16:00:03 #startmeeting fpc 16:00:03 Meeting started Thu Jun 2 16:00:03 2022 UTC. 16:00:03 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:03 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:03 #meetingname fpc 16:00:03 #topic Roll Call 16:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:20 hey 16:00:25 #chair mhroncok 16:00:25 Current chairs: geppetto mhroncok 16:00:26 hey 16:00:30 I am here, but only half way 16:01:14 That's probably fine :) 16:02:19 I'm here too 16:02:25 #chair decathorpe 16:02:25 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto mhroncok 16:02:38 .hello2 16:02:39 GwynCieslasheher: Sorry, but user 'GwynCieslasheher' does not exist 16:02:41 Hello. 16:02:44 #chair GwynCieslasheher 16:02:44 Current chairs: GwynCieslasheher decathorpe geppetto mhroncok 16:02:48 That's startling. 16:02:53 All this time.... 16:03:03 Maybe that's why I failed that turing test. 16:03:42 🤖 16:04:52 😼 16:06:03 #chair tibbs 16:06:03 Current chairs: GwynCieslasheher decathorpe geppetto mhroncok tibbs 16:06:18 Argh, missed tibbs saying hello 16:06:28 just to make sure nobody falls through the cracks :) 16:06:49 decathorpe++ 16:06:49 geppetto: Karma for decathorpe changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:10:55 #topic Schedule 16:11:07 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SYMIAF64FAOMRVR3Z7HZSNTZVS334CGS/ 16:11:14 #topic Open Floor 16:11:24 So … again, nothing has changed in the last week or so. 16:11:34 Anyone have anything to talk about? 16:11:50 I think I promised to write a PR for the Java ExclusiveArch stuff? ... sorry, I've been really busy and health problems drained my energy :( 16:12:18 no problem … on the upside that can probably all happen outside of the weekly meetings, right? 16:12:30 yeah 16:12:34 Cool 16:14:11 On that note, I won't be here on the 16th, 30th of June and very unlikely on the 9th June or 7th of July. 16:14:57 I don't think FPC is that busy these days? so that should be fine ... 16:17:36 * geppetto nods … if anyone else wants to run the meeting the instructions should be easy enough, but yeh we can probably just skip those days. 16:18:09 .hi 16:18:10 carlwgeorge: carlwgeorge 'Carl George' 16:18:31 I will be traveling a bit as well but I need to check the dates to see how things overlap. 16:18:32 I backported java_arches to epel9 16:18:57 #chair carlwgeorge 16:18:57 Current chairs: GwynCieslasheher carlwgeorge decathorpe geppetto mhroncok tibbs 16:19:04 I saw the java_arches commit went in. 16:19:12 carlwgeorge: nice 16:19:58 I think it's probably fine to skip it for epel7/8 and just have it for 9 going forward 16:20:13 If someone asks, it is at least trivial to add. 16:20:29 yup 16:24:44 Did anyone have anything to add to https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1179 ? 16:25:03 I think your comment summed it up nicely 16:25:06 #whattibbssaid 16:25:27 The overlap between the guidelines and legal stuff has always kind of been weird. 16:25:45 Which was why having spot here was nice back in the before times. 16:25:56 Indeed. 16:26:35 Though the fact that he was in both groups is kind of the reason why there is some overlap. 16:26:47 Fair. 16:27:32 Without that, the overlap can get slightly problematic though if the legal folks wanted us to change or remove something I'm sure we would just do it, no questions asked. 16:28:05 My guess would be that if the metainfo file is provided by the packager it's fine, but if it's provided by upstream then you'd want to include it … but I don't even pretend to be spot, nevermind a lawyer 16:28:44 And I felt so confident about my guess that I didn't respond :) 16:29:14 Knowing that some of my packages would be affected by this, it would be super awkward to handle this just because one metadata file has a different license than the project itself ... 16:29:17 On that note, I'll close in a minute unless anyone wants to talk about anything 16:29:22 Yeah, it seems dumb to list a license for a single file that doesn't come from upstream, but... it's legal stuff. So I don't know. 16:29:53 I feel like there should be a legal principle that info about a license should be as or more permissive than the license itself. 16:29:57 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:29:57 no, those are from upstream. but AppStream metadata have a default license ... and most projects copy-paste those lines. 16:29:59 but IANAL 16:30:46 There is plenty of legal-related activity going on right now with the wholesale change to SPDX so it wouldn't be a bad idea to ask but I have no stake in this so I wouldn't be the best person. 16:31:45 * decathorpe thinks about having had a review request blocked on FE-Legal for months without anything happening 16:32:10 Yeah, I don't think anyone actually checks that. 16:32:26 mattdm claimed that it's still the correct thing to do 16:32:29 so ... 16:32:35 Yeh, I wouldn't block anything important for it 16:32:43 But opening a ticket can't be a bad idea 16:33:14 :( yeah 16:35:41 #endmeeting