2025-10-28 17:00:34 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !startmeeting FESCo (2025-10-28) 2025-10-28 17:00:36 <@meetbot:fedora.im> Meeting started at 2025-10-28 17:00:34 UTC 2025-10-28 17:00:36 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting name is 'FESCo (2025-10-28)' 2025-10-28 17:00:39 <@salimma:fedora.im> !hi 2025-10-28 17:00:41 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Michel Lind (salimma) - he / him / his 2025-10-28 17:00:41 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !meetingname fesco 2025-10-28 17:00:42 <@meetbot:fedora.im> The Meeting Name is now fesco 2025-10-28 17:00:47 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !group members fesco 2025-10-28 17:00:49 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Members of fesco: Dave Cantrell, Fabio Valentini, Fabio Alessandro Locati, TomΓ‘Ε‘ Hrčka, Jef Spaleta, Kevin Fenzi, ngompa (@conan_kudo:matrix.org, @ngompa:fedora.im, @pharaoh_atem:opensuse.org, @ngompa:kde.org, @ngompa:almalinux.im), salimma (@michel-slm:matrix.org, @salimma:fedora.im), Stephen Gallagher, Zbigniew JΔ™drzejewski-Szmek 2025-10-28 17:00:52 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> !hi 2025-10-28 17:00:53 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic Init Process 2025-10-28 17:00:53 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh) - he / him / his 2025-10-28 17:00:54 <@salimma:fedora.im> good riddance Daylight saving, hello pre-dinner meeting 2025-10-28 17:01:42 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> morning 2025-10-28 17:01:45 <@fale:fale.io> !hi 2025-10-28 17:01:47 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Fabio Alessandro Locati (fale) - he / him / his 2025-10-28 17:02:11 <@salimma:fedora.im> I guess it is dinner time for CET folks, sorry 2025-10-28 17:02:13 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> !hi 2025-10-28 17:02:19 <@zodbot:fedora.im> Neal Gompa (ngompa) - he / him / his 2025-10-28 17:02:42 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> don't worry, it changes more next week too. ;) 2025-10-28 17:03:38 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ok, we are already Six of Nine, and zbyszek said he won't be able to attend - should we wait until :05 or start early? :) 2025-10-28 17:04:34 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> go ahead and start 2025-10-28 17:04:35 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> We can assimilate them when they arrive 2025-10-28 17:04:49 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ha! at least one of you got the reference πŸ€– 2025-10-28 17:05:16 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !link 2025-10-28 17:05:23 <@salimma:fedora.im> nice 2025-10-28 17:05:25 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> lol ok 2025-10-28 17:05:38 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !link Schedule https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/3AM3XFKSBFRQ7PGWLZFWPKKZV3KBOHOY/ 2025-10-28 17:06:15 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ok, let's just go through the things in order, so ... 2025-10-28 17:06:34 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic #3475 Packages owned by invalid users 2025-10-28 17:06:42 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !fesco 3475 2025-10-28 17:06:44 <@zodbot:fedora.im> **fesco #3475** (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3475):**Packages owned by invalid users** 2025-10-28 17:06:44 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Assignee:** Not Assigned 2025-10-28 17:06:44 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Last Updated:** a week ago 2025-10-28 17:06:44 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Opened:** a month ago by gotmax23 2025-10-28 17:06:44 <@zodbot:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:07:01 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> how long shall we give people? 2025-10-28 17:07:03 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> Has there been any movement since last week? 2025-10-28 17:07:19 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> lots of folks seem to be still on holidays (there were holidays in cz and ie at least this week) 2025-10-28 17:08:00 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> what about "let's give people one more week (i.e. Nov. 04) to account for holidays and f43 release prep" ? 2025-10-28 17:08:25 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> sure, I can try and ping some more teams on various coms too... 2025-10-28 17:08:35 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah this Monday is a bank holiday in Ireland, and the rest of the week is school midterm break (a.k.a. "let the kids have Halloween off" 2025-10-28 17:08:40 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah this Monday is a bank holiday in Ireland, and the rest of the week is school midterm break (a.k.a. "let the kids have Halloween off") 2025-10-28 17:08:44 <@salimma:fedora.im> so a lot of parents are probably out 2025-10-28 17:08:55 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> yeah it's "Autumn Holiday" in Austria too :) 2025-10-28 17:09:12 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> Canada just ended its batch of holidays, and the US holidays are starting the roll in :) 2025-10-28 17:10:13 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ok, Proposal: Give users / groups one more week (Nov. 4) to assign a "main admin" and decide upon a default bugzilla contact for affected packages, and if there are no responses until then, orphan affected packages. 