topic #2285 Make Eclipse Installable 15:01:52 .fesco 2285 15:01:53 zbyszek: Issue #2285: Make Eclipse Installable - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285 15:02:03 I put this on the agenda, but it seems there's some progress... 15:02:09 https://pagure.io/fm-orchestrator/pull-request/1526#request_diff 15:03:13 I guess FESCo doesn't need to weigh in at this point. 15:03:23 Yeah, I was hoping to have rebuilt the Eclipse modules by now, but I was beset by infrastructure problems, as you can see. 15:03:50 yes, this should be set 15:04:01 are we agree that setting a default module for eclipse for f31 solves the issue for now? 15:04:08 .hello2 15:04:09 otaylor: otaylor 'Owen Taylor' 15:04:34 Right, so it looks like setting the default module for F31 fixes the issue there, and that was the heart of the FESCo request right? 15:04:47 i think if it is only MBS and infra issues which are in the way, we can approve the default steam and let mbooth finish with the work 15:05:00 The other bits being rawhide issues, which seem to be in progress? 15:05:49 jforbes: Rawhide issues should also be solved by the rebuild -- different infrastructure problem. 15:06:53 Right. but my point was, we were originally asked to vote on making the default module for F31, which would be currently working if we voted to do so? 15:07:39 Yes 15:07:43 Just seems that if it would solve the problem now, why wait a week? 15:08:10 +1 15:09:47 There's also the question of testing the stream before unleashing it on F31 users. 15:10:16 zbyszek: F31 is testable, and working per the ticket 15:10:27 if rawhide will have default stream for eclipse, I'm fine with adding it for F31. however, I'd like to see more testing. 15:11:54 i don't think verification should be done by fesco to be honest, and given by the fact that we don't make it worse then now.. 15:12:15 i'd say maintainers should verify it 15:12:28 and users :) 15:12:36 So... if someone feels they grok the details, please make a Proposal. 15:13:25 proposal: Allow setting the default stream for eclipse module in F31 15:13:56 I would append that, with F32 once the rebuild finishes 15:14:30 proposal Allow setting the default stream for F31 now, and F32 once the rebuild finishes and it is verified to work 15:14:42 ok 15:15:08 +1 15:15:13 Is the comma in that place on purpose (i.e. no verification is needed on F31) ? 15:15:23 F31 has been verified 15:17:27 -0. I think the details are still unclear, and I don't like applying clearly alpha-quality solutions to a stable release. 15:17:50 But OTOH, I don't have enough information to vote -1. 15:18:02 zbyszek: not sure how they can be clarified more, we have 3 tickets on this and it has drug on for weeks 15:18:40 In the meantime, eclipse is not available for F31 users 15:18:50 zbyszek: how do you expect this to be clarified? by whom? 15:19:58 java maintainers have verified it, do we need fedora qa approval? we don;t usually do that for individual package updates and eclipse in its current state somehow passed qa verification :) 15:20:13 so i don't think we are against release criteria here 15:20:29 There's a number of patches and changes in flight, and I'm simply not involved enough to understand all of them. 15:20:31 bookwar: Sadly Eclipse does not come under and release criteria :-) 15:21:02 zbyszek: Those are for F32 which is why that one needs verification 15:21:12 Which is why I could get freeze exception, but not blocker status 15:21:59 Ack. Anyway, I think it is OK if we don't have unanimity here. 15:22:26 jforbes: +1 15:23:19 zbyszek: Sure, though right now I count (+3,1,-0) 15:23:33 ignatenkobrain: are you still with us? 15:23:47 and otaylor ? 15:24:20 +1 15:24:49 This is not enough to pass. I'll ask votes in the ticket. 15:25:06 ack 15:25:16 I think we should move on, unless somebody want to discuss this more. 15:25:46 Well, if ignatenkobrain were to vote +1 that would put us at (+5,1,-0) 15:26:07 #info There were not enough votes to decide the matter. We'll continue voting in the ticket. 15:26:10 #topic Next week's chair 15:26:12 Any takers? 15:26:29 I can do it again 15:26:39 #action jforbes will chair next meeting. 15:26:42 Thanks! 15:26:45 #topic Open Floor 15:27:24 Remember to vote if you haven't already 15:27:33 Right. 15:27:40 If nothing else, I'll close in a minute. 15:28:50 #endmeeting