15:00:45 #startmeeting FESCO (2020-11-11) 15:00:45 Meeting started Wed Nov 11 15:00:45 2020 UTC. 15:00:45 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:45 The chair is dcantrell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:45 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2020-11-11)' 15:00:45 #meetingname fesco 15:00:45 #chair nirik, ignatenkobrain, decathorpe, zbyszek, sgallagh, mhroncok, dcantrell, cverna, Conan_Kudo, Pharaoh_Atem, Son_Goku, King_InuYasha, Sir_Gallantmon, Eighth_Doctor 15:00:45 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 15:00:45 Current chairs: Conan_Kudo Eighth_Doctor King_InuYasha Pharaoh_Atem Sir_Gallantmon Son_Goku cverna dcantrell decathorpe ignatenkobrain mhroncok nirik sgallagh zbyszek 15:00:48 #topic init process 15:00:59 morning 15:01:03 .hello2 15:01:04 zbyszek: zbyszek 'Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek' 15:01:10 .hello2 15:01:11 dcantrell: dcantrell 'David Cantrell' 15:01:49 I'll give everyone some minutes here 15:02:18 apologies for last week....it was a networking fun day for me 15:03:00 it happens, no worries 15:03:03 * King_InuYasha waves 15:03:07 .hello ngompa 15:03:08 King_InuYasha: ngompa 'Neal Gompa' 15:03:15 champagne flute and cucumber sandwitches kind of networking at least? 15:03:15 morning, King_InuYasha 15:03:36 zbyszek: I wish, it was on the floor and in the ceiling unfortunately 15:03:45 hey, sorry for being late 15:03:53 no worries 15:04:03 I count 6.... ? 15:04:17 nope, 5 15:05:24 dcantrell: I received no reminder. maybe pinging peaople in #fedora-devel will help 15:05:41 mhroncok: noted 15:06:03 ah, thanks :) 15:06:06 done 15:06:23 ok, so we don't have much to talk about and I sort of picked things I wanted to do a check in on for this meeting. hopefully it's quick for us. 15:06:26 did anyone hear anything from ignatenkobrain? I think someone was going to try and call him/contact him OOB? 15:06:33 I have not 15:06:36 hey, sorry for being late 15:06:44 nirik: zbyszek talked to ignatenkobrain 15:06:44 Sorry folks, I have a conflict and cannot attend today 15:06:44 decathorpe: no worries 15:06:54 sgallagh: ok, thanks and good luck 15:07:00 #info Igor is alive, but busy 15:07:10 ah, good. Glad he's ok. 15:07:11 I'm glad someone got in touch with him 15:07:22 yeah, ignatenkobrain is busy, but hopes that this will pass 15:08:05 #topic #2495 Election Interview Questions — FESCo (Fedora 33) 15:08:05 .fesco 2495 15:08:07 dcantrell: Issue #2495: Election Interview Questions — FESCo (Fedora 33) - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2495 15:08:44 the main reason I brought this one up is that mhroncok commented that he will abstain from proposing questions 15:08:47 I agree with this 15:08:54 but nearly all of us are self-nominated 15:09:11 so should we try to get some other community member to wrangle some questions for this one to make it fairer for the community? 15:09:12 we tried to as for new questions on devel several times in the past 15:09:12 yeah 15:09:24 *ask 15:09:31 maybe bcotton could help us out here? 15:09:36 the curret questions are only 1 release old 15:09:46 I don't think ti's worth restarting now (also, it's late) 15:09:54 yep. we revamped them not long back... 15:10:06 good points, just wanted to check on that 15:10:17 perhaps the process for collecting questions should be revisited later? 15:10:23 +1 15:10:31 I mean, that doesn't sound fun (i.e., not engineering), but could worthwhile 15:11:28 I guess I like the idea of that, but don't have a good idea on how to proceed. I don't have a proposal on that for now. 15:11:50 I think the current questions are fine 15:11:57 action bcotton to... :) 15:12:13 mhroncok: :) 15:12:15 dcantrell: I think we (or bcotton) could just ask people to contribute questions when announcing elections. If people submit some nice ones, then we can include them. Otherwise, keep the old ones. 15:12:27 unlike previous releases, there really hasn't been significant community churn to warrant significant change to them 15:12:51 zbyszek: +1 15:13:01 zbyszek: +1 15:13:41 zbyszek: +1 15:13:54 admittedly, time's up for getting new questions for this round, though 15:13:55 ok, I'm going to followup with bcotton on this one later and update the issue 15:14:04 sure, time is up for now, I was thinking about next time 15:14:07 (next time, gadget) 15:14:08 yup, makes sense 15:14:09 :D 15:14:31 #action dcantrell followup with bcotton regarding election question gathering process 15:14:37 Also, I thinkthe questions are open-ended, so it doesn't matter that much. 15:15:21 they are and that's fine, but maybe it's because I was sitting in a council meeting for a long time the other day and feel maybe the process could improve on engaging people for submitting questions 15:15:27 * nirik proposed last time we just make it an essay/freeform, but people didn't like that. ;) 15:15:41 yeah, essay with a minimum word count :) 15:15:50 due Friday! 15:15:58 it took me days to write the answers to the questions we have now anyway during the last cycle :P 15:15:59 ok, moving on unless anyone has anything else to add on this one? 15:16:00 :) 15:16:41 #topic #2475 proposal: let's develop the idea of a new repo for lightly-maintained packages 15:16:44 .fesco 2475 15:16:44 dcantrell: Issue #2475: proposal: let's develop the idea of a new repo for lightly-maintained packages - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2475 15:16:58 I tossed this on the meeting because I wanted to check with everyone on this one again 15:17:05 * mhroncok hates when ideas are discuces as fesco tickets 15:17:14 * nirik agrees with mhroncok there. 15:17:30 that's why I suggested to move to devel 15:17:30 how else do we do this then? 15:17:42 devel list 15:17:47 where the packagers actually are 15:17:59 I'm ambivalent to this 15:18:09 but after my suggestion, nothing happened 15:18:11 ok, well I brought it up here because I wanted to see if any of you guys had any pending ideas before I posted to devel list 15:18:15 but if no one wants to do that, fine 15:18:19 but packager/community feedback is probably a good start 15:18:27 I also think that someone should come up with a valid proposal. It may even be a strawman proposal to be struck down. But we need something to start the discussion. 15:19:33 yeah 15:19:46 since mattdm made the initial ticket, I'd expect something from him though :P 15:19:54 * nirik nods 15:20:04 ok then, moving to the last one I grabbed. I said I'd post an update but that was already in progress 15:20:08 #topic #2473 updates policy is out of date 15:20:09 .fesco 2473 15:20:10 dcantrell: Issue #2473: updates policy is out of date - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2473 15:20:23 I guess everyone look at it or something 15:20:28 vote in the ticket 15:20:33 I folded suggestions from zbyszek in... 15:20:53 nirik: yeah, thanks. I think it looks good now. 15:21:00 we should also get QA to chime in... 15:21:27 nirik: the bodhi thing is now called "bodhi-change-point" 15:21:28 ? 15:21:46 that works 15:22:04 mhroncok: +1 15:22:05 you have my axe 15:22:06 * decathorpe prepares scathing response 15:22:07 I think we should wait for QA ack before voting. 15:22:10 yeah, but I guess bcotton has it as 'Bodhi updates-testing activation point' so perhaps we should sync terms. 15:22:54 that works even better, either way not that important 15:23:02 and possibly some time for comment on devel list? Nothing too radically changing here, but... shrug 15:23:11 +1 15:23:18 +1 too 15:23:25 haven't we always called it Bodhi activation point? 15:23:29 I can post a pointer to changes. 15:23:30 otherwise, meh +1 15:23:42 King_InuYasha: yes, but now we always have bodhi enabled since rawhide gating. 15:23:47 well, bodhi is always active now, so "updates-testing activation point" is more accurate 15:23:53 that's true 15:24:14 I forget about that since all the important stuff refuses to use gating, so stuff breaks anyway :( 15:24:42 ok, nirik, leave this with you to followup with qa and notify devel list? 15:24:42 King_InuYasha: Python is gated on PR level 15:24:46 King_InuYasha: bodhi i too late 15:24:51 King_InuYasha: I'd love to use gating, but it's hard. 15:24:54 yeah, perhaps we should look at pushing more gating... like enable some global tests for everything now. 15:25:16 like - does this thing even install? 15:25:16 nirik: I find the gating reports exteremely hard to understand. 15:25:17 mhroncok, zbyszek: yeah, I know that it's difficult, but it sucks losing entire weekends to the compiler being broken :( 15:25:20 that would be lovely :D 15:25:35 I think the UI would need to improve before we make this opt out. 15:25:36 and I agree that gating at Bodhi is too late (I wanted it at koji build time) 15:25:37 mhroncok: yeah. Thats what I was thinking... 15:25:50 King_InuYasha: +1 15:26:24 someone said that it's impossible to make Koji fail a build task because of gating, which seems odd to me, but oh well... 15:26:37 or https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/46 15:26:40 nothing is impossible, all of this is just made up anyway 15:26:59 indeed 15:27:24 dcantrell: yes, I can bring it up to qa and start a devel thread. 15:27:31 thanks 15:27:37 nirik: could you post the policy update proposal to devel please? 15:27:38 dcantrell: well, there are undecidable problems, but I don't think koji has to deal with those :D 15:28:03 #action nirik to followup with qa and devel list re: 2473 15:28:09 decathorpe: true 15:28:52 mhroncok: yep. on it. 15:29:02 #topic Next week's chair 15:29:33 I can. 15:29:37 thanks! 15:29:47 #action zbyszek will chair next meeting 15:29:57 #topic Open Floor 15:31:10 nothing for the open floor? 15:31:35 alright, thanks everyone! 15:31:36 I got nothing :) 15:31:45 #endmeeting