2025-10-28 17:10:34 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Fabio Valentini: +1 2025-10-28 17:10:44 <@fale:fale.io> +1 2025-10-28 17:10:54 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> lots of those left seem to be the lvm folks. 2025-10-28 17:11:00 <@salimma:fedora.im> +1 2025-10-28 17:11:21 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> +1 I suppose... although it might make a mess. 2025-10-28 17:11:46 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> if nobody is reachable for 3+ weeks then that's kind of on them, not on us, IMO 2025-10-28 17:12:39 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I count +5, I guess we lost Neal along the way? 2025-10-28 17:13:40 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> going for ... first, second, third, sold, or whatever auctioneers say 2025-10-28 17:13:41 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> +1 2025-10-28 17:14:29 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !agreed APPROVED Give users / groups one more week (Nov. 4) to assign a "main admin" and decide upon a default bugzilla contact for affected packages, and if there are no responses until then, orphan affected packages. (+6, 0, -0) 2025-10-28 17:15:01 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic #3490 Change Packaging Guidelines to be based on the "Linux File System Hierarchy" instead of the FHS 2025-10-28 17:15:08 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !fesco 3490 2025-10-28 17:15:09 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Opened:** a week ago by zbyszek 2025-10-28 17:15:09 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Assignee:** Not Assigned 2025-10-28 17:15:09 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Last Updated:** 2 minutes ago 2025-10-28 17:15:09 <@zodbot:fedora.im> **fesco #3490** (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3490):**Change Packaging Guidelines to be based on the "Linux File System Hierarchy" instead of the FHS** 2025-10-28 17:15:09 <@zodbot:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:15:37 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I think discussion this makes more sense when zbyszek is here, so I propose to move this to next week. 2025-10-28 17:15:48 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yeah, +1 2025-10-28 17:16:00 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Agreed 2025-10-28 17:16:00 <@fale:fale.io> +1 on punting 2025-10-28 17:16:35 <@salimma:fedora.im> +1 2025-10-28 17:17:25 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> punt +1 2025-10-28 17:17:48 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> (but FYI I am opposed to the change, but we can discuss that some other time) 2025-10-28 17:17:53 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !info This topic will be discussed next week when zbyszek can hopefully participate in the discussion. 2025-10-28 17:18:21 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic docs#108 Broken links to meeting minutes 2025-10-28 17:18:34 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !link https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/issue/108 2025-10-28 17:19:01 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I'm not sure off hand why this doesn''t work? some kind of frame issue... 2025-10-28 17:19:17 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I clicked around the new meeting logs website, and I don't see a way to have a permalink to specific meetings. It's just a single page JavaScript application now AFAICT 2025-10-28 17:19:32 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> well, the raw ones work fine 2025-10-28 17:19:59 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I suppose the easiest solution is to search for the string "fesco" 2025-10-28 17:20:10 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> and if you follow the html ones, they work, but then if you try and open that same url it fails because of js I guess? 2025-10-28 17:20:10 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> but that doesn't give you useful links. 2025-10-28 17:20:15 <@salimma:fedora.im> I didn't realize searching by group worked in the past 2025-10-28 17:20:30 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-10-21/fesco.2025-10-21-17.01.html ? 2025-10-28 17:20:32 <@salimma:fedora.im> would have made it so easy to search for previous meetings 2025-10-28 17:21:11 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> oh, it's the team one thats failing 2025-10-28 17:21:13 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> nirik: yeah, that works, but there's no page like "here's a list of all `fesco` meetings" 2025-10-28 17:21:54 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I might be able to fix this, it might be a permissions issue. 