17:02:08 #startmeeting fpc 17:02:08 Meeting started Thu Jan 14 17:02:08 2021 UTC. 17:02:08 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:02:08 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:02:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:02:08 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:02:08 #meetingname fpc 17:02:08 #topic Roll Call 17:02:08 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:02:16 .hello churchyard 17:02:18 mhroncok: churchyard 'Miro Hrončok' 17:02:21 limburgher: Hey 17:02:21 * limburgher still here 17:02:23 #chair limburgher 17:02:23 Current chairs: geppetto limburgher 17:02:25 I am here but I might need to run away soon 17:02:25 #chair mhroncok 17:02:25 Current chairs: geppetto limburgher mhroncok 17:03:29 * carlwgeorge waves 17:03:43 #chair carlwgeorge 17:03:43 Current chairs: carlwgeorge geppetto limburgher mhroncok 17:04:04 * limburgher waves at geppetto 17:04:28 hey 17:04:29 * decathorpe waves 17:04:33 #chair decathorpe 17:04:33 Current chairs: carlwgeorge decathorpe geppetto limburgher mhroncok 17:08:59 #topic Schedule 17:09:02 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ISDMVCMBGBYCJQRA22RB5LOIXOKMKALA/ 17:09:09 Hey, folks. 17:09:15 #chair tibbs 17:09:15 Current chairs: carlwgeorge decathorpe geppetto limburgher mhroncok tibbs 17:09:18 Hey, just in time :) 17:09:19 Sorry I had to make a pit stop. 17:09:23 no problem 17:09:38 So we have the same issue and PR open we've had for the last month 17:09:46 AFAIK there's no movementon either 17:09:53 *movement 17:09:59 the nodejs one is new 17:10:03 Lots of movement in the nodejs one. 17:10:38 * geppetto is looking at tagged meeting ones 17:11:11 Yeah, we need to get better about that. 17:11:40 Which issue #? 17:11:44 * geppetto can't find it 17:11:55 But I'm running mostly on red bull today, so it could just be me 17:12:10 It's PR 1034 17:12:11 it is a PR 17:12:17 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1034 17:12:33 Ahh 17:12:35 Which is something else we need to figure out how to deal with: PRs without tickets. 17:13:01 #topic PR#1034 - Change the prefered method of nodejs packaging to bundle nodejs libraries. 17:13:03 I think the smart thing is really to just deal with every ticket not otherwise tagged. 17:13:18 #link https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1034 17:14:27 I mean, obviously we're going to be sad that the end result is "bundle everything" but the ecosystem is just so broken and it's not our call in any case. 17:15:41 At least the npm ecosystem has a good security track record. 17:15:44 * limburgher ducks 17:16:01 limburgher: gnihihi 17:16:02 But yeah, it is what it is. 17:16:37 Better to do the bad thing well than badly. 17:16:44 So as a PR, anyone have any objections to merging? 17:16:58 It's had a lot of work and it's pretty good. 17:16:59 Or … what was the reason to disuccs it vs. just merging it? 17:17:17 I say merge. +1 17:17:23 no objections to merging. PR has gone through a lot of work. although converting to sembr at some point would be nice. right now some lines are really long. 17:18:00 +1 for the guidelines 17:18:02 * geppetto nods 17:18:02 They were long in the original because we hadn't fixed it up yet and I assume Troy just followed suit. 17:18:09 yeh 17:18:15 I don't care if we merge it as is or reformat, but I am not volunteering 17:18:32 Only other thing is perhaps we can pull out the example spec into the examples directory. 17:18:37 But we can fix all of that after merging. 17:18:53 tibbs: +1 17:19:06 My question is whether we should actually do this now, or if it's contingent on the change being approved or something like that. 17:19:39 Fesco issue was approved, so I do think we're good. 17:19:47 .fesco 2523 was approved, yes. 17:19:47 decathorpe: Error: '2523 was approved, yes.' is not a valid integer. 17:19:56 bad zodbot. 17:20:02 lol 17:20:45 So I guess +1 to merge and then I'll fix up with sembre and lifting out the example. 17:21:01 sembrs? line breaks? 17:23:12 We lost Miro? 17:23:14 Yeh, I'm fine with that … you want to click the merge button tibbs ? 17:24:02 II can, but did we get sufficient votes? Or does it matter? 17:25:01 If it does, I think I see +3. 17:25:13 for PRs I didn't think we stuck to +5 17:25:27 which is why I just asked if anyone had an objection 17:26:01 But I'm fine to +1 17:26:11 +1 as well 17:26:18 I don''t really see why we'd treat them any differently than a ticket, honestly. 17:26:34 tibbs: I guess thinking more on it that was supposed to be smaller PRs 17:26:38 I never understood why the github model separates tickets and PRs. They really should just have the same interface. 17:27:01 * geppetto <- still on red bull 17:27:21 Yeah I'm feeling pretty terrible this morning myself. Not really sure why, either. 17:27:27 geppetto: w or wo vodka? 17:27:33 #action Change the prefered method of nodejs packaging to bundle nodejs libraries (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) 17:27:34 tibbs: They do have the same interface in the API, FWIW 17:28:07 limburgher: just red bull … although maybe scotch later 17:28:22 sgallagh: huh, interesting 17:28:28 geppetto: ok, but don't mix those. ew. 17:28:55 If there ever was a year to start consuming alcohol, 2020 was it but I managed to resist. 17:28:55 there's even an api call you can do that converts an issue into a pull request, but it has weird side effects 17:30:17 tibbs: Impressive. 17:30:45 50 years of watching other people get drunk. 17:31:39 OK, merge button clicked. 17:32:43 I'll work on the other stuff today since I don't have much else to do (for the moment, at least). 17:33:33 Ok, cool 17:33:37 #topic Open Floor 17:33:42 I have to go grab lunch before an afternoon of $dayjob meetings, do we have anything else? 17:34:03 limburgher: I don't think so … about to close in 2 minutes unless anyone brings anything up 17:34:25 Ok, you'll have quorum if you need it. Toodles! 17:35:40 And on that note … 17:35:44 #endmeeting