17:01:36 #startmeeting FESCo (2022-08-02) 17:01:36 Meeting started Tue Aug 2 17:01:36 2022 UTC. 17:01:36 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:01:36 The chair is decathorpe. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 17:01:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:01:36 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2022-08-02)' 17:01:40 #meetingname fesco 17:01:40 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 17:01:50 #chair nirik, decathorpe, zbyszek, sgallagh, mhroncok, dcantrell, music, mhayden, Conan_Kudo, Pharaoh_Atem, Son_Goku, King_InuYasha, Sir_Gallantmon, Eighth_Doctor 17:01:50 Current chairs: Conan_Kudo Eighth_Doctor King_InuYasha Pharaoh_Atem Sir_Gallantmon Son_Goku dcantrell decathorpe mhayden mhroncok music nirik sgallagh zbyszek 17:01:54 .hello2 17:01:55 dcantrell: dcantrell 'David Cantrell' 17:01:58 morning all 17:01:59 #topic Init process 17:02:01 .hello2 17:02:02 mhayden: mhayden 'Major Hayden' 17:02:04 .hello2 17:02:05 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 17:02:06 .hi 17:02:06 .hello2 17:02:08 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 17:02:11 jonathanspw: jonathanspw 'Jonathan Wright' 17:03:05 hey all 17:03:26 .hello2 17:03:27 music[m]: Sorry, but user 'music [m]' does not exist 17:03:30 .hello dcavalca 17:03:31 davide: dcavalca 'Davide Cavalca' 17:04:23 .hello music 17:04:24 sgallagh: music 'Benjamin Beasley' 17:04:33 hello 17:05:12 ok, 6 FESCo members are present, let's make this a short meeting 17:05:25 #link Schedule https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6VAM5N54Z4AJQ7XVYFSZZFC6QTG26P7H/ 17:05:38 .hello 17:05:38 salimma: (hello ) -- Alias for "hellomynameis $1". 17:06:13 .fesco 2833 17:06:14 decathorpe: Issue #2833: Change: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2833 17:06:23 we apparently approved this during last week's meeting? 17:06:27 yeah 17:06:34 Yes 17:06:43 I completely flaked and forgot to update the ticket appropriately. 17:06:48 Sorry about that. 17:07:09 no problem. 17:07:10 just making sure 17:07:17 I'll announce it when I send out the meeting minutes later today. 17:07:21 that was easy 17:07:45 #topic #2842 Change: z13 as the Baseline for IBM Z Hardware 17:07:45 too easy! :) 17:07:50 .fesco 2842 17:07:51 decathorpe: Issue #2842: Change: z13 as the Baseline for IBM Z Hardware - fesco - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2842 17:08:23 my -1 vote stands, so we need to talk about this, I guess 17:08:52 hey§ 17:08:55 got distracted 17:08:57 I'm +1 to either doing it now or doing it for f38+ 17:08:58 hey o/ 17:09:00 -1 for f37, +1 for f38 17:09:22 is this more of a "good idea, not good timing" problem? 17:09:32 mhayden: Yes 17:09:45 That's how I view it, anyway 17:09:57 * mhayden is reading some of the comments there 17:10:03 yeah. in my opinion, it should have been a "System-Wide Change that needs to be applied before the Mass rebuild" kind of Change 17:10:09 I agree with the claim that the risk is likely low, but I also agree that a change to default compiler flags really ought to be included in the mass rebuild. 17:10:10 sharkcz did say "I won't disagree if the consensus will be to move the Change to F-38" 17:10:16 not a late-submitted "Self-Contained Change" 17:10:29 .hello ngompa 17:10:29 Yes, I was about to say, I’m also not sure a change to default compiler flags can really be considered self-contained. 17:10:29 Eighth_Doctor: ngompa 'Neal Gompa' 17:10:44 I would 100% vote for the same change as a system-wide change for F38. 17:10:51 I agree as well 17:11:20 +1 on F38 here, too 17:11:29 ok, sounds like this is pretty clear-cut, so ... 17:11:44 Vote no. 1: Proposal is rejected for F37 17:11:49 +1 17:11:51 0 17:12:12 .hi 17:12:13 salimma: salimma 'Michel Alexandre Salim' 17:12:17 (As previously noted, we've been running an even-stricter set of flags in ELN for months) 17:12:31 -1 (but fine to be overruled) (I think the risk is very low) 17:12:42 0 on rejecting this for F37 (but totally +1 with F38) 17:13:30 Conan Kudo, dcantrell, mhroncok: vote? 17:13:50 +1 to reject for F37, +1 for F38 17:14:13 +1 on rejecting for F37. I think the risk is very low, but so is the benefit of rushing it in. 17:14:43 +1 on rejecting for F37 17:15:05 (note that I am not sure what happens if we dn'T a pprove to reject) 17:15:20 poteto potato 17:15:28 IMHO we should just vote for the change as is (whcih would probbaly fail) 17:15:45 Yeah, probably would be better to invert the question, since the 0's have kind of the opposite meaning there 17:16:00 I don't think it will make a difference. 17:16:13 Conan Kudo: vote? regarding reject for F37 17:16:21 +1 reject for F37 17:16:29 thanks 17:16:52 #agree REJECTED for F37 (+5, 2, -1) 17:17:47 cool 17:17:50 Vote no. 2: Same Change proposal, except resubmitted for F38 and recategorized as System Wide change. 17:17:58 I thought I counted 9 votes... 17:18:17 nope, zbyzsek is not here today, we are only 8 17:18:25 ah, okay 17:18:38 +1 on Vote 2 17:18:45 +1 17:18:57 +1 17:19:30 +1 17:19:37 +1 17:19:51 +1 17:19:59 hold on 17:20:09 Should we technically ask the change owner to populate the contingency plan if the change type will be adjusted? 17:20:29 are you asking the change owner to resubmit or just deciding to accept it as an F38 System-Wide Change 17:20:34 because if it's the former, you don't really need to vote on that 17:20:34 holding on 17:20:46 no, we just approving it for f38 17:20:50 *we're 17:21:02 okay, that's what i thought. just wanted to make sure 17:21:03 as stated, technically, conditional approval 17:21:21 the "resubmitted" threw me off 17:21:45 edited s/37/38 and s/Self-Contained/System-Wide/ 17:22:08 I guess that doesn't count as "resubmitted" then 17:22:09 :) 17:22:33 Patch: Accepted as a System-Wide Change for Fedora 38 17:23:03 that was my intention, yes. assuming the Change owner does want to do that. 17:23:30 Conan Kudo music votes? 17:23:47 +1 17:23:50 to Stephen Gallagher ^ 17:24:23 To be clear, my patch is a rephrasing for clarity, not a new proposal 17:24:51 So is the idea that we are approving it as a system-wide change without the additional sections normally required for a system-wide change, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/#_change_proposal_sections? I’m not too concerned about the details of those additional sections in practice, just trying to understand. 17:25:13 Well, I think the contingency plan will need to be adjusted, given that it will be a System-Wide change 17:25:34 And not having a plan in the first place for something that affects 99% of packages was a bad idea to begin with 17:28:39 Then shall we just recommend that the change owner should re-submit as a system-wide change for F38, and vote on it once that is completed? 17:28:58 seems reasonable. 17:29:20 I don't think it's neccessary 17:29:31 I was trying to short-circuit that by making a conditional approval now, but if you are more comfortable with saying "please resubmit with these changes" and then vote *after* that's done, I'm fine with that too 17:29:48 it's a technicality. the contingency plan is to revert the change if it causes too much damage -- and it won't 17:30:26 Hmm, I’m OK with short-circuiting, effectively with the additional sections “empty,” as long as we’re clear that’s what we are doing. 17:31:35 +1 for F38, then. 17:32:09 ok, thanks 17:33:19 #agree APPROVED under the condition that the Change proposal is re-targeted at Fedora 38 and classified as a System-Wide Change (+8, 0, -0) 17:33:57 any objections to this statement before I clobber zodbot's "undo" functionality? 17:34:47 ack 17:34:58 sounds good 17:35:03 ok, thanks 17:35:12 #topic Next week's chair 17:35:44 Any volunteers? 17:35:53 me 17:36:02 as promised 17:36:06 great, thanks 17:36:14 #action mhroncok to chair next week's meeting 17:36:30 #topic Open Floor 17:36:54 Nothing from me 17:37:16 anybody want to prepare something for FESCo panel later this week at Nest? 17:37:40 * nirik will be at the panel, but might have to leave part way thru... 17:37:41 I will not be at the Nest panel because I will be on PTO 17:39:09 #action zbyszek to prepare introductory remarks because he signed us up for it in the first place 17:39:59 ok, gotta go 17:40:01 see you next week 17:40:09 see you o/ 17:40:14 Fabio Valentini++ 17:40:38 anything else for open floor? 17:41:01 otherwise I will terminate(meeting) in a minute or two. 17:43:05 music: you were typing? 17:43:20 Yes, but no. All good. 17:43:28 ACK 17:43:49 have some 15 minutes back, everyone :) 17:43:53 #endmeeting