2025-10-28 17:21:58 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I guess we can either 1) change the link and tell people to use the search box, and / or 2) file an RFE against the website for name based view? 2025-10-28 17:22:32 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> there is a team view, it's just not working. ;) 2025-10-28 17:23:12 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> oh, ok. so, let's file an issue to track getting that fixed? :) 2025-10-28 17:24:17 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> sure. I think it's a bad / messed up meeting causing it to not process the teams, but not 100% sure. 2025-10-28 17:24:55 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> any volunteer who is going to file a ticket to track this, and fix the link in the fesco docs once that's done? 2025-10-28 17:25:13 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I can file it. 2025-10-28 17:25:27 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> thank you πŸ™‡ 2025-10-28 17:25:30 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I think if it gets fixed, we can just drop the docs change as the old thing will work again 2025-10-28 17:25:52 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !action nirik to file a ticket to track broken teams view on the meeting logs page 2025-10-28 17:26:19 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic docs#110 Stalled request process adjustments 2025-10-28 17:26:23 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !link https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/110 2025-10-28 17:27:11 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> I pushed back on this initially because I don't think it makes sense to already adapt a new policy before we even used it *once*, but if there's a good reason to do so, then I would be fine with that ... 2025-10-28 17:27:36 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> We don't need to discuss this now, but it would be great if other fesco members could leave feedback on the PR. 2025-10-28 17:28:50 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yeah, doesn't seem many people are using it... 2025-10-28 17:28:56 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> So you're saying that the process of amending the stalled request process has stalled and you're requesting we process it? 2025-10-28 17:29:07 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> lol 2025-10-28 17:29:12 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> such wow, much meta. 2025-10-28 17:29:42 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I think realistically the fact that the main user of it doesn't like how it exists now is kind of a problem 2025-10-28 17:30:24 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> but I've left a comment in the PR 2025-10-28 17:30:30 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> Right. I'm not sure I'm remembering this right though - was the process *modeled* after the Stalled EPEL Requests Policy, or was it also supposed to *replace* it? I only remember the first part. 2025-10-28 17:30:52 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> both 2025-10-28 17:31:04 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> the idea was to unify the processes and it was modeled on the EPEL one 2025-10-28 17:31:33 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ok - then it makes more sense to me to tweak it slightly in order for them to be more similar. 2025-10-28 17:31:42 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> the idea was to generalize the processes and it was modeled on the EPEL one 2025-10-28 17:32:29 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I personally think a light ack would be an okay compromise, we can see how EPSCo feels about it 2025-10-28 17:32:56 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I'm also starting to think we have too many things that require us to vote too 2025-10-28 17:33:02 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> but that's a separate discussion 2025-10-28 17:34:04 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> Proposal: Please leave feedback on the PR, and vote on it once it's been adapted *or* after it has been determined that no further changes to the PR are needed. 2025-10-28 17:34:36 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> +1 2025-10-28 17:34:51 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> I don't think that proposal requires a formal vote 2025-10-28 17:35:04 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yeah, probibly not, seems reasonable. 2025-10-28 17:35:19 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> 🀫 I'm just trying to push more people to look at it 2025-10-28 17:35:30 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> ack 2025-10-28 17:36:03 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !info FESCo members are encouraged to leave feedback on the PR and ack / nack it once it's ready. 2025-10-28 17:36:12 <@salimma:fedora.im> ack 2025-10-28 17:36:22 <@jflory7:fedora.im> (Not sure what the agenda is for today's meeting is, but if #3493 comes up, please ping me and I am happy to chat about itβ€”sorry for the interrupt message) 2025-10-28 17:36:44 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> Justin Wheeler: It's on the agenda, I'll ping you once we're there. :) 2025-10-28 17:37:02 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic docs#112 Add section to ensure SIG Policy 2025-10-28 17:37:02 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !link https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/112 2025-10-28 17:38:07 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> This is now on the correct page, though I'm not sure the formatting and grammar are right here. 2025-10-28 17:38:09 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> umm what? 2025-10-28 17:38:33 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> what is this supposed to be for? 2025-10-28 17:39:12 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I'm confused by the existence of this PR 2025-10-28 17:39:25 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> yeah - though I don't think it's a bad idea to document where / how the SIG Policy is enforced 2025-10-28 17:39:58 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> what sig policy are we talking about? 2025-10-28 17:40:05 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> yeah... its otherwise invisible. 2025-10-28 17:40:14 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> and I guess this is about programmatically enforcing this 2025-10-28 17:40:23 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> yeah - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/SIG_policy/ 2025-10-28 17:40:35 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> the enforcement is already automatic 2025-10-28 17:40:38 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> oh this policy 2025-10-28 17:40:38 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> right, it's just a pointer to where the automation is. 2025-10-28 17:40:44 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> yeah this just adds a link to the script to the policy 2025-10-28 17:41:10 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah the wording is oofy 2025-10-28 17:41:19 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I'll try to put some suggestions in the PR 2025-10-28 17:41:31 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> sounds good to me. thanks! 2025-10-28 17:41:37 <@salimma:fedora.im> "SIG policy enforcement" sounds better to me than "Ensuring SIG policy" ? 2025-10-28 17:41:42 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah 2025-10-28 17:41:46 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> that's basically what I was thinking 2025-10-28 17:41:50 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !info We'll leave suggestions on the PR and then do the needful. 2025-10-28 17:42:04 <@salimma:fedora.im> "Enforcing SIG policy" works too, it's basically just "ensuring" to me sounds like it should be followed by something else :) 2025-10-28 17:42:36 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yup 2025-10-28 17:42:42 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !fesco 3491 2025-10-28 17:42:42 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !topic #3491 F43 FESCo Election Questions 2025-10-28 17:43:04 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> huh, why doesn't it work for *that* command? ... strange. 2025-10-28 17:43:04 <@jflory7:fedora.im> Oh, I guess this is also me too now πŸ™‚ 2025-10-28 17:43:06 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> !fesco 3491 2025-10-28 17:43:07 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Last Updated:** 6 days ago 2025-10-28 17:43:07 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Opened:** a week ago by amoloney 2025-10-28 17:43:07 <@zodbot:fedora.im> ● **Assignee:** Not Assigned 2025-10-28 17:43:07 <@zodbot:fedora.im> **fesco #3491** (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3491):**F43 FESCo Election Questions** 2025-10-28 17:43:07 <@zodbot:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:44:01 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> Michel and I left some minor feedback / suggestions, but other than that, does anybody have comments? 2025-10-28 17:44:03 <@salimma:fedora.im> do we need to approve anything here? we just need to give suggestions and let Justin figure out the final wording, right? 2025-10-28 17:44:28 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> aside from the name thing and updating to Matrix rather than IRC, I think it's gravy 2025-10-28 17:44:48 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Well, I guess the open question is if we want to put any specific topics on the list 2025-10-28 17:44:50 <@jflory7:fedora.im> It would help me if you do the wordsmithing on what you like, otherwise I'll probably just say "preferred name" and "Matrix ID" 2025-10-28 17:44:59 <@jflory7:fedora.im> That's pretty small stuff, though 2025-10-28 17:45:16 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Like in the past we've occasionally included controversial topics to allow voters to hear stances on them 2025-10-28 17:45:29 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> that would be fine I think 2025-10-28 17:45:43 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> admittedly I have a bit of a bias against people only being known by pseudonyms these days because of all the OSS hijack stuff lately 2025-10-28 17:45:43 <@salimma:fedora.im> preferred name seems reasonable to me 2025-10-28 17:45:55 <@salimma:fedora.im> maybe with a humorous link to fallacies about names 2025-10-28 17:46:00 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> but that's more of a me thing than a thing we should encode in our questionnaire 2025-10-28 17:46:05 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Conan Kudo 🀧: In a very real sense, all names are pseudonyms 2025-10-28 17:46:06 <@nirik:matrix.scrye.com> I think it's fine... 2025-10-28 17:46:07 <@salimma:fedora.im> https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ 2025-10-28 17:46:46 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah but in an environment where people might not be allowed to legally change their names... we don't want to deadname people either 2025-10-28 17:46:48 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> a name is a promise and a representation of who we are :) 2025-10-28 17:46:50 <@salimma:fedora.im> it's a tricky balance :) 2025-10-28 17:47:00 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah it's a mess 2025-10-28 17:47:02 <@salimma:fedora.im> I"d like to think if a shady person runs for FESCo one of us would raise the alarm 2025-10-28 17:47:18 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> I'd like to think so :) 2025-10-28 17:47:26 <@jflory7:fedora.im> I think for FESCo elections though, this seems less likely of an issue 2025-10-28 17:47:30 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> Michel Lind UTC+1: I hope they don't. That could rule me out as a candidate! 2025-10-28 17:47:35 <@salimma:fedora.im> and speaking of which I forgot to update my display name tz again 2025-10-28 17:47:52 <@salimma:fedora.im> the real slim shady 2025-10-28 17:48:06 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> and admittedly because of reasons(tm) I have been going by multiple names of the years and have responded to the "wrong" name a few times :P 2025-10-28 17:48:49 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> ok, I think we're mostly in agreement about the small suggested changes and that otherwise the questions are fine? 2025-10-28 17:48:50 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> I think "preferred name" is the best option in this instance 2025-10-28 17:48:56 <@salimma:fedora.im> I am trained to respond to Michael by now 2025-10-28 17:48:58 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> It lets the person filling it out decide the appropriate value 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ``` 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### What else should community members know about you or your positions? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### Why do you want to be a member of FESCo and how do you expect to help steer the direction of Fedora? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### What Matrix Channels do you tend to use? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### What is your FAS Username and/or Matrix ID? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ``` 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### What is your preferred name? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### How do you handle disagreements when working as part of a team? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ### How do you currently contribute to Fedora? How does that contribution benefit the community? 2025-10-28 17:49:27 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:49:33 <@sgallagh:fedora.im> I get "Stefan" a lot as well. 2025-10-28 17:49:39 <@jflory7:fedora.im> These are the questions I have in my staging area in git 2025-10-28 17:49:56 <@jflory7:fedora.im> Which, admittedly, does seem a little different from what is in the FESCo issue, i.e. Matrix channels 2025-10-28 17:50:00 <@jflory7:fedora.im> But maybe not an issue 2025-10-28 17:50:21 <@salimma:fedora.im> Matrix has rooms not channels right? 2025-10-28 17:50:25 <@conan_kudo:matrix.org> yeah 2025-10-28 17:50:26 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> That looks good, just wonder if it makes sense for a FESCo candidate *not* to have a FAS username yet ;) 2025-10-28 17:50:29 <@salimma:fedora.im> and it should be lowercased, but otherwise SGTM 2025-10-28 17:50:34 <@jflory7:fedora.im> Yeah, I'll amend that 2025-10-28 17:50:46 <@jflory7:fedora.im> `s/Channels/rooms/` 2025-10-28 17:50:49 <@salimma:fedora.im> yeah maybe ask for FAS *and* Matrix? 2025-10-28 17:51:11 <@jflory7:fedora.im> `s/and\/or/and/` 2025-10-28 17:51:26 <@decathorpe:fedora.im> perfect :chef's kiss: 2025-10-28 17:51:30 <@salimma:fedora.im> Matrix I guess could be useful if people don't use their fedora.im - which otherwise should be the default. but might as well ask 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> ``` 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> +### What is your FAS Username and Matrix ID? 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> -### What is your FAS Username and/or Nick? 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> +### What is your preferred name? 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> -### What is your name (Given/First and Family/Last Names please)? 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> --> 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> Please answer all questions in the space below the question and leave a blank line between your answers and the questions. 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Thank you for your interest in running for the Fedora Engineering Steering Commi 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im> **MARK THIS TICKET AS PRIVATE** 2025-10-28 17:51:54 <@jflory7:fedora.